Documents
Briefs, oral arguments, agency decisions and the Federal Register.
7,113 results
0.15s
Supreme Court brief · Opposition Brief · Nov 13, 2018
Jones, 565 U.S. 400 (2012) ..................................................... 7 United States v. Wells, 519 U.S. 482 (1997) ..................................................... 7 United States v. … Wells, 519 U.S. 482, 488 (1997) (citing United States v. Williams, 504 U.S. 36, 42 (1992)); see also e.g., United States v. Jones, 565 U.S. 400, 413 (2012); Youakim v.
Opposition Brief — Penobscot Nation v. Georgia-Pacific Corp.
Supreme Court brief · Opposition Brief · 2002
Compare U.S. Const. art. I, § 7 (statutes) with U.S. Const. art. … Penobscot Nation, 130 F.3d 482, 485 (1st Cir. 1997). Il.
534 U.S. 1127Opposition Brief — Arizonans for Official English v. Arizona
Supreme Court brief · Opposition Brief · 1997
United States, 249 U.S. 616 (1919) ............. Fn. 11 Gooding v. Wilson, 405 U.S. 518 (1972) Fn. 12 Griswold v. Connecticut, 381 U.S. 475, 482 (1965) ........ Fn. 13 Hurtado v. … Connecticut, 381 U.S. 475, 482 (1965). Moreover, Justice 13 speech clause.
520 U.S. 43Opposition Brief — Levine v. Central Florida Medical Affiliates, Inc.
Supreme Court brief · Opposition Brief · 1996
Hyde, 466 U.S. 2 (1984). … Klor’s, 359 U.S. at 213.
519 U.S. 820Opposition Brief — Hillsbورو Properties Properties v. City of Rohnert Park (No. 06-510)
Supreme Court brief · Opposition Brief · 2006
County of Los Angeles, 482 U.S. 304 CFU Pints venctincsadendiacenbipsdinnsinesipaashiniobauneotoaeuiinaren passim Galland v. City of Clovis, 24 Cal.4th 1003 (2001)........ 7,13 Hernandez v. … County of Los Angeles, 482 U.S. 304 (1987). Moreover, U.S.
Opposition Brief — Aiuppa v. United States
Supreme Court brief · Opposition Brief · 1988
McGowan, 423 F.2d 413 (4th Cir. 1970) . 10 United States v. Meester, 762 F.2d 867 (11th Cir.), cert. re eR! Ye, | ne rr 15 United States v. Miller, 552 F. Supp. 827 (N.D. … McGowan, 423 F.2d 413, 415-417 (4th Cir. 1970).3 The analysis is no different even where, as here, peti- tioners’ convictions on the substantive counts may have rested, under Pinkerton, on their participation
486 U.S. 1006Opposition Brief — Aiuppa v. United States
Supreme Court brief · Opposition Brief · 1988
McGowan, 423 F.2d 413 (4th Cir. 1970) . 10 United States v. Meester, 762 F.2d 867 (11th Cir.), cert. nmin, GPO UG. TRO CIO a nn os hc kc csc eeawdesass 15 United States v. Miller, 552 F. … McGowan, 423 F.2d 413, 415-417 (4th Cir. 1970).3 - The analysis is no different even where, as here, peti- tioners’ convictions on the substantive counts may have rested, under Pinkerton, on their
486 U.S. 1006Opposition Brief — In re Parker
Supreme Court brief · Opposition Brief · 1993
Garden State Bar Ass’n, 457 U.S. 423 (1982).1+ In addition, Petitioner’s claimed injury cannot be traced to the Sixth Circuit’s fraud on the court investigation. … Hermansdorfer, 423 U.S. 336 (1976) (mandanus appropriate to correct a clearly erroneous remand of case out of a federal forum); Dairy Queen v.
508 U.S. 938Opposition Brief — Michael Harper, Petitioner v. United States
Supreme Court brief · Opposition Brief · Nov 9, 2023
Ware, 964 F.3d 482 (6th Cir. 2020) ......................................... 12, 13 United States v. White, 984 F.3d 76 (D.C. … Ware, 964 F.3d 482, 488-489 (6th Cir. 2020).2 The practical significance of that limited and lopsided conflict is minimal.
Opposition Brief — United States ex rel. Foulds v. Texas Tech University
Supreme Court brief · Opposition Brief · 2000
Gingles, 478 U.S. 30 (1986)........cccccsececeseseeeeees 10 TABLE OF AUTHORITIES — Continued Page United States v. Bornstein, 423 U.S. 303 (1976).......ccccecesee0e. 23 United States v. … Bornstein, 423 U.S. 303, 314-15 (1976)(purpose of FCA remedies is to make government completely whole); U.S. ex rel. Marcus v. Hess, 317 U.S. 537, 551-53 (1943)(same).
