Documents

Briefs, oral arguments, agency decisions and the Federal Register.

Filters2003

10,000+ results

0.18s

  • Petition for Writ of Certiorari — Pinkston v. Office of Disciplinary Counsel of Louisiana

    Supreme Court brief · Petition for Writ of Certiorari · 2004

    Nebraska, 262 U.S. 390, 399 (1923)........ 11 Middlesex County Ethics Committee v. Garden State Bar Ass’n., 457 U.S. 423 (1982)........,-.. 8 Palko v. … Graham, 450 U.S. 24, 29 (1981). Johnson v.

    540 U.S. 1179
  • Petition for Writ of Certiorari — William M. Hilton, Petitioner v. United States

    Supreme Court brief · Petition for Writ of Certiorari · Mar 12, 2026

    Downum, __ M.J. ___, No. 24-0156/AR, 2024 CAAF LEXIS 315 (C.A.A.F. May 14, 2024) (same); United States v. Davis, __ M.J. ___, No. 24-0152/AR, 2024 CAAF LEXIS 314 (C.A.A.F. … Rorie, 58 M.J. 399 (C.A.A.F. 2003).

  • Petition for Writ of Certiorari — Samuel Lee Smithers, Petitioner v. Florida

    Supreme Court brief · Petition for Writ of Certiorari · Oct 8, 2025

    Smithers Date of Entry of Judgement: Order Denying Postconviction Relief, October 24, 2007. … Wainwright, 477 U.S. 399 (1986) ............................................................... 5, 12 Furman v.

  • Joint Appendix — Jones v. United States

    Supreme Court brief · Joint Appendix · 1982

    Robinson, 166 U.S.App.D.C. 62, 66, 509 F.2d 395, 399 (1977); United States v. Brown, 155 U.S.App. D.C. 402, 404 n.3, 478 F.2d 606, 608 n.3 (1973); Dixon v. … Waite, supra, at 288-89, 475 F.2d 399-400.

    454 U.S. 1141
  • Reply Brief — Devlin v. Scardelletti

    Supreme Court brief · Reply Brief · 2002

    Sosna explained that the significance of certification was that “all persons” in the class would be bound (419 U.S. at 399 n.9 (emphasis added)), and the Court held there was an ongoing controversy … Rule 24 does not mention Rule 23 class actions, let alone suggest that class action settlements may be appealed only by a Rule 24 intervenor.

    536 U.S. 1
  • Opposition Brief — Media General, Inc. v. Federal Communications Commission

    Supreme Court brief · Opposition Brief · 2005

    FCC, 399 F.2d 65, 69 (8th Cir. 1968); Scott v. Rosenberg, 702 F.2d 1263, 1272 (9th Cir.1983); Coty. Communications Co., Inc. v. … App. at 57a-58a. 24 doubt arbitrary and capricious.” Id. at 63a.

    545 U.S. 1123
  • Amicus Curiae Brief — Association for Education Fairness, Petitioner v. Montgomery County Board of Education, et al.

    Supreme Court brief · Amicus Curiae Brief · Aug 26, 2026

    Hall, 4 Cal. 399 (1854) .............................. 20 Plessy v. Ferguson, 163 U.S. 537 (1896)................... 24 Rice v. … Dominance, CNBC Tech (Jan. 24, 2025), found at https://www.cnbc. com/2025/01/24 /how-chinas-newai-model- deepseek-is -threatening- us-dominance. html? &doc=108093228 (last visited 8/24/2026).

  • Petition for Writ of Certiorari — James Synnott, Petitioner v. Paul Burgermeister, et al.

    Supreme Court brief · Petition for Writ of Certiorari · May 13, 2024

    Circuits Are Divided on Domestic Relations Doctrine............................ 24 3. … Dallas Cnty., 64 F.4th 616, 62333 (5th Cir. 2023) (en banc)............ 24 Dennis v. Sparks, 499 U.S. 24, 27 (1980).................................................... 35 Dimick v.

  • Subsistence Management Regulations for Public Lands in Alaska, Subpart D; Changes to Harvest Limits for Moose in Units 21(D) and 24, Muskox in Unit 26(C), and Caribou in Unit 17(A) and (C)

    Federal Register · Rule · Feb 12, 2003

    Units 21(D) and 24 (portion)—Moose Analysis of results from trend surveys conducted by ADF&G in Units 21(D) and 24 between 1985 and 1999, reveal significant declines in calf production and yearling bull … After reaching a peak of 399 animals in 1986, numbers of muskoxen in Unit 26(C) were relatively stable from 1987-1998, but have declined sharply in the past two years.

    68 FR 7298Agriculture DepartmentForest Service
  • Clean Air Act Full Approval of Operating Permit Program; District of Columbia

    Federal Register · Rule · Oct 16, 2001

    The term “applicable requirements,” however, is a defined term in 20 DCMR 399 and includes the requirements of the District's approved SIP. … With this clarification, the District of Columbia's program is consistent with 40 CFR part 70. 24.

