Documents
Briefs, oral arguments, agency decisions and the Federal Register.
10,000+ results
0.12s
Supreme Court brief · Amicus Curiae Brief · Jul 7, 2022
Air. Qual. Cntrl. … Rev. 1, 5 (2010) (referring to comments of David A.
Amicus Curiae Brief — BNSF Ry. Co. v. Loos, 139 S. Ct. 304 (2018) (No. 17-1042)
Supreme Court brief · Amicus Curiae Brief · 2018
When the Treasury Department revised its regula- tions concerning RRTA “compensation” in 1993, the De- partment utilized notice-and-comment rulemaking and rejected a commenter’s suggestion that, because … Riverside Bayview Homes, Inc., 474 U.S. 121, 138 & n.11 (1985) (treating a particular Clean Water Act provision’s ref- erence to “waters” “including wetlands adjacent thereto” as evidence that “the
Supreme Court brief · Amicus Curiae Brief · Feb 26, 2026
See Mark Shawhan, Comment, The Significance of Domicile in Lyman Trumbull’s Conception of Citizenship, 119 Yale L.J. 1351, 1353 n.9 (2010). … Allapattah Servs., 545 U.S. 546, 568 (2005) (cleaned up), each example is flawed.
Amicus Curiae Brief — Eastern Pilots Merger Committee v. Continental Airlines, Inc
Supreme Court brief · Amicus Curiae Brief · 2002
June 4, TD cesecrticleeiiibiiaitietimiatinn hiatal dice 17-18 Air Transportation Safety and System Stabil- ization Act, 49 U.S.C. § 40101 note (Supp. … See, e.g., Air Transportation Safety and System Stabilization Act, 49 U.S.C. § 40101 note (Supp. 2002); 148 18 Cong. Rec. $4939-41 (daily ed. June 4, 2002) (statements of Sens.
537 U.S. 944Amicus Curiae Brief — Richard Stuart Ross, Petitioner v. United States
Supreme Court brief · Amicus Curiae Brief · Aug 20, 2026
KJI directly litigates, including forfeiture cases, files amicus briefs, and comments on matters of public concern. … that the kitchen is clean, full stop; the reason to add “substantially” is to acknowledge that the standard usually implied by “clean” might not quite be met.
Amicus Curiae Brief — Stephen E. Stockman, Petitioner v. United States
Supreme Court brief · Amicus Curiae Brief · Aug 12, 2020
Id. at 219 (cleaned up). … The justifications for the regulation of express advocacy apply equally to ads aired during those periods if the ads are intended to influence the voters’ decisions and have that effect.
Supreme Court brief · Amicus Curiae Brief · Mar 1, 2021
Air’ (funded by brothers Charles and Sam Wyly)”). … As Justice Scalia wrote, “Requiring people to stand up in public for their political acts fosters civic courage, without which democracy is doomed.” John Doe No. 1 v.
Amicus Curiae Brief — Billy Raymond Counterman, Petitioner v. Colorado
Supreme Court brief · Amicus Curiae Brief · Mar 6, 2023
Ct. at 1891 (cleaned up). … (cleaned up)).
Amicus Curiae Brief — Progress Energy Energy, Inc. v. Taylor (No. 07-539)
Supreme Court brief · Amicus Curiae Brief · 2007
Other Practical Considerations Also a 8 CASEY bok dca te eeckegtecete sewers 14 li TABLE OF CITED AUTHORITIES Page Cases: Air Line Pilots Ass’n, Int’l v. O’Neill, 499 U.S. … See, e.g., Air Line Pilots Ass’n, Intl v. O'Neill, 499 U.S. 65, 78 (1991); Carson v.
Amicus Curiae Brief — Wisconsin Bell, Inc., Petitioner v. United States, ex rel. Todd Heath
Supreme Court brief · Amicus Curiae Brief · May 10, 2024
Co., Reply Comment Letter on Modernizing the E-Rate (Oct. 17. 2013), https://perma.cc/P94C-MVPH. … App. 25a (cleaned up). Rather, all that matters is that “[a]ll of the USAC’s actions are subject to the ultimate control of the principal, the FCC, acting as a part of the United States government.”
