Documents
Briefs, oral arguments, agency decisions and the Federal Register.
7,792 results
0.13s
Amicus Curiae Brief — Dutra Grp. v. Batterton, 139 S. Ct. 627 (2018) (No. 18-266)
Supreme Court brief · Amicus Curiae Brief · 2018
Roberson, 103 Ark. 361, 146 S.W. 482 Cie bisnadineienssocnsarsipesmevensesnenteesqusemnntsenqesimsntnindemacavens 21 Texas & Pacific Railway Co. v. … Roberson, 103 Ark. 361, 146 S.W. 482, 485 (1912) (affirming a punitive-damages award for the death of a passenger); Kentucky, see Louisville & Nashville Railroad Co. v.
Supreme Court brief · Amicus Curiae Brief · Apr 7, 2025
Aguillard, 482 U.S. 578 (1987) ........................................... 14 iv TABLE OF AUTHORITIES (continued) Page(s) Epperson v. … Aguillard, 482 U.S. 578, 583-584 (1987). The Court has done so in large measure because “[f]amilies entrust public schools with the education of their children.” Id. at 584.
Amicus Curiae Brief — Capitol SquareReview and Advisory Bd. v. Pinette
Supreme Court brief · Amicus Curiae Brief · 1995
ACLU, 492 U.S. 573 (1989) ... passim Doe v. Small, 964 F.2d 611 (7th Cir. 1992) (en banc) .... 16 Edwards v. Aguillard, 482 U.S. 578 (1987) ......... 10, 20 Edwards v. … Aguillard, 482 U.S. 578, 583-584 (1987)).
515 U.S. 753Amicus Curiae Brief — Lujan v. National Wildlife Federation
Supreme Court brief · Amicus Curiae Brief · 1990
U.S. Const., art. III, § 2. … County of Los Angeles, 482 U.S. 304 (1987)." Amici believe that such litigation is not appropriate as another form of public participation, unless actual persons are adversely affected.
497 U.S. 871Amicus Curiae Brief — Curtiss-Wright Corp. v. Schoonejongen
Supreme Court brief · Amicus Curiae Brief · 1994
Ct. 482 GD os0c vcdawebs deena duets oa 21 Metropolitan Life Ins. Co. v. Massachusetts, 471 U.S. i TE ee ee ne nw ee re 21 Moore v. Metropolitan Life Ins. … Ct. 482 (1992); Hozier v. Midwest Fasteners, Inc., 908 F.2d at 1160.
512 U.S. 1288Amicus Curiae Brief — Stenberg v. Carhart
Supreme Court brief · Amicus Curiae Brief · 2000
Odegaard, 416 U.S. 312 (1974) ............ 4 Edwards v. Aguillard, 482 U.S. 578 (1987) ............ 4 Eubanks v. Stengel, 28 F. Supp. 2d 1024 (W.D. Ky. 1998)14, 15 Evans v. Kelley, 977 F. … Aguillard, 482 U.S. 578, 595 (1987); Hoffman Est. v. Flipside, Hoffman Est. , 455 U.S. 489, 494 n.5 (1982); DeFunis v. Odegaard, 416 U.S. 312, 317 (1974).
530 U.S. 914Amicus Curiae Brief — Summit Health, Ltd. v. Pinhas
Supreme Court brief · Amicus Curiae Brief · 1991
denied, 481 U.S. 1038 (1987) 8,9 Kartell v. Blue Shield of Massachusetts, 749 F.2d 922 (Ist Cir. 1984), cert. denied, 471 U.S. 1029 (1985) - 8 McLain v. … McCain, “Protection and Disclosure of Medical Peer Review Information,” Health Law Handbook, p. 423 (1989). *Ariz. Rev. Stat. Ann. §§ 36-445 et seg. (1986 & Supp. 1989); Cal. Bus. & Prof.
500 U.S. 322Amicus Curiae Brief — Philpott v. Essex County Welfare Bd.
Supreme Court brief · Amicus Curiae Brief · 1973
Shaw, 300 U.S. 245 15 Lewis’ Estate, In re, 287 Mich., 179, 283 N.W. 21 16 Miller v. Standard Nut Margarine Co. of Florida, 284 U.S. 498 1 Ponath v. … Collett, 337 U.S. 55 (1949) .................
409 U.S. 413Amicus Curiae Brief — Rapanos v. United States
Supreme Court brief · Amicus Curiae Brief · 2006
Coeur d'Alene Tribe of Idaho, 521 U.S. 261, 283 (1997) (citation omitted); see also Utah Div. of State Lands v. United States, 482 U.S. 193, 195-98 (1987). … See, e.g., Utah Division, 482 U.S. at 197-98; Idaho v. Coeur d'Alene, 521 U.S. at 285 (discussing //linois Central R. Co. v.
547 U.S. 715Amicus Curiae Brief — Tamer Mahmoud, et al., Petitioners v. Thomas W. Taylor, et al.
Supreme Court brief · Amicus Curiae Brief · Mar 10, 2025
Heller, 554 U.S. 570 (2008). . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 7 Edwards v. Aguillard, 482 U.S. 578 (1987) . . . . . 24 iv Engel v. … Aguillard, 482 U.S. 578 (1987), this Court struck down a Louisiana law requiring public schools that taught the theory of evolution to also teach the theory of creation.13 In Lee v.
