Documents
Briefs, oral arguments, agency decisions and the Federal Register.
10,000+ results
0.11s
Petition for Writ of Certiorari — Donoho v. United States
Supreme Court brief · Petition for Writ of Certiorari · 1968
Barash, 365 F. 2d 395, 399, 403 (2nd ORE BE five. 14 United States v. Bottone, 365 PF. 2d 389, 394 (2nd Cir. . See Pe, Pe Te Pe: HRA NT aT 14 ‘United States v. … Barash, 365 F. 2d 395, 399, 403 (2nd Cir.’ 1966), states that ‘‘the doctrine of one good count is not a fetish’’: .
390 U.S. 1014Petition for Writ of Certiorari — McClaren v. Wisconsin (No. 09-421)
Supreme Court brief · Petition for Writ of Certiorari · 2009
Florida, 399 U.S. 78 (1970). … Williams, 399 U.S. at 85 (emphasis added).
Petition — Bradford v. United States
Supreme Court brief · Petition · 1979
U.S., 399 F. … Randall, (DC Supr.Ct. 11/24/76), 20 Cr.L. 2299.
441 U.S. 931Opposition Brief — Unus v. Kane (No. 09-294)
Supreme Court brief · Opposition Brief · 2009
Commonwealth, 493 S.E.2d 397, 399 (Va. … Pet. 24.
Petition for A Writ of Certiorari — Kiraly v. United States
Supreme Court brief · Petition for A Writ of Certiorari · 1971
United States, 399 F.2d 471, rehearing denied, 402 F.2d 271 (5th - Cir. 1968) Plies ts. United TASS 431 F.2d 727 (9th Cir. 1970). Portnoy ts. … denied, 366 U.S. 911. gyi 23. 399 F.2d at 472.. : { ope as "10 Tie ek, j of conflict regarding this issue. In United States vs.
404 U.S. 915Amicus Curiae Brief — John Doe, et al., Petitioners v. Kathy Hochul, Governor of New York, et al.
Supreme Court brief · Amicus Curiae Brief · May 18, 2026
Northwell Health Sys., No. 24-2665, 2025 WL 2610704 (2d Cir. … General Mills Inc., 513 F.2d 1040 (6th Cir. 1975), Williams, 492 F.2d 399, and Rosenfeld v.
motion to affirm — Ball v. James
Supreme Court brief · motion to affirm · 1981
Morris Farr (August 24, 1976). … Kolod- zlejski, 399 U.S. 204 (1970). Applying that standard, the * The District’s voting system would not even meet the test of rea- sonableness.
451 U.S. 355Petition — Huerta v. United States
Supreme Court brief · Petition · 1977
t ¢ - 24 * « * . Pal “ € ~ . . ‘ % > a EEE EOE OE OO IN THE Supreme Court of the United States No. JuaN M. Huerta, Petitioner v. … And he did intercede with his superiors, who consulted with, among others, the Pub- lie Works officials (385, 386, 387, 393, 396-399).
434 U.S. 828Petition for Writ of Certiorari — Loesch v. Heck
Supreme Court brief · Petition for Writ of Certiorari · 1987
Nebraska, 262 U.S. 390, 399 (1932)). … -24- Under Burchard v.
484 U.S. 965Supreme Court brief · Amicus Curiae Brief · Jan 4, 2022
Weinstock Perry Guha LLP 1740 Broadway, 15th Floor New York, NY 10019 (212) 399-8330 Norman L. … Weinstock Perry Guha LLP 1740 Broadway, 15th Floor New York, NY 10019 (212) 399-8330 Norman L.
Petition for Writ of Certiorari — Edward A. Caniglia, Petitioner v. Robert F. Strom, et al.
Supreme Court brief · Petition for Writ of Certiorari · Aug 10, 2020
Maroney, 399 U.S. 42 (1970) ............................................ 1, 21 Collins v. Virginia, 138 S. Ct. 1663 (2018) .............................. 24, 25, 26 Colorado v. … Maroney, 399 U.S. 42, 52 (1970)).
