Documents

Amicus Curiae Brief — West Virginia, et al., Petitioners v. B. P. J., By Her Next Friend and Mother, Heather Jackson

Supreme Court brief · Amicus Curiae Brief · Sep 19, 2025

Id. at 469 (cleaned up). The Court said this argument was a potential basis to distinguish the NCAA from an entity addressed in United States DOT v. … funding to the NCAA or other such governing bodies, is the Civil Rights Restoration Act (CRRA).

Amicus Curiae Brief — Shawn Montgomery, Petitioner v. Caribe Transport II, LLC, et al.

Supreme Court brief · Amicus Curiae Brief · Jan 21, 2026

While the FMCSA compiles data on carriers, Congress previously recognized, in the Fixing America’s Surface Transportation Act (“FAST Act”), Pub. … Brokers merely act as intermediaries . . . .

Amicus Curiae Brief — California Restaurant Association, Inc., Petitioner v. Superior Court of California, Los Angeles County, et al.

Supreme Court brief · Amicus Curiae Brief · Sep 2, 2021

California Air Resources Board, 111 Cal.App.4th 1255, 1265 (2003). … Both of these statutes require that health officers act when “necessary.”

Amicus Curiae Brief — Brutsche v. Cleveland-Perdue

Supreme Court brief · Amicus Curiae Brief · 1990

The rotating physi- cians stepped up their responsibilities until] another full-time physician could be hired; two more inmates died during this period. In August 1975, petitioner hired Dr. … In- deed, no argument could have been made in Zweibon that there was anything approaching a consensus supporting recognition of a constitutional right dur- ing the period of the conduct at issue.

Amicus Curiae Brief — Gilbert P. Hyatt, Petitioner v. John A. Squires, Under Secretary of Commerce for Intellectual Property and Director, United States Patent and Trademark Office

Supreme Court brief · Amicus Curiae Brief · Apr 3, 2026

(cleaned up). -8compliance with its regulations, including that any applicant submission is not “being presented … to cause unnecessary delay,” in contravention of 37 C.F.R. § 11.18(b)(2)(i). … Some rules employ words requiring applicants to act “promptly,”14 to be “diligent,”15 act in “good faith,”16 13 Br. of SBTC, Addendum 2. 14 See 37 C.F.R. §§ 1.6(f)(1)(i); 1.8(b)(1); 1.10(c)(1), (d)(1)

Amicus Curiae Brief — Burlington Northern Railroad v. Brotherhood of Maintenance of Way Employes

Supreme Court brief · Amicus Curiae Brief · 1987

The Board issued its recommendations to the President on June 21, initiating another 30-day cooling off period in which all self-help or other displacement of the status quo is forbidden. … Department of Transportation in the Texas Air-Eastern Acquisition Case, Docket No. 48825.

Amicus Curiae Brief — Chad Wolf, Acting Secretary of Homeland Security, et al., Petitioners v. Martin Jonathan Batalla Vidal, et al.

Supreme Court brief · Amicus Curiae Brief · Dec 6, 2018

” requiring “notice and comment.” … Since the DAPA policy was not implemented in accordance with “notice and comment” requirements, Judge Hanen concluded that it was invalid.

Amicus Curiae Brief — Gundy v. United States (No. 17-6086)

Supreme Court brief · Amicus Curiae Brief · 2019

Rev. 265, 307 (2001) (cleaned up). … When government acts in excess of lawful powers, that liberty is at stake.” Bond v. United States, 564 U.S. 211, 221—22 (2011) (cleaned up).

Amicus Curiae Brief — Pan Am Corp. v. Section 1110 Parties

Supreme Court brief · Amicus Curiae Brief · 1991

A consensus has clearly developed contrary to the position we advocate on this appeal, including comprehensive opinions by district courts acting as appellate courts in the Sec- ond and Third Circuits … The delay arising out of carrying this case over the Court’s summer recess would inflict irreparable injury on lessors and would impose an ill-advised period of new uncertainties on airline financing

Amicus Curiae Brief — Department of Homeland Security, et al., Petitioners v. Regents of the University of California, et al.

Supreme Court brief · Amicus Curiae Brief · Dec 6, 2018

” requiring “notice and comment.” … Since the DAPA policy was not implemented in accordance with “notice and comment” requirements, Judge Hanen concluded that it was invalid.

