Documents

Amicus Curiae Brief — Metro-Goldwyn-Mayer Studios Inc. v. Grokster, Ltd.

Supreme Court brief · Amicus Curiae Brief · 2005

Melville, Note, The Future of the Audio Home Recording Act of 1992: Has it Survived the Millennium Bug?, 7 B.U. J. Sci. & Tech. … As courts and commentators have noted, many P2P users are genuinely confused about the legal standards that govern the duplication of copyrighted works on P2P networks.

Amicus Curiae Brief — Lubbock Independent School District v. Lubbock Civil Liberties Union

Supreme Court brief · Amicus Curiae Brief · 1983

Other student groups regularly meet during this activity period. … In fact, this Court has consistently re, aired governmental neutrality toward religion. See Roemer v.

Amicus Curiae Brief — Bray v. Alexandria Women's Health Clinic

Supreme Court brief · Amicus Curiae Brief · 1993

My partner and I got to the Air and Space Museum around 6:00 a.m. … In addition, during the same time period, the demonstrators picketed a judge’s home and made anti-semitic comments to him in open court.

Amicus Curiae Brief — Pacific Mutual Life Insurance v. Haslip

Supreme Court brief · Amicus Curiae Brief · 1991

Air Conditioning Co., Inc. Jury Verdicts Weekly Vol./No. … Air Cal Para v. Watsonville Canning Co. Jury Verdicts Weekly Vol./No.

Amicus Curiae Brief — UNUM Life Ins. Co. of America v. Ward

Supreme Court brief · Amicus Curiae Brief · 1999

Delta Air Lines, Inc., 463 U. S. 85, 105 (1983). … so to act.”

Amicus Curiae Brief — Chemical Workers v. Pittsburgh Plate Glass Co.

Supreme Court brief · Amicus Curiae Brief · 1971

P., and Company, 105 NLRB 373 (1953) 22 Westinghouse Air Brake Corp., 119 NLRB 1391 5. ) 29 W: W. Cross d Company, 77 NLRB 1162 (1948) . 7 W.. Cross & Company v. … See-also Westinghouse Air Brake Corp., 119 NLRB 1391 (1958).

Amicus Curiae Brief — Van Klassens, Inc. v. Imagineering, Inc.

Supreme Court brief · Amicus Curiae Brief · 1995

Bifold Co., 50 F.3d RPP CU le SOE sk ee cle Gas » Ge Vornado Air Circulation Systems, Inc. v. … The complaint alleged three claims: 1) violation of § 32 of the Trademark Act of 1946, 15 U.S.C. § 1114; 2) violation of § 43(a) of the Trademark Act of 1946 and 3) violation of unfair competition under

Amicus Curiae Brief — Scheuer v. Rhodes

Supreme Court brief · Amicus Curiae Brief · 1974

For the fext thirty minutes, tear gas and epithets, and occasionally rocks, filled the air. … In the period since January 1, 1968, military troops have been utilized in domestic situations more 7 frequently than during any comparable period in American history; and as the facts giving rise

Amicus Curiae Brief — Jake's Fireworks, Inc., Petitioner v. Consumer Product Safety Commission, et al.

Supreme Court brief · Amicus Curiae Brief · Jan 29, 2025

That is an evasion of the Administrative Procedure Act’s directive to regulate via notice and comment. … The CPSC created the test—poof— out of thin air.

Amicus Curiae Brief — US Airways, Inc. v. Barnett

Supreme Court brief · Amicus Curiae Brief · 2002

The general criticism of the commentators was acknowledged and addressed in a later Supreme Court case, Alexander v. Choate, 469 U.S. 287, 300, n. 20 (1985). … Air, Inc., 228 F.3d 1105, 1122-1123 (9th Cir. 2000) (en banc) (Gould, J., concurring). Compare 21 CHARLES A. WRIGHT & KEN- NETH A.

