Documents
Briefs, oral arguments, agency decisions and the Federal Register.
10,000+ results
0.08s
Supreme Court brief · Petition for Writ of Certiorari · Jan 28, 2023
Vol. 2 at 24-25, 41 and 411. See also Supra at 11, Entries #13 and #16. … Matter of Kenney, 399 Mass. 431, 436, 504 N.E. 2d 652 (1987). Citing Matthews v. Eldridge, 424 U.S. 319, 333 (1976).
Petition for Writ of Certiorari — John Wayne Morgan, Jr., Petitioner v. United States
Supreme Court brief · Petition for Writ of Certiorari · Jan 16, 2026
Id. at 24. … June 24, 2024). Even beyond new prosecutions, § 922(g)(1)’s reach is staggering.
Supreme Court brief · Brief for the Respondents in Opposition · 1949
Lafount’s acquisition of 400 shares of Class B stock was reported to the Commission on Mareh 31, 1937 (R. 399). … For this reason the “Amount Actually Paid for Stock” by Lafount was reported as $20,000 (R. 112, 399).
337 U.S. 901Petitioners Brief — Pierce v. United States (No. 36)
Supreme Court brief · Petitioners Brief · 1940
E UR aa oda ee 20, 31, 32 Ot 21 EI ero aoe eS FERRE es ROME 21, 24, 32 Revenue Act of 1939, c. 247, 53 Stat. 862, Sec. 212______- 24 Internal Revenue Code, Sections 24 (b) (1), 117... -..--- 19, 25 … (2d) at 398, 399.
Respondents Brief — Greg Abbott, Governor of Texas, et al., Appellants v. Shannon Perez, et al.
Supreme Court brief · Respondents Brief · Mar 28, 2018
Strickland, 556 U.S. 1, 24 (2009). … Comm. to End the War in Viet Nam, 399 U.S. 383, 388 (1970) (citing Fed. R. Civ. P. 65(d)).
Petition — Zeldes v. Manufacturers Hanover Trust Co.
Supreme Court brief · Petition · 1977
See gen- erally New Haven Inclusion Cases, 399 U.S. 392, 408-410 (1970). … (Trustee’s Statement, at 24).
434 U.S. 833Jurisdictional StatementO — Keyishian v. Board of Regents of Univ. of State of NY
Supreme Court brief · Jurisdictional StatementO · 1966
S. 485 . .9, 17, 18, 19, 3 21, 22, 24, 26 Baggett v. Bullitt, 377 U. S. 360 3, 9, 24, 27, 35, 45 Baggett v. Bullitt, 219 F. Supp. 4339. 35 Bailey v. Richardson, 182 F. 24 46, 341 U. … Brief, p. 24.
385 U.S. 589Opposition Brief — Hamilton v. City of Romulus
Supreme Court brief · Opposition Brief · 2011
Pellullo, 399 F.3 197, 222 (3d Cir. 2005) cert den. 546 U.S. 1137; 126 Ct. 1141; 163 L. … Record 333, Memo/Order 7, pp 16-17, 24, 26; Record 335, Memo/Order, p 4 iting Record 201-5, Hamilton 12/11/06 dep, pp 39 196: Record 335.
563 U.S. 1021Supreme Court brief · Amicus Curiae Brief · Mar 27, 2026
Novo Nordisk A/S, 566 U.S. 399 (2012) .................................................. 4, 7 Cox Commc’ns, Inc. v. Sony Music Ent., No. 24-171, slip op. (U.S. … Sony Music Ent., No. 24-171, slip op. at 7 (U.S.
Petition for Writ of Certiorari — Pacelli v. United States
Supreme Court brief · Petition for Writ of Certiorari · 1973
Kietzke, 186 N.W.2d 551 (S.D. 1971) ........ 24 State v. Ray, 249 So.2d 540 (La. 1971) .............. 24 State v. Williams, 246 So.2d 4 (La. 1971) ............ 4 Steele v. … Lipscomb, (Continued on Page 24) Pe ae ee eee ee aera a 24 conceded—the conviction should not be allowed to stand.
