Documents
Briefs, oral arguments, agency decisions and the Federal Register.
10,000+ results
4.37s
Opposition Brief — Sanofi-Aventis U.S., LLC, Petitioner v. Mylan, Inc., et al.
Supreme Court brief · Opposition Brief · Mar 8, 2023
Nashville Coal Co., 365 U.S. 320 (1961) ........... 10, 14, 20, 23-24, 30, 33 United States v. Dentsply Int’l, Inc., 399 F.3d 181 (3d Cir. 2005) ............................ 26, 32 United States v. … If, unlike here, a restraint forecloses enough of the market, courts ana- 24 lyze its “‘probable effect” on “the relevant area of effective competition’ and ‘the probable immediate and future effects
Reply Brief — Nelson v. Campbell, Commissioner, Alabama Department of Corrections
Supreme Court brief · Reply Brief · 2003
Br. 34; see also id. at 1, 12, 17, 21, 24-35, 44, 48) is a complete fiction. Nothing in the cause of action pleaded by Mr. … Nelson’s direct appeal was concluded on September 24, 1996. Thus, his state postconviction petition was due September 24, 1998. * See Tarver v. State, 769 So. 2d 338 (Ala. Crim. App. 2000).
540 U.S. 1046Opposition Brief — Association of Massachusetts Consumers, Inc. v. Securities & Exchange Commission
Supreme Court brief · Opposition Brief · 1976
New England Electric System, 376 F. 2d 399, reversed, 384 U.S. 176 3-4 Securities and Exchange Commission v. … App. 7, 52-53). 384 U.S. 176, reversing 346 F. 2d 399 (C.A. 1), and was re- affirmed in Securities and Exchange Commission v.
423 U.S. 1052Opinion — Northwestern Mut. Life Ins. Co. v. McCue
Supreme Court brief · Opinion · 1912
Westerfield, 47 Nebraska, 399; Nicholson v. Cosmos, 90 Indiana, 515. … Lundy, 24 Ont. Rep. 132; Riggs v. Palmer, 115 N. Y. 506 has been expressly disapproved by Schellenberger v. Ransom, supra, by.
223 U.S. 234Petition for Writ of Certiorari — Motley v. New Jersey State Police
Supreme Court brief · Petition for Writ of Certiorari · 2000
United States, 365 U.S. 399 (1961) .. 10 Wilson v. … United States, 365 U.S. 399 (1961) (granting certiorari because of petitioner's claim that Court of Appeals misconceived meaning of controlling precedent); Wilson v.
529 U.S. 1087Opposition Brief — Eng v. United States
Supreme Court brief · Opposition Brief · 1994
Dougherty, 895 F.2d 399, 403-404 (7th Cir. 1990). … Kelly, 974 F.2d 22, 24-25 (1992).9 We are unaware of any cases in other circuits in which this supervised-release issue has been litigated.
513 U.S. 807Respondents Brief — Holland v. Illinois
Supreme Court brief · Respondents Brief · 1990
Florida, 368 U.S. 57 (1961) .......... 23, 24 Irvin v. Dowd, 366 U.S. 717 (1961) ........... 44, 47 Lockhart v. McCree, 476 U.S. 162 (1986) . 11, 24, 32, 33, 47 McCray v. … Florida, 399 U.S. 78, 100 (1970).
493 U.S. 474Amicus Curiae Brief — Contessa Premium Foods, Inc. v. Berdex Seafood, Inc.
Supreme Court brief · Amicus Curiae Brief · 2005
Renosky, 399 F.3d 168, 174 (3d Cir. 2005) (willfulness is not a prerequisite to an award of infringer’s profits); Quick Techs., Inc., v. … LEXIS 16,444, at *24 (D. Ill.
546 U.S. 957Amicus Curiae Brief — Alabama v. Shelton
Supreme Court brief · Amicus Curiae Brief · 2002
New York, 399 U.S. 66 (1970), that anyone who has a Sixth Amendment right to a jury trial cannot be denied a lawyer to make that right meaningful. … New York, 399 U.S. 66, 69 (1970) (“no offense can be deemed ‘petty’ for purposes of the right to trial by jury where imprisonment for more than six months is authorized”).
535 U.S. 654Brief in Opposition — Silber v. United States
Supreme Court brief · Brief in Opposition · 1962
. ---- 19, 20, 24 Tileston v. Ullman, 318 U.S. 44__._-.-.------ 16, 7 Ullmann v. United States, 350 U.S. 422____-- . Uphaus v. Wyman, 360 U.S. 72......------- 17 Wilkinson v. … United States, 365 U.S. 399, and Braden v. United States, 365 U.S. 431. 2.
