Documents

Appellants Reply Brief — Able v. Texas

Supreme Court brief · Appellants Reply Brief · 1983

knows no legal reason why the appli- cation should not be renewed, the li- cense may then be renewed for a period of 24 months from the date of expiration and may be renewed subsequently each 24 months … [Acts 1973, 63rd Leg., p. 083, ch. 399, § 1, eff. Jan. 1, 1974.] § 12.23.

Opposition — Bendetti v. United States

Supreme Court brief · Opposition · 1981

Petitioners, too, agreed to this arrangement (12/10/79 Tr. 20-24). … United States, 380 U.S. 24, 34-35 (1965)). Accordingly, the Court’s decision in Wood .v.

Petition for Writ of Certiorari — Ballard v. Garrett

Supreme Court brief · Petition for Writ of Certiorari · 2003

Ramirez, 418 U.S. 24, 39-40, 94 S.Ct. 2655, 2664, 41 L.Ed.2d 551 (1974); Hansberry v. Lee, supra. … Ramirez, 418 U.S. 24, 39-40, 94 S.Ct. 2655, 2664, 41 L.Ed.2d 551 (1974); Hansberry v.

Amicus Curiae Brief — Charles G. Moore, et ux., Petitioners v. United States

Supreme Court brief · Amicus Curiae Brief · Sep 6, 2023

Florida, 399 U.S. 78 (1970). … , Gallup (May 24, 2023), http://bit.ly/3yvPrvr.

Amicus Curiae Brief — Robert A. Rucho, et al., Applicants v. Common Cause, et al.

Supreme Court brief · Amicus Curiae Brief · Jan 16, 2018

Perry, 548 U.S. 399 (2006) .............................8 League of Women Voters v. Commonwealth, No. 159 MM 2017 (Pa. … Aug. 24, 2017) (three-judge court). The court issued the stay because “the [U.S. Supreme] Court's analysis [in Gill v.

Petition for Writ of Certiorari — Fairmont Glass Works v. Cub Fork Coal Co.

Supreme Court brief · Petition for Writ of Certiorari · 1933

Petitioner answered by denial (R. 31), counterclaim (R. 21-24), and certain affirma- tive defenses (R. 31-37). … Fraloff, 100 U. 8. 24, 31.

Amicus Curiae Brief — Cutberto Viramontes, et al., Petitioners v. Cook County, Illinois, et al.

Supreme Court brief · Amicus Curiae Brief · Aug 31, 2026

District of Columbia, 670 7 F. 3d 1244, 1287, 399 U.S. App. D.C. 314 (CADC 2011) (Kavanaugh, J., dissenting); see also Garland v. Cargill, 602 U.S. 406, 430-431, 144 S. … Bruen, 597 at 24, citing, Konigsberg, 366 U.S., at 50, n. 10, 81 S. Ct. 997, 6 L.Ed.2d 105.

Petition for a Writ of Certiorari — micro_IA40385608_0097

Supreme Court brief · Petition for a Writ of Certiorari · 1974

Pen nsylvania, 382 U.S. 399 (1966) ; Lanzetta v. New Jerse y, 806 U.S. 451 (1939). Similarly, Dr. … Bricf for Respondent, pp. 22-24, People v. Ketchum, supra.

Petition for Writ of Certiorari — Walter Barton, Petitioner v. William Stange, Warden

Supreme Court brief · Petition for Writ of Certiorari · May 18, 2020

Wainwright, 477 U.S. 399 (1986) ............................................ 9-11, 24-25, 27-28 Lonchar v. … Wainwright, 477 U.S. 399, 409-410 (1986); Panetti v. Quarterman, 551 U.S. 930, 934 (2007); Madison v. Alabama. 139 S.Ct. 718, 24 728 (2019).

Petition for Writ of Certiorari — Jakari Alexander Lee, Petitioner v. United States

Supreme Court brief · Petition for Writ of Certiorari · Aug 18, 2025

Id. at 24. … See Petition for Writ 25 of Certiorari at 22–24, Garland v.

Record and brief — Magwood v. Patterson

Supreme Court brief · Record and brief · 2010

Ayzer, 399 So.2d at 339. … Br. 24.

