Documents
Briefs, oral arguments, agency decisions and the Federal Register.
10,000+ results
0.10s
Opposition Brief — Reeves v. Texas
Supreme Court brief · Opposition Brief · 1999
The evidence was admissible The Texas Court of Appeals held the fact that Reeves had refused to permit the Arlington police to enter his home on the evening of October 12, 1994 (about 24 hours after … Maroney, 399 U.S. 42, 53, 90 S.Ct. 1975, 26 L.Ed.2d 419 (1970).
526 U.S. 1068Reply Brief — Richard Gerald Jordan, Petitioner v. Mississippi
Supreme Court brief · Reply Brief · May 29, 2025
**THIS IS A CAPITAL CASE – EXECUTION SET FOR JUNE 25, 2025** No. 24A1143 No. 24-959 (connected case) In the Supreme Court of the United States RICHARD GERALD JORDAN, v. … Wainwright, 477 U.S. 399, 411 (1986) (“[E]xecution is the most irremediable and unfathomable of penalties.”), and common sense.
Petition — Balano v. United States
Supreme Court brief · Petition · 1980
Green, 399 U.S. 149, 156 (1970). … Evid. 803(24).
449 U.S. 840Supreme Court brief · Opposition Brief · 1900
Preambles { 30,419 Os Mi I 4,6 Order No. 399-A, Refunds Resulting From Btu Measurement Adjustments, FERC Stats. & Regs., Regs. … SCHIFFER MICHIGAN CONSOLIDATED GAS COMPANY 500 Griswold Street Detroit, MI 48226 (313) 256-5206 August 31, 1990 24 JErryReY M.
Supreme Court brief · Respondents Brief · Apr 25, 2025
Apr. 4, 2025) (D.E. 52). 24 2. … Adkins, 310 U.S. 381, 399 (1940).
Reply Brief for Respondent — Di Giovanni v. Camden
Supreme Court brief · Reply Brief for Respondent · 1935
S. 93, 112, 24 8. Ct. 399, 407 ' 7, 87 Keaton vs. Little, 34 Fed. (2d) 396, 398 (C. C. A. r eee ese Kimel vs. Missouri State Life Insurance Company, 71 Fed. (2d) 921, 924 (C. C. … S. 24, 29, 54 S.
296 U.S. 64Petitioners Brief — Noyd v. Bond
Supreme Court brief · Petitioners Brief · 1969
S. 281 (1960) r...-..16, 24, 25, 26 U. S. ex rel. Mankiewicz v. Ray, 399 F. ad nd (2d Cir. 1968) ae 40 U.S. ex rel. Toth 1 V: Quarles, 350 U.S. 11 (1955) .. .-16, 24 Witmer v. U. S., 348 U. … Ray, 399 F; 2d 900 (2d Cir. 1968). 41 In In re Kelly, —~ F. 24 —~, 37 U. S.
395 U.S. 683Respondents Brief — Devlin v. Scardelletti
Supreme Court brief · Respondents Brief · 2002
Br. at 24-26. … Br. at 26 (quoting 419 U.S. at 399 n.8).
536 U.S. 1Petition for Writ of Certiorari — James Synnott, Petitioner v. Paul Burgermeister, et al.
Supreme Court brief · Petition for Writ of Certiorari · May 13, 2024
Circuits Are Divided on Domestic Relations Doctrine............................ 24 3. … Dallas Cnty., 64 F.4th 616, 62333 (5th Cir. 2023) (en banc)............ 24 Dennis v. Sparks, 499 U.S. 24, 27 (1980).................................................... 35 Dimick v.
Clean Air Act Full Approval of Operating Permit Program; District of Columbia
Federal Register · Rule · Oct 16, 2001
The term “applicable requirements,” however, is a defined term in 20 DCMR 399 and includes the requirements of the District's approved SIP. … With this clarification, the District of Columbia's program is consistent with 40 CFR part 70. 24.
