Documents
Briefs, oral arguments, agency decisions and the Federal Register.
10,000+ results
0.32s
Supreme Court brief · Reply Brief · Jul 3, 2025
Larosa, 796 F.3d 399 (4th Cir. 2015). . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .11 Citizens United v. … Id. at 823-24. The court did not search for a benign legislative intent or purpose.
Supreme Court brief · Reply Brief · Jun 10, 2025
United States, No. 24-6203 (Apr. 16, 2025); see also Armster, 806 F.2d at 1356 n.12. … Saenz, No. 23-7809 (argued Feb. 24, 2025), and considered a GVR. Pet. 29-30.
Petition for Writ of Certiorari — Panetti v. Quarterman
Supreme Court brief · Petition for Writ of Certiorari · 2007
Wainwright, 477 U.S. 399 (1986) . 0.0... ccc cc eee eee eee 3] Vargas v. … Wainwright, 477 U.S. 399, 409 (1986) (majority opinion).
551 U.S. 930Petition for Writ of Certiorari — Alejandro Evaristo Perez, Petitioner v. The Walt Disney Company
Supreme Court brief · Petition for Writ of Certiorari · Jun 6, 2023
Automated Medical Laboratories, 4th Circuit, 770 F.2d 399 (1985) 15, 30 USA v. … AUTOMATED MEDICAL LABORATORIES” 770 F.2d 399 [1985] and “USA V.
Supreme Court brief · Amicus Curiae Brief · Jun 24, 2024
L. 391, 399 (2008). … Lacks, supra, at 399-401. This narrow interpretation meant that Section 1983 was 6 rarely invoked against police officers. Id. at 399-401.
Amicus Curiae Brief — Midland Funding, LLC v. Johnson, 137 S. Ct. 326 (2016) (No. 16-348)
Supreme Court brief · Amicus Curiae Brief · 2016
App’x 31 (5th Cir. 2007) ...............00..0.00...9 In re Chaussee, 399 B.R. 225 (B.A.P. 9th Cir. 2008)......... 24, 25, 26 Cope v. Anderson, ETE Rn arc me LITE 13 Crawford v. … In re Chaussee, 399 B.R. at 238.
Record and brief — Coy v. Iowa
Supreme Court brief · Record and brief · 1988
Inadi, at 399. … Green, 399 U.S. 149 (1970) . . _ 5, 7, 9, 24 Chappel v. State, 18 Ark. App. 26, 710 SW.2d 214 SS a ere eee wee Commonwealth v. Ludwig, No. E1003, slip op. (Pa.
487 U.S. 1012Motion to Dismiss or Affirm — Gholston v. Martin
Supreme Court brief · Motion to Dismiss or Affirm · 1982
Kansas City General Hospital, 608 S.W.2d 397, 399 (Mo. 1980); Roberts v. Durham County Hospital, N.C. App. 9 » 389 S.E.2d 875, 878-79 (rejecting strict scrutiny). … Tripi, supra, at 170-72, 267 N.E.2d at 423-24. The court thus properly deferred to the legislative judgment in this pragmatic, policy-laden area.
459 U.S. 808Petitioners Brief — Cupp v. Murphy
Supreme Court brief · Petitioners Brief · 1973
Maroney, 399 U.S. 42, 49 (1970); Carroll v. United States, 267 U.S. 132, 158-159 -_ 15 wt (1925). … Maroney, 399 U.S. 42, 51-52 (1970).
412 U.S. 291Reply Brief — Romag Fasteners, Inc., Petitioner v. Fossil Group, Inc., fka Fossil, Inc., et al.
Supreme Court brief · Reply Brief · Jun 4, 2019
Renosky, 399 F.3d 168 (3d Cir. 2005) ........................................ 3 Church & Dwight Co. v. Russ, 99 F. 276 (C.C.D. … Br. in Opp. 24-25.
Amicus Curiae Brief — Billy Raymond Counterman, Petitioner v. Colorado
Supreme Court brief · Amicus Curiae Brief · Sep 12, 2022
E.g., R.A.V., 505 U.S. at 399 (internal quotation marks omitted); accord United States v. … R.A.V., 505 U.S. at 399 (quoting Chaplinsky v. New Hampshire, 315 U.S. 568, 571–72 (1942)); see also Riley v.