    66 FR 52538Environmental Protection Agency
  • Petition for Writ of Certiorari — Huang v. French

    Supreme Court brief · Petition for Writ of Certiorari · 1996

    Supp. 568 Bae POEs be Ce eee ee a eK 6 oe 24 Drown vy. Portsmith School District, OS5t 2G LIGR CISA Cae FPUSe beh i oi veer ees 20, 21, 22 Dynalectorn Corp. v. … The time has come for elaboration as to what kind of evidence will suffice to get to the jury. 24 due process violation. Accord Hearn v.

    517 U.S. 1157
  • Brief for Respondent — North Carolina v. Rice

    Supreme Court brief · Brief for Respondent · 1971

    E. 24 245 (1965) 2 State v. Sparrow, 276 N.C. 499, 173 S.E.2d 807 (1970) 8 State v. Spencer, 276 N.C. 335, 173 8. K 24 765 (1970) 4 Torrence v. Henry, 304 F. Supp. 725 (E. b. . … New York, 399 U.S. 66 (1970); Duncan v. Louisiana, 391 U.S. 145 (1968).

    404 U.S. 244
  • Petition — Arkansas v. Sanders

    Supreme Court brief · Petition · 1979

    Maroney, 399 U.S. 42 (1970) ...... 6... ccc cece eee eee ees 6 Commonwealth v. Scull, 200 Pa. 122, 186 A. 2d ve k ec entast covonntiss 14 Coolidge v. … Maroney, supra, 399 U.S. 42.

    442 U.S. 753
  • Appellees Brief — United States v. St. Louis, SF & TR Co.

    Supreme Court brief · Appellees Brief · 1926

    Heth, 3 Cranch 399 ............... 12, 13 Umited States v. Southern Ry. Co., No. 501 this term . 15 United States v. Sugar Refining Co., 202 U.S. 563... 18 Wabash Railway Co. v. … Heth, 3 Cranch 399, 413.

    270 U.S. 1
  • Opposition Brief — Pacific Bell Telephone Co. v. Wayne

    Supreme Court brief · Opposition Brief · 2001

    BECAUSE THE DUTY NOT TO ACTIVELY MISINFORM EMPLOYEES, REGARDLESS OF SERIOUS CONSIDERATION, DOES NOT CONTROL THE CEs Or ERED CASE oo sc cc sic ccsccees 20 Bee An cee bak eo 065 04 Figacesae wees 24 … disputed, circuit split would not necessarily deter- mine the outcome of this case, if the Court were to grant certiorari based on such a split, it would be doing so only to make a policy decision. 24

    534 U.S. 814
  • IN THE MUSCOGEE (CREEK) NATION SUPREME COURT

    Tribal code · Tribal code

    Martin, 375 U.S. 399 (1964); Terry v. Adams, 345 U.S. 461 (1953). … Martin, 375 U.S. 399 (1964); Terry v. Adams, 345 U.S. 461 (1953).

  • Amicus Curiae Brief — Don Higginson, Petitioner v. Xavier Becerra, Attorney General of California, et al.

    Supreme Court brief · Amicus Curiae Brief · May 5, 2020

    Perry, 548 U.S. 399 (2006). … Perry, 548 U.S. 399, 512 (2006) (Scalia, J., concurring in the judgment in part and dissenting in part).

  • Reader Aids

    Federal Register · Uncategorized Document · Oct 13, 1994

    51877, 51879 71.....................................50865, 51394, 51395 380..................................................51881 381..................................................51881 399 … ...............51887 1316.................................................51887 22 CFR 40...................................................51367 24

  • Congressional Budget Resolutions: Reporting Deadline in the Senate

    Congressional research report · CRS Report · Apr 23, 2008

    1978 19 95-90 04-12-77 — 1979 80 95-739 04-14-78 — 1980 22 96-68 04-12-79 — 1981 86 96-654 04-09-80 — 1982 19 97-49 05-01-81 — 1983 92 97-385 05-10-82 — 1984 27 98-63 04-24 … -83 — 1985 106 98-399 04-18-84 — 1986 32 99-15 03-20-85 — April 1 Reporting Deadline 1987 120 99-264 03-24-86 — 1988 49 — 04-15-87 No written report. 1989 113 100-311 03-31-88

    RS20541Congressional Research Service
  • Petition for Writ of Certiorari — Clark v. California

    Supreme Court brief · Petition for Writ of Certiorari · 1954

    City of Chicago, 399 Ill 551,111 N.E, 2d 626. 19 » In Clark v. … Peoria Housing Authority, 399 Ill. 579, 78 N.E.2d 276. In Zurn v.

    348 U.S. 847

Ask Donna what matters in the record.

She can read the source against your case and show you exactly where the answer came from.

Ask Donna

A word about cookies

We need a few to keep you signed in and the library working. The rest help us see which pages people use and where they get stuck. They stay off unless you say yes.