Amicus Curiae Brief — Price Waterhouse v. Hopkins

Supreme Court brief · Amicus Curiae Brief · 1989

She also cited comments from the files of other women partnership candidates, such as the remark that one candidate acted like “Ma Barker” (ibid.). … There must be a specific external act, more than a mental act. Only if he does the act because of the grounds stated in the bill would there by any legal consequences.”

Amicus Curiae Brief — Williamson v. Mazda Motor of America, Inc. (No. 08-1314)

Supreme Court brief · Amicus Curiae Brief · 2009

NHTSA did, however, comment that if manufacturers were able to design and install lap/shoulder belts in these positions, it “ts encouraged to doso”™. Ot course. … To the contrary, the Court's decision included and is based on a detailed and exhaustive examination of the highly unusual history and framework of the air bag standard of FMVSS 208.

Amicus Curiae Brief — Public Employees Retirement System of Ohio v. Betts

Supreme Court brief · Amicus Curiae Brief · 1989

But, as this Court held in United Air Lines, Inc. v. … Second, as this Court held in United Air Lines, Inc. v.

Amicus Curiae Brief — Bankers Life & Casualty Co. v. Crenshaw

Supreme Court brief · Amicus Curiae Brief · 1988

Holt, Magna Carta 323 (1965)... 18 Jeffries, A Comment on the Constitutionality of Punitive Damages, 72 Va. L. Rev. 139 (1986) ....7, 12, 21 F. … See generally Jeffries, A Comment on the Constitutionality , runitive Damages, 72 Va. L.

Amicus Curiae Brief — Trump v. Hawaii, 138 S. Ct. 923 (2018) (No. 17-965)

Supreme Court brief · Amicus Curiae Brief · 2018

Wald, 468 U.S. 222 (1984) ............ccccccceeeeeeees 21 United Air Lines, Inc. v. … See Hawaii, 878 F.3d at 684 (interpreting 17 “suspend” and “period” as limiting the President’s “ex- clusion power”).

Amicus Curiae Brief — Donald J. Trump, President of the United States, et al., Petitioners v. Hawaii, et al.

Supreme Court brief · Amicus Curiae Brief · Mar 30, 2018

See Hawaii, 878 F.3d at 684 (interpreting 17 “suspend” and “period” as limiting the President’s “exclusion power”). … Immigration & Nationality Act of 1952, Pub. L. No. 82414, 66 Stat. 190 (June 27, 1952), § 215.

Amicus Curiae Brief — Sereboff v. Mid Atlantic Medical Services, Inc.

Supreme Court brief · Amicus Curiae Brief · 2006

See Restatement of Restitution § 162 comment (b) pg. 654-655. … Restatement of Restitution, supra, 215, Comment a, at 867.

Amicus Curiae Brief — EEOC v. Arabian American Oil Co.

Supreme Court brief · Amicus Curiae Brief · 1991

Baylor os of Medicine, 805 F.2d I 28 | Air Line Dispatchers Ass'n v. National Mediation | Board, 189 F.2d 685 (D.C. … denied, 342 U.S. 849 (1951) (amendment to Railway Labor Act which extended coverage to air carriers “engaged in interstate or foreign commerce” held not to apply outside the United States in the absence

Amicus Curiae Brief — Oklahoma v. Ponca Tribe of Oklahoma

Supreme Court brief · Amicus Curiae Brief · 1996

Union Gas considered Congress’ enactment of the Comprehensive Environmental Response, Compensation, and Liability Act of 1980 (“CERCLA”), providing means to clean up hazardous waste sites throughout … Then, the State must ignore at its peril a court order to negotiate within a 60-day period.

Amicus Curiae Brief — Richard Devillier, et al., Petitioners v. Texas

Supreme Court brief · Amicus Curiae Brief · Nov 20, 2023

Young, Federal Suits and General Laws: A Comment on Judge Fletcher's Reading of Sosa v. Alvarez-Machain, 93 Va. L. Rev. … Seaboard Air Line Railway Co. v. United States, 261 U.S. 299, 304 (1923).