Documents
Briefs, oral arguments, agency decisions and the Federal Register.
10,000+ results
0.13s
Supreme Court brief · Amicus Curiae Brief · Dec 27, 2021
Counsel for amici provided notice to all parties in Cases 21A244 and 21A247 on December 24. … Parrish, 300 U.S. 379, 398–399 (1935).
Supreme Court brief · Amicus Curiae Brief · Nov 24, 2025
Garner, Reading Law: The Interpretation of Legal Texts 399 (2012). That text goes on: “Lawyers are . . . necessarily historians . . . . … Id. at 399-400 (footnotes omitted).
Amicus Curiae Brief — Ohio, Petitioner v. Garry Smith
Supreme Court brief · Amicus Curiae Brief · May 14, 2025
No. 24-985 IN THE Supreme Court of the United States STATE OF OHIO, Petitioner, v. GARRY SMITH, Respondent. … Rev. 399, 439 (2019). 32 Amy E.
Supreme Court brief · Amicus Curiae Brief · Mar 27, 2026
Novo Nordisk A/S, 566 U.S. 399 (2012) ........................................... 4, 8 Eli Lilly & Co. v. … Novo Nordisk A/S, 566 U.S. 399 (2012); Eli Lilly & Co. v.
Supreme Court brief · Amicus Curiae Brief · Aug 3, 2026
Rev. 399 (2010)........................ 10, 11 Nina A. … Rev. 399, 426 (2010).
Supreme Court brief · Brief for Appellant · 1974
White Plains Publishing Co., 327 U.S. 178__- 54 New Haven Inclusion Cases, 399 U.S. 392... _-- 13, 24, 27, 59 N.Y., NUT. & H. R. Co. Bondholders’ Committee v. United States, 289 F. … See New Have Tnclusion Cases, 399 U.S. 392, 490, n. 82.
Supreme Court brief · Brief for the Respondent in Opposition · 1943
She attended 399 *“As a part of the ‘totality of the company’s activities’, the court below noted (R. 140) that other-supervisors also engaged in anti-union conduct (Adams, R. 107-109, 124, Union … On September 25 Walser discharged Evington at the request of overseer Grubb (R. 24; 81, 109).
320 U.S. 738Petition for Writ of Certiorari — Wingrove Robinson, Petitioner v. Raintree Tower Apartments, et al.
Supreme Court brief · Petition for Writ of Certiorari · May 17, 2019
order issued Jan 24, 2019 W. 0(*ut* v. … No. 24) that was construed as an objection to the report and recommendation. (Doc. No. 25).
Brief for the United States in Opposition — Nicholson v. United States
Supreme Court brief · Brief for the United States in Opposition · 1962
| JURISDICTION, The. judgment of the court of Appeals was’ entered on May 24, 1962. The fime for filing a petition for a writ of certiorari was extended by Mr. … Schwartz, 151 F, Supp, 399 (W.D. Pa.)and / ‘nited States v. Jacobson, 198 F. Supp. 386 (D. Conn.). , . 4 a“ / ‘ \ ‘ ’ 0.8 GOVERNMENT Fe NT MG OFFICE (02 \
371 U.S. 823Brief for the United States in Opposition — Dolleris v. United States
Supreme Court brief · Brief for the United States in Opposition · 1969
United States, 392 IF. 2d 24, 28 (C.A. 4) The trial court, moreover, Charged the jury in the usual manner that they shduld not consider or discuss the defend- ant’s failtire to take the stand (Rt. 399
395 U.S. 943Reply Brief — Brian J. Dorsey, Petitioner v. David Vandergriff, Warden
Supreme Court brief · Reply Brief · Apr 8, 2024
Dorsey CAPITAL CASE Execution Scheduled for April 9, 2024 at 6:00 pm CDT Brian Dorsey is scheduled to be executed in just over 24 hours, on April 9, 2024. Yet executing Mr. … Wainwright, 477 U.S. 399 (1986).
Changes in Flood Elevation Determinations
Federal Register · Rule · Nov 3, 2000
Box 8005, Cary, North Carolina 27512 October 24, 2000 370238 E Dare Unincorporated areas August 24, 2000, August 31, 2000, The Coastline Times Mr. … Box 399, Lawrenceville, Virginia 23868 September 6, 2000 510236 B Independent City City of Winchester August 30, 2000, September 5, 2000, Winchester Star Mr. Edwin C.
