Documents

Amicus Curiae Brief — John Sturgeon, Petitioner v. Bert Frost, in His Official Capacity as Alaska Regional Director of the National Park Service, et al.

Supreme Court brief · Amicus Curiae Brief · Aug 14, 2018

“Hovercraft” is defined as a device that is supported by a fan-generated air cushion. … “Most visitors access the park by air taxi, in small aircraft equipped with floats or tundra tires.”

Amicus Curiae Brief — United States, Petitioner v. Zackey Rahimi

Supreme Court brief · Amicus Curiae Brief · Aug 21, 2023

Water Act, 33 U.S.C. 1251 et seq. ................... 16 Miscellaneous: 139 Cong. … The Seventh Amendment has also been extended to government suits seeking civil penalties for Clean Water Act violations, see Tull v.

Amicus Curiae Brief — Tyson Foods, Inc. v. Bouaphakeo ex rel. Situated, 135 S. Ct. 2806 (2015) (No. 14-1146)

Supreme Court brief · Amicus Curiae Brief · 2015

of work, including compensable time spent putting on, taking off and cleaning his or her protective equipment, clothing, or gear.” … For example, a rest period or a lunch period is part of the “workday”, and section 4 of the Portal Act therefore plays no part in determining whether such a period, under the particular circum- stances

Amicus Curiae Brief — Kumho Tire Co. v. Carmichael

Supreme Court brief · Amicus Curiae Brief · 1999

He is a member of the Board of Editors of Heating/Piping/Air Conditioning Magazine. Ernest L. … The major lesson of Daubert is that the district courts must act as “gatekeepers” to ensure the “reliability” of expert testimony submitted to the jury. 505 U.S., fn. 9 at 591.

Amicus Curiae Brief — NetChoice, LLC, dba NetChoice, et al., Petitioners v. Ken Paxton, Attorney General of Texas

Supreme Court brief · Amicus Curiae Brief · Jan 23, 2024

North Carolina, 582 U.S. 98, 104-05 (2017) (cleaned up). … Congress intended the must-carry requirements for cable companies to further three interests: “(1) preserving the benefits of free, over-the-air local broadcast television, (2) promoting the widespread

Amicus Curiae Brief — Wilkinson v. Confederated Tribes & Bands of the Yakima Indian Nation

Supreme Court brief · Amicus Curiae Brief · 1988

16, 20 ESET 20 Clean Water Act, 38 U.S.C. § 1877.............................. 14 Safe Drinking Water Act, 42 U.S.C. § 300j-11_......... 14 Comprehensive Environmental Response, Com- pensation and … Clean Water Act, 33 U.S.C. § 1377; Safe Drinking Water Act, 42 U.S.C. § 300j-11; Comprehensive Environmental Response, Compensation and Liability Act (Superfund), 42 U.S.C. § 9626 et seq.

Amicus Curiae Brief — Southwestern Bell Telephone Co. v. Oklahoma Corp. Commission

Supreme Court brief · Amicus Curiae Brief · 1994

TAOS CAEN ois ingga ee ee ee 8 RevisEpD Mopet STATE ADMINISTRATIVE PROCEDURE ACT Proceeding in the Committee of the Whole, August 23, 1960, at 8 (comments of Professor WIT si vn hs cee ci Daa eee 8 … Revisep Mopet State ADMINISTRATIVE Procepure Act, Proceeding in the Committee of the Whole, August 23, 1960, at 8 (comments of Professor Merrill). 8 The 1981 Model Act is more nuanced in its distinction

Amicus Curiae Brief — McLane Co. v. Equal Emp't Opportunity Comm'n, 137 S. Ct. 30 (2016) (No. 15-1248)

Supreme Court brief · Amicus Curiae Brief · 2016

Cir. 2005)................... 16 FEDERAL STATUTES Freedom of Information Act, Be is Sr I OI aicisccccsccscsennnssosesscuses 15 Title VII of the Civil Rights Act of 1964, 42 U.S.C. §§ 20006 et seq … United Air Lines, Inc., 287 F.3d 643, 653 (7th Cir. 2002) (quoting EEOC v. K-Mart Corp., 694 F.2d 1055, 1066 (6th Cir. 1982)).

Amicus Curiae Brief — Porter v. Nussle

Supreme Court brief · Amicus Curiae Brief · 2002

or not act, e.g., a policy providing that an em- ployee should perform some act if it is ‘reasonably’ warranted by the circumstances.” … Gear; a clean-up of a flooded cell that re- ‘sulted in pinochle cards getting wet; and a search of a cell in which clean and dirty clothes were mixed together. 141 Cong. Rec. at 14 579 (Sen.

