Documents

Amicus Curiae Brief — Google LLC, Petitioner v. VirtaMove, Corp., et al.

Supreme Court brief · Amicus Curiae Brief · May 29, 2026

The Act authorizes post-grant review, in which a patent may be challenged on all validity grounds during the period between the patent’s issuance and “the date that is 9 months after th[at] date.” 35 U.S.C … Since Congress enacted the America Invents Act in 2011, the USPTO had understood that inter partes review is available for the entirety of this period of enforceability (“after” the availability of post-grant

Amicus Curiae Brief — Buckhannon Board & Care Home, Inc. v. West Virginia Dept. of Health and Human Resources

Supreme Court brief · Amicus Curiae Brief · 2001

Thereafter, it was applied to a Clean Water Act case, Friends of the Earth v. Laidlaw Envil. Services, Inc.., 149 F.3d 303 (4th Cir. 1998), rev'd on other grounds, 120 S. … Similarly, legislative materials accompanying the 1987 amendments to the Clean Water Act demonstrate that a “prevailing party” is one who settles the case as surely as one who litigates to judgment.

Amicus Curiae Brief — Andre Martello Barton, Petitioner v. William P. Barr, Attorney General

Supreme Court brief · Amicus Curiae Brief · Jul 3, 2019

Air Lines v. Waterman S.S. Corp., 333 U.S. 103 (1948) .................................... 26 City of Arlington v. … Compare id. at 1017, with Chicago & Southern Air Lines v. Waterman S.S.

Amicus Curiae Brief — Williams & Wilkins Co. v. United States

Supreme Court brief · Amicus Curiae Brief · 1975

Random House, Inc., aires SSS SOUT ie, Ae Sere 12 The Williams & Wilkins Company v. United States, REI ae ASD eRe pe ed ee 4,8 The Williams & Wilkins Company v. … As the dissent below rightly observed there seems tas | 10 to be no legitimate reason for harking back to inapplicable legislative history regarding prior copyright acts.

Amicus Curiae Brief — Enrique Jevons, as a Managing Member of Jevons Properties LLC, et al., Petitioners v. Jay Inslee, Governor of Washington, et al.

Supreme Court brief · Amicus Curiae Brief · Dec 1, 2023

Magna Carta art. 39 (cleaned up) (emphasis added). … John Locke, Second Treatise of Government, IX § 123 (1689) (cleaned up).

Amicus Curiae Brief — Robinhood Markets, Inc., et al., Petitioners v. Vinod Sodha, et al.

Supreme Court brief · Amicus Curiae Brief · Mar 11, 2026

Many of amici’s members are subject to the Securities Act of 1933 (“Securities Act”), 15 U.S.C. § 77a et seq., and accordingly, Section 11(a) of the 1 Pursuant to Supreme Court Rule 37.6, amici curiae … P., 601 U.S. 257, 264 (2024) (cleaned up) (quoting Matrixx Initiatives, Inc. v. Siracusano, 563 U.S. 27, 44 (2011)); see 17 C.F.R. § 240.10b-5.

Amicus Curiae Brief — TrafFix Devices, Inc. v. Marketing Displays, Inc.

Supreme Court brief · Amicus Curiae Brief · 2001

A patentee does not receive through the patent any right to practice an invention, let alone an exclusive right, for a limited period of time or for any period of time. … Still, at least one circuit has arguably created such a special defense, see Vornado Air Circulation Sys., Inc. v.

Amicus Curiae Brief — Turner Broadcasting System, Inc. v. FCC

Supreme Court brief · Amicus Curiae Brief · 1994

Cable Television Consumer Protection and Com- petition Act of 1992 (“The 1992 Cable Act”), Pub. L. No, 102-385, 106 Stat. 1160 LEGISLATIVE HISTORY H.R. No. 628, 102 Cong. 2d Sess. 52 (1992) S. … This programming is threatened by the must carry provisions * of the Cable Television Consumer Protection and Competition Act of 1992 (“The 1992 Cable Act”).”

Amicus Curiae Brief — Long Island Care at Home, Ltd. v. Coke

Supreme Court brief · Amicus Curiae Brief · 2007

See also Application of the Fair Labor Standards Act to Domestic Service, 66 Fed. … The total working age population (per- sons aged 18 to 64) will grow by just 16% during this time period.

Amicus Curiae Brief — Environmental Protection Agency v. Defenders of Wildlife

Supreme Court brief · Amicus Curiae Brief · 2007

Act. 7 aM. … These include the type of Clean Water Act (CWA) permits at issue in this case, which allow point-source dis- charges to the waters of the United States. See CWA § 402, 33 U.S.C. § 1342.

