Documents
Briefs, oral arguments, agency decisions and the Federal Register.
3,958 results
0.52s
Appendix — National Labor Relations Board v. J. H. Rutter-Rex Manufacturing Co.
Supreme Court brief · Appendix · 1970
United States, 353 U.S. 657; Ra-Rich Mfg. Corp., 121 NLRB 700. … N.L.R.B., 318 U.S. 177, 198, n.7, citing Pusey Maynes & Breish Company, 1 NLRB 482-487. See also Link Belt Company, 12 NLRB 854, 872; Acme Mattress Com- pany, Inc., 97 NLRB 1439, 1443.
396 U.S. 258Appendix — United States Trust Co. of NY v. New Jersey
Supreme Court brief · Appendix · 1977
Yes, I think the lawsuit filed immediately by the U.S. … On 5-20-76, another appeal to the U.S.
431 U.S. 1Appendix — United States v. Citizens & Southern National Bank
Supreme Court brief · Appendix · 1975
Summons issued and delivered to U.S. Marshal. Jan. 4 Order filed that parties may file with the Clk. certain affidavits in support of and in response to the Mo- tion to Lift the Stay, etc. … Woolsey, you are presently an officer of the Independent Bankers Association of [423] Georgia? A. Yes, I am. Q.
422 U.S. 86Supreme Court brief · Appendix · 1973
U.S. Medical Center in Springfield, Missouri. Q. Of what school or schools are you a graduate Doctor? A. Duke University and Vanderbilt University. Q. When did you graduate from Duke? A. 929. … Now, did you, when you examined him on the 30th, you didn’t [482] see that scar did you? A. I saw it. I made no report in the record about it. I didn’t consider it significant at all. Q.
409 U.S. 224Appendix — United Mine Workers of America v. Gibbs
Supreme Court brief · Appendix · 1966
Lowisville ¢ N.R.R., 213 U.S. 175, 191, 53 L. … Russell, 356 U.S. 634; United Construction Workers v. Laburnum Corp., 347 U.S. 656. ...” In our decision in Price v.
383 U.S. 715Appendix — United States v. General Motors Corp.
Supreme Court brief · Appendix · 1966
Gilliatt and dated De- ert Me ee eee Ok 1314734 No. 115—Letter to “General Sales Managers, U.S. Car Diyisions’” from H. E. … U.S. Car Division Discussed with Murray, Averill, Kennard Hudgins, Feely. {Handwritten in Right-Hand Corner.]
384 U.S. 127Appendix — Detroit Edison Co. v. National Labor Relations Board
Supreme Court brief · Appendix · 1979
We estimate what 30 degrees is and set it up that way, and [482] we run calibrations to make sure we’re right. Q. Now, these little arithmetic questions. … (D) 423 25.
440 U.S. 301Appendix — Western Pacific Railroad v. United States
Supreme Court brief · Appendix · 1965
Only the U.S. Pipe and Foundry. Q. The rest of them did not? A. No, sir, they didn’t locate on our line. Q. … (fol. 423] Q. And why do you not agree with it? A. Well, the points that I just read off are not exclusive points on the Northern Pacific.
382 U.S. 237Appendix — Johnson v. United States
Supreme Court brief · Appendix · 1971
United States, 93 U.S. App. … United States, 77 U.S. App.
401 U.S. 846Appendix — Commissioner v. National Alfalfa Dehydrating & Milling Co.
Supreme Court brief · Appendix · 1974
U.S. 130 Fed. 2d 883 and Southern Fertilizer & Chemical Co. v. Edwards, 55-1 USTC Para. 49133. … U.S. GOVERNMENT PRINTING OFFICE : 1973-—-O-524-785
417 U.S. 134Appendix — Liberty Mutual Insurance v. Wetzel
Supreme Court brief · Appendix · 1976
U.S. v. Diebold, Inco, porated, 369 U. S. 654 (1962). 7. Phoenix Savings and Loan, Inc. vy. Aetna Casualty and Surety Company, 381 F. 2d 245 (C. A. 4, 1967). 8. … CES 8 saisnlpy oul ‘pred 0g pros Cory: cen S$idvs 2N1 ONINIVIOO on “‘su0ysod judwabevew P “yds Oy OU'Us-919) K2E2 10 8128, on1 F~8 toa sh eOsJusd earns 104 19180py 4119917 Ou WOODS , qwasd4; PS ote2 423
