Documents
Briefs, oral arguments, agency decisions and the Federal Register.
10,000+ results
0.10s
Amicus Curiae Brief — Richard Devillier, et al., Petitioners v. Texas
Supreme Court brief · Amicus Curiae Brief · Nov 20, 2023
Cir. 2011) (government seized airplanes that were under contract to Air Columbia); Nixon v. United States, 978 F.2d 1269 (D.C. … Federal and state clean energy policies, including the tax incentives in the Inflation Reduction Act, have resulted in increased demand for such pore spaces.
Amicus Curiae Brief — Louisiana, Appellant v. Phillip Callais, et al.
Supreme Court brief · Amicus Curiae Brief · Sep 3, 2025
Hoston, Black Legislative Politics: Examining the Issue of Voting Rights in the Post-Hurricane Katrina Period, 49 SOC. SCI. … Home to more than 200 petrochemical plants and refineries, the region’s estimated cancer risks from air pollution exceed federal thresholds.
Amicus Curiae Brief — FMC Corp. v. Holliday
Supreme Court brief · Amicus Curiae Brief · 1990
Delta Air Lines, Inc., 463 U.S. 85, 98 n.19 (1983). … See Comment, State Regulation of aire Employee Welfare Benefit Plans, 62 Geo. L.J. 339, 345- 346 (1973).
498 U.S. 52Amicus Curiae Brief — American Telephone & Telegraph Co. v. Central Office Telephone, Inc.
Supreme Court brief · Amicus Curiae Brief · 1998
Civil Aeronautica Be., 382 F.2d 466, 476 (5th Cir. 1967) (Federal Aviation Act (based or the ICA) requires air carriers’ tariffs to show “all rates, fares, and charges for air transportation ... and … *8 AT&T’s Comments on AT&T Tariff 12 Issues on Remand. AT&T Communications; Revisions to Tariff F.C.C.
524 U.S. 214Supreme Court brief · Amicus Curiae Brief · 2016
The Government may, for good cause, obtain additional extensions of the 60-day seal period. 31 U.S.C. § 3730(b)(3). … As Congressman Taylors comments demonstrate, respondents revealed that they were alleging fraud “against the United States Government.”
Amicus Curiae Brief — Shapiro v. Thompson
Supreme Court brief · Amicus Curiae Brief · 1969
We-comment on this below. … Unemployment, Compensation Act in Sherbert:v.
394 U.S. 618Amicus Curiae Brief — Perpich v. Department of Defense
Supreme Court brief · Amicus Curiae Brief · 1990
.... 5, 6 Act of January 21, 19038, ch. 196, 32 Stat. 775... 6, 7 National Defense Act of 1916, ch. 134, 39 Stat. … Act of May 8, 1792, ch. 33, §1, 1 Stat. 271.
496 U.S. 334Amicus Curiae Brief — Florence County School Dist. Four v. Carter
Supreme Court brief · Amicus Curiae Brief · 1993
App. 3a, 24a. 4 receive individualized instruction for three periods per week. … Observing that the IEP’s goal of “four months progress over a period of more than one year was rather modest” and “failed to satisfy the Act’s requirement of more than minimal or trivial progress,”
510 U.S. 7Amicus Curiae Brief — Terence Tramaine Andrus, Petitioner v. Texas
Supreme Court brief · Amicus Curiae Brief · Nov 16, 2021
For instance, the CCA declared “skepticism” about Terence’s mental illness claims since he was able to act as a parental figure to his siblings. Andrus, Ex Parte Andrus, 622 S.W.3d 892, 901 (Tex. … Notably, this was during the same period that staff were sexually assaulting youth at TYC.
Amicus Curiae Brief — Associates Commercial Corp. v. Rash
Supreme Court brief · Amicus Curiae Brief · 1997
Although the House bill did not contain the second sentence, the comments to this subsection of House Bill 8200 nonetheless stated: “’Value’ does not necessarily contemplate forced sale or liquidation … #0 All N.A.D.A. values (whether retail or wholesale) assume the vehicle is clean. Id.
