Documents
Briefs, oral arguments, agency decisions and the Federal Register.
3,958 results
0.17s
Supreme Court brief · Appendix · 1980
Goode, 423 U.S. 362, 378-81, 96 S.Ct. 598, 46 L.Ed.2d 561 (1976). … Brewer, 408 U.S. 471i, 482, 92 S.Ct. 2593, 2601, 33 L.Ed.2d 484 (1972); Goldberg v.
445 U.S. 263Appendix — Basso v. United States
Supreme Court brief · Appendix · 1981
Watson, 423 U.S. 411 (1976). If it occurred in Basso’s home it could be invalidated under the rule of Payton v. … Fitzharris, 521 F.2d 246 (9th Cir.), cert. denied, 423 U.S. 897 (1975) and United States v.
450 U.S. 965Supreme Court brief · Appendix · 1984
March 26, 1981) ; In re Burka, 423 A.2d 181 (D.C. 1980) (en banc); In re Newsome, No. D-34-79 (D.C. November 21, 1979) ; In re Quimby, 123 U.S. App. D.C. 273, 359 F.2d 257 (1966) (per curiam). … See In the Matter of Burka, 423 A.2d 181 (D.C. App. 1980) {(en banc) ]; In the Matter of Quimby, 123 U.S. App.
469 U.S. 1071Appendix — Fiorillo v. United States (No. 07-1065)
Supreme Court brief · Appendix · 2007
Felix, 545 U.S. 644, 659 (2005); United States v. Cruz, 423 F.3d 1119, 1121 (9th Cir.2005); cf. Carrington v. … Arkansas, 435 U.S. 475, 482, 98 S.Ct. 1178, 55 L.Ed.2d 426 (1978) and Berger v. Kemp, 488 U.S 788 (1987).
Appendix — Local Union No. 3, International Brotherhood of Electrical Workers v. Ingram
Supreme Court brief · Appendix · 1983
Four opinions written by the district court are reported at 482 F. Supp. 414, 482 F. Supp. 426, 482 F. Supp. 918, and 535 F. Supp. 1082. … See Ingram, 482 F.Supp. 414, 423 (S.D.N.Y¥. 1979). l23a In light of the foregoing dis- cussion, the Court sees no reason to reopen the record in this already pro- tracted litigation.
464 U.S. 937Appendix — Shoemaker v. Kellogg
Supreme Court brief · Appendix · 1995
Ie., 408 U.S. at 482. … LOric2, 482 U.S. 423, 430 (1987) (quoting Weaver v. Graham, 450 U.S. 24, 29 (1981)); Dale v. Haeberlin. 878 2d 930, 935 (6th Cir. 198S), cers. Senied, 494 U.S. 1058 (1990).
516 U.S. 907Supreme Court brief · Appendix · 2003
Bowen, 482 U.S. at 146 n. 5, 107 S. Ct. 2287 (quoting Schweiker v. Gray Panthers, 453 U.S. 34, 43, 101 S. … Yuckert, 482 U.S. 137, 146 n.5 1987).
540 U.S. 20Appendix — Lufthansa German Airlines v. Krys
Supreme Court brief · Appendix · 1998
Air France, 470 U.S. at 406, 105 S.Ct. at 1345. … American Airlines, U.S. Dist. Ct.
522 U.S. 1111Appendix — Dodson v. Superior Court of Connecticut
Supreme Court brief · Appendix · 1990
denied, 423 U.S. 825, 96 S.Ct. 39, 46 L.Ed.2d 41 (1975). … Russell, 411 U.S. 423, 432, 93 $.Ct.. 1637, 36 L.Ed.2a 366 (1973).
498 U.S. 896Appendix — Greenholtz v. Inmates of Neb. Penal and Correctional Complex
Supreme Court brief · Appendix · 1979
Brewer, supra, 408 U.S. at 482. Since the protection of the due process clause extends to parolees, it may not be denied to inmates. … Brewer, supra, 408 U.S. at 482 n.8.
442 U.S. 1Appendix — TorPharm, Inc. v. Genpharm, Inc.
Supreme Court brief · Appendix · 2000
Catrett, 477 U.S. 317 (1986). … Zenith Radio Corp., 475 U.S. 574, 587-88 (1986). Conclusory allegations are not sufficient to defeat a motion for summary judgment. Cf. Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc., 477 U.S. 242, 249 (1986).
