Documents
Briefs, oral arguments, agency decisions and the Federal Register.
10,000+ results
0.15s
Amicus Curiae Brief — Cass County v. Leech Lake Band of Chippewa Indians
Supreme Court brief · Amicus Curiae Brief · 1998
County of Yakima, 502 U.S. at 255.“ The Burke Act, however, expressly provided for state control and taxation of allotted lands for which the Secretary had issued fee patents before the trust period … The Court confirmed this reading with the Burke Act proviso, which applies literally only to land for which the Secretary issued patents before the normal expiration of the trust period (“prematurely
524 U.S. 103Supreme Court brief · Amicus Curiae Brief · Apr 17, 2024
Cedar Point Nursery, 594 U.S. at 150 (cleaned up and citations omitted). … Babcock & Wilcox Co., 351 U.S. 105 (1956) involved “protecting employees’ rights of collective bargaining under the [National Labor Relations] Act”) (emphasis added).
Amicus Curiae Brief — Seila Law LLC, Petitioner v. Consumer Financial Protection Bureau
Supreme Court brief · Amicus Curiae Brief · Jul 29, 2019
Ct. 1807 (2016) (judicial review of agency interpretation of Clean Water Act); Sackett v. EPA, 566 U.S. 120 (2012) (same); Decker v. Nw. Envtl. Def. … Ctr., 568 U.S. 597 (2013) (Auer deference to Clean Water Act regulations); Rapanos v. United States, 547 U.S. 715 (2006) (agency regulations defining “waters of the United States”).
Supreme Court brief · Amicus Curiae Brief · Jun 9, 2023
Aires, 89 A.2d 521 (Pa. 1952) ............................................. 8 Yee v. … Aires, 89 A.2d 521, 522 (Pa. 1952).
Supreme Court brief · Amicus Curiae Brief · 2007
. _ Attorneys for the Natural Gas Supply Association August 6, 2007 yrs i QUESTIONS PRESENTED Under the Natural Gas Act and the Federal Power Act, as interpreted by this Court in United Gas Pipe … Any change in a legal regime that acts, as do the.
Amicus Curiae Brief — Solid Waste Agency of Northern Cook Cty. v. Army Corps of Engineers
Supreme Court brief · Amicus Curiae Brief · 2001
The Corps of Engineers therefore asserted that there was federal jurisdiction to bar use of the land for the Agency’s purpose, based on the Clean Water Act, the Corps’ regulations, and ultimately on … Scholarly commentators agree with this principle. 1 Ronald D. Rotunda & John E.
531 U.S. 159Amicus Curiae Brief — Calero-Toledo v. Pearson Yacht Leasing Co.
Supreme Court brief · Amicus Curiae Brief · 1974
Vessels, vehicles, and air- craft may be termed the ‘operating tools’ of dope peddlers, counterfeiters, and gangsters. … doing the act.
416 U.S. 663Amicus Curiae Brief — Trump v. Hawaii, 138 S. Ct. 923 (2018) (No. 17-965)
Supreme Court brief · Amicus Curiae Brief · 2018
Moreover, while the Administrative Pro- cedure Act does not generally apply to the Presi- dent’s actions (see Dalton v. … Put differently, Congress could not have intended to prohibit dis- crimination at the embassy but permit it at the air- port gate.
Amicus Curiae Brief — American Hospital Assn. v. NLRB
Supreme Court brief · Amicus Curiae Brief · 1991
(1989 Act.) Rural (1989 Act.) … (1989 Act.) Rural (1989 Act.)
499 U.S. 606Amicus Curiae Brief — Whole Woman's Health v. Cole, 136 S. Ct. 499 (2015) (No. 15-274)
Supreme Court brief · Amicus Curiae Brief · 2015
. § 171.063(a)(2)....... 16 Wisconsin Act 37 of 2013, codified at Wis. Stat. … In those comments, Planned Parenthood * See Jeffrey Toobin, Daughters of Texas: The Fight for Abortion Rights, New Yorker (Aug. 5, 2013), http://www.
Amicus Curiae Brief — BCI Coca-Cola Bottling Co. v. EEOC, 127 S. Ct. 852 (2007) (No. 06-341)
Supreme Court brief · Amicus Curiae Brief · 2007
See Restatement of Agency (Third), Section 7.07 comment b (2006). 14 The Court in Faragher declined to impose this burden on the employer, but only because “there is no reason to suppose that Congress … United States Air Force, 939 F.2d 762, 771 (9th Cir.1991)." Thereafter, an aggrieved employee may file suit in district court.