520 U.S. 953Supreme Court brief · Amicus Curiae Brief · May 21, 2026
(cleaned up)). … Id. at 373 (cleaned up).
Amicus Curiae Brief — Braun v. Ann Arbor Charter Township (No. 08-250)
Supreme Court brief · Amicus Curiae Brief · 2008
ee I cis bc inccaicuncdiieiechtenedigecesdubiantcininieniinienn 5 John Delaney & Duane Desiderio, Who Will Clean Up the “Ripeness Mess”? … The state-litigation rule has been thoroughly aired in the lower federal and state courts.
Amicus Curiae Brief — Blonder-Tongue Laboratories, Inc. v. University of Illinois Foundation
Supreme Court brief · Amicus Curiae Brief · 1971
United Air Lines, 216 F. Supp. 709, affirmed as to res judicata, sub nom. United Air Lines v. … It is thus entirely appropriate for the Court to act in the matter. ?
402 U.S. 313Amicus Curiae Brief — Red Lion Broadcasting Co. v. Federal Communications Commission
Supreme Court brief · Amicus Curiae Brief · 1969
’’ : And $501 of the Act, 47 U.S.C. §501 provides: ‘‘Any person who willfully and knowingly. does or . causes or suffers to be’done any act, matter, or a ‘ in this chapter prohibited or declared to … the Act.
395 U.S. 367Amicus Curiae Brief — Tahoe-Sierra Preservation Council, Inc. v. Tahoe Regional Planning Agency
Supreme Court brief · Amicus Curiae Brief · 2002
In another War Powers Act case, Kimball Laundry Co. v. … These state courts had no trouble finding that takings may result from government acts that deny all use of private property for a period of time less than the temporal whole—even when those acts were
535 U.S. 302Amicus Curiae Brief — Chevron USA Inc. v. Echazabal
Supreme Court brief · Amicus Curiae Brief · 2002
The EEOC promulgated those regulations through notice-and-comment rulemaking, see 56 Fed. … Because the ADA is modeled on the Rehabilitation Act, it was reasonable for the EEOC to incorporate prior practice under the Rehabilitation Act into its ADA regulations. See Bragdon v.
536 U.S. 73Amicus Curiae Brief — Nike, Inc. v. Kasky
Supreme Court brief · Amicus Curiae Brief · 2003
Business periodicals are advising companies that “[uJ]nless and until the U.S. Supreme Court reviews Kasky . . . … An ESPN television documentary that later aired orrthe issue also directly challenged Nike’s claim.
539 U.S. 654Amicus Curiae Brief — Textron Funding Corp. v. Bessette, 121 S. Ct. 2016 (2001) (No. 00-1454)
Supreme Court brief · Amicus Curiae Brief · 2001
Alley, Comment, Redemption, Reaffirmation, Exemption, and Retention in Chapter 7 Bankruptcy: Extinction Looms Near for the Free Ride, 47 KAN. L. … Alley, Comment, Redemption, Reaffirmation, Exemption, and Retention in Chapter 7 Bankruptcy: Extinction Looms Near for the Free Ride, 47 KAN. L.
Amicus Curiae Brief — Festo Corp. v. Shoketsu Kinzoku Kogyo Kabushiki Co.
Supreme Court brief · Amicus Curiae Brief · 2002
“Comments for Issues”’).’ … Comments for Issues, supra, at 27.
535 U.S. 722Amicus Curiae Brief — Friends of Earth v. Laidlaw Environmental Services
Supreme Court brief · Amicus Curiae Brief · 2000
(“CLEAN”) and Sierra Club should be parties in this action. CLEAN and Sierra Club never filed 60-day notice letters and, therefore, should not be parties. 33 U.S.C.A. § 1365(b) (1986). … In response, the Petitioners submit a lengthy argument that the Fourth Circuit decision is “of devastating consequence to citizen suits under the Clean Water Act and other environmental statutes,” “
528 U.S. 167
Ask Donna what matters in the record.
She can read the source against your case and show you exactly where the answer came from.