Documents
Briefs, oral arguments, agency decisions and the Federal Register.
10,000+ results
2.42s
Reply Brief — Dutra Grp. v. Batterton, 139 S. Ct. 627 (2018) (No. 18-266)
Supreme Court brief · Reply Brief · 2018
American Cyanamid Co., 760 ¥ 3d 600, 620-621 (7th precedent”); , Palmer, 9A ¥ 24 TT1, 788 (D.C. … McBride, 8 768 F.3d at 394-399 (Clement, J., concurring); id. at 403 (Haynes, J., concurring); see infra LIL.C. C.
Opposition — Butner v. United States
Supreme Court brief · Opposition · 1979
.: section 64, 11 U.S.C. 106 occccccccccccoccoccee..... 4 Sections 301-399 (Chapter XI) I! … Sections 301-399, 52 Stat. 905, and amended (11 U.S.C. 701-799). Golden owned several parcels of income-producing real estate located in North Carolina.
440 U.S. 48Petition for Writ of Certiorari — Patel v. Mukasey (No. 07-771)
Supreme Court brief · Petition for Writ of Certiorari · 2007
As of today, no decision has been rendered with respect to his I-140 even though it had been filed on July 24, 2007. … Matter of Cerna, 20 I&N Dec. 399 (1991).
Opposition Brief — Michael Vetere v. James E. Allen Jr.
Supreme Court brief · Opposition Brief · 1965
Y. 2d 399; Blocker v. Board of Edu- cation, supra;, Jackson Vv. Pasadena City School Dis- trict, supra. … Y. 24 127; Balaban v.
382 U.S. 825Respondent Brief in Opposition to Petition for Writ of Certiorari — In re Teitelbaum
Supreme Court brief · Respondent Brief in Opposition to Petition for Writ of Certiorari · 1958
Tinkoff, 399 TIL 282, certiorari denied, 34 : SS The Court stated (pp, 19-20) ; ‘*Secking to annnal these Orders, apprethart ons. le PPOssessts ile ‘right’, to petition, eof san) preter? … IL, 400, G4 Ne pe. 24 OO, a disharmens proceeding, The. court there peinted ont that ~ink.. 103 conumnittows of the Chicago Bar Association Wave acted as Commissioners of the Hingis Supreme Court
358 U.S. 881Reply Brief — Walter Barton, Petitioner v. William Stange, Warden
Supreme Court brief · Reply Brief · May 19, 2020
Wainwright, 477 U.S. 399 (1986) ................................................................10, 11 Madison v. … Barton is clearly not competent under applicable standards (Petition, p. 24-28). Mr.
Amicus Curiae Brief — Tamer Mahmoud, et al., Petitioners v. Thomas W. Taylor, et al.
Supreme Court brief · Amicus Curiae Brief · Oct 4, 2024
No. 24-297 In the Supreme Court of the United States MAHMOUD, ET AL., v. Petitioners, THOMAS W. TAYLOR, ET AL., Respondents. … Nebraska, 262 U.S. 390, 399 (1923) (“While this court has not attempted to define with exactness the [due process] liberty . . .
Petition for Writ of Certiorari — Rosenthal v. State Bar
Supreme Court brief · Petition for Writ of Certiorari · 1990
State Bar (1978) 22 C3d 707, 150 Cal.Rptr. 273. 14th Amendment, and under the confrontation Clause of the 6th Amendment. 24 age(s QUESTIONS PRESENTED Oe FI TABLE OF CONTENTS iii TABLE OF AUTHORITIES … State Bar (1935) 4 Cal. 2d 399 Rosenthal vs. State Bar (1987) 43 Cal.3d 612 Worth vs. State Bar (1978) 22 Cal.3d 707 ed t 28 U.S.
494 U.S. 1066Reply Brief — Stewart v. Martinez-Villareal
Supreme Court brief · Reply Brief · 1998
As discussed in the Petition at 22-24, this Court has repeatedly held that it possesses authority to review the general validity of statutory schemes even when there are prohibitions against review … Wainwright, 477 U.S. 399 (1986) (dissenting opinions of Justices O’Connor and Rehnquist); Solesbee v. Balkcom, 339 U.S. 9, 12-13 (1950) (discussing cases).
523 U.S. 637Reply Brief — Minnesota v. Mille Lacs Band of Chippewa Indians
Supreme Court brief · Reply Brief · 1999
Utah, 510 U.S. 399, 420 (1994), an Order of President Roosevelt was “clear evidence of the understanding at the time.” … Chippewa Brief at 24: “There is no court order allocating 50 percent of the resources to Bands.”