424 U.S. 737Appendix — National Labor Relations Board v. J. H. Rutter-Rex Manufacturing Co.
Supreme Court brief · Appendix · 1970
il e BO ow OE e | Te Ty NANO | HLH me HH 523 | +H 1 | ; 4 es | 11493695) | | fo 482 " 1 s | 4 F-4 7 6 . … Babcock & Wilcox Co., 351 U.S. 105, 112, but they are not left to sheer acceptance of the Board’s conclusions,’ Republic Aviation Corp. v. Labor Board, 324 U.S. 793, 803.
396 U.S. 258Appendix — Securities & Exchange Commission v. New England Electric System
Supreme Court brief · Appendix · 1966
Secondly, the gas companies in New England are adding new customers at a slower rate than in most sections of the U.S. … For example, Wachuset area—482 percent, Northampton area—445 percent, Layrence area—383 per- cent, Norwood area—327 percent.
384 U.S. 176Appendix — Idaho Sheet Metal Works, Inc. v. Wirtz
Supreme Court brief · Appendix · 1966
This cause came on to be heard by the Court sitting without a jury on May 21, 1962, upon complaint under the Fair Labor Standards Act of 1938, as amended (29 U.S. … | — 279a — Testimony of Walter F. deBruin 423 Q. Yes. Did that letter from Mr.
383 U.S. 963Supreme Court brief · Appendix · 1972
Well, during the past five years, has Mark Young ever come in and made financial Ke 423 reports to the membership? I don’t remember any. … “482 Isn’t he financial secretary of the local? Yes, he’s. financial secretary of the local.
406 U.S. 945Appendix — Alcolac, Inc. v. Elam
Supreme Court brief · Appendix · 1989
Powell, 574 S.W.2d 423, 426(3,4] (Mo. bance 1978). 108m5. Const. Art. V § 3 (1945, amended 1982); State v. … Crenshaw, U.S.
493 U.S. 817Appendix — NLRB v. Yeshiva Univ.
Supreme Court brief · Appendix · 1980
423 MR. KRAMER: Math and science education depart- ment, which is one department. Q Is that to offset the administrative functions of the chairman? A Yes. … A The university decided to have a uniform salary agreement—salary arrangement, rather, for its faculty 482 at least so I was informed, and so as I think was in earlier testimony as was made clear
444 U.S. 672Appendix — United States v. Grinnell Corp.
Supreme Court brief · Appendix · 1966
Little, Ine. report on U.S. Mar- ket for electric protection services, 1961 to 1962 5724 3863 WW-1—Biographical summaries of Messrs. … SF319, 323, 324, 326, 330, 382, 423.
384 U.S. 563Supreme Court brief · Appendix · 1979
A I think it would be an unfortunate experience. 423 [158] MR. BALLIRO: That is all I have, Your Honor. MR. COLE: May I have re-direct on that issue, Your Honor? JUDGE ALDRICH: You may. … I don't happen to remember the precise contours of that case. 482 MR. COLE: I am sorry and I will try to explain.
443 U.S. 622Appendix — United States v. Topco Associates, Inc.
Supreme Court brief · Appendix · 1972
Morton (Washington) ar - (Kentucky) e U.S. Senate . , U.S, Senate - - Hon, Gate W. Mors (Wyoming) Hon. Roman L. Hruska A (Nebraska) U.S. Senate . _ US. Senate ‘How. Pup A. Hine —— U.S. … House of tbasiceieniatbees U.S. House of aici eiamanbae _ > Hoy. ,Caruerine May (Washington) ‘. . US. ‘House, of ee; \ =. ar _” How. BensaMrn 8, ROSENTHAL (New York) ; \ te - U.S.
405 U.S. 596
Ask Donna what matters in the record.
She can read the source against your case and show you exactly where the answer came from.