Documents
Briefs, oral arguments, agency decisions and the Federal Register.
7,792 results
0.15s
Amicus Curiae Brief — Richards v. Wisconsin
Supreme Court brief · Amicus Curiae Brief · 1997
Cruz, 805 F.2d 1464 (11th Cir. 1986), cert. denied, 481 U.S. 1006 & 482 U.S. 930 . ͤ— ͤ ˙ V W - 14 United States v. … United States, 391 U.S. 585, 588-589 (1968); Miller, 357 U.S. at 306; Wong Sun v. United States, 371 U.S. 471, 482-484 (1963). 10 B.
520 U.S. 385Amicus Curiae Brief — Zoning Board of Adjustment v. DeBlasio
Supreme Court brief · Amicus Curiae Brief · 1995
Mississippi, 456 U.S. 742 (1982) ........ 8 First English Evangelical Lutheran Church of Glendale v. County of Los Angeles, 482 U.S. IN A a gar hea ge cas a leas oo hoe ks 7 Genty v. … County of Los Angeles, 482 U.S. 304 (1987) (clause extends to temporary takings). * The takings clause has been made applicable to the States through the Fourteenth Amendment. See Chicago B & Q.
516 U.S. 937Amicus Curiae Brief — Kunstler v. Britt (Nos. 90-807, 90-802, 90-1094)
Supreme Court brief · Amicus Curiae Brief · 1990
Gibbons, Inc., 482 I a hr oe tn ee oan ate eas 15 Hensley v.Eckerhart, 103 S.Ct. 1933 (1983) ........ 12 In Re: Kunstler, No. 89-2815 (4th Cir. … Gibbons, Inc., 482 U.S. 437, 444 (1987)("Congress meant to impose rigid controls on cost-shifting in federal courts.”).
Amicus Curiae Brief — Deboer v. Snyder, 135 S. Ct. 1040 (2015) (No. 14-571)
Supreme Court brief · Amicus Curiae Brief · 2015
Safley, 482 U.S. 78, 95 (1987) (“the decision to marry is a fundamental right”); Meyer v. Nebraska, 262 U.S. 390, 399 (1923) (recognizing “right . . . to marry”); Maynard v. … Cal. 2012) (citing 388 U.S. at 12). In Turner, “the fundamental right was the right to marry, not the right to inmate marriage.” Id. (citing 482 U.S. at 94-96).
Amicus Curiae Brief — Hodgson v. Minnesota
Supreme Court brief · Amicus Curiae Brief · 1990
Safley, 482 U.S. 78, 94-99 (1987); Moore v. City of East Cleveland, 431 U.S. 494 (1977); Pierce v. Society of Sisters, 268 U.S. 510 (1925). … See Bose Corp., 466 U.S. at 501; Turner, 482 U.S. at 93-94 n.*. '?
497 U.S. 417Amicus Curiae Brief — Batson v. Kentucky
Supreme Court brief · Amicus Curiae Brief · 1986
Partida, 430 U.S. 482 (1977)... ......4.. 10 Commonwealth v. Brown, 11 Mass. App. Ct. 288, 416 SRD DE oc cccncesesescnensoeneceesonss 25 Commonwealth v. DiMatteo, 12 Mass. App. … Partida, 430 U.S. 482, 503 (1977) (Marshall, J., concurring). See also Babcock, Voir Dire: Pre- serving ‘Its Wonderful Power,’ 27 Stan. L.
476 U.S. 79Amicus Curiae Brief — Obergefell v. Hodges
Supreme Court brief · Amicus Curiae Brief · 2015
Memo in Support of Summary Judgment, 13-482-CWD, Dkt No. 57-2, at 35 (D. Idaho Feb. 18, 2014). … Otter’s Response Brief, 13-482-CWD, Dkt No. 81, at 9 n. 18.
576 U.S. 644Amicus Curiae Brief — Majestic Realty Co., et al., Petitioners v. Alex Salazar
Supreme Court brief · Amicus Curiae Brief · Jun 25, 2026
Los Angeles Cnty., 482 U.S. 304 (1987) . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 18 Golden Gateway Center v. … Los Angeles Cnty., 482 U.S. 304, 318 (1987).
Amicus Curiae Brief — Abitron Austria GmbH, et al., Petitioners v. Hetronic International, Inc.
Supreme Court brief · Amicus Curiae Brief · Dec 27, 2022
Punchgini, Inc., 482 F.3d 135 (2d Cir. 2007)......................................................... 10 Kiobel v. … ITC Ltd. v. 9 Punchgini, Inc., 482 F.3d 135, 142 (2d Cir. 2007); see also J. McCarthy, Trademarks and Unfair Competition § 29:2, at 29-6 (5th ed. 2022) (McCarthy); L.
Supreme Court brief · Amicus Curiae Brief · Jun 17, 2025
That decision, which hinged on the distinction between government and private speech, was litigated "in the shadow" of the Establishment Clause (id. at 482 (Scalia, J., concurring)), “with one eye on [ … Id. at 482 (Scalia, J., concurring). The City’s intent was to visually describe its history, not to prescribe religious doctrine or to echo the words engraved on the donated monument.