410 U.S. 983Petition for Writ of Certiorari — Kirsh v. City of New York
Supreme Court brief · Petition for Writ of Certiorari · 1998
Oklahoma, 520 U.S. 397 (1987) ............... 24 Bouie v. City of Columbia, 378 U.S. 347 (1964) ......... 29 City of Canton, Ohio v. Harris, 489 U.S. 378 (1989) ...... 24 County of Sacramento v. … New York, 399 U.S. 66, 68-69 (1970). : 29 barred from going % mile of the building, has no set end.
525 U.S. 1054Supreme Court brief · Petition · 1977
Fowler, 439 F. 24 133 (9th Cir. 1971) 28 United States ex rel. Haynes Vv. McKendrick, 461 FP. 24 152 (24 Cis. 1973). ~ 2-22 ee 2 8 e 8 © * 17,26 United States ex rel. Kirby v. … Mulligan, 399 F.Supp. 1285 (D. N.J. 1975).
430 U.S. 704Petition for Writ of Certiorari — Andrey Bridges, Petitioner v. David W. Gray, Warden
Supreme Court brief · Petition for Writ of Certiorari · Nov 3, 2020
Dempsey. 261 U.S. 86; 24 Mooney v. Holohan. 294 U.S. 103; 24 Bowen v. Johnston. 306 U.S. 19, 24. 24 Actual Innocence. 24 U.S. v. Friday. D.C. … Marruio. 86 N.M. 399, 524 P.2d 1015, 1019; 24 b) False Imprisonment, where Bridges is unlawfully under detention, whereby he is denied his personal liberty, “Quoting”; Dupler v.
Respondents Brief — Perry v. Louisiana
Supreme Court brief · Respondents Brief · 1990
Wainwright, 477 U.S. 399 (1986), does not require more. … Wainwright, 477 U.S. 399 (1986).
498 U.S. 38Petition for Writ of Certiorari — Gilbert v. Colvert
Supreme Court brief · Petition for Writ of Certiorari · 1990
Colvert, Appeal No. 67,525, on January 24, 1989, Appendix C hereto. … Green (1970) 399 U.S. 149, 158, quoting Wig- more.
494 U.S. 1056Amicus Curiae Brief — Oregon v. Mitchell
Supreme Court brief · Amicus Curiae Brief · 1970
Kolodziejski, 399 U.S. 204 (1970) ....& 23 Davis v. Beason, 133 U.S. 333, 10 S.Ct. 299, 33 L.ed. 637 (1890) 2 Dreuding v. … Kolodziejski, 399 U.S. 204 (1970) <cecsocssccue 8, 23, a Pope v. Williams, 193 U.S. 621, 24 S.Ct. 573, 48 L.ed. 817 (1904) 2 Prichard v.
400 U.S. 801Opposition — Figueredo v. South Florida Beverage Corp.
Supreme Court brief · Opposition · 1982
Florida, 399 U.S. 78 (1970) 8 Yadav v. … App. 24-26).
459 U.S. 881Reply Brief — White v. Illinois
Supreme Court brief · Reply Brief · 1992
(State’s Brief at 24) More- over, Respondent’s proposal violates the Sixth Amend- ment and would subvert the truth-seeking process. 1. … Inadi, 475 U.S. at 399.
502 U.S. 346Respondents Brief — United States v. Watson
Supreme Court brief · Respondents Brief · 1975
Appendix, page 23-24. Respondent was then removed from the restaurant and given his Miranda warnings. … Maroney, 399 U.S. 42 (1970); Carroll v. United States, 267. U.S. 137 (1925).
423 U.S. 411Opposition Brief — Hill v. Florida
Supreme Court brief · Opposition Brief · 1997
Moran, 509 U.S. 389, 399 (1993), the Florida Supreme Court concluded: In sum, we conclude that the inquiry in this case complied with both Faretta and rule 3.111(d). … The motion was called up for a hearing on October 24, 1994, and granted on such date.
522 U.S. 907
Ask Donna what matters in the record.
She can read the source against your case and show you exactly where the answer came from.