Documents

Briefs, oral arguments, agency decisions and the Federal Register.

Filters2019

10,000+ results

0.17s

  • Brief for Respondent — Cady v. Dombrowski

    Supreme Court brief · Brief for Respondent · 1973

    United States, 267 U.S. 132 (1925) ...... 13, 22, 24 Chambers v. Maroney, 399 U.S. 42 (1970) ....---- 21, 22, 25 Chimel v. California, 395 U.S. 752 (1969) ...----- 13, 21, 22 Coolidge v. … Maroney, 399 U.S. 42, 51 (1970).

    413 U.S. 433
  • Petition for Writ of Certiorari — Tahina Corcoran, as next friend on behalf of Joseph E. Corcoran, Petitioner v. Ron Neal, Warden

    Supreme Court brief · Petition for Writ of Certiorari · Dec 17, 2024

    Wainwright, 477 U.S. 399 (1986), Panetti v. Quarterman, 551 U.S. 930 (2007), and Madison v. Alabama, 586 U.S. 265 (2019). … Wainwright, 477 U.S. 399 (1986), Panetti v. Quarterman, 551 U.S. 930 (2007), and Madison v. Alabama, 586 U.S. 265 (2019).

  • Petition for Writ of Certiorari — Jackson Daniel Bowers, Petitioner v. United States

    Supreme Court brief · Petition for Writ of Certiorari · Aug 1, 2025

    Florida, 399 U.S. 78 (1970); United States v. Wood, 299 U.S. 123, 142–43 (1936); Ex parte Quirin, 317 U.S. 1, 39 (1942); Peña-Rodriguez v. Colorado, 580 U.S. 206, 210 (2017). … There's three 24 flights of stairs.

  • Amicus Curiae Brief — Louisiana, Appellant v. Phillip Callais, et al.

    Supreme Court brief · Amicus Curiae Brief · Sep 3, 2025

    Perry, 548 U.S. 399 (2006) ....................... 17, 22, 23, 24, 27 Merrill v. Milligan, 142 S. Ct. 879 (2022) .............................................29 Miller v. … Perry, 548 U.S. 399 (2006); Bartlett v.

  • Amicus Curiae Brief — Bradley Weston Taggart, Petitioner v. Shelley A. Lorenzen, Executor of the Estate of Stuart Brown, et al.

    Supreme Court brief · Amicus Curiae Brief · Feb 26, 2019

    See, e.g., Robin Woods, 28 F.3d at 399 (imposing sanctions where the injunction left “no ground to doubt the wrongfulness 24 of the conduct” at issue). … Ct. 399, 407 (2018) (citation omitted).

  • Amicus Curiae Brief — United States v. Hays

    Supreme Court brief · Amicus Curiae Brief · 1994

    Supp. 399 (W.D. La. 1976), aff'd in part, 563 F.2d 180 (Sth Cir. 1977), cert. denied, 438 U.S. … June 22, 1994 Tr., Vol. 4, at 24, 25.

    513 U.S. 1053
  • Petition for Writ of Certiorari — Samuel Adkins, Petitioner v. Texas

    Supreme Court brief · Petition for Writ of Certiorari · Feb 9, 2023

    Alabama, 571 U.S. 263 (2014) 24 9. Kaupp v. Texas, 538 U.S. 626 (2003) 24 10. King v. Johnson, 138 F.3d 951, 1998 WL 110056 15 (5th Cir. 1998) 11. Lair v. State, 265 S.W.3d 590 (Tex.App. … Ct. 1002 (2016) 24 24. Wiggins v. Smith, 539 U.S. 510 (2013) 16,21 25. Wilson v. Sellers, 138 S.Ct. 1188 (2018) 15,19 CONSTITUTIONAL PROVISIONS U.S. CONST, amend IV 24 U.S. CONST, amend.

  • Amicus Curiae Brief — Wes Allen, Alabama Secretary of State, et al., Appellants v. Evan Milligan, et al.

    Supreme Court brief · Amicus Curiae Brief · Oct 9, 2025

    Callais, Nos. 24-109, 24-110 (U.S. Sept. 23, 2025) .............................................. 21 C. … Callais, Nos. 24-109, 24-110 (U.S. Sept. 23, 2025). But there is no doubt that racial segregation for districting purposes is still racial segregation.

  • Amicus Curiae Brief — Wes Allen, Alabama Secretary of State, et al., Appellants v. Bobby Singleton, et al.

    Supreme Court brief · Amicus Curiae Brief · Oct 9, 2025

    Callais, Nos. 24-109, 24-110 (U.S. Sept. 23, 2025) .............................................. 21 C. … Callais, Nos. 24-109, 24-110 (U.S. Sept. 23, 2025). But there is no doubt that racial segregation for districting purposes is still racial segregation.

  • Petition for Rehearing — Railroad Comm'n of Cal. v. Los Angeles R. Corp.

    Supreme Court brief · Petition for Rehearing · 1929

    Railroad Commission brief, pp. 20 to 33; City brief, pp. 24 to 38. … Columbus, 249 U. 8. 399; Opelika v. Opelika Sewer Co., 265 U. S. 215; Public Service Co. v. St. Cloud, supra, and Southern Utilities Co. v. Palatka, 268 U. S. 232.

