Documents

Amicus Curiae Brief — Seven County Infrastructure Coalition, et al., Petitioners v. Eagle County, Colorado, et al.

Supreme Court brief · Amicus Curiae Brief · Sep 4, 2024

If the agency has no authority to act, it has no authority to remedy. … Center’s Comments at 63.

Amicus Curiae Brief — Obergefell v. Hodges

Supreme Court brief · Amicus Curiae Brief · 2015

Air Force and became eligible for benefits pursuant to the Veterans’ Preference Act of 1944, 5 U.S.C. § 851, et seq. (1958). … After successfully serving in this role for nearly two years as an air traffic controller in Denver, well beyond the one-year probationary period required under federal regulations, and having received

Amicus Curiae Brief — Rowe v. New Hampshire Motor Transport Ass'n

Supreme Court brief · Amicus Curiae Brief · 2008

May not enact or enforce a law ... related to a price, route, or services of an air carrier or car- rier affiliated with a direct air carrier ... when such carrier is transporting property by aircraft … That case held that the Federal Aviation Act, Pub. L.

Amicus Curiae Brief — Weyerhaeuser Company, Petitioner v. United States Fish and Wildlife Service, et al.

Supreme Court brief · Amicus Curiae Brief · Jul 5, 2018

Filling the ephemeral pools or other wetlands on Unit 1 in connection with residential development would only create a federal nexus if a Section 404 Clean Water Act permit, 33 U.S.C. § 1344(a), was required … It is unlikely that continued timber production would create such a federal nexus, because of a specific grandfathering exemption for existing timber operations in Section 404 of the Clean Water Act. 33

Amicus Curiae Brief — Itel Containers Int'l Corp. v. Huddleston

Supreme Court brief · Amicus Curiae Brief · 1993

Petitioner was audited by the Tennessee Department of Revenue for the period of January 1983 through No- vember 1986. … In December 1986, the Department issued an assessment determining that petitioner owed additional sales tax for the audit period.

Amicus Curiae Brief — FS Credit Opportunities Corp., et al., Petitioners v. Saba Capital Master Fund, Ltd., et al.

Supreme Court brief · Amicus Curiae Brief · Oct 16, 2025

Greene Co., 124 A. 373, 374 (1922) (cleaned up) (quoting Browning v. Morris, 2 Cowp. 790, 792 (1778)).6 That right, of course, had limits. … E.g., Cummings v. 5 Commenters collecting blue sky laws have referred to voidness provisions as “[o]ne of the most common” sources of civil liability in state securities law. Robert L.

Amicus Curiae Brief — New York State Rifle & Pistol Association, Inc., et al., Petitioners v. Kevin P. Bruen, in His Official Capacity as Superintendent of New York State Police, et al.

Supreme Court brief · Amicus Curiae Brief · Jul 20, 2021

Acts 127, 129. … Acts ch. 164, § 10.

Amicus Curiae Brief — Board of School Commissioners v. Jaffree

Supreme Court brief · Amicus Curiae Brief · 1984

period.? … Lee, 455 U.S. 252 (1982); Trans World Air- lines, Inc. v. Hardison, 432 U.S. 63 (1977).

Amicus Curiae Brief — Rehaif v. United States, 139 S. Ct. 914 (2019) (No. 17-9560)

Supreme Court brief · Amicus Curiae Brief · 2019

Water Act, 33 U.S.C. § 1319(c)(2)(A) ............... 14 Firearms Owners’ Protection Act, Pub. … Wilson, 133 F.3d 251, 261 (4th Cir. 1997) (in- terpreting prohibition in Clean Water Act, 33 U.S.C.

Amicus Curiae Brief — Bucklew v. Precythe, 139 S. Ct. 306 (2018) (No. 17-8151)

Supreme Court brief · Amicus Curiae Brief · 2018

Specifically this action sought a declaratory judgment that Missouri’s lethal injection violates the Food, Drug and Cosmetic Act (“FDCA”) as well as the Controlled Substances Act (“CSA”).'3 The State … The total period of delay is shocking and now amounts to almost fourteen years.

