Documents
Briefs, oral arguments, agency decisions and the Federal Register.
10,000+ results
0.96s
Petition for Writ of Certiorari — Ricky Parkerson, Petitioner v. United States
Supreme Court brief · Petition for Writ of Certiorari · Jun 11, 2021
Green, 399 U.S. 149 (1970) ................................................................................................ 11 Crawford v. … At a total offense level 13 and a criminal history category III, his advisory imprisonment range was 18-24 months. (ROA.113).
Supreme Court brief · Reply Brief · Jun 24, 2022
Perry, 548 U.S. 399 (2006) .................................................................................................. 12 Merrill v. … Jan. 24, 2022).
Supreme Court brief · Reply Brief · Jun 24, 2022
Perry, 548 U.S. 399 (2006) .................................................................................................. 12 Merrill v. … Jan. 24, 2022).
Petition for Writ of Certiorari — Shawn M. Robertson, Petitioner v. United States
Supreme Court brief · Petition for Writ of Certiorari · Sep 8, 2025
Id. at 24. … See Petition for Writ 25 of Certiorari at 22–24, Garland v.
Appellants Reply Brief — Able v. Texas
Supreme Court brief · Appellants Reply Brief · 1983
knows no legal reason why the appli- cation should not be renewed, the li- cense may then be renewed for a period of 24 months from the date of expiration and may be renewed subsequently each 24 months … [Acts 1973, 63rd Leg., p. 083, ch. 399, § 1, eff. Jan. 1, 1974.] § 12.23.
460 U.S. 1064Opposition — Bendetti v. United States
Supreme Court brief · Opposition · 1981
Petitioners, too, agreed to this arrangement (12/10/79 Tr. 20-24). … United States, 380 U.S. 24, 34-35 (1965)). Accordingly, the Court’s decision in Wood .v.
452 U.S. 938Petition for Writ of Certiorari — Ballard v. Garrett
Supreme Court brief · Petition for Writ of Certiorari · 2003
Ramirez, 418 U.S. 24, 39-40, 94 S.Ct. 2655, 2664, 41 L.Ed.2d 551 (1974); Hansberry v. Lee, supra. … Ramirez, 418 U.S. 24, 39-40, 94 S.Ct. 2655, 2664, 41 L.Ed.2d 551 (1974); Hansberry v.
537 U.S. 1104Amicus Curiae Brief — Charles G. Moore, et ux., Petitioners v. United States
Supreme Court brief · Amicus Curiae Brief · Sep 6, 2023
Florida, 399 U.S. 78 (1970). … , Gallup (May 24, 2023), http://bit.ly/3yvPrvr.
Petition for a Writ of Certiorari — micro_IA40385608_0097
Supreme Court brief · Petition for a Writ of Certiorari · 1974
Pen nsylvania, 382 U.S. 399 (1966) ; Lanzetta v. New Jerse y, 806 U.S. 451 (1939). Similarly, Dr. … Bricf for Respondent, pp. 22-24, People v. Ketchum, supra.
Petition for Writ of Certiorari — Walter Barton, Petitioner v. William Stange, Warden
Supreme Court brief · Petition for Writ of Certiorari · May 18, 2020
Wainwright, 477 U.S. 399 (1986) ............................................ 9-11, 24-25, 27-28 Lonchar v. … Wainwright, 477 U.S. 399, 409-410 (1986); Panetti v. Quarterman, 551 U.S. 930, 934 (2007); Madison v. Alabama. 139 S.Ct. 718, 24 728 (2019).
Supplemental Brief — Morton v. Morton
Supreme Court brief · Supplemental Brief · 1979
Calif., 399 U.S. 159 (c.b. p. 30) 59. D. … Green, 399 U.S. 159.
439 U.S. 1062Supreme Court brief · Petition for Writ of Certiorari · Jul 7, 2021
See LRCiv 3.5(b). 24 II. … Kelley, No. 4:20cv00434, 24 2020 WL 2561956, at *1 (E.D. Ark.