Amicus Curiae Brief — American Petroleum Institute, et al., Petitioners v. Environmental Defense Center, et al.

Supreme Court brief · Amicus Curiae Brief · Feb 27, 2023

Ninth Circuit posited will become a reality unless and until an 3 For instance, a final rule setting the procedural requirements for all applications to the agency, conducted pursuant to notice and comment … See National Environmental Policy Act Implementing Regulations Revisions, 87 Fed.

Amicus Curiae Brief — Washington, Petitioner v. United States, et al.

Supreme Court brief · Amicus Curiae Brief · Mar 2, 2018

Lastly, the Ninth Circuit’s reasoning has far-reaching impact as reflected by EPA’s recent reliance on it in imposing federal water quality standards under the Clean Water Act (CWA), 33 U.S.C. §§ 1251- … There, this Court declined to recognize the availability of a laches as a complete defense to a Copyright Act claim for damages brought within the three-year limitation period in 17 U.S.C. § 507(b).

Amicus Curiae Brief — Weyerhaeuser Co. v. U.S. Fish & Wildlife Serv., 139 S. Ct. 45 (2018) (No. 17-71)

Supreme Court brief · Amicus Curiae Brief · 2018

Under one scenario the Service determined that Clean Water Act (“CWA”) Section 404 permits would be necessary before development could occur in Unit 1 -triggering the Endangered Species Act (“ESA”) … The opinion concluded with a warning to overzealous EPA officials: “[T]here is no reason to think that the Clean Water Act was uniquely designed to enable the strong-arming of regulated parties into

Amicus Curiae Brief — United States, Petitioner v. Zayn al-Abidin Muhammad Husayn, aka Abu Zubaydah, et al.

Supreme Court brief · Amicus Curiae Brief · Aug 20, 2021

Sportsflight Air, Inc., No. 509735 (N.Y. App. Div.) .................... 13, 16, 17 C. … Sportsflight Air, Inc., No. 509735, (N.Y. App.

Amicus Curiae Brief — Daren K. Margolin, Director of the Executive Office for Immigration Review, Petitioner v. National Association of Immigration Judges

Supreme Court brief · Amicus Curiae Brief · Jan 30, 2026

Salazar, 555 U.S. 379, 395 (2009) (cleaned up). … Barry III, Comment, The Council of Revision and the Limits of Judicial Power, 56 U. Chi. L.

Amicus Curiae Brief — Monge v. California

Supreme Court brief · Amicus Curiae Brief · 1998

Therefore, this Court has periodically reversed course and overruled prior double jeopardy decisions. See, e.g., United States v. Scott, 437 U. S. 82, 86-87 (1978) (overruling United States v. … As the slate has been “wiped clean,” any legal sentence may be imposed upon retrial.’

Amicus Curiae Brief — United States v. Texas, 136 S. Ct. 2271 (2016) (No. 15-674)

Supreme Court brief · Amicus Curiae Brief · 2016

The recent DAPA and DACA program have no comparable paper trail because they were created without using notice-and-comment rulemaking. … public notice-and-comment?

Amicus Curiae Brief — Lukhard v. Reed

Supreme Court brief · Amicus Curiae Brief · 1987

She also spent her award for transportation expenses, clothing and a few inexpensive toys for her child, and non-Food Stamp items such as cleaning supplies. Ms. … Although it is true that the Secretary’s interpretation of the Social Security Act would be entitled to deference, this deference does not abrogate the Court’s duty to in- terpret the Act in a manner

Amicus Curiae Brief — Connecticut, Petitioner v. Michael Skakel

Supreme Court brief · Amicus Curiae Brief · Sep 10, 2018

Reed, 535 N.W.2d 496, 505 n.14 (1995) (cleaned up) (citing Murray v. Carrier, 477 U.S. 478, 496 (1986), and Kimmelman, 477 U.S. at 386). … In this Court, the majority commented that there was “room for debate about counsel’s obligation to follow at least some of” the leads that Rompilla claimed they should have. Id. at 383.

Amicus Curiae Brief — Duy T. Mai, Petitioner v. United States, et al.

Supreme Court brief · Amicus Curiae Brief · Jan 19, 2021

STATEMENT OF THE CASE Petitioner was involuntarily committed for mental health treatment for a brief period of time when he was a minor. … Id. at 1116 (cleaned up). The lower court also recognized that “§ 922(g)(4)’s prohibition places” a substantial burden on Petitioner’s exercise of Second Amendment rights. Id. at 1115.

Amicus Curiae Brief — McDonough v. Smith (No. 18-485)

Supreme Court brief · Amicus Curiae Brief · 2019

claims based on individual wrongful acts.” bid. … The question before the Court is when that period began to run.