Documents
Briefs, oral arguments, agency decisions and the Federal Register.
10,000+ results
0.14s
CLP Hartford Sales, L.L.C., et al. Electric Rate and Corporate Regulation Filings
Federal Register · Notice · Jan 25, 1995
ER95-399-000] Take notice that on January 9, 1995, The Washington Water Power Company (WWP), tendered for filing with the Federal Energy Regulatory Commission pursuant to 18 CFR 35.13, a new unsigned … [FR Doc. 95-1830 Filed 1-24-95; 8:45 am] BILLING CODE 6717-01-M
60 FR 4905Energy DepartmentFederal Energy Regulatory CommissionMemorandum — Texeira v. United States
Supreme Court brief · Memorandum · 1974
This operation involved first diluting heroin and then putting five dollars worth of the mixture in an individual bag (Tr. 20-23, 27, 37-38, 235-238, 398- 399). … Ramirez and others also acted as couriers for petitioners on several occasions, taking “bagged up” heroin from New York City to New Orleans, Louis- iana (Tr. 24-26, 27-31, 33-34, 238-241). 1.
419 U.S. 825Reply Brief — Bell v. Thompson
Supreme Court brief · Reply Brief · 2005
Wainwright, 477 U.S. 399 (1986), and (3) the threshold requirements for an eviden- tiary hearing under 28 U.S.C. §2254(e)(2) are inapplicable to his case. … (Brief in Opposition, pp. 23-24) Thompson’s Ford claim was ripe for review by the state and federal courts only because of his imminent execution date.
545 U.S. 794Petition for a Writ of Certiorari — United States v. John Barth Co.
Supreme Court brief · Petition for a Writ of Certiorari · 1929
CR. 24, 25, 29.) SPECIFICATION OF ERRORS TO BE URGED The Cirenit Court of Appeals erred : 1. … Maryland Casualty Company, No, 399, October Term, 1928, and it is desirable to save the rights of the United States in the present case pending the decision of the case so certified.
279 U.S. 370Petition for Writ of Certiorari — Pinkston v. Office of Disciplinary Counsel of Louisiana
Supreme Court brief · Petition for Writ of Certiorari · 2004
Nebraska, 262 U.S. 390, 399 (1923)........ 11 Middlesex County Ethics Committee v. Garden State Bar Ass’n., 457 U.S. 423 (1982)........,-.. 8 Palko v. … Graham, 450 U.S. 24, 29 (1981). Johnson v.
540 U.S. 1179Petition for Writ of Certiorari — William M. Hilton, Petitioner v. United States
Supreme Court brief · Petition for Writ of Certiorari · Mar 12, 2026
Downum, __ M.J. ___, No. 24-0156/AR, 2024 CAAF LEXIS 315 (C.A.A.F. May 14, 2024) (same); United States v. Davis, __ M.J. ___, No. 24-0152/AR, 2024 CAAF LEXIS 314 (C.A.A.F. … Rorie, 58 M.J. 399 (C.A.A.F. 2003).
Petition for Writ of Certiorari — Samuel Lee Smithers, Petitioner v. Florida
Supreme Court brief · Petition for Writ of Certiorari · Oct 8, 2025
Smithers Date of Entry of Judgement: Order Denying Postconviction Relief, October 24, 2007. … Wainwright, 477 U.S. 399 (1986) ............................................................... 5, 12 Furman v.
Joint Appendix — Jones v. United States
Supreme Court brief · Joint Appendix · 1982
Robinson, 166 U.S.App.D.C. 62, 66, 509 F.2d 395, 399 (1977); United States v. Brown, 155 U.S.App. D.C. 402, 404 n.3, 478 F.2d 606, 608 n.3 (1973); Dixon v. … Waite, supra, at 288-89, 475 F.2d 399-400.
454 U.S. 1141Reply Brief — Devlin v. Scardelletti
Supreme Court brief · Reply Brief · 2002
Sosna explained that the significance of certification was that “all persons” in the class would be bound (419 U.S. at 399 n.9 (emphasis added)), and the Court held there was an ongoing controversy … Rule 24 does not mention Rule 23 class actions, let alone suggest that class action settlements may be appealed only by a Rule 24 intervenor.
536 U.S. 1Opposition Brief — Media General, Inc. v. Federal Communications Commission
Supreme Court brief · Opposition Brief · 2005
FCC, 399 F.2d 65, 69 (8th Cir. 1968); Scott v. Rosenberg, 702 F.2d 1263, 1272 (9th Cir.1983); Coty. Communications Co., Inc. v. … App. at 57a-58a. 24 doubt arbitrary and capricious.” Id. at 63a.
