Documents

Briefs, oral arguments, agency decisions and the Federal Register.

Filters1998

10,000+ results

0.33s

  • Petition for Writ of Certiorari — Clifton Bean, Petitioner v. Florida

    Supreme Court brief · Petition for Writ of Certiorari · Sep 11, 2024

    Counsel of Record 24 Wooster Heights Dr. … Florida, 399 U.S. 78 (1970)............................................................................. 8-14, 16 U.S. Constitution Page No.

  • Amicus Curiae Brief — Ahmad Abouammo, Petitioner v. United States

    Supreme Court brief · Amicus Curiae Brief · Jan 27, 2026

    Florida, 399 U.S. 78 (1970).................... 10 Statutes & Legislative Materials MICH. COMP. LAWS ANN. § 762.3(1) (West 2000)....... 13 Other Authorities Brian C. … REV. 59, 63 (1944)). 23 Id. at 806–07. 7 deportation for trials overseas.24 The Founders condemned these measures for depriving accused Americans of local support.25 Though it appears that no overseas

  • Amicus Curiae Brief — Donald J. Trump, President of the United States, et al., Petitioners v. Barbara, et al.

    Supreme Court brief · Amicus Curiae Brief · Jan 27, 2026

    Id. at 399. Wong Kim Ark endorsed the common law principles of birthright citizenship as laid out in Calvin’s Case. … Rep. at 399.

  • Amicus Curiae Brief — United States v. Vuitch

    Supreme Court brief · Amicus Curiae Brief · 1971

    United States, 354 U.S. 394, 399-400 (1957) Craig v. Rowland, 10 App. D.C. 402 (1897) Daley v. Meier, 33 Ill. App.24 218, 178 N.E.2d 691 (1961) . Damasiewicz v. … Bl. 399, 126 Eng.

    402 U.S. 62
  • Amicus Curiae Brief — Cook v. Gralike

    Supreme Court brief · Amicus Curiae Brief · 2001

    Martin, 375 U.S. 399 (1964) (striking down on equal protection grounds a Louisiana statute requiring ballots to designate the “race” of the candidates). … Martin, 375 U.S. 399 (1964). 15 of providing ballot information indistinguishable from that being used in the informed voter law.

    531 U.S. 510
  • Amicus Curiae Brief — Kerr-McGee Corp. v. Navajo Tribe

    Supreme Court brief · Amicus Curiae Brief · 1985

    T 7, § 326 17 N.T.C., T 24, § 201 4 4 N.T.C., T 24, $ 212 1,4 N.T.C., T 24, § 214 ie 4 N.T.C., T 24, § 215 5 N.T.C., T 24, $217 5, 16 N.T.C., T 24, § 219 16 xi TABLE OF AUTHORITIES—Continued Pages … N.T.C., T 24, $ 222 16 N.T.C., T 24, § 401 ........... 4 N.T.C., T 24, § 401(b) 4 Se er I iii cieieesebinilensiieniinntenentienieilananiidedl 4, 24 N.T.C., T 24, § 418 1,5 N.T.C., T 24, § 421 5

    471 U.S. 195
  • Petition for Writ of Certiorari — Humphress v. United Parcel Service, Inc.

    Supreme Court brief · Petition for Writ of Certiorari · 1999

    Norge Div. of Magic Chef_Inc., 486 U.S. 399, 413 (1988). Mr. … Inc., 486 U.S. 399, 410, 108 S. Ct. 1877, 1883. 100 L. Ed.2d 410 (1988).

    526 U.S. 1099
  • Petition for Rehearing — John Ching En Lee, Petitioner v. United States

    Supreme Court brief · Petition for Rehearing · May 3, 2021

    See id. 393:1-9, 399:12-16. Tr. 327:10-14, •S H§ £E o a +-» & 13 Critically, Special Agent Scott testified that he knew defendant was lying at the October ■ISJ xfi O M 2013 interview. … Tr. 399:17-22. 4 Defendant states that the first time he learned of the allegation regarding the TECS print­ out was upon hearing Special Agent Scott’s testimony at trial. Mot. at 10.

  • Proposed Flood Elevation Determinations

    Federal Register · Proposed Rule · Nov 1, 2006

    Approximately 0.31 miles upstream of State Highway 24 (approximate cross section J) None +3,753   Approximately 0.43 miles upstream of State Highway 24 South (at cross section T) None … Approximately 4600 feet upstream from confluence with Santa Fe River +7180 +7171 Arroyo Seco Approximately 2500 feet upstream of the intersection of Highway 399 (106) and Jara Lane None

    71 FR 64208Homeland Security DepartmentFederal Emergency Management Agency
  • Brief for the Respondent in Opposition — Sabin v. Home Owners' Loan Corp.

    Supreme Court brief · Brief for the Respondent in Opposition · 1945

    (1) US ae TF ee TAN ORS I Re ES: aad ea Pa ee ee 2 The opinion of the Circuit Court of Appeals (R. 399-406) is reported in 147 F. 2d 653. … On July 24, 1941, leave was granted to the petitioners to file a petition to recall the mandate and to grant a rehearing, and such petition was filed (R. 356-359).