Supreme Court brief · Amicus Curiae Brief · Mar 20, 2025
Novo Nordisk A/S, 566 U.S. 399 (2012) . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 17 Commil USA, LLC v. … Novo Nordisk A/S, 566 U.S. 399, 405 (2012); Michael A. Carrier, Unsettling Drug Patent Settlements: A Framework for Presumptive Illegality, 108 MICH. L.
Petitioners Brief — Madison v. Alabama, 138 S. Ct. 943 (2018) (No. 17-7505)
Supreme Court brief · Petitioners Brief · 2018
Wainwright, 477 U.S. 399 (1986), and Panetti v. … (Doc. 8-1 at 123-24 (hearing).) ‘6 Throughout this litigation, the State has consistently ar- gued that Mr.
Opposition Brief — United States v. Rainier View Associates
Supreme Court brief · Opposition Brief · 1989
.: Sues a2 0... 1457fcK2)................. 9 24 C.F.R.: ES 6 Miscellaneous: H.R. Rep. … HUD tries to explain away the regulation (24 C.F.R.
490 U.S. 1066Opposition — Everett C. McKethan v. United States
Supreme Court brief · Opposition · 1978
Green, 399 U.S. 149 10 Chambers v. Mississippi, 410 U.S. 284 ___ 9-10 Dutton v. Evans, 400 U.S. 74 10, 12 Gore v. United States, 357 U.S. 386 ____ 15 Kirby v. … Green, 399 U.S. 149, 165-168. See generally McCormick on Evidence 606-607 (2d ed. 1972).
439 U.S. 936Amicus Curiae Brief — School Dist. of Grand Rapids v. Ball
Supreme Court brief · Amicus Curiae Brief · 1985
Wolman, 342 rs + 399 ~——"TS.D. Ohio 1972), aff'd. 409 U.S. 808 (1972)....... Ll, 12, 23, 24 Everson v. Board of Education, 330 U.S. l (1947) wc ccceeeecces 28, 29 Flast v. … Wolman, 342 F.Supp. 399, 419 (S.D. Ohio 1972), aff'd. 409 U.S. 808 (1972).
473 U.S. 373Petition for a Writ of Certiorari — Walling v. T. Buettner & Co.
Supreme Court brief · Petition for a Writ of Certiorari · 1943
A minimum rate of 30 cents per hour is prescribed by the section for the period between October 24, 1939, and October 23, 1945, when it is to become 40 cents. … Although the contention was made there, as in the instant case, ae 10 that this defeated the Administrator’s right to an injunction, the Circuit Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit held (p. 399
319 U.S. 771Opposition — Stanley v. United States
Supreme Court brief · Opposition · 1978
Maroney, 399 U.S. 42, 52. b. … Act of July 31, 1789, Section 24, 1 Stat. 43.
436 U.S. 917Brief for the Respondent in Opposition — Transit Casualty Co. v. Security Trust Co.
Supreme Court brief · Brief for the Respondent in Opposition · 1971
causes at 372 F.2d 441; 396, F.2d 803; and 399 F.2d 665, . cert. den. 393 U.S. 1024. paar | . : JURISDICTION . Jurisdiction of this Court is invoked under 28 U\S.C. § 1254(1). … ” _ In its Order on Petition for —. at 399 F.2d 665, the Court. of Appeals states: “...
404 U.S. 883Petition for Writ of Certiorari — Tillem v. New Jersey
Supreme Court brief · Petition for Writ of Certiorari · 1974
In all, he was given State Prison sentences totalling 24-36 years. … Forbes, 24 N. J. 341, 358 (1957). We believe the Legislature felt Joan sharking is of that invidious caliber.
419 U.S. 900
Ask Donna what matters in the record.
She can read the source against your case and show you exactly where the answer came from.