Amicus Curiae Brief — Cory v. Western Oil & Gas Ass'n
Supreme Court brief · Amicus Curiae Brief · 1985
Lockheed Air Terminal, Inc., 411 U.S. 624, 635 n.14(1973), the Court noted that while a municipality might not regulate air traffic pursuant to its police power, as proprietor of an airport, it was … Thus, the cases and commentators place emphasis on the “reasons for which the regulations were imposed.”
471 U.S. 81Amicus Curiae Brief — City of Edmonds v. Oxford House, Inc.
Supreme Court brief · Amicus Curiae Brief · 1995
(the Act), and the Fair Housing Amendments Act of 1988 (FHAA), which extended the Act’s antidiscrimination provisions to the handicapped. 42 U.S.C. $§ 3604(f)(2), 3604(f)(3)(B), 3607(b)(1). … air make the area a sanctuary for people."
514 U.S. 725Amicus Curiae Brief — McClanahan v. Arizona Tax Comm'n
Supreme Court brief · Amicus Curiae Brief · 1973
Art. 20, Para. 4 i OTHER AUTHORITIES ‘Comment, Indian Taxation: Underlying Policies and __ Present Problems, 59 CalifL.Rev. 1261, 1285-1286 (1971) Comment, State Taxation of Indian Income, ~ -1971 … W aggonner, 376 US. 369 (1964) (invalid Louisiana ad valorem tax on privately owned property on an Air Force field); Mississippi River Fuel Corp. v.
411 U.S. 164Amicus Curiae Brief — Standard Industries, Inc. v. Tigrett Industries, Inc.
Supreme Court brief · Amicus Curiae Brief · 1970
ve hinds Air Products Co., pod U Ss sats ‘OOS ‘(quoting Stuilave Retrigerator Col Vv. W inte r, 280. U.S. 30, see The Court i Graver ae explamed (339 CLS. … and such claim shall be construed to cover the corresponding structure, material, or acts described in the specification and equivalents thereof.” ; 20 . .
397 U.S. 586Amicus Curiae Brief — Nash v. Florida Industrial Commission
Supreme Court brief · Amicus Curiae Brief · 1967
United Air- 5 - eraft Corp., 887 F. 2d 5. — Mortensen v. Board of Review, 21 N.J. 242, 121 : i ARETE IEA NEA ERT a AA NRE 18 - 2 Moving Pictures Machine Oyivaiere v. National 1, . … Nash had neither claimed nor received benefits for that period. ‘ ih LOONIE S fe SOT SME ANT ROME.
389 U.S. 235Amicus Curiae Brief — Bridge Aina Le'a, LLC, Petitioner v. Hawaii Land Use Commission
Supreme Court brief · Amicus Curiae Brief · Aug 21, 2020
Regulations that stem from federal legislation include: Clean Water Act, National Environmental Policy Act, Endangered Species Act, Energy Policy Act, Occupational Safety and Health Act, Fair Housing Act … , and Safe Drinking Water Act.
Amicus Curiae Brief — Digital Realty Trust, Inc. v. Somers, 138 S. Ct. 43 (2017) (No. 16-1276)
Supreme Court brief · Amicus Curiae Brief · 2017
espoused by the Ninth Circuit in this case would greatly expand the number of employees authorized to pursue the enhanced remedies of the Act, and the period of time in which they may sue for alleged … The limitations period is short—the Sarbanes-Oxley Act prescribed a 90- day limitation period, which the Dodd-Frank Act extended to 180 days. 18 U.S.C. § 1514A(b)(2)(1)); see H.R. 4173, Lllth Cong.
Amicus Curiae Brief — Oklahoma Corp. Commission v. ANR Pipeline Co.
Supreme Court brief · Amicus Curiae Brief · 1989
Mar. 6, 1989), is the State of Oklahoma preempted under the Natural Gas Act and the Natural Gas Policy Act of 1978 from exercising regulatory authority pursuant to Oklahoma Statute title 52, section … Similarily, is the State of Oklahoma preempted under the Natural Gas Act and the Natural Gas Policy Act of 1978 from establishing a priority of production schedule pursuant to the State’s strong interest
490 U.S. 1051Supreme Court brief · Amicus Curiae Brief · Mar 5, 2020
an opportunity for public comment. 3. … Air Regulatory Group v. EPA, 134 S. Ct. 2427, 2444 (2014)). Cf.
Ask Donna what matters in the record.
She can read the source against your case and show you exactly where the answer came from.