Documents

Reply Brief — Libby Hilsenrath, on Behalf of Her Minor Child, C. H., Petitioner v. Chathams School District Board of Education

Supreme Court brief · Reply Brief · Nov 17, 2025

Edwards, 482 U.S. at 583. … Edwards, 482 U.S. at 584.

Reply Brief — Leggett v. United States

Supreme Court brief · Reply Brief · 2002

Wade, 410 U.S. 113, 125 (1973); Weinstein v. Bradford, 423 U.S. 147, 149 (1975). This case fits the exception to the rule against moot- ness which applies when two elements co-exist. … Weinstein, 423 U.S. at 149. Both prongs are satis- fied here. First, it is well recognized that a contempt action is intrinsically limited in term, lasting no longer than 18 months.

Opposition — Natelli v. United States

Supreme Court brief · Opposition · 1977

United States, 417 U.S. 333 coccccccccees 7 Donnelly v. De Christoforo, 416 U.S. 637 «0.0... 10 Egger v. United States, 509 F. 2d 745, cer- tiorari demied, 423 U.S. … United States, 423 U.S. 861; Ugarte-Veizaga v. United States, 452 F.2d 1194, 1195 (C.A. 5)?

Petition for Writ of Certiorari — Deerwester v. Illinois

Supreme Court brief · Petition for Writ of Certiorari · 1999

Abdullah, 85 Ill. 2d at 307, 423 N.E. 2d at 918. … Abdullah, 423 N.E. 2d at 918.

Petition for Writ of Certiorari — American Petroleum Institute, et al., Petitioners v. Minnesota

Supreme Court brief · Petition for Writ of Certiorari · Aug 18, 2023

Williams, 482 U.S. 386, 392 (1987). … Acker, 527 U.S. 423, 431 (1999). i.

Opposition — Morton-Norwich Products, Inc. v. United States

Supreme Court brief · Opposition · 1980

Com- 4 missioner, 198 F. 2d 214, 216 (2d Cir.), cert. denied, 344 U.S. 874 (1952). See also B. Bittker & J. Eustice, Federal Income Taxation of Corporations, para. 15.06, at 15-16 (¢1979 ed.). … Seeley Tube & Box Co., 338 U.S. 561, 566 (1950), interest is assessed against the taxpayer on underpayments on the theory that, until actual payment, he “had the use of funds which rightfully should

Opposition — Gluesenkamp v. Florida

Supreme Court brief · Opposition · 1981

White, 15 423 U.S. 65. (1975) United States v. Chadwick, 15,19 433 U.S. 1 (1979) United States v. Jiminez, 15 626 F.2d 39 (7th Cir.1980) United States v. … United States, 267 U.S. 132 (1925); Chambere v. Maroney, 399 U.S. 42 (1970); Texae v. White, 423 U.S. 65 (1975). Petitioner's reliance upon this Court's decisions in United States v.

Intent To Revoke Antidumping Duty Orders and Findings and To Terminate Suspended Investigations

Federal Register · Notice · Nov 4, 1996

Contact: Tom Killiam at (202) 482-2704 The People's Republic of China Tungsten Ore Concentrates A-570-811 56 FR 58681 November 21, 1991 Contact: Andrea Chu at (202) 482-4733 Japan Certain Small Electric … Seven copies of such objections should be submitted to the Assistant Secretary for Import Administration, International Trade Administration, Room B-099, U.S.

Brief for the United States — De Forest Radio Telephone Co. v. United States

Supreme Court brief · Brief for the United States · 1927

Curtis Turbine Co., 246 U.S. 28.) … Palmer, 128 U.S. 262; Dodge Manufacturing Co. v. Puster, 42 Fed. 54; Cline v. Horton, 274 Fed. 728; Walker on Patents, Fifth Ed., Section 312).

Mattresses From Bosnia and Herzegovina, Bulgaria, Burma, India, Italy, Kosovo, Mexico, the Philippines, Poland, Slovenia, Spain, and Taiwan: Initiation of Less-Than-Fair-Value Investigations

Federal Register · Notice · Aug 23, 2023

Department of Commerce, 1401 Constitution Avenue NW, Washington, DC 20230; telephone: (202) 482-6334, (202) 482-4567, (202) 482-5673, (202) 482-3350, (202) 482-4948, (202) 482-3964, (202) 482-3457, (202 … ) 482-0176, (202) 482-0223, (202) 482-2185, (202) 482-1678, and (202) 482-5673, respectively.