    326 U.S. 759
  • Petition for Writ of Certiorari — Carreras v. Texas

    Supreme Court brief · Petition for Writ of Certiorari · 1997

    (See Appellant’s Brief 13-28; Appellant’s Reply Brief 1-9; Appellant’s Motion for Rehearing 4-14; and Petition for Discretionary Review 9-20, 23-24.) … Illinois, 399 U.S. 11 235, 242 (1970); Griffin v. Illinois, 351 U.S. 12, 17 n.11 (1956).

    522 U.S. 933
  • Petition for Writ of Certiorari — Andrew John Yellowbear, Jr., Petitioner v. Robert O. Lampert, Director, Wyoming Department of Corrections

    Supreme Court brief · Petition for Writ of Certiorari · Nov 21, 2018

    Wainright, 477 U.S. 399 (1986)........................................11 Jones v. Meehan, 175 U.S. 1 (1899) ............................................8 Magnan v. … Ford v Wainright, 477 U.S. 399, 411, 106 S. Ct. 2595, 91'L.Ed. 2d 335 (1986).

  • Amicus Curiae Brief — Lawrence W. Blessinger, Petitioner v. United States

    Supreme Court brief · Amicus Curiae Brief · Jul 18, 2019

    Ann. § 14-399; Neb. Rev. Stat. Ann. § 28-523. 11 See, e.g., Wash. Rev. Code Ann. § 9A.84.030; Ohio Rev. Code Ann. § 4511.48. 12 See, e.g., Wash. Rev. Code Ann. § 77.15.370; 18 U.S.C. § 41; Fla. … Code Ann. §§ 4301.62, 4301.99. 22 See Grigg, 498 F.3d at 1080. 23 See Atwater, 532 U.S. at 347. 24 See Fla. Stat. § 828.1615(4). 25 See Floyd, 959 F.

  • Petition for Writ of Certiorari — Ernest Bustos, Petitioner v. Encino Park Homeowners Association, et al.

    Supreme Court brief · Petition for Writ of Certiorari · Oct 30, 2023

    Supreme Court of Texas Petition for Review 22-111 denied March 24, 2023 Motion for Rehearing dined June 02, 2023. … Kirby 111 S.W.2d 391, 398-399 (Tex. 1989) Duncan v. Pogue, 759 S.W.2d 435, 435-436 (Tex. 1988); Oake v. Collin County, 692 S.W.2d 454, 455-456 (Tex. 1985).

  • Petition for Writ of Certiorari — District of Columbia ex rel. Capital Lighting & Supply Inc. v. Merando Inc.

    Supreme Court brief · Petition for Writ of Certiorari · 1965

    United States, 354 U.S. 449 (1957) ........ 24, 29 Naples v. United States, 113 U.S. App. D.C. 281, 307 Fe I 6 eco tb csc ked waweaceek cane ccsae 24 Oakes v. … United States, 348 U.S. 11 (1954) .......... 24 Spriggs v. United States, — U.S. App. D.C. —, 335 (fs 4%. Seca er mpm ae 24 Thorington v.

    381 U.S. 936
  • Amicus Curiae Brief — Forney v. Apfel

    Supreme Court brief · Amicus Curiae Brief · 1998

    Thomas & Betts Co., EES Se 24, 25 Farr v. Gruber, 950 F.2d 399 (7th Cir. 1991)... 12 Faucher v. … App. 24.

    524 U.S. 266
  • Petition for Writ of Certiorari — Hazel-Atlas Glass Co. v. Hartford-Empire Co.

    Supreme Court brief · Petition for Writ of Certiorari · 1944

    ‘SS. 190... .16, 24 Southland Gasolene v. Bayley, ge | rere 16 - — A tlantic ¢ oast Line R. c 0., 290 U. “a | - $22, 326 .:....... SUALULE MARA WN brah Ree meea 24 ~ Uz a. Industrial Chemicals v. … ' -Haszel, 59 F. 2d 399, Circuit Judge Buffington writing the opinion, Circuit Judge Davis concurring, and Circuit Judge Woolley dissenting with opinion.

    322 U.S. 238
  • Amicus Curiae Brief — League of United Latin American Citizens v. Perry

    Supreme Court brief · Amicus Curiae Brief · 2005

    Henderson, 399 F. Supp. 2d at 770 (emphasis added). Moreover, Appellants’ complaint is based only upon the results of the 2004 election. … City of 18 Appellants also argue that former District 24 should be protected by Section 2.

    546 U.S. 1074
  • Reply Brief — Mark Brnovich, Attorney General of Arizona, et al., Petitioners v. Democratic National Committee, et al.

    Supreme Court brief · Reply Brief · Feb 12, 2021

    First, the United States contends (at 21-24) that §2 requires proof of proximate causation. … Br. 21-24. Second, the State Petitioners agree with the United States (at 24-25) that States must retain the ability to present their governmental interests when defending against vote-denial claims.

  • Petition — Lehigh & New England Railway Co. v. Interstate Commerce Commission

    Supreme Court brief · Petition · 1977

    United States, 282 U.S. 399 (1931) 23 Kimball Laundry Co. v. United States, 338 U.S. 1 (1949) 23 King v. United States, 364 F.2d 235 (5th Cir. 1966) 24 Marbury v. … to March 24, 1975).

    429 U.S. 1061

Ask Donna what matters in the record.

She can read the source against your case and show you exactly where the answer came from.

Ask Donna

A word about cookies

We need a few to keep you signed in and the library working. The rest help us see which pages people use and where they get stuck. They stay off unless you say yes.