Documents
Briefs, oral arguments, agency decisions and the Federal Register.
10,000+ results
1.75s
Supreme Court brief · Amicus Curiae Brief · Sep 3, 2024
Id. § 387j(a)(2)(A) (cleaned up). Much like new drugs or medical devices, new tobacco products require premarket review from FDA through a premarket tobacco application or “PMTA.” … After following 15,000 smokers over a two-year period, researchers affiliated with the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention found that more smokers turned to e-cigarettes than to “the nicotine patch
Supreme Court brief · Amicus Curiae Brief · Sep 10, 2021
TCA and its trucking company members regularly comment on matters affecting the national transportation industry’s common interests. … Wolens, 513 U.S. 219, 228 (1995) (holding that the ADA preempted claims under the generally applicable Illinois Consumer Fraud Act). 4.
Amicus Curiae Brief — McCain v. Wisconsin Right to Life, Inc. (Nos. 06-970, 06-969)
Supreme Court brief · Amicus Curiae Brief · 2006
Before the ink was dry on Section 203, which bans corporate expenditures of more than $10,000 to fund “electioneering communications”—broadcast, cable, or satellite ads, aired within a fixed period … See William Shakespeare, The Tragedy of Julius Caesar act Ill, sc. 1i.
Supreme Court brief · Amicus Curiae Brief · Oct 24, 2025
Va., 597 U.S. at 724 (cleaned up, brackets supplied). This action’s “economic and political significance . . . is staggering by any measure.” … And under those provisions, the Executive’s tariff authorities are either strictly time-limited, 19 U.S.C. § 2132(a), require a pre-tariff investigation, or even have a notice-and-comment period before
Amicus Curiae Brief — United States v. United States Dist. Court for Eastern Dist. of Mich.
Supreme Court brief · Amicus Curiae Brief · 1972
See also Donnelly, , Comments and Caveats About the Wire Tapping Controversy, 63 Yale L. … periods. described are as follows: ean June 19 to.
407 U.S. 297Supreme Court brief · Amicus Curiae Brief · Dec 7, 2023
Reed, 576 U.S. at 171 (cleaned up). … Burson, 504 U.S. at 199 (plurality opinion) (cleaned up).
Supreme Court brief · Amicus Curiae Brief · Aug 20, 2021
, (4) sleep deprivation for prolonged periods, (5) threats, including death threats, (6) violent shaking, and (7) using cold air to chill” constitute torture. … HRC General Comment 31, ¶ 17.
Amicus Curiae Brief — United States, Petitioner v. Justin Eugene Taylor
Supreme Court brief · Amicus Curiae Brief · Oct 29, 2021
‘the dispute threatened to spread to other cities’ ‘the air was raw and threatened rain’ ■ (of something undesirable) seem likely to occur. … Id. at 380 (cleaned up).
Amicus Curiae Brief — Sheriff v. Gillie, 136 S. Ct. 614 (2015) (No. 15-338)
Supreme Court brief · Amicus Curiae Brief · 2015
And the value of their assets was decimated during the Great Recession, or depleted to cover long periods of unemployment. … Rebecca Thiess & Ellen Taverna, Cleaning Up Debt Collection: New rules are necessary to end abusive debt collection practices, U.S.
Amicus Curiae Brief — Federal Election Com'n v. Wisconsin Right to Life, Inc.
Supreme Court brief · Amicus Curiae Brief · 2007
Arnold Schwarzenegger (acting). … In their 2002 comments to the FEC, the Intervenors asserted that “prohibit{ing] use of a candidate’s name makes it less likely that the ex- 21 2002 comments to require or warrant a different analysis
551 U.S. 449Amicus Curiae Brief — McCain v. Wisconsin Right to Life, Inc. (Nos. 06-970, 06-969)
Supreme Court brief · Amicus Curiae Brief · 2006
Arnold Schwarzenegger (acting). … In their 2002 comments to the FEC, the Intervenors asserted that “prohibit{ing] use of a candidate's name makes it less likely that the ex- 21 2002 comments to require or warrant a different analysis
Supreme Court brief · Amicus Curiae Brief · Jan 26, 2022
Dialysis, put most simply, is a medical procedure during which a person’s blood is filtered and cleaned outside the kidney. … Under the Social Security Act, a Medicare beneficiary is defined as “an individual who is entitled to benefits under part A or enrolled under part B.” 42 U.S.C. § 1395a(b)(6)(a) (emphasis added).
Supreme Court brief · Amicus Curiae Brief · Oct 7, 2022
Horizon Air Indus., Inc., 280 F.3d 901 (9th Cir. 2002) .................... 7, 8, 9, 15 Bhd. of Locomotive Eng’rs v. Kan. City S. … See, e.g., Horizon Air, 280 F.3d at 903–04 (alleged retaliation against flight attendants who wore pro-union pins).
Amicus Curiae Brief — Arbaugh v. Y & H Corp.
Supreme Court brief · Amicus Curiae Brief · 2006
Air Courier Conf. of Am. v. American Postal Workers Union, 498 U.S. 517, 523 n.3 (1991). … , 7.e., the filing of the suit, rather than the time period of the underlying con- duct.
546 U.S. 500Amicus Curiae Brief — Federal Bureau of Investigation, et al., Petitioners v. Yonas Fikre
Supreme Court brief · Amicus Curiae Brief · Dec 20, 2023
Promise to stop pursuing the Sackett family and keep enforcing the Clean Water Act broadly everywhere else. … The First Circuit has aired a possible distinction between acts of legislative bodies and those “of private, municipal, and administrative defendants.” Town of Portsmouth v.
Amicus Curiae Brief — George Sheetz, Petitioner v. County of El Dorado, California
Supreme Court brief · Amicus Curiae Brief · Nov 20, 2023
In forcing more people into motor vehicles for longer periods of time, the housing shortage increases vehicle miles traveled as well as emissions of conventional air pollutants and greenhouse gases (GHGs … Air Res.
Supreme Court brief · Amicus Curiae Brief · May 28, 2021
s law—and appears to have been a pointed comment that the dissenters should have found D.C.' … Id. at 864–65 (quoting Act of June 2, 1927, No. 373, § 3, 1927 Mich. Public Acts 887, 888 (repealed 1959); Act of Apr. 22, 1927, ch. 1052, §§ 1, 4, 1927 R.I.
Amicus Curiae Brief — Renton v. Playtime Theatres, Inc.
Supreme Court brief · Amicus Curiae Brief · 1986
Acting Att’y Gen’l, 405 U.S. 1000 (1972). 52. Section I(B) supra. … Ky. 1978); Comment, Developments in the Law—Zening, 91 Harv.
475 U.S. 41Amicus Curiae Brief — Koons v. Rogers
Supreme Court brief · Amicus Curiae Brief · 1992
Section 107 of the Copyright Act, 17 U.S.C. § 107, pro- vides that the “fair use” of a copyrighted work “for purposes such as criticism [or] comment... is not an infringement of copyright.” … Air Pirates, 581 F.2d 751 (9th Cir. 1978).
506 U.S. 934Supreme Court brief · Amicus Curiae Brief · Sep 19, 2025
Id. at 469 (cleaned up). The Court said this argument was a potential basis to distinguish the NCAA from an entity addressed in United States DOT v. … funding to the NCAA or other such governing bodies, is the Civil Rights Restoration Act (CRRA).
Ask Donna what matters in the record.
She can read the source against your case and show you exactly where the answer came from.