Opposition — California v. Federal Communications Commission

Supreme Court brief · Opposition · 1978

FCC, 423 U.S, 836 (1975), ue System Tariff Offerings, 40 P. C. … FCC, 422 U.S, 1026 (1975), rehearing denied, 423 U.S, 886 (1976). "47 U.S.C, 151 et seq, '' Tolerant Leasing Corp., 45 F.C. C. 2d 204 (1974), '* North Carolina Utilities Commission v.

IN TIIE IJNITED STATES DISTRICT COTIRT

Court rules · Court rule

$a7s(a)(B) seeu,s.c.$423(aX4) o I (i . … the underslgned and their lead the undersigned hereby ORDERED TO APFEARbefore office to for counsel a are at the U.S.

Motion to Proceed In Forma Pauperis — James Ayers, Petitioner v. United States

Supreme Court brief · Motion to Proceed In Forma Pauperis · Apr 19, 2021

Box 266 Jackson, TN 38302 Telephone: 731-423-5565 Facsimile: 731-423-5372 Email: mike@weinmanthomas.com CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE The undersigned hereby certifies that a true and exact copy of the forgoing … Acting United States Attorney Western District of Tennessee U.S.

Reply Brief — Michigan Diversified Business Products, Inc. v. City of Warren

Supreme Court brief · Reply Brief · 1986

Bruen, 42 U.S. 169, | How. 169 (1843)........ Canal & C.S.R. Co. v. Hart, 114 U.S. 654, 5 S.Ct. EER a Rt oo OR ey er Morrill v. Jones, 106 U.S. 466, 1 S.Ct. 423 (1883) .. United States v. … Hart, 114 U.S. 654, 5 S.Ct. 1127 (1885); Morrill v. Jones, 106 U.S. 466, 1 S.Ct. 423 (1883); Bates v. Coe, 98 U.S. 31 (1878); Bell v. Bruen, 42 U.S. 169, | How. 169 (1843).

Opposition — McManus v. Village of Southhampton

Supreme Court brief · Opposition · 1984

County of Alameda, 411 U.S. 693 20. Nelson v. Meyer, 520 F. 2d 1276, cert. den, 423 U.S. I: se cisssietdiniancatetseslacsanaiuhsatishdeuinaabesndauacbacseaacalaieee en Owens v. … Meyer, 520 F. 2d 1276, cert. den. 423 U.S. 1034. Clearly there is no independent Federal jurisdiction against the municipal defendants since diversity does not exist.

Prologue — Harrison Aire, Inc. v. Aerostar International, Inc. (No. 05-887)

Supreme Court brief · Prologue · 2005

Aerostar International, Inc., U.S. Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit, September 16, 2005 Appendix B - Opinion, //arrison Aire v. Aerostar International, Inc., U.S. … Image Technical Services, Inc. 504 U.S. 451, 112 S. Ct. 2072 (U.S. Cal.) (1992) In re Braden’s Balloons Aloft, Inc., FAA Docket No. CP99S WO037, U.S.

Intent To Revoke Antidumping Duty Orders and Findings and To Terminate Suspended Investigations

Federal Register · Notice · Dec 4, 1995

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Michael Panfeld or the analyst listed under Antidumping Proceeding at: Office of Antidumping Compliance, Import Administration, International Trade Administration, U.S. … Seven copies of such objections should be submitted to the Assistant Secretary for Import Administration, International Trade Administration, Room B-099, U.S.

Intent to Revoke Antidumping Duty Orders and Findings and to Terminate Suspended Investigations

Federal Register · Notice · Jan 31, 1997

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Michael Panfeld or the analyst listed under Antidumping Proceeding at: Import Administration, International Trade Administration, U.S. … Seven copies of such objections should be submitted to the Assistant Secretary for Import Administration, International Trade Administration, Room B-099, U.S.

Reply Brief — Burbridge v. California

Supreme Court brief · Reply Brief · 1967

Ohio, 360 U.S. 423 (1959)....... esis cela ° ‘ F 3 : 4 ° ‘ : ‘ California Penal Code: Bre ey = a Section 407 ...... kaevasdoeis Aek Cah eee tics . “3 Ege errerrr rs erraver iT rea ett eT wekes a nary … Ohio, 360 U.S. 423 (1959). 2, Respondenj has not-contested the applicability of Bowe v. South Carolina, 378 U.S. 347 (1964) to this case.

Determination Not to Revoke Antidumping Duty Orders and Findings Nor to Terminate Suspended Investigations

Federal Register · Notice · Jul 16, 1996

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Michael Panfeld or the analyst listed under Antidumping Proceeding at: Office of Antidumping Compliance, Import Administration, International Trade Administration, U.S. … Department of Commerce, 14th Street & Constitution Avenue, N.W., Washington, D.C. 20230, telephone (202) 482-4737.