International Fisheries; Pacific Tuna Fisheries; 2022-2024 Commercial Fishing Restrictions for Pacific Bluefin Tuna in the Eastern Pacific Ocean

Federal Register · Rule · Aug 5, 2022

If the annual limit is between 297-399 mt, the initial trip limit will 15 mt, and the trip limit will be reduced as follows: • January-June: If cumulative catch is within 220 mt of the annual limit, the … Under this final rule, e-tickets must be submitted within 24 hours if any Pacific bluefin tuna is included in a landing into California.

UNITED STATES TAX COURT

Agency decision · Agency decision

Memo. 2019-24 UNITED STATES TAX COURT KATHERINE DENISE HENRY, Petitioner, AND TIMMY H. BLACK, Intervenor v. COMMISSIONER OF INTERNAL REVENUE, Respondent Docket No. 20138-16. … On March 24, 2014, respondent sent petitioner and intervenor a "Notice CP2000" proposing a deficiency of $2,243 attributable to the unreported wage income from the church.

Amicus Curiae Brief — California v. Krivda

Supreme Court brief · Amicus Curiae Brief · 1972

Moore, 35 Ml. 2d 399, 220 N.E. 2d 443 (1966) ii. Stanley v. Georgia, 394 U.S. 557 (1969)...........-.. li Terry v. Ohio, 392 U.S. 1 (1968)... ...........- ee eee 7 Trask v. … Rev. 45 (1957)..............-05: 5 Plumb, ‘‘Illegal Enforcement of the Law,’’ 24 Cornell ee a | Ter!

Opposition — Griffith v. United States

Supreme Court brief · Opposition · 1975

Illinois, 399 U.S. 235, 243; United States v. Bristol, 473 F. 2d 439, 445 (C.A. 5). 4 3. … Ct. 754, 24 L. Ed. 2d 753 (1969) ; Bruce vs. U.S., 351 F. 2d 318, 5th Cir. (1965), Cert. den., 384 U.S. 921, 86 S. Ct. 1370, 16 L. Ed. 2d 441 (1966).

Brief for the Respondent in Opposition — Sandberg v. New England Novelty Co.

Supreme Court brief · Brief for the Respondent in Opposition · 1944

United States, 264 Fed. 399. In this connection the attention of the Court is directed to the principle that is established in the case of Erie Rail- road Co. v. … The petition for contempt was filed and an order of notice was issued thereon on October 24, 1941 (Record, page 34).

Amicus Curiae Brief — Robert A. Rucho, et al., Appellants v. Common Cause, et al.

Supreme Court brief · Amicus Curiae Brief · Feb 11, 2019

Florida, 399 U.S. 78, 100 (1970). 5 Justices typically spoke unanimously.11 Only about 8% of cases included a dissenting opinion. … Id. at 534. 24 Republican Party of Minnesota, 536 U.S. at 777–78. 10 ought to be able to ensure that their cases are decided in an ideologically-balanced way.

Opposition Brief — New Mexico Taxation & Revenue Department v. Ramah Navajo School Board, Inc.

Supreme Court brief · Opposition Brief · 1999

After dismissing claims based on 42 U.S.C. § 1983, the District Court rendered summary judgment for Petitioner Taxation & Revenue Department on September 24, 1997. … These steps — from bid solicitation to delivery — were often accomplished the same day and almost always within 24 hours.

Brief for the United States in Opposition — Riggs v. United States

Supreme Court brief · Brief for the United States in Opposition · 1971

United States, 399 F. 24.93, certiorari . © denied, 393 U.S. 1025 __..... + Parker Vv. United States, 252 F. 2d 680, certiorari denied, 356 U.S. 964 - —_ “SEL ar 8 Remmer v. … Lennon, 246 F. 2d 24, — Gael, BT Te cp i es are. . United, States v. McGuire, 381 F. 2d OR re 8 United States v. Shavin, 287 F. 2d 647 _.- 8 ' United States v.

Appendix — Koran v. United States

Supreme Court brief · Appendix · 1971

United States, make a print of an obligation of the United States, to wit: a $5.00 Federal Reserve Note drawn on the Federal Reserve Bank of New York, Series 1950E, Check Letter “P,” Face Plate No. 399 … Whether the “Con- current sentence” doctrine enunciated in Hirabayashi has continiung validity in light of subsequent decisions will be argued before the Su- preme Court on March 24, 1969.