Amicus Curiae Brief — Parm v. Shumate (No. 07-1289)

Supreme Court brief · Amicus Curiae Brief · 2008

See Fish and Wildlife Coordination Act of 1985, 16 U.S.C. §§661-668; The Fish and Wildlife Act of 1956, 16 U.S.C. §§742a-742};; The Magnuson-Stevenson 23 Fisheries Management and Conservation Act of … 1996, 16 U.S.C. §1801 et seg.; and the Clean Water Act, 33 U.S.C. §1251 et seq.

Amicus Curiae Brief — Gray v. United States

Supreme Court brief · Amicus Curiae Brief · 2001

The European Court reached a similar conclusion regarding Royal Air Force courts-martial. Coyne v. United Kingdom, 1997-V Eur. Ct. H.R. 1842. … Numerous commentators have scrutinized the proper method of member selection.’

Amicus Curiae Brief — Republic of Iraq v. Simon (No. 08-539)

Supreme Court brief · Amicus Curiae Brief · 2009

Many of the Vine plaintiffs were rounded up by Iraqi security forces and forcibly relocated to strategic sites, where they were used as “human shields” to prevent allied air attack. … In fact, history has demonstrated that Congress acted responsibly in extending the sunset provision by one year in November 2003—a period that proved more than sufficient in giving the Secretary of

Amicus Curiae Brief — Eunice Medina, Director, South Carolina Department of Health and Human Services, Petitioner v. Planned Parenthood South Atlantic, et al.

Supreme Court brief · Amicus Curiae Brief · Feb 10, 2025

Air Regulatory Grp. v. EPA, 573 U.S. 302 (2014); Nat’l Ass’n of Mfrs. v. Dep’t of Def., 138 S. Ct. 617 (2018). … After laying out the question, the Court explained that, We shall not review the writings of public men and commentators or discuss the legislative practice.

Amicus Curiae Brief — Miller v. French

Supreme Court brief · Amicus Curiae Brief · 2000

Prior to the PLRA’s consideration, various commentators had noted that federal prison litigation orders caused substantial public safety problems, wasted taxpayer dollars, and needlessly interfered … International Parts Corp., 392 U.S. 134, 138 (1968) (holding that “unclean hands" defense does not apply in Sherman Act and Clayton Act Antitrust actions); See also, INS v.

Amicus Curiae Brief — Free Speech Coalition, Inc., et al., Petitioners v. Ken Paxton, Attorney General of Texas

Supreme Court brief · Amicus Curiae Brief · Nov 15, 2024

Many state legislatures codified these common law prohibitions against obscenity in the period following the ratification of the Bill of Rights. Id. at 384. … Thus the 1873 Comstock Act passed by Congress did not appear out of an otherwise libertine air as revisionists suggest. Id.

Amicus Curiae Brief — Food and Drug Administration, et al., Petitioners v. Alliance for Hippocratic Medicine, et al.

Supreme Court brief · Amicus Curiae Brief · Feb 29, 2024

Massachusetts does not here dispute that the Clean Air Act applies to its citizens; it rather seeks to assert its rights under the Act.” Massachusetts v. … CRAIG, Acting Division Chief 700 W. Jefferson St., # 210 Boise, ID 83720 (208) 334-2400 ANDREW BAILEY Missouri Attorney General JOSHUA M. DIVINE Solicitor General Counsel of Record MARIA A.

Amicus Curiae Brief — Fleet Factors Corp. v. United States, 111 S. Ct. 752 (1991) (No. 90-504)

Supreme Court brief · Amicus Curiae Brief · 1991

College members are required to have concentrated their practice in real estate law for a period of not less than ten years. … For instance, certain types of tenants, such as dry cleaning establishments, photo finishing labs or phar- macies can generate solvent and other toxic waste resi- dues which require disposal.

Amicus Curiae Brief — Greater New Orleans Broadcasting Assn., Inc. v. United States

Supreme Court brief · Amicus Curiae Brief · 1999

Peardon ed., Bobbs-Merrill 1st ed. 1975) 16 As one newspaper commentator put it. … This period marked a robust increase in the prominence and utility of advertising.

Amicus Curiae Brief — National Ass'n v. Defenders of Wildlife

Supreme Court brief · Amicus Curiae Brief · 2007

Given that the dispute in the instant case arises under the Clean Water Act, it is particularly significant to note the global importance of this country’s aquatic species. … Army Corps of Engineers pursuant to section 404 of the Clean Water Act, 26 U.S.C.