531 U.S. 1051Appendix — Carr v. Montgomery County Board of Education
Supreme Court brief · Appendix · 1975
6 6 caaver a tee. b4o 2 ts had 421 i 423 ” s Booker T Washington (ir. … School Dist., 5 Cir, 1970, 433 F.2d 387, 394-95; Allen vy, Board of Public Instrue, of Brow- ard County, 5 Cir, 1970, 482 F.2d 362, 367-71 (citing additional cases), cert, denied, 1971, 402 U.S, 952
423 U.S. 986Supreme Court brief · Appendix · 1988
Tennessee Valley Authority, 297 U.S. 288, 345-48, 56 S. Ct. 466, 482-83 (1936) (Brandeis, J., concurring). … Watson, 423 U.S. 411, 416 (1976).
485 U.S. 904Appendix — District of Columbia v. Hansford
Supreme Court brief · Appendix · 1993
at 423, 90 S.Ct. at 1755, 26 L.Ed.2d at 375. See also Howard v. Commissioners of Sinking Fund of City of Louisville, 344 U.S. 624, 73 S.Ct. 465, 97 L.Ed. 617 (1953).° Lowe v. Lowe and Royer v. … Court, 658 P.2d 422, 423 (Nev.), cert. dismissed, 464 U.S. 806, 104 S.Ct. 195, 78 L.Ed.2d 71 (1983).
509 U.S. 905Appendix — Icicle Seafoods, Inc. v. Worthington
Supreme Court brief · Appendix · 1986
Wheeling Pittsburgh Steel Corp., 521 F.2d 31, 37 (3d Cir. 1975), cert. denied, 423 U.S. 1054 (1976); Brown v. ITT Rayonier, Inc., 497 F.2d at 237; Lowe v. California Co., 296 F. … Wheeling Pittsburgh Steel Corp., 521 F.2d 31, 37 (3d Cir. 1975)(worker from labor pool assisting in the loading of barges), cert. denied, 423 U.S. 1054 (1976); Klarman v.
475 U.S. 709Appendix — New York v. United States
Supreme Court brief · Appendix · 1984
Spannus, Attorne General of Minnesota, 436 U.S. 234 von Seer 22 Barrett v. State of New York, 220 N.Y. 423 (1917).... 26 Battle v. … Supp. 482 (N.D. Ala. 1977) w.cccccccccccces 39 Jacobson & Co., Inc. v. Armstrong Cork Co., supra, 54 P.2 at 442 *e eweeeeneenrtneeneeeneeeneeeeeeeee#ee#e 46,47 Keefe v.
466 U.S. 936Appendix — Manbeck v. Katonah-Lewisboro School District (No. 08-116)
Supreme Court brief · Appendix · 2008
New York, 423 F.Supp.2d 129, 145 (S.D.N.Y.2006) (internal quotations omitted). The Due Process Clause of the Fourteenth Amendment protects an individual's property interests. See Bd. … Dist., 10 Misc.3d 1059, 809 N.Y.S.2d 482 (N.Y. Sup.Ct. Westchester Cty.2005); Isquith v. Levitt, 137 N.Y.S.2d 493 (Sup.Ct. Kings Cty.1954).
Appendix — Gunter v. United States (No. 08-104)
Supreme Court brief · Appendix · 2008
Frazier, 423 F.3d at 532 (quoting Zurcher v. Stanford Datly, 436 U.S. 547, 556, (1978)). … Frazier, 423 F.3d at 533 (quoting Leon, 468 U.S. at 922 (internal quotations omitted)).
Supreme Court brief · Appendix · 2006
See 423 U.S. at 144, 96 S. Ct. 335. … Moore, 423 U.S. 122, 140-42 (1975).
546 U.S. 243Appendix — Lucero v. New Mexico
Supreme Court brief · Appendix · 1994
Cervantes, 92 N.M. 643, 647, 593 P.2d 478, 482 ices . aD.2.. . Cate. denied, 92 N.M. 621, 593 P.2d 62 (1979). … App. 1980); State v, Kittredge, 585 P.2d 423, 424-25 (or. Ct. App. 1978).
510 U.S. 1115
Ask Donna what matters in the record.
She can read the source against your case and show you exactly where the answer came from.