Amicus Curiae Brief — Conestoga Wood Specialties Corp. v. Sebelius
Supreme Court brief · Amicus Curiae Brief · 2013
Harris, 482 F. Supp. 1073 (D. Mont. 1980)................ 23 Baltimore & Ohio Railroad Co. v. ICC, - 2 Bok Bo. ae | ih | ocr ee ine peaeme rs 26 Bank of Augusta v. … Harris, 482 F. Supp. 1073, 1077 (D. Mont. 1980), but the only case it was able to cite was Advance- Rumely Thresher Co. v. Jackson, 287 U.S. 283 (1932).
571 U.S. 1067Amicus Curiae Brief — Verizon Communications Inc. v. Law Offices of Curtis v. Trinko, LLP
Supreme Court brief · Amicus Curiae Brief · 2004
FPC, 369 U.S. 482 (1962) ..... eilinwa tits 7 Cavalier Telephone, LLC. v. Verizon Virginia, Inc. _____ F. 3d __, No. 02-1337, 2003 WL 21153305 (4 Cir., SE ee 8 Conley v. … Radio Corp. of America, 358 U.S. 334 (1959)(broadcasting); Otter Tail Power Co. v. U.S., 410 U.S. 366 (1973)(electricity wholesaling); California v. FPC, 369 U.S. 482 (1962)(natural gas); Nat?
540 U.S. 398Amicus Curiae Brief — United States, Petitioner v. Evelyn Sineneng-Smith
Supreme Court brief · Amicus Curiae Brief · Jan 22, 2020
Jews for Jesus, Inc., 482 U.S. 569 (1987) .............................................. 16 Bender v. Williamsport Area Sch. … Jews for Jesus, Inc., 482 U.S. 569, 574 (1987) (quoting City Council of L.A. v. Taxpayers for Vincent, 466 U.S. 789, 801 (1984)). A.
Amicus Curiae Brief — Joseph A. Kennedy, Petitioner v. Bremerton School District
Supreme Court brief · Amicus Curiae Brief · Mar 31, 2022
Aguillard, 482 U.S. 578 (1987) ..................8 Engel v. Vitale, 370 U.S. 421 (1962) ..............................8 Garcetti v. … Aguillard, 482 U.S. 578, 584 (1987).
Amicus Curiae Brief — United States v. United States Shoe Corp.
Supreme Court brief · Amicus Curiae Brief · 1998
Wages, 423 U.S. 276, 290-93 (1976). The term "tax" as it appears in the text of the Export Clause is broad and unambiguous, making no allowance for non-discriminatory taxes or “user fees". … United States, 181 U.S. at 295.
523 U.S. 360Amicus Curiae Brief — Joseph A. Kennedy, Petitioner v. Bremerton School District
Supreme Court brief · Amicus Curiae Brief · Apr 1, 2022
Aguillard, 482 U.S. 578 (1987) ......... 12 Evans-Marshall v. Bd. of Educ., 624 F.3d 332 (6th Cir. 2010) .................................................. 24 Fox v. Traverse City Area Pub. Sch. … Aguillard, 482 U.S. 578, 584 (1987). Nor has this Court ever said that coercion only exists in the K-12 public school context where a teacher explicitly “compels” students to pray.
Amicus Curiae Brief — Smalis v. Pennsylvania
Supreme Court brief · Amicus Curiae Brief · 1986
United States, 423 U.S. 212 .....00000.... 25 (TIT) IV Cases—Continved : Page Brotherhood of Locomotive Firemen & Enginemen v. Bangor & Aroostook R.R., 389 U.S. 327 .......... 3 Burks v. … United States, 423 U.S. 212 (1976)). See also Finch v. 26 B.
476 U.S. 140Amicus Curiae Brief — Sinochem Intern. v. Malaysia Intern. Shipping
Supreme Court brief · Amicus Curiae Brief · 2007
Miller, 510 U.S. 443 Ge x didabadciabivn bia vsdeuens 2, 3, 12, 13, 19, 26 Arakaki v. Lingle, 423 F.3d 954 (9th Cir. 2005), vacated and remanded on other grounds, 126 S. Ct. … Lingle, 423 F 3d 954, 962 (9th Cir. 2005), vacated and remanded on other grounds, 126 S. Ct. 2859 (2006). See Goldwater v.
549 U.S. 422Amicus Curiae Brief — City of Boerne v. Flores
Supreme Court brief · Amicus Curiae Brief · 1997
Thomas Special Counsel NATIONAL COUNCIL OF CHURCHES 2708 Montvale Road Maryville, TN 37801 (423) 977-9046 J. … Thomas Special Counsel NATIONAL COUNCIL OF CHURCHES 2708 Montvale Road Maryville, TN 37801 (423) 977-9046 J.
521 U.S. 507Amicus Curiae Brief — Stoneridge Inv. Partners v. Scientific-Atl.
Supreme Court brief · Amicus Curiae Brief · 2008
Credit Suisse First Boston (USA), Inc. , 482 F.3d 372 (5th Cir. 2007).......... 23 S.E.C. v. Zandford, 535 U.S. 813 (2002)................ 6, 7,9, 13 Santa Fe Indus. v. … Credit Suisse First Boston (USA), Inc., 482 F.3d 372, 378 (5th Cir. 2007) (“Enron”) (investment banks, owing no duty to issuer’s shareholders, allegedly structured transactions with issuer — motions
552 U.S. 148
Ask Donna what matters in the record.
She can read the source against your case and show you exactly where the answer came from.