Amicus Curiae Brief — Cipollone v. Liggett Group, Inc.

Supreme Court brief · Amicus Curiae Brief · 1992

State tort law was also in a period of change. … Ouellette, 479 U.S. 481, 494-97 (1987) (Court finds partial preemption, despite savings clause, by examining congressional objectives under Clean Water Act).

Amicus Curiae Brief — Geduldig v. Aiello

Supreme Court brief · Amicus Curiae Brief · 1974

C. guidelines are not legisla- five rules as the courts and commentators have defined that tem, but are merely expressions of current opinions by the administrative officers as to the meaning of the … Delta Air Lines, Inc., supra. 18 I. AN EMPLOYER NEED NOT PROVIDE FRINGE BENEFITS FOR MATERNITY OR CONDITIONS RELATED TO PREG.

Amicus Curiae Brief — Weyerhaeuser Company, Petitioner v. United States Fish and Wildlife Service, et al.

Supreme Court brief · Amicus Curiae Brief · Jul 6, 2018

Br. at 42 (noting that they could “forego [Clean Water Act] permitting or other federal involvement and continue to operate Unit 1 as a commercial forest”). … Some species require transitory or ephemeral habitats that may go 25 long periods without habitation.

Amicus Curiae Brief — Williams & Wilkins Co. v. United States

Supreme Court brief · Amicus Curiae Brief · 1975

Indeed, in contemporary usage photo- mechanical duplication is the essential act of proscribed copying. See Walt Disney Productions v. The Air Pirates, 845 F. Supp. 108, 110 (D. … The applicability of the right to ‘‘copy’’, without more, to books and periodicals is also demonstrated by other sections of the Copyright Act.

Amicus Curiae Brief — Eugene Mazo, et al., Petitioners v. Tahesha Way, New Jersey Secretary of State, et al.

Supreme Court brief · Amicus Curiae Brief · Jul 5, 2023

So, too, here the State has chosen one and only one issue to comment on the position of the candidates. … Cook, 531 U.S. at 530-532 (Rehnquist, J., concurring) (cleaned up).

Amicus Curiae Brief — Wright v. Universal Maritime Service Corp.

Supreme Court brief · Amicus Curiae Brief · 1999

United Air Lines, Inc., 560 F.2d 224 (7th Cir. 1977), cert. denied, oo ee 20 Excel Corp. v. … Rights Act of 1991, § 118, Pub.

Amicus Curiae Brief — United States Forest Service, et al., Petitioners v. Cowpasture River Preservation Association, et al.

Supreme Court brief · Amicus Curiae Brief · Dec 6, 2019

Menasche, 348 U.S. 528 (1955) ...................................................7 Utility Air Regulatory Group v. E.P.A., 573 U.S. 302, 134 S. … Congress recognized “the public land laws of the United States have developed over a long period of years through a series of Acts of Congress which are not fully correlated with each other. . . .”

Amicus Curiae Brief — Bennett v. Spear

Supreme Court brief · Amicus Curiae Brief · 1997

For example, the Act’s requirement that an agency conduct a hearing on a listing proposal, if requested (§ 1533(b)(5)(E)), creates a forum in which competing interests can be aired. … Other provisions too—such as notice and comment requirements more demanding than those imposed by the Administrative Procedure Act—would be otiose if 7 Congress’ sole concern were to protect endangered

Amicus Curiae Brief — Weyerhaeuser Co. v. U.S. Fish & Wildlife Serv., 139 S. Ct. 45 (2018) (No. 17-71)

Supreme Court brief · Amicus Curiae Brief · 2018

Br. at 42 (noting that they could “forego [Clean Water Act] permitting or other federal involvement and continue to operate Unit | as a commercial forest”). … " Here, ESA regulations are only implicated if there is a fed- eral nexus, like a section 404 permit under the Clean Water Act, 33 U.S.C. §§ 1251 et seq. (1972). 19 residential development of the

Amicus Curiae Brief — Military-Veterans Advocacy Inc., Petitioner v. Denis R. McDonough, Secretary of Veterans Affairs

Supreme Court brief · Amicus Curiae Brief · Nov 13, 2023

The BWN Act did not override the scope of the Agent Orange Act. … It is clear from the legislative history that the Agent Orange Act was meant to (i) remedy a lengthy period of Congressional paralysis concerning ailing Vietnam veterans and (ii) provide a universal solution