Supreme Court brief · Amicus Curiae Brief · Feb 27, 2020
Texas, 441 U.S. 418 (1979) ....................11 Atkins v. Virginia, 536 U.S. 304 (2002)............... passim Brumfield v. Cain, 135 S. Ct. 2269 (2015) ....................2 Cooper v. … Texas, 441 U.S. 418, 423–24 (1979)). 12 under a preponderance standard, Hill was intellectually disabled.23 Georgia prosecutors appealed both rulings to the Georgia Supreme Court, which reversed the lower
Amicus Curiae Brief — Anderson v. Creighton
Supreme Court brief · Amicus Curiae Brief · 1987
Ohio, 392 U.S. 1 Texas v. Brown, 460 U.S. 730 Trejo v. Perez 693 F.2d 482 United States v. Brignoni - Ponce, 422 U.S. 873 United States v. … United States, 338 U.S. 160 (1949); Beck v. Ohio, 379 U.S. 89 (1964); Illinois v. Gates, 462 U.S. 213 (1983).
483 U.S. 635Amicus Curiae Brief — City of Chicago v. Billish
Supreme Court brief · Amicus Curiae Brief · 1993
Moody, 422 U.S. 405 SE eretn te aaae cial a eee tae pect oral Deno. 11 Castaneda v. Partida, 4830 U.S. 482 (1976) 9 City of Richmond v. J.A. … See Hazelwood, 433 U.S. at 309 n.14; Castaneda v. Partida, 430 U.S. 482, 496-97 n.17 (1976).
510 U.S. 908Amicus Curiae Brief — Brown v. Pro Football, Inc.
Supreme Court brief · Amicus Curiae Brief · 1996
Comne, 482 U.S. 1 (1987) ...... siecle glee elder acne n eA aE 14 Gateway Coal Co. v. UMW, 414 U.S. 368 (1974)... 2 General Ore, Inc., 126 N.L.R.B. 172 (1960)... 25 Golden State Transit Corp. v. … Coyne, 482 U.S. 1 (1987); Metro- politan Life Ins. Co. v. Massachusetts, 471 U.S. 724 (1985).
518 U.S. 231Amicus Curiae Brief — Zobrest v. Catalina Foothills School Dist.
Supreme Court brief · Amicus Curiae Brief · 1993
Felton, 473 U.S. 402 (1985)... ...... 11, 12, 14 Califano v. Yamasaki, 422 U.S. 682 (1979)... 22... 10 Edwards v. Aguillard, 482 U.S. $78 (1987) ........... 1 Goodall by Goodall v. … Aguillard, 482 U.S. 578, 636 (1987) (Scalia, J., dissenting), ASBA urges this Court to continue to recognize the three-part approach — purpose, effect and entanglement — as the proper framework of analysis
509 U.S. 1Supreme Court brief · Amicus Curiae Brief · 2017
California, 283 U.S. 423 (1981) .....-ccccccccceesereee 29 Arkansas La. Gas Co. v. Hall, 453 U.S. 571 (1981)............ 29 Bates v. … California, 283 U.S. 423, 451 (1931) (“The United States may perform its functions without conforming to the police regula- tions of a state.”); Helfrich, 804 F.3d at 1100 n.7 (col- lecting cases).
Amicus Curiae Brief — Allied-Signal, Inc. v. Director, Div. of Taxation
Supreme Court brief · Amicus Curiae Brief · 1992
Washington, 377 U.S. 436 eseuustenemeasecs 5 Goodman v. Lukens Steel Co., 482 U.S. 656 (1987) .. 15 Hans Rees’ Sons, Inc. v. North Carolina, 283 U.S. EE EE SESS 6, 23 Helvering v. … Lukens Steel Co., 482 US. 656, 659-62 (1987); Patterson v. McLean Credit Union, 491 U.S. 164, 173 (1989). Thus, this Court should not lightly upset this area of the law.
504 U.S. 768Amicus Curiae Brief — Michigan Beer & Wine Wholesalers Assn. v. Heald
Supreme Court brief · Amicus Curiae Brief · 2004
United States, 495 U.S. 423 (1990)........ 20 Pennsylvania Dep't of Corrections v. Yeskey, 524 aa SU CMU ciceichinicheciehinelientapheiment deh elas 14 Philadelphia v. … United States, 495 U.S. 423, 439 (1990) (plurality) (“Congress has the power to confer immunity from state regulation on Government suppliers beyond that conferred by the Constitution alone, even when
543 U.S. 954Supreme Court brief · Amicus Curiae Brief · Jan 21, 2026
Schempp, 374 U.S. 203 (1963) . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 18, 22 Edwards v. Aguillard, 482 U.S. 578 (1987) . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 19 Engel v. … Aguillard, 482 U.S. 578 (1987), this Court struck down a Louisiana law requiring public schools that taught the theory of evolution to also teach the theory of creation. • In Lee v.
Amicus Curiae Brief — Tanco v. Haslam, 135 S. Ct. 1040 (2015) (No. 14-562)
Supreme Court brief · Amicus Curiae Brief · 2015
Safley, 482 U.S. 78 (1987) ...................200-. 28 United States v. Carolene Products Co., ee rs Be Giicicicitnccieedteetamibiieen tea 26 United States v. … Safley, 482 U.S. 78, 95 (1987) (holding that incarcerated persons have the right to marry); Windsor, 133 S.
Ask Donna what matters in the record.
She can read the source against your case and show you exactly where the answer came from.