Documents
Briefs, oral arguments, agency decisions and the Federal Register.
10,000+ results
0.15s
Supreme Court brief · Petition for Writ of Certiorari · Nov 26, 2021
Latasha Jackson, No. 711-419, Motion and Order 82 for Appeal, Feb. 24, 2015 5 Jefferson Parish Juvenile Court, Louisiana Dept of Children & Fam. Ser., In the Interest of Mark Jenkins, Jr. v. … Based on this reasoning, and considering the respondent’s complete lack of remorse, we find the boards recommended sanction is appropriate. 24 Accordingly, we will suspend respondent from the practice
Brief for the United States — United States v. Johnson
Supreme Court brief · Brief for the United States · 1966
Brown, No, 399, O.T. 1964, slip op. 1, 6, (dissenting opinion). 31 II. … Brown, No. 399, O.T. 1964, slip op. 5-7. Quoted in Tenney v.
383 U.S. 169Supreme Court brief · Petition for Writ of Certiorari · Feb 15, 2019
Wainwright, 477 U.S. 399 (1986) ................................................................... 24 Goldberg v. … Collins, 506 U.S. 390, 399 (1993), a habeas petitioner has the “fundamental requisite of due process of law [that] is the opportunity to be heard.” Ford v. Wainwright, 477 U.S. 399, 413 (1986).
Supreme Court brief · Petition for Writ of Certiorari · Jul 30, 2021
* Consolidated on March 24, 2020, see Doc. 10727730 (10th Cir.). … McKnight, 521 U.S. 399 (1997), it found that neither history nor policy favored immunity for private prison guards. Id. at 412. And in Filarsky v.
Cite as 24 I&N Dec. 452 (BIA 2008)
Agency decision · Agency decision
I&N Dec. 382, 399 (BIA 2007) (Pauley, concurring) (“[T]he upshot of the approach adopted by the Court [in Lopez] is that the penalty assigned by the State to a drug offense is irrelevant; it is the hypothetical … See generally Matter of Babaisakov, 24 I&N Dec. 306 (BIA 2007). 458
Executive Office for Immigration ReviewSupreme Court brief · Motion · 1928
E. 399, 39 L. R. A. 765. Nonomaker v. Amos, 76 N. E. 949, 4 L. R. A. (N. S.) 980. Kelly v. Keys, 62 Atl. 911. … The entire opinion of the Supreme Court of Oklahoma is found in the record, pages 16 to 24, inelusive.
277 U.S. 302Opinion — Selliger v. Kentucky
Supreme Court brief · Opinion · 1909
Stevens, 8 How. 399, 400; Leonard v. Davis, 1 Black, 482, 483; Holliday v. Hamil- ton, 11 Wall. 564, 565; The Thames, 14 Wall. 106; Crapo v. Kelly, 16 Wall. 640; Insurance Co. v. Kiger, 103 U. … California, 24 How. 169; Fairbank v. United States, 181 U.S. 283, 294. We discuss the case on the facts assumed by the Court of Appeals.
213 U.S. 200Brief for the United States — Central Tablet Mfg. Co. v. United States
Supreme Court brief · Brief for the United States · 1974
Logan, 283 U.S. 404 24 Cluff v. Commissioner, 17 T.C. 225 24 Commissioner v. Baertschi, 412 F. 2d 494 _ ae 23 Commissioner v. Court Holding Co., 324 US. 331 _5, 6, 22 Commissioner v. … Kieselbach, 127 F. 2d 359, 363 (C.A. 3), affirmed on another issue, 317 U.S. 399.
417 U.S. 673Reply Brief — Clemente Avelino Pereida, Petitioner v. Robert M. Wilkinson, Acting Attorney General
Supreme Court brief · Reply Brief · Mar 30, 2020
Gov’t Br. 27; see also id. at 24. … Shepard, 544 U.S. at 24-25 (plurality opinion).
Amicus Curiae Brief — Department of State, et al., Petitioners v. Sandra Muñoz, et al.
Supreme Court brief · Amicus Curiae Brief · Mar 28, 2024
Mar. 31, 1987) ..................................... 24 American Academy of Religion v. Napolitano, 573 F.3d 115 (2d Cir. 2009) ................................. 24 Aptheker v. … Nebraska, 262 U.S. 390, 399 (1923); 5 see also Obergefell v. Hodges, 576 U.S. 644, 668 (2015) (quoting Meyer for this proposition).