530 U.S. 1202Opposition Brief — Alameida v. Mayweathers
Supreme Court brief · Opposition Brief · 2003
Safley, 482 US. 78 (1987) vsccscssesssecscsvssecvsssvensenes 11 United States v Grossi, 143 F.3d 348 (7th Cir.), cert. denied, 525 US. 87B.C1GGB) .......sscsssssssesessonanovevsveeseseee 13 United … Smith, 494 U.S. 872 (1990), or prisoners’ First Amendment claims under Turner v. Safley, 482 U.S. 78 (1987).
540 U.S. 815Opposition Brief — New Mexico Ex Rel. Ortiz v. Reed
Supreme Court brief · Opposition Brief · 1998
Superior Court of California, 482 US. Gee Gd ckssrencneageblnnwhdessnhsiaesdehomicos 10 , £e 8 FS Ff eee 16 Goldberg v. Kelly, 397 U.S. 254 (1970)................ 11 Michigan v. … Superior Court of California, 482 U.S. 400 (1987) and Puerto Rico v. Branstad, Governor of Iowa, et al., 483 U.S 219 (1987) is equally unavailing.
524 U.S. 151Opposition Brief — United States ex rel. Foulds v. Texas Tech University
Supreme Court brief · Opposition Brief · 2000
Gingles, 478 U.S. 30 (1986).....cscssssssssseesesssesses TABLE OF AUTHORITIES — Continued Page United States v. Bornstein, 423 U.S. 303 (1976).......cccccese0000: 23 United States v. … Bornstein, 423 U.S. 303, 314-15 (1976)(purpose of FCA remedies is to make government completely whole); U.S. ex rel. Marcus v. Hess, 317 U.S. 537, 551-53 (1943)(same).
530 U.S. 1202Opposition Brief — National Union Fire Insurance v. Camp, 113 S. Ct. 1366 (1993) (No. 92-1046)
Supreme Court brief · Opposition Brief · 1993
Hollins, 241 U.S. 523 (1916) ou... Duignan v. United States, 274 U.S. 195 (1927) .... me National Bank v. … Associated Underwriters, Inc., 423 F.Supp. SOB Gk. SPR SEE Withsennsaseiiaiacemnens 5 SIPC v. Barbour, 421 U.S. 412 (1975) .................. 2,3 SIPC v. Charisma Sec.
Opposition Brief — Honda Motor Company, Ltd. v. Walter P. Coons
Supreme Court brief · Opposition Brief · 1985
Ohio, 482 U.S. 161 (1967) -...................... 5 Buck Stove & Range Co. v. Vickers, 226 U.S. 205 | —__ I A APRINES RIe PE 6 Coons v. … Ohio, 482 U.S. 161, 167 (1977), quoting Garner v.
469 U.S. 1123Opposition Brief — Ian Mitcham, Petitioner v. Arizona
Supreme Court brief · Opposition Brief · Mar 26, 2025
. at 482–83. … Id. at 482–83. More importantly, the fourth Cox exception only applies “if a refusal immediately to review the state court decision might seriously erode federal policy.” Id. at 483.
Supreme Court brief · Opposition Brief · Aug 7, 2019
Co., 514 U.S. 159 (1995) .................... 11, 32, 37 In re Reed Elsevier Props. Inc., 482 F.3d 1376 (Fed. … Inc., 482 F.3d 1376, 1380 (Fed.
Opposition Brief — United Auto Workers, Local 422 v. Tosti
Supreme Court brief · Opposition Brief · 1987
Jones, 4600 U.S. 669 (1983).. 29 Old Dominion Branch No. 496 National Association of Letter Carriers v. Austin, 418 U.S.264 Pek v2 Pen ry se 3 Tosti v. … Ayik, 394 Mass. 482, 499 (1985) (Pet. App. B) (hereinafter Tosti II).
484 U.S. 964Opposition Brief — Adkins v. United States
Supreme Court brief · Opposition Brief · 1985
Hasting, 461 U.S. 499 ...... United States v. Lovasco, 431 U.S. 783 ...... United States v. Scott, 668 F.2d 384 ........ Constitution, statutes and rules: U.S. Const. Amend. … Hasting, 461 U.S. 499 (1983). DOJ-1985-03
471 U.S. 1053Opposition Brief — Colon v. Division of Human Rights
Supreme Court brief · Opposition Brief · 1974
Jordan, —— U.S. —— (March 23, 1974), i CD on ncwnnccesoooesseces 5 Francisco Enterprises v. Kirby, 482 F. 2d 481 (9th i Mn siccctcsocenbaneeeeisusdusaeéoebns 6 Fuld v. Elliot, US. … Fidelity Trust Co., 263 U.S. 413 (1923); Angel v. Bullington, 330 U.S. 18 (1947); Francisco Enterprises v. Kirby, 482 F. 2d 481 (9th Cir. 1973); Tang v.
417 U.S. 946
Ask Donna what matters in the record.
She can read the source against your case and show you exactly where the answer came from.