Documents

Amicus Curiae Brief — Reves v. Ernst & Young

Supreme Court brief · Amicus Curiae Brief · 1993

Co., 809 F.2d 1016 (3d Cir.), cert. denied, 482 U.S. 915 and 484 USS. GBB CIOOT) .... ........cccececescnsecceacseccosssseeneeee Bank of America v. … (litigant filed false interrogatory answers with enterprise court), cert. de- nied, 482 U.S. 915, 484 U.S. 822 (1987); Park South Assocs. v. Fischbein, 626 F. Supp. 1108 (S.D.N.Y.)

Amicus Curiae Brief — Chevron Corp. v. Arizona

Supreme Court brief · Amicus Curiae Brief · 1991

RKO Radio Pictures, 327 U.S. 251 dR ee a 8 Matsushita Elec. Industrial Co. . Zenith Radio, 475 U.S. 574 (1986) ................. Go taacds ce Monsanto Co. v. … Co, of Califernia, 906 F.2d 482 (9th Cir. 1990). 3 The Ninth Circuit declares the basis of its ruling to be Matsushita Elec, Industrial Co. v.

Amicus Curiae Brief — Gobeille v. Liberty Mut. Ins. Co., 135 S. Ct. 885 (2014) (No. 14-181)

Supreme Court brief · Amicus Curiae Brief · 2014

Coyne, 482 U.S. 1, 11 (1987) (‘ERISA’s pre-emption provi- sion was prompted by recognition that employers es- tablishing and maintaining employee benefit plans are faced with the task of coordinating … See Fort Halifax, 482 U.S. at 11 (“ERISA’s pre-emption provision was prompted by recognition that * * * [a] patchwork scheme of regu- lation would introduce considerable inefficiencies in benefit program

Amicus Curiae Brief — Tollett v. Henderson

Supreme Court brief · Amicus Curiae Brief · 1973

Cook, 423 F.2d 721 Geeee 190 |. 3S 15 Constitution of the United States Fourteenth Amendment bai ath eabia’s : 1 a A Passim Federal Rules of Criminal Procedure, Rule 12(b)(2)....... 13 <3 IN THE … Harpole, 263 F.2d 71 (1959), cert. den. 361 U.S. 838; Labat v. Bennett, 365 F.2d 698 (1966), cert. den. 386 U.S. 991; Windom y. Cook, 423 F.2d 721 (1970); Whippler v. Balkcom, 342 F.2d 388 (1965).

Amicus Curiae Brief — New York State Conference of Blue Cross & Blue Shield Plans v. Travelers Insurance

Supreme Court brief · Amicus Curiae Brief · 1994

Holliday, 498 U.S. 52 (1990) ....... 9, 16, 24 Fort Halifax Packing Co. v. Coyne, 482 U.S. 1 hited a ee at at 16 Hampton Indus., Inc. Vv. Sparrow, 981 F.2d 726 Sl EE 24 Ingersoll-Rand Co. Vv. … Coyne, 482 U.S. 1 (1987).

Amicus Curiae Brief — Stoneridge Inv. Partners v. Scientific-Atl.

Supreme Court brief · Amicus Curiae Brief · 2008

Credit Suisse First Boston (USA), Inc., 482 F. 3d 372 (Sth Re aT dis tisnid dinitiinerniesianinacsinitesteintiamneaniaineneeen 16 Santa Fe Industries, Inc. v. … See 511 U.S. at 177.

Amicus Curiae Brief — Food and Drug Administration, et al., Petitioners v. Alliance for Hippocratic Medicine, et al.

Supreme Court brief · Amicus Curiae Brief · Feb 29, 2024

Prometheus Radio Project, 592 U.S. 414, 423 (2021) this Court held that the Administrative Procedure Act’s “arbitrary-and-capricious standard requires that agency action be reasonable and reasonably explained … Mifeprex medication guide, U.S.

Amicus Curiae Brief — Kendra Espinoza, et al., Petitioners v. Montana Department of Revenue, et al.

Supreme Court brief · Amicus Curiae Brief · Sep 17, 2019

Bower, 747 N.E.2d 423 (Ill. App. 5th Dist. 2001) ...............................................................27 Heckler v. Mathews, 465 U.S. 728 (1984)....................13 In re N.C.B. … Bower, 747 N.E.2d 423, 426 (Ill. App. 5th Dist. 2001); Gaddy, 802 S.E.2d at 225 (denied challenge on standing grounds); McCall, 199 So. 3d at 359 (similar).

Amicus Curiae Brief — Lester J. Smith, Petitioner v. Timothy C. Ward, Commissioner, Georgia Department of Corrections

Supreme Court brief · Amicus Curiae Brief · Jun 6, 2022

Safley 482 U.S. 78 (1987) . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 4 vi Cited Authorities Page(s) Wolff v. … Safley, 482 U.S. 78, 84 (1987) (“Prison walls do not form a barrier separating prison inmates from the protections of the Constitution”); see also Bell v.

Amicus Curiae Brief — Casey v. Planned Parenthood of Southeastern Pennsylvania (Nos. 91-902, 91-744)

Supreme Court brief · Amicus Curiae Brief · 1991

Franklin, 439 U.S. 379 (1979) 10, 16, 26, 27 Connecticut V. Menillo, 423 U.S. 9 (1975) 10 Cruzan V. Director, Missouri Dep't of Health, 110 i i 9 Curran V. … Virginia, 462 U.S. 506 (1983) (per curiam ) ; Connecticut v. Menillo, 423 U.S. 9 (1975). - il in a woman’s path to an abortion.”