Amicus Curiae Brief — Jason Smith, Petitioner v. Arizona
Supreme Court brief · Amicus Curiae Brief · Nov 20, 2023
Green, 399 U.S. 149, 158 (1970) (quoting 5 Wigmore § 1367). … Id. at 23– 24.
Petition for Writ of Certiorari — Raymond Dugan, Petitioner v. United States
Supreme Court brief · Petition for Writ of Certiorari · Jul 29, 2025
Supp. 3d 883 (N.D.IL 2021) 19, 24 24 United States V. Mitrovich, 458 Supp . 961 (ND.D.IL 2020 ) passim United States V. Mitrovich, 18-cr-789 (N.D.IL 2019) 24 United States V. Modanlo, 954 F. … Appx. 398, 399(4th cir. 2019)(Wynn, J. dissenting in the denial of reh'g en banc).
Brief Amicus Curiae — Reitman v. Mulkey
Supreme Court brief · Brief Amicus Curiae · 1967
A. 4, 1966) «*..........., hamAMAisee meen 23, 24, 25 Hurd v. Hodge, 334 U. S. 24 (1948) aura Aenea -41 * Jackson v. … S. 399, 402 (1964). In neither case is discrimination compelled by the state; in both, it is at least facilitated. This is not ‘‘neutrality.’’
387 U.S. 369Appellants Brief — Rowan v. United States Post Office Department
Supreme Court brief · Appellants Brief · 1970
Maryland, 380 U.S. 552 ........... 24, 44 Giacco v. Pennsylvania, 382 U.S. 399 .00000........ 38 Ginsburg v. United States, 383 U.S. 463 ................ … (A 24, 25.)
397 U.S. 728Petition for Writ of Certiorari — Titus v. Wallick
Supreme Court brief · Petition for Writ of Certiorari · 1939
Y. 399 Meeker v. Claghorn, 44 N. Y. 349 Moffett v. Robbins, 81 F. (2d) 431 Phillips v. Griffin, 236 N. Y. App. Div. 209 a a SS 8 ee Roche v. McDonald, 275 U. 8. 449 Roby v. … Saltmarsh, 174 Oklahoma 226 s Be RRBRERSSESNERSE 35, 39 36 24, 38 24 35 19 27, 39 34 24 33 38 iv INDEX Taste or Statutes Crrep.
306 U.S. 282Petitioner for ReHearing — Lutwak v. United States
Supreme Court brief · Petitioner for ReHearing · 1953
F. 24 256.(C. A. 8th, 1926), the court ‘reversed convictions for. … , 399, 413).
344 U.S. 604Petition for Writ of Certiorari — Massachusetts v. Gray, 109 S. Ct. 1305 (1989) (No. 87-1784)
Supreme Court brief · Petition for Writ of Certiorari · 1989
. §362(d)(1) 23, 26 23 22, 26 -18, 19 -24, 29 15n. … White 2d Ed. 1972) 28, 28, 28, 23, 29 passim passim 29 29 30 30 25 24 24 Petitioner, the Commonwealth of Mass- achusetts, respectfully requests that a writ of certiorari issue to review
Petition for Writ of Certiorari — Timothy Sumpter, Petitioner v. Kansas
Supreme Court brief · Petition for Writ of Certiorari · Jun 21, 2023
App. 22-24. In contrast to the district court, the Tenth Circuit concluded that the KCOA reasoning was not contrary to Strickland. App. 24. … McFadden, 399 F.3d 993, 999 (9th Cir. 2005).
Brief for the Respondent in Opposition — Fetters v. United States Ex Rel. Cunningham
Supreme Court brief · Brief for the Respondent in Opposition · 1931
S. 399 19 U. S. ex rel. = v. Hecht 9 11 vy? pe a INDEX (Continued). N i . … S., supra 1 24 ö — Pierce v. Creecy, V 24 * Beavers v. Henkel (1903) 194 U. S. 76. 25 i : Henry v. Henkel, supra 24 Greene v.
283 U.S. 638Petition for Writ of Certiorari — Scottie Bernard Shaver, Petitioner v. Russ Rurka, Acting Warden
Supreme Court brief · Petition for Writ of Certiorari · Dec 9, 2025
.—5,10,11 California v Green, 399 US 149 (1970) ................. ,................. —.11 Coleman v Alabama, 399 US 1 (1970) .............................................. ..... ,....... ............ … 19 Cone v Bell, 556 US 449,470 (2009) ............................ ........ 24 .............. ...............,.
Ask Donna what matters in the record.
She can read the source against your case and show you exactly where the answer came from.