526 U.S. 172Opposition Brief — United States v. Nachtigal
Supreme Court brief · Opposition Brief · 1993
New York, 399 U.S. 66 (1970) ........ Séeeeeececes e Blanton v. City of North Las Vegas, 489 U.S. 538 (1989) ..... Brown v. Richter v. … New York, 399 U.S. 66, 68, 90 S.Ct. 1886, 1887 (1970)).
507 U.S. 1Supreme Court brief · Opposition · 1977
United States, 399 F. 2d 106 (8th Cir. 1968), cert denied 393 U. S. 933 (1968) —... … On December 24, 1975, Petitioner filed a motion to suppress certain evidence obtained in the search of his premises.
434 U.S. 903Opposition — Gibson Products, Inc. v. Texas
Supreme Court brief · Opposition · 1977
It does, however, contain the essential facts which are that on December 24, 1975, following a hearing, a state district court enjoined Petitioner from further violations of Article 9001, Vernon’s Texas … Respondent cannot agree to the “statement of materiai facts” found in the Petition for Writ of Certiorari for it is more argumentative than it is ‘Now repealed by Acts 1973, 63rd Leg., p. 991, ch. 399
431 U.S. 955Opposition Brief — Mount v. Sumner
Supreme Court brief · Opposition Brief · 1975
Ann. tit. 12, § 34: Act of June 24, 1895, P.L. 236. § 2, which reads: “Every suit hereafter brought to recover damages for injury wrongfully done to the person, in case where the injury does not result … Florida, 399 U.S. 78 (1970)] that there was ‘no discernible difference between the results reached by the two dif- ferent-sized juries,’ 399 US, at 101, 26 L Ed 2d 446, drew largely upon the results
423 U.S. 865Opinion — St. Louis & San Francisco R. Co. v. Conarty
Supreme Court brief · Opinion · 1915
Rep. 399. The absence of the coupler was not the proximate cause of injury. A., T. & S. F. Ry. v. Calhoun, 213 U. S. 1; Beach on Con. … Y. 24; Legg v. Britton, 64 Vermont, 652; Mich. Cent. R. R. v. Vreeland, 227 U.S. 59; Munro v. Dredging Co., 84 California, 515; McCaf- ferty v. Penna. Ry., 193 Pa. St. 339; St. L., I. M. & So.
238 U.S. 243Petition for Writ of Certiorari — Kasine Deleston, Petitioner v. United States
Supreme Court brief · Petition for Writ of Certiorari · Feb 4, 2019
Mankiewicz, 122 F.2d 399 (7th Cir. 1997)..8 United States v. Padilla, 186 F.3d 136 (2d Cir. 2000).... 7 United States v. Randolph, 230 F.3d 243 (6th Cir. 2000)....8 United States v. … (July 24, Dist LEXIS 107341 2015).
Petition for Writ of Certiorari — Parkening v. Arnold
Supreme Court brief · Petition for Writ of Certiorari · 1945
App. (2d) 399, 112 Pac. (2d) 649 salina Firpo v. Murphy, 72 Cal. App. 259, 236 Pac. 968 Gatti v. Highland Park Builders, 67 A. C. A. 872 Hayter v. Fulmor, 66 A. C. … App. (2d) 399, 112 P. (2d) 649; Davis v. Chipman (1930), 210 Cal. 609, 293 P. 40: IWise v. Radis (1925), 74 Cal. 765, 242 P. 90.
326 U.S. 738Reply Brief — Su v. M/V Southern Aster
Supreme Court brief · Reply Brief · 1993
Atkin- son, 399 U.S. 527 (1962). … (f) At the end of a voyage, the master shall pay each seaman the balance of wages due the seaman within 24 hours after the cargo has been discharged or within 4 days after the seaman is discharged,
508 U.S. 906Brief for the Respondents in Opposition — Mitchell Watson v. Kenlick Coal Company, Inc.
Supreme Court brief · Brief for the Respondents in Opposition · 1975
W. 2d 395, 399 (1968) ; Buchanan v. Watson, 290 S. W. 2d 40, 43 (1956). … W. 2d at 399.”’
422 U.S. 1012Reply Brief — Thompson v. Mille Lacs Band of ChipPewa Indians
Supreme Court brief · Reply Brief · 1999
Utah, 510 U.S. 399, 420 (1994), an Order of President Roosevelt was “clear evidence of the understanding at the time.” … Chippewa Brief at 24: “There is no court order allocating 50 percent of the resources to Bands.”
526 U.S. 1060
Ask Donna what matters in the record.
She can read the source against your case and show you exactly where the answer came from.