Amicus Curiae Brief — Young v. United States Ex Rel. Vuitton Et Fils SA

Supreme Court brief · Amicus Curiae Brief · 1987

Nixon, 418 U.S. 688 United States v. Payner, 447 U.S. 7277 United States v. Russell, 411 U.S. 423 -.................. United States v. Sells Engineering, Inc., 463 U.S. … Wright, 468 U.S. 737, 750-751, 759-761 (1984); United States v. Russell, 411 U.S. 423, 485 (1973).

Amicus Curiae Brief — Santa Fe Independent School Dist. v. Doe

Supreme Court brief · Amicus Curiae Brief · 2000

Aguillard, 482 U.S. 578 (1987) cocccccccccccccceceeees 10 Harris v. Joint Sch. Dist. No. 241, 41 F.3d 447 (9th Cir. 1994) ooocccccccccceeeeeeeeeeees ll Hogue v. … Aguillard, 482 U.S. 578 (1987); moments of silence, Wallace v. Jaffree, 472 U.S. 38 (1985); nativity scenes, Lynch v.

Amicus Curiae Brief — Harris v. Nelson

Supreme Court brief · Amicus Curiae Brief · 1969

Rev. 423 (1961) © eile biased dilated Mi ainieesibii AE 30 Carter, Pre-Trial Suggestions for Section 2255. —— Under Title 28, United States _— 32 F. … Rev. 423 (1961) ; Reitz, Federal Habeas Corpus: Past-conviction - Remedy for State Prisoners, 108 U. Pa. L.

Amicus Curiae Brief — Oklahoma, Petitioner v. Victor Manuel Castro-Huerta

Supreme Court brief · Amicus Curiae Brief · Apr 4, 2022

Lowe, 114 U.S. 525 (1885) .......... 9 Kennerly v. District Court of the Ninth Judicial Dist., 400 U.S. 423 (1971) ................................................... 31 McClanahan v. … Lee, 358 U.S. at 219, 221; cf. 31 Kennerly v. District Court of the Ninth Judicial Dist., 400 U.S. 423, 424 n.1, 427 (1971) (per curiam).

Amicus Curiae Brief — Northeast Bancorp, Inc. v. Board of Governors, FRS

Supreme Court brief · Amicus Curiae Brief · 1985

Cir. 1975), cert. denied, 423 U.S. 875 .......... 5, 18, 24, 26 Lewis v. BT Investment Managers, Inc., 447 U.S. 27.. 18, 22, 25 Moragne v. … Cir.), cert. denied. 423 U.S. 875 (1975) (“Towa Inde- pendent Bankers’’) at 1291-92, 1296-97.

Amicus Curiae Brief — Rancho Palos Verdes v. Abrams

Supreme Court brief · Amicus Curiae Brief · 2005

carefully tailored scheme); Wright, 479 U.S. at 423-24 (quoting Smith v. … Brf. at 14 (citing Sea Clammers, 453 U.S. at 13 and Smith, 468 U.S. at 1010-12).

Amicus Curiae Brief — St. Louis & San Francisco R. Co. v. Spiller

Supreme Court brief · Amicus Curiae Brief · 1927

Co., 249 U.S. 145), to the effect that: a! Bo ‘“‘The reversal of the judgment cannot have a retroactive operation and make void that which was lawful when done. … Anderson, 103 Tll. 403, 406; 2 Freeman on Judgments, Sec. 482; Ruling Case Law, See. 245, ought not to be disregarded.

Amicus Curiae Brief — United States v. Chesapeake & Potomac Telephone Co.

Supreme Court brief · Amicus Curiae Brief · 1995

Public Service Comm'n, 447 U.S. 530 (1980) ....... 17 Edwards v. Aguillard, 482 U.S. 578 (1987) ............ 19 Erznoznik v. City of Jacksonville, 422 U.S. 205 (1975) .... 19 FCC v. … Aguillard, 482 U.S. 578, 636-39 (1987) (Scalia, J., dissenting).

Amicus Curiae Brief — Obergefell v. Hodges

Supreme Court brief · Amicus Curiae Brief · 2015

Safley, 482 U.S. 78 (1987) .............. 17, 18, 22 United States v. Windsor, 133 S.Ct. 2675 le a 2,9 Varnum v. Brien, 763 N.W.2d 862 (Iowa 2009)............ 2 Verhage v. … Safley, 482 U.S. 78, 95-96 (1987), marriage remains a fundamental right for individuals, such as prison inmates, who may never have the opportunity to “consummate” a marriage, much less have children

Amicus Curiae Brief — Allender v. United States

Supreme Court brief · Amicus Curiae Brief · 1999

Sitz, 496 U.S. SE I eich tinhchaniediccdsenbaciscaernapacess cienavaitsabints passim New. York v. Burger, 482 U.S. 691 (1987)............. 24 Pennsylvania v. … Burger, 482 U.S. 691, 713-16 (1987) (upholding warrantless inspections of closely regulated businesses); South Dakota v.