    280 U.S. 145
  • Amicus Curiae Brief — Whorton v. Bockting

    Supreme Court brief · Amicus Curiae Brief · 2007

    Murphy, 96 F.3d 856 (CA7 1996) (en banc), rev'd on other grounds, 521 U.S. 320 (1997) ....... 24 Linkletter v. Walker, rr rr erry ree ) Mackey v. … Marathon Pipe Line Co., Fe es PCRS racine busccadesesunseusess 24 Nix v. Williams, ey Gt Se ED. hoe Gacuréaddurenenseusaeues 25 Ohio v. Roberts, RR OTe er eT re ere 5 O'Dell v.

    549 U.S. 406
  • Petition for A Writ of Certiorari — Erreca v. United States

    Supreme Court brief · Petition for A Writ of Certiorari · 1948

    Dec. 399........ Fatherree et al. v. McCormick et al., 199 Miss. 248, 24 rE fas RS oe a hk SoM ks wv wean 8 & ielsenthal v. Warring, 40 Cal. App. 119, 180 Pac. 67. Poster v. … Dec. 399. ‘*A reservation or exception can only be out of the estate granted.”’ Hill v.

    335 U.S. 884
  • Petition for a Writ of Certiorari — Buteau v. Connecticut

    Supreme Court brief · Petition for a Writ of Certiorari · 1950

    Chin Lung, 106 Conn, 701. 4, 24 30 State vs. Coffee, 56 Conn. 399 il INDEX PAGE Turner vs. Commonwealth of Pennsylvania, 338 U.S. 62, 69 S. Ct. 1352 19, 23, 26, 31, 32 United States vs. … Statutes, Rev. 1930, Sec. 239; (Sec. 54-h, C.S. 1945; Sec. 465, G.S. 1949) 30 1945 Supplement to the General Statutes: Section 54-h, C.S. 1945 (Sec. 465, G.S. 1949) 2, 3, 12, 13, 14, 15, 21, 22, 24

    339 U.S. 903
  • Brief for the Respondent in Opposition — Calderon v. Atlas SS Co.

    Supreme Court brief · Brief for the Respondent in Opposition · 1898

    Rep., 399. Aff'g S. C., 27 lbid, 476. The Denmark, 27 bid, 141. Green vs. Boston & Lowell R. R., 128 Mass., 221. … S., 24, 27. There is no distinction on principle between these cases and the one at bar.

    170 U.S. 272
  • Supplemental Brief — FCC v. Beach Communications, Inc.

    Supreme Court brief · Supplemental Brief · 1993

    FCC, 399 F.2d 65 (8th Cir. 1968), and subse- quently found its way into the Cable Act. … Washington, D.C. 20005 (202) 371-5700 November 24, 1992 Counsel for Respondents.

    508 U.S. 307
  • Amicus Curiae Brief — Azar v. Garza, 138 S. Ct. 1790 (2018) (No. 17-654)

    Supreme Court brief · Amicus Curiae Brief · 2018

    (Pet. 20-24, relying on United States v. Munsingwear, Inc., 340 U.S. 36, 39 (1950), and similar authorities). … Wainwright, 477 U.S. 399, 409-410 (1986)).

  • Opposition Brief — Nebrasks v. Parker, 136 S. Ct. 27 (2015) (No. 14-1406)

    Supreme Court brief · Opposition Brief · 2015

    App. 24. 3 22 Stat. 341. … Utah, 510 U.S. 399, 420 (1994)).

  • Opposition — Patrick Simpson v. State of Georgia

    Supreme Court brief · Opposition · 1981

    Illinois, 399 U.S. 235 (1970). Petitioner is not being held beyond the statutory maximum penalty; rather, his basic claim must be that he has a right to probation. … Illinois, 399 U.S. 235, 245, n. 21 (1970), which cited with approval statutes in California, Michigan and Pennsylvania.

    450 U.S. 972
  • Reply Brief — Delaware v. Van Arsdall

    Supreme Court brief · Reply Brief · 1986

    Green, 399 U.S. 149 (1970) 0D Chapman v. California, 386 U.S. 18 (1967) 00. 3, 8,9 Connecticut v. Johnson, 460 U.S. 73 (1983) 2000. 9 Davis v. Alaska, 415 U.S. 308 (1974) 2 5, 9.11 Delaware v. … California, 386 U.S. 18, 24 (1967), dictates reversal only where there is a reasonable possibility, not just any possibility, that the error affected the judgment.

    475 U.S. 673
  • Opposition — Darneille v. Caro

    Supreme Court brief · Opposition · 1980

    Computing Scale Co., 261 U.S. 399, BB. (A923) cccccccvcccs os eee od coer a3 United Airlines, Inc. v. … Computing Scale Co., 261 U.S. 399, 418 (1923); Hamilton-Brown Shoe Co. Vv. wolf Brothers, 240 U.S. 251, 257-258 (1916).

    449 U.S. 825

Ask Donna what matters in the record.

She can read the source against your case and show you exactly where the answer came from.

Ask Donna

A word about cookies

We need a few to keep you signed in and the library working. The rest help us see which pages people use and where they get stuck. They stay off unless you say yes.