Amicus Curiae Brief — Karcher v. May

Supreme Court brief · Amicus Curiae Brief · 1987

Finally, the court of appeals considered whether the legislature acted with a permissible purpose when it en- acted the moment of silence statute. Analyzing this Court’s decision in Wallace v. … does not thereby endorse or promote any of the particular ideas aired there”); Zorach v. Clauson, 343 U.S. at 311.

Amicus Curiae Brief — Holder v. Martinez Gutierrez

Supreme Court brief · Amicus Curiae Brief · 2012

(citing Chicago & Southern Air Lines, Inc. v. Waterman S.S. Corp., 333 U.S. 103, 112-13 (1948)), the approach has particular significance in the immigration context. … Cf., e.g., Occupational Safety and Health Act of 1970, 29 U.S.C. §§ 651-678; Federal Mine Safety and Health Amendments Act of 1977, 30 U.S.C. § 823; Federal Aviation Act of 1958, Pub. L.

Amicus Curiae Brief — Michael W. Gahagan, Petitioner v. Citizenship & Immigration Services

Supreme Court brief · Amicus Curiae Brief · Aug 14, 2019

Dep’t of Justice, 820 F.Supp.2d 39 (D.D.C. 2011) ..................................................... 10, 15 Dep’t of Air Force v. Rose, 425 U.S. 352 (1976).............4 Fogerty v. … Dep’t of Air Force v. Rose, 425 U.S. 352, 361 (1976).

Amicus Curiae Brief — Kelo v. New London

Supreme Court brief · Amicus Curiae Brief · 2005

Commentators agree that redevelopment projects today are carried out with greater sensitivity to the value of existing communities.” enacted the Uniform Relocation Assistance Act, Conn. Gen. … ”"® > Missouri lost 94,500 jobs during the 20-month period ending December 2003, the worst rate of decline among the 50 States.

Amicus Curiae Brief — Jan M. Sensenich, Petitioner v. PHH Mortgage Corporation

Supreme Court brief · Amicus Curiae Brief · May 3, 2022

Cambridgeport Air Sys., Inc., 26 F.3d 1187 (1st Cir. 1994) .................................................10 Saccameno v. U.S. … Cambridgeport Air Sys., Inc., 26 F.3d 1187, 1191 (1st Cir. 1994) (“[T]he key language of the OSH Act is broad. It authorizes a court to ‘order all appropriate relief.’

Amicus Curiae Brief — Golden Gate Restaurant Ass'n v. City & County of San Francisco

Supreme Court brief · Amicus Curiae Brief · 2010

Delta Air Lines, Inc., AGS U.S. 85 (1069) «0. :60.cicneee 18 Sipma v. Massachusetts Casualty Ins. Co., 256 F.3d 1006 (10th Cir. 2001) 0.0.0... cece ec eeceeeceee ees 9 Wickman v. … Delta Air Lines, Inc., 463 U.S. 85, 96, 97 (1983), this Court established that for purposes of Section 514(a), a state law “relates to” an employce benefit plan “if it has a connection with or reference

Amicus Curiae Brief — Air and Liquid Systems Corp., et al., Petitioners v. Roberta G. DeVries, Individually and as Administratrix of the Estate of John B. DeVries, Deceased, et al.

Supreme Court brief · Amicus Curiae Brief · Aug 24, 2018

This last act of service should not be thwarted to assuage commercial interests. ------------------------------------------------------------------ ARGUMENT I. … Specifically, Comment h of § 402A requires a manufacturer to warn when, as here, “he has reason to anticipate that danger may result from a particular use” of its product.

Amicus Curiae Brief — Scott D. Pitta, Petitioner v. Dina Medeiros, Individually and in Her Official Capacity as Administrator of Special Education for the Bridgewater Raynham Regional School District, et al.

Supreme Court brief · Amicus Curiae Brief · May 3, 2024

(cleaned up). B. … To wit, the Department of Justice has previously opined that the right to record police officers discharging their duties 16 in public “does not depend on individuals criticizing police, commenting on

Amicus Curiae Brief — Friedrichs v. Cal. Teachers Ass'n, 135 S. Ct. 2933 (2015) (No. 14-915)

Supreme Court brief · Amicus Curiae Brief · 2015

Detroit Bd. of Education, ey I cteriiniicieninitinicteimegndnnernnmssens passim Air Line Pilots v. Miller, ic iterianehtnciane 28 American Mfrs. Mut. Ins. Co. v. … See Air Line Pilots v.

Amicus Curiae Brief — Merck KGaA v. Integra Lifesciences I, Ltd.

Supreme Court brief · Amicus Curiae Brief · 2005

AIRE OER GED ccccccceccosececes passim FO OBE. | FR GRD cc ccccccccccccesenceses 24 5S UBL. © SES GRSGEP cccccccccccccccsccseces 23 35 UBL. … (“Hatch-Waxman Act” or “1984 Act”).’