545 U.S. 1123Petition for Writ of Certiorari — James Synnott, Petitioner v. Paul Burgermeister, et al.
Supreme Court brief · Petition for Writ of Certiorari · May 13, 2024
Circuits Are Divided on Domestic Relations Doctrine............................ 24 3. … Dallas Cnty., 64 F.4th 616, 62333 (5th Cir. 2023) (en banc)............ 24 Dennis v. Sparks, 499 U.S. 24, 27 (1980).................................................... 35 Dimick v.
Clean Air Act Full Approval of Operating Permit Program; District of Columbia
Federal Register · Rule · Oct 16, 2001
The term “applicable requirements,” however, is a defined term in 20 DCMR 399 and includes the requirements of the District's approved SIP. … With this clarification, the District of Columbia's program is consistent with 40 CFR part 70. 24.
66 FR 52538Environmental Protection AgencyPetition for Writ of Certiorari — Huang v. French
Supreme Court brief · Petition for Writ of Certiorari · 1996
Supp. 568 Bae POEs be Ce eee ee a eK 6 oe 24 Drown vy. Portsmith School District, OS5t 2G LIGR CISA Cae FPUSe beh i oi veer ees 20, 21, 22 Dynalectorn Corp. v. … The time has come for elaboration as to what kind of evidence will suffice to get to the jury. 24 due process violation. Accord Hearn v.
517 U.S. 1157Brief for Respondent — North Carolina v. Rice
Supreme Court brief · Brief for Respondent · 1971
E. 24 245 (1965) 2 State v. Sparrow, 276 N.C. 499, 173 S.E.2d 807 (1970) 8 State v. Spencer, 276 N.C. 335, 173 8. K 24 765 (1970) 4 Torrence v. Henry, 304 F. Supp. 725 (E. b. . … New York, 399 U.S. 66 (1970); Duncan v. Louisiana, 391 U.S. 145 (1968).
404 U.S. 244Petition — Arkansas v. Sanders
Supreme Court brief · Petition · 1979
Maroney, 399 U.S. 42 (1970) ...... 6... ccc cece eee eee ees 6 Commonwealth v. Scull, 200 Pa. 122, 186 A. 2d ve k ec entast covonntiss 14 Coolidge v. … Maroney, supra, 399 U.S. 42.
442 U.S. 753Appellees Brief — United States v. St. Louis, SF & TR Co.
Supreme Court brief · Appellees Brief · 1926
Heth, 3 Cranch 399 ............... 12, 13 Umited States v. Southern Ry. Co., No. 501 this term . 15 United States v. Sugar Refining Co., 202 U.S. 563... 18 Wabash Railway Co. v. … Heth, 3 Cranch 399, 413.
270 U.S. 1Opposition Brief — Pacific Bell Telephone Co. v. Wayne
Supreme Court brief · Opposition Brief · 2001
BECAUSE THE DUTY NOT TO ACTIVELY MISINFORM EMPLOYEES, REGARDLESS OF SERIOUS CONSIDERATION, DOES NOT CONTROL THE CEs Or ERED CASE oo sc cc sic ccsccees 20 Bee An cee bak eo 065 04 Figacesae wees 24 … disputed, circuit split would not necessarily deter- mine the outcome of this case, if the Court were to grant certiorari based on such a split, it would be doing so only to make a policy decision. 24
534 U.S. 814IN THE MUSCOGEE (CREEK) NATION SUPREME COURT
Tribal code · Tribal code
Martin, 375 U.S. 399 (1964); Terry v. Adams, 345 U.S. 461 (1953). … Martin, 375 U.S. 399 (1964); Terry v. Adams, 345 U.S. 461 (1953).
Supreme Court brief · Amicus Curiae Brief · May 5, 2020
Perry, 548 U.S. 399 (2006). … Perry, 548 U.S. 399, 512 (2006) (Scalia, J., concurring in the judgment in part and dissenting in part).
TUV Rheinland of North America, Inc.: Application for Expansion of Recognition
Federal Register · Notice · Jun 25, 2021
Table 1—Proposed List of Appropriate Test Standards for Inclusion in TUVRNA's NRTL Scope of Recognition Test standard Test standard title UL 399 Standard for Drinking-Water Coolers. … [FR Doc. 2021-13545 Filed 6-24-21; 8:45 am] BILLING CODE 4510-26-P
86 FR 33779Labor DepartmentOccupational Safety and Health Administration
Ask Donna what matters in the record.
She can read the source against your case and show you exactly where the answer came from.