66 FR 52538Environmental Protection AgencyBrief for Respondent — North Carolina v. Rice
Supreme Court brief · Brief for Respondent · 1971
E. 24 245 (1965) 2 State v. Sparrow, 276 N.C. 499, 173 S.E.2d 807 (1970) 8 State v. Spencer, 276 N.C. 335, 173 8. K 24 765 (1970) 4 Torrence v. Henry, 304 F. Supp. 725 (E. b. . … New York, 399 U.S. 66 (1970); Duncan v. Louisiana, 391 U.S. 145 (1968).
404 U.S. 244Petition — Arkansas v. Sanders
Supreme Court brief · Petition · 1979
Maroney, 399 U.S. 42 (1970) ...... 6... ccc cece eee eee ees 6 Commonwealth v. Scull, 200 Pa. 122, 186 A. 2d ve k ec entast covonntiss 14 Coolidge v. … Maroney, supra, 399 U.S. 42.
442 U.S. 753Appellees Brief — United States v. St. Louis, SF & TR Co.
Supreme Court brief · Appellees Brief · 1926
Heth, 3 Cranch 399 ............... 12, 13 Umited States v. Southern Ry. Co., No. 501 this term . 15 United States v. Sugar Refining Co., 202 U.S. 563... 18 Wabash Railway Co. v. … Heth, 3 Cranch 399, 413.
270 U.S. 1Petition for Writ of Certiorari — Huang v. French
Supreme Court brief · Petition for Writ of Certiorari · 1996
Supp. 568 Bae POEs be Ce eee ee a eK 6 oe 24 Drown vy. Portsmith School District, OS5t 2G LIGR CISA Cae FPUSe beh i oi veer ees 20, 21, 22 Dynalectorn Corp. v. … The time has come for elaboration as to what kind of evidence will suffice to get to the jury. 24 due process violation. Accord Hearn v.
517 U.S. 1157IN THE MUSCOGEE (CREEK) NATION SUPREME COURT
Tribal code · Tribal code
Martin, 375 U.S. 399 (1964); Terry v. Adams, 345 U.S. 461 (1953). … Martin, 375 U.S. 399 (1964); Terry v. Adams, 345 U.S. 461 (1953).
Opposition Brief — Pacific Bell Telephone Co. v. Wayne
Supreme Court brief · Opposition Brief · 2001
BECAUSE THE DUTY NOT TO ACTIVELY MISINFORM EMPLOYEES, REGARDLESS OF SERIOUS CONSIDERATION, DOES NOT CONTROL THE CEs Or ERED CASE oo sc cc sic ccsccees 20 Bee An cee bak eo 065 04 Figacesae wees 24 … disputed, circuit split would not necessarily deter- mine the outcome of this case, if the Court were to grant certiorari based on such a split, it would be doing so only to make a policy decision. 24
534 U.S. 814Supreme Court brief · Amicus Curiae Brief · May 5, 2020
Perry, 548 U.S. 399 (2006). … Perry, 548 U.S. 399, 512 (2006) (Scalia, J., concurring in the judgment in part and dissenting in part).
Respondents Brief — Air Line Pilots v. Miller
Supreme Court brief · Respondents Brief · 1998
(See id. at 22 n.10, 24. … (ALPA’s Br. at 24.)
523 U.S. 866Petition — Ochs v. United States
Supreme Court brief · Petition · 1979
Maroney, supra, 399 U.S. at 52 n.10, 90 S.Ct. 1975. … Kern, 67 Misc.24 495, 324 N.Y.S. 24 442 (1971) contains a factual Similarity with what confronts us here.
444 U.S. 955Appellees Brief — Askew v. Hargrave
Supreme Court brief · Appellees Brief · 1971
pp. 24-95 29-30. a a Williams v. Alinois, 399 US. 2%, 242 ( Wi). ; / “~e 3 pom ‘ electoral standard. Voter qualifications have no. … Ilinois, 399-U.S.- 235, 244 (1970) (** [There —.
401 U.S. 476
Ask Donna what matters in the record.
She can read the source against your case and show you exactly where the answer came from.