Amicus Curiae Brief — California v. Krivda
Supreme Court brief · Amicus Curiae Brief · 1972
Moore, 35 Ml. 2d 399, 220 N.E. 2d 443 (1966) ii. Stanley v. Georgia, 394 U.S. 557 (1969)...........-.. li Terry v. Ohio, 392 U.S. 1 (1968)... ...........- ee eee 7 Trask v. … Rev. 45 (1957)..............-05: 5 Plumb, ‘‘Illegal Enforcement of the Law,’’ 24 Cornell ee a | Ter!
409 U.S. 33Opposition — Griffith v. United States
Supreme Court brief · Opposition · 1975
Illinois, 399 U.S. 235, 243; United States v. Bristol, 473 F. 2d 439, 445 (C.A. 5). 4 3. … Ct. 754, 24 L. Ed. 2d 753 (1969) ; Bruce vs. U.S., 351 F. 2d 318, 5th Cir. (1965), Cert. den., 384 U.S. 921, 86 S. Ct. 1370, 16 L. Ed. 2d 441 (1966).
423 U.S. 926Brief for the Respondent in Opposition — Sandberg v. New England Novelty Co.
Supreme Court brief · Brief for the Respondent in Opposition · 1944
United States, 264 Fed. 399. In this connection the attention of the Court is directed to the principle that is established in the case of Erie Rail- road Co. v. … The petition for contempt was filed and an order of notice was issued thereon on October 24, 1941 (Record, page 34).
323 U.S. 740Amicus Curiae Brief — Robert A. Rucho, et al., Appellants v. Common Cause, et al.
Supreme Court brief · Amicus Curiae Brief · Feb 11, 2019
Florida, 399 U.S. 78, 100 (1970). 5 Justices typically spoke unanimously.11 Only about 8% of cases included a dissenting opinion. … Id. at 534. 24 Republican Party of Minnesota, 536 U.S. at 777–78. 10 ought to be able to ensure that their cases are decided in an ideologically-balanced way.
Opposition Brief — New Mexico Taxation & Revenue Department v. Ramah Navajo School Board, Inc.
Supreme Court brief · Opposition Brief · 1999
After dismissing claims based on 42 U.S.C. § 1983, the District Court rendered summary judgment for Petitioner Taxation & Revenue Department on September 24, 1997. … These steps — from bid solicitation to delivery — were often accomplished the same day and almost always within 24 hours.
528 U.S. 928Brief for the United States in Opposition — Riggs v. United States
Supreme Court brief · Brief for the United States in Opposition · 1971
United States, 399 F. 24.93, certiorari . © denied, 393 U.S. 1025 __..... + Parker Vv. United States, 252 F. 2d 680, certiorari denied, 356 U.S. 964 - —_ “SEL ar 8 Remmer v. … Lennon, 246 F. 2d 24, — Gael, BT Te cp i es are. . United, States v. McGuire, 381 F. 2d OR re 8 United States v. Shavin, 287 F. 2d 647 _.- 8 ' United States v.
404 U.S. 823Appendix — Koran v. United States
Supreme Court brief · Appendix · 1971
United States, make a print of an obligation of the United States, to wit: a $5.00 Federal Reserve Note drawn on the Federal Reserve Bank of New York, Series 1950E, Check Letter “P,” Face Plate No. 399 … Whether the “Con- current sentence” doctrine enunciated in Hirabayashi has continiung validity in light of subsequent decisions will be argued before the Su- preme Court on March 24, 1969.
402 U.S. 948Motion to Dismiss Appeal — F. & M. Schaefer Brewing Co. v. Gerosa
Supreme Court brief · Motion to Dismiss Appeal · 1959
D. sales (fol. 323, Txp’s Exh. 24, p. 151). … (one document) showing, among other things, the number of units of each descrip- tion ordered by the distributer (fols. 101-104, 176, 186, Txp’s Exh. 24, p. 150).
358 U.S. 282
Ask Donna what matters in the record.
She can read the source against your case and show you exactly where the answer came from.