370 U.S. 717Petition — Kutas v. United States
Supreme Court brief · Petition · 1977
United States, 422 F.2d 374 (1970), cert.denied, 399 U.S. 915, 90 S.Ct. 2219, 26 L.Ed.2d 573. … Szukhert, 375 U.S. 3ll, 84 S.ct. 411, 11 L.Ed.2d 354, 367-8 -24- (1964).
429 U.S. 1073Reply Brief — Legal Services Corp. v. Velazquez
Supreme Court brief · Reply Brief · 2001
On Ethics and Profes- sional Responsibility, Formal Op. 96-399 (1996) (“ABA 9 Op.”). … Br. at 24-26; NYSBA Br. at 7-8.
531 U.S. 533Opinion — Bloom v. Illinois (No. 52)
Supreme Court brief · Opinion · 1967
Almon, 24 LQ. Rev. 184, 266 (1908) ; The Summary Process to Punish Contempt, 25 L: Q. ® 6 "_ BLOOM v. ILLINOIS. … United States, 350 U.S. 399 (1956). BLOOM v. ILLINOIS. = 9 Dunn, 6 Wheat. 204, 227-228 (1821).
Petitioners Brief — Green v. County School Board of New Kent County
Supreme Court brief · Petitioners Brief · 1968
Martin, 375 U. 8. 399 Board of Education of Oklahoma City Public Schools v. Dowell, 372 F. 2d 158 (10th Cir 1967) ee v. Sharpe, 347 U.S. 497 ieviles a 50 Borders v. … Fla. ), January 24, 1967 ....: . 49n Briggs v. Elliot, 132 F. Supp. 776 (E. D. SC. 1955) . .28, 33 Brown v.
391 U.S. 430Petition for Writ of Certiorari — Donte Booker, Petitioner v. United States
Supreme Court brief · Petition for Writ of Certiorari · Dec 15, 2017
(See Case No. 1:13CR-00050, DN #: 51, at 310-,- ¶ 22-24);(DN #: 51, at 311, ¶ 14-24);(DN #: 51 at 312, ¶ 1-12);(see also Exhibit B). … (DN: 51,at 311, ¶ 22-24). TRIAL COUNSEL: "Why didn't you at that point in time just not go?
Amicus Curiae Brief — Owens v. Steele (No. 09-130)
Supreme Court brief · Amicus Curiae Brief · 2009
Guida, 549 F3d 399 (6th Cir. 2008) ................ 8 State v. Kelly, ye Eee 9, 10 United States v. Bagley, Sie a oa eas swe cscs cecee 18 United States v. … App. 24. 18. The majority opinion also suggests that Ms.
Amicus Curiae Brief — Peterson v. Stafford
Supreme Court brief · Amicus Curiae Brief · 1993
et Vv. , 490 N.W.2d at 423- 24 quoting Gustafson v. Holm, 232 Minn. at 1265-27, 44 N.W.2d at 447. … Anderson v Martin, 375 U.S. 399, 84 S.Ct. at 456 (1964).
507 U.S. 1033Reply Brief — Legal Services Corp. v. Velazquez
Supreme Court brief · Reply Brief · 2000
On Ethics and Profes- sional Responsibility, Formal Op. 96-399 (1996) (“ABA 9 Op.”). … Br. at 24-26; NYSBA Br. at 7-8.
529 U.S. 1052Amicus Curiae Brief — Brenda Evers Andrew, Petitioner v. Tamika White, Warden
Supreme Court brief · Amicus Curiae Brief · Feb 22, 2024
Rev. 399 (2019) ........... 5 Farr, Defeminizing and Dehumanizing Female Murderers: Depictions of Lesbians on Death Row, 11 Women & Crim. … Rev. 399, 405 (2019) (“gatekeepers unjustly discount women’s personal trustworthiness, based on inaccurate interpretations of survivors’ courtroom demeanor, as well as negative cultural stereotypes about
Opposition Brief — Kiernan Wholean, et al., Petitioners v. CSEA SEIU Local 2001, et al.
Supreme Court brief · Opposition Brief · Feb 22, 2021
Pet. at 24. … Ass’n, 399 F. Supp. 3d 361 (W.D. Pa. 2019), aff’d, 972 F.3d 262 (3d Cir. 2020); Ogle v. Ohio Civ. Serv. Emps. Ass’n, 397 F. Supp. 3d 1076 (S.D.
Ask Donna what matters in the record.
She can read the source against your case and show you exactly where the answer came from.