65 FR 66181Federal Emergency Management AgencyRULE 47. SELECTING JURORS (2019)
Court rules · Court rule
Simons, 2017 ME 180, 169 A.3d 399; Grover v. Boise Cascade Corporation, 2004 ME 119, 860 A.2d 851; and United States v. Ramírez-Rivera, 800 F.3d 1, 38 n.32 (1st Cir. 2015). … This practice, identical to that under Criminal Rule 24(b), is intended to eliminate any prejudice which might result from a challenge for cause. See Reporter's Notes, Me.R.Crim.P. 24.
Petitioners Brief — Smith v. United States
Supreme Court brief · Petitioners Brief · 1933
Risk Ins. ri (40 Stat. 399 and 555) ....\ “SET OT ORE Section 202, War Risk Ins. Act (40 Stat. 403). 21 Section 402 War Risk Ins. … A.-8), 39 oo (24) 197. : #2)".
292 U.S. 337Petition for Writ of Certiorari — Jeremy S., Petitioner v. West Virginia
Supreme Court brief · Petition for Writ of Certiorari · Feb 1, 2021
Va. 627, 630, 319 S.E.2d 395, 399 (1984). During polling, however, it is not always clear whether a juror agrees (or disagrees) with the verdict. … Id. at 630, 319 S.E.2d at 399.
Petitioners Brief — Commissioner of Immigration of Port of NY v. Gottlieb
Supreme Court brief · Petitioners Brief · 1924
S. 399. . .. 2... e eee e eee cece ee eeeees 17,19 Zartarian v. … White, 256.U. 8. 399; Low Wah Suey v. Backus, 225 U.S. 460.
265 U.S. 310Petition for Writ of Certiorari — Howard Griffith, Petitioner v. New York
Supreme Court brief · Petition for Writ of Certiorari · Jun 23, 2025
On December 9, 2024, the Supreme Court of the State of New York, Appellate Division/ Fourth Department, denied my motion as, in “People v Syville, id. at 399”, the Court of Appeals notes that “in People … discovered within the one-year period, the time limit imposed in CPL 460.30 should not categorically bar an appellate court from considering that defendant's application to pursue an untimely appeal” (id. at 399
Opposition Brief — Credit Suisse Securities (USA) LLC v. Billing
Supreme Court brief · Opposition Brief · 2007
See Pet. 22-24; NASD Br. 6-7. … LEVINE WILMER CUTLER PICKERING HALE & Dorr LLP 399 Park Avenue New York, Now York 10022 Citigroup Global Markets Inc. ANDREW J. FRACKMAN RICHARD G.
551 U.S. 264Opposition — Arkansas v. Haynes
Supreme Court brief · Opposition · 1980
RECEIVED Nov 24 1980 IN THE OFFICE OF THE 7 SUPREME COURT OF THE UNITED STATES supreme COURT, U OCTOBER TERM, 1980 STATE OF ARKANSAS, ) Petitioner vs. … Maroney, 399 U.S. 42 (1970)... 1... ee ee eee 3 Fox Film Corp. v. Muller, 296 U.S. 207 (1935) ........4.6. 1 Haynes v. State, 269 Ark. _, 602 S.W.2d 599 (1980). . . iv Murdock v.
449 U.S. 1066Amicus Brief — Parratt v. Taylor
Supreme Court brief · Amicus Brief · 1981
Cook, 586 F. 2d 399 ( Sth Cir. 1978) ....... 7 Bonner v. Coughlin, 545 F. 2d 565 (7th Cir. 1976). 7 Butler v. Jenkins, 450 F. Supp. 574 (E.D. Tenn.., RARE Re amon ree 11 Cotton v. … Ed. 2d 24 (1978), this Court specifically left open the question of whether negligent conduct can ever constitute a cause of action under 42 U.S.C. § 1983. Shortly thereafter in Baker v.
451 U.S. 527
Ask Donna what matters in the record.
She can read the source against your case and show you exactly where the answer came from.