Petition for Writ of Certiorari — Ashley Moore, Petitioner v. United States
Supreme Court brief · Petition for Writ of Certiorari · Jan 8, 2026
Moore, No. 7:24-cr-218-2 (W.D. Tex. Feb. 13, 2025) No other proceedings in state or federal trial or appellate courts, or in this Court, are directly related to this case. … Illinois directly condemns the approach taken below. 399 U.S. 235 (1970).
Petitioner for ReHearing — Roesch v. Roesch
Supreme Court brief · Petitioner for ReHearing · 1979
Addison, 62 Cal.2d 558, 399 P.2d 897, 43 Cal. Rptr. 97, 14 A.L.R.3d 404 (1965) . 12, 13, 14, 15 Hughes v. Hughes, 573 P.2d 1194, 91 N.M. 399 Sai Mex. Sup. … Hughes, supra, 573 P.2d 1194 at p. 1201, 91 N.M. 399, at p. 406.
440 U.S. 915Agency decision · Agency decision
Novo Nordisk A/S, 566 U.S. 399, 408 (2012); see also Massachusetts Laborers' Health & Welfare Fund v. Boehringer Ingelheim Pharms., Inc., No. 24-CV-10565-DJC, 2025 WL 928747, at *20 (D. Mass. … Amneal Pharms. of N.Y., LLC, No. 24-1936 (Fed. Cir. Sept. 6, 2024), ECF No. 62; see also Mem. of Law of Amicus Curiae the Federal Trade Commission in Opp’n to Defs.’
Federal Trade CommissionPetition for Writ of Certiorari — Deshawn Legrier, Petitioner v. United States
Supreme Court brief · Petition for Writ of Certiorari · Nov 30, 2020
Medley, 972 F.3d 399 (4th Cir.), rehearing en banc granted, 2020 WL 6689728 (4th Cir. 2020) …………….……………………….. 6, 9-10 United States v. … See Medley, 972 F.3d 399.
Those Licensed to Perform Marriages by Cherokee Nation Law (2024)
Tribal code · Tribal code
Box 530 Hays, MT 59527 (406) 399-0684 Stephanie Christ, Minister 1729 N.W. 19th St. Oklahoma City, OK 73106 (405) 818-5438 Mildred Banks, Minister Green Country Ceremonies 7750 S. … Box 1084 Westville, OK 74965 (918) 264-6107 Page 4 of 4 2/15/24
Supreme Court brief · Amicus Curiae Brief · 1990
Scheiner, 107 DG ya 9, 12, 15, 24 Arizona Governing Comm. v. Norris, 463 U.S. (a ———————————— 7,11, 15, 19 Armco Inc. v. Hardesty, 467 U.S. 638 (1984)........ 24 Ashland Oil, Inc. v. … Choper, Judicial Review in the National Political Process 174-175 (1980). 24 d.
496 U.S. 18Opposition — Penoli v. California
Supreme Court brief · Opposition · 1979
Maroney (1970) 399 U.S. 42; Cardwell v. Lewis (1975) 417 U.S. 583, 589.) … Maroney, 399 U.S. 42 (1970). See also South Dakota v. Opperman, 428 U.S. 3604, 367 (1976).
440 U.S. 945Opposition Brief — Brigandi v. New York
Supreme Court brief · Opposition Brief · 1973
Louisiana, 399 U.S. 30 (1969) 0.00. 16 Zap v. … Harris, 453 F. 24 1317 (8th Cir. 1972).
414 U.S. 1040Supreme Court brief · Amicus Curiae Brief · Oct 3, 2025
Callais, No. 24-109 (U.S. Aug. 27, 2025)....................... 1, 11 LULAC v. Perry, 548 U.S. 399 (2006) ................................................ 3 iii Merrill v. Milligan, 142 S. … Callais, No. 24-109 at 1 (U.S. Sept. 24, 2025) (citing Nw. Austin Mun. Utility Dist. No. One v. Holder, 557 U.S. 193, 202 (2009)).
Ask Donna what matters in the record.
She can read the source against your case and show you exactly where the answer came from.