Supreme Court brief · Amicus Curiae Brief · 2018
Comment, Turning the Endangered Species Act Inside Out?, 113 Yale L.J. 947 (2004) ................ Jonathan H. … Ho, 311 F.3d 589, 602-04 (5th Cir. 2002) (ag- gregating a single instance of improper asbestos re- moval vio find a substantial effect on interstate commerce due to air pollution under the Clean Air
Amicus Curiae Brief — United States, et al., Applicants v. Texas, et al.
Supreme Court brief · Amicus Curiae Brief · Jul 13, 2022
Regents, 140 S.Ct. at 1913 (cleaned up) (citation omitted). “It would be arbitrary and capricious to ignore such matters.” Id. … For example, the old §1252 provided that during the prior six-month removal period “the Attorney General shall have a period of six months ... to effect the alien’s departure from the United States.” 8
Supreme Court brief · Amicus Curiae Brief · Sep 20, 2023
Circuit courts interpreting the Clean Water Act have long recognized that “the most common way by which pollutants reach the surface waters is through improper ‘land application’” because “when waste is … Defecation, urination, drug deals, assaults, sexual acts, and rape also occur in the open air with increasing impunity.
Amicus Curiae Brief — TRW Inc. v. Andrews
Supreme Court brief · Amicus Curiae Brief · 2001
The FCRA, like the Privacy Act, fits that model. That conclusion is consistent with Congress’s selec- tion of a relatively short limitation period, and with the history and structure of the Act. … commences when the plaintiff has ‘a com- plete and present cause of action,” Bay Area Laundry & Dry Cleaning Pension Trust Fund v.
534 U.S. 19Amicus Curiae Brief — E. Tex. Baptist Univ. v. Burwell, 136 S. Ct. 444 (2015) (No. 15-35)
Supreme Court brief · Amicus Curiae Brief · 2015
Air Regulatory Grp. v. EPA, 134 S. … Ct. 2427, 2444 (2014) (rejecting EPA’s interpretation of the Clean Air Act to authorize rewriting statutory thresholds for green- house-gas emissions in part “because it would bring about an enormous
Amicus Curiae Brief — United States, et al., Petitioners v. Texas, et al.
Supreme Court brief · Amicus Curiae Brief · Jul 13, 2022
Regents, 140 S.Ct. at 1913 (cleaned up) (citation omitted). “It would be arbitrary and capricious to ignore such matters.” Id. … For example, the old §1252 provided that during the prior six-month removal period “the Attorney General shall have a period of six months ... to effect the alien’s departure from the United States.” 8
Amicus Curiae Brief — Daniel Rutherford, Petitioner v. United States
Supreme Court brief · Amicus Curiae Brief · Aug 15, 2025
But “[b]efore the First Step Act was enacted in 2018, federal judges were required to sentence certain first-time offenders convicted of violating 18 U.S.C. § 924(c) . . . to ‘stacked’ 25-year periods … United States, 566 U.S. 231, 242–43 (2012) (cleaned up).
Amicus Curiae Brief — South Dakota v. Wayfair, Inc., 138 S. Ct. 2080 (2018) (No. 17-494)
Supreme Court brief · Amicus Curiae Brief · 2018
If the Court does not act now, Quill threatens to inflict irremediable practical harms even as its legal and economic rationales have van- ished. … As one retail industry commentator noted: The Toys “R” Us bankruptcy is another reminder that retail is in a constant state of disruption, which is why only those retailers that relentlessly adapt
Supreme Court brief · Amicus Curiae Brief · 2015
Air Regulatory Grp. v. EPA, 134 S. … Ct. 2427, 2444 (2014) (rejecting EPA’s interpre- tation of the Clean Air Act to authorize rewriting stat- utory thresholds for greenhouse-gas emissions in part “because it would bring about an enormous
Supreme Court brief · Amicus Curiae Brief · Sep 22, 2023
Air Regulatory Grp. v. EPA, 573 U.S. 302 (2014) ............................................. 10 West Virginia v. EPA, 142 S. … United States, 562 U.S. 44, 54–58 (2011) (Internal Revenue Code); Entergy, 556 U.S. at 224 (Clean Water Act); United States v.
Ask Donna what matters in the record.
She can read the source against your case and show you exactly where the answer came from.