Documents

Petition for a Writ of Certiorari — Karger v. United States

Supreme Court brief · Petition for a Writ of Certiorari · 1971

After a recommendation of five years concurrent to all counts made by the Depart- ment of Justice, petitioner was sentenced to twelve years incarceration on October 14, 1970 (R. at 24-35).* Petitioner … Alabama, 399 U.S. 1 (1970), requires that a preliminary hearing be held.

Petitioners Brief — Nieschlag & Co. v. Atlantic Mutual Insurance

Supreme Court brief · Petitioners Brief · 1942

Y. 24, 29). … Y, 24, 29. Conclusion.

Amicus Curiae Brief — Jimcy McGirt, Petitioner v. Oklahoma

Supreme Court brief · Amicus Curiae Brief · Mar 20, 2020

Utah, 510 U.S. 399, 411 (1994); Solem, 465 U.S. at 471; Rosebud Sioux Tribe v. Kneip, 430 U.S. 584, 588 n.4 (1977). … and Indian tribes, including those relating to tobacco, motor fuel sales tax, gaming, motor vehicle and license tags, water rights, and water quality that greatly benefit their members.2 Nations Br. 15-24

Transcript of Record — Brown Shoe Co. v. United States

Supreme Court brief · Transcript of Record · 1962

fg ea. a anen es 00 9.98 i i 40 4 = Ur vw t) ut ; OS 2.99 ‘an een aaa 830 6 SS Bw BB 6 AY ——15-—1 ee >| OS 4.99 28 399s 9 “3? … 260 Bo 3299 53 24 24 15 4299 1 $.9¢ && LY.) 19 27 25 10 6099 196 9? 56 80 2?

Petition for Writ of Certiorari — Isaiah Kahlil Wise, Petitioner v. United States

Supreme Court brief · Petition for Writ of Certiorari · Sep 22, 2025

Id. at 24. … Illinois, 399 U.S. 235 (1970).

Safety Zones; Captain of the Port Detroit Zone

Federal Register · Rule · Jul 25, 2003

DEPARTMENT OF HOMELAND SECURITY Coast Guard 33 CFR Part 165 [CGD09-03-399] RIN 1625-AA00 Safety Zones; Captain of the Port Detroit Zone AGENCY: Coast Guard, DHS. … [FR Doc. 03-18923 Filed 7-24-03; 8:45 am] BILLING CODE 4910-15-P

Respondents Brief — Watts v. Seward School Bd.

Supreme Court brief · Respondents Brief · 1968

Comm'n, 61 Cal. 24-331, 38 Cal. … E@ttc:, 357 U.S. 399 (1958); and Schware v. Board of Bar.Examiners, 353 U.S. 232 (1957)..

Petition for Writ of Certiorari — Freddie Quinn, Petitioner v. Florida

Supreme Court brief · Petition for Writ of Certiorari · Jan 12, 2024

Florida, 399 U.S. 78, 86 (1970), that juries as small as six were constitutionally permissible. … New York, 399 U.S. 117, 122-23 (1970) (citation omitted) (Harlan, J., concurring in the result in Williams).

Petition for Writ of Certiorari — Keith Raniere, Petitioner v. United States

Supreme Court brief · Petition for Writ of Certiorari · Mar 6, 2023

United States, 391 U.S. 123, 88 S.Ct. 1620, 20 L.Ed.2d 476 (1968) .....................................21, 24 California v. Green, 399 U.S. 149, 158, 90 S. Ct. 1930, 26 L. … Green, 399 U.S. 149, 158, 90 S. Ct. 1930, 1935, 26 L.

Petition — Boswell v. United States

Supreme Court brief · Petition · 1978

Maroney, 399 U.S. 42 (1970) Chapman v. United States? 386 U.S. 18 (1967) Coleman v. Alabama, 399 U.S. 1 (1970) Freeman v. United States, 227 Fed. 732 (Second Cir., 1915) Haith v. … The judgment of the United States Court of Appeals for the Fifth _ Circuit is printed in Appendix B, infra, p. 24.

Amicus Curiae Brief — Crawford v. Washington

Supreme Court brief · Amicus Curiae Brief · 2004

Green, 399 U.S. 149, 158 (1970)). … Green, 399 US. at 158.

Brief for the United States — Ming v. United States

Supreme Court brief · Brief for the United States · 1972

Miriani, 422 F.2d 150, 153-154 (C.A. 6), certiorari denied, 399 U.S. 910; United States v. Prudden, 424 F.2d 1021 (C.A. 5), certiorari denied, 400 U.S. 831; United States v. … Federal Rules of Criminal Procedure: Rule 24. TRIAL JURORS * > am * * (b) Peremptory Challenges.

Reply Brief — Devan Pierson, Petitioner v. United States

Supreme Court brief · Reply Brief · Jan 26, 2021

Medley, 972 F.3d 399 (4th Cir. 2020).................................... 7 United States v. Miller, 891 F.3d 1220 (10th Cir. 2018)...................... passim United States v. … App.18, 24, 26-27.

Opposition Brief — United States, Petitioner v. Saleem Hakim

Supreme Court brief · Opposition Brief · Jan 17, 2023

Alabama, 399 U.S. 1 (1970), cited by the Petition at 12, 13, 14, 16, and 17). … See Dkt. 47 at 12:25–13:2; Dkt. 82 at 4:1–5, 4:24–25. In addition, without counsel, Mr.

Amicus Curiae Brief — Tamer Mahmoud, et al., Petitioners v. Thomas W. Taylor, et al.

Supreme Court brief · Amicus Curiae Brief · Apr 9, 2025

L. & Educ. 399 (2003) .............................................. 24 VII Other Authorities—Continued: Volokh, Equal Treatment Is Not Establishment, 13 Notre Dame J.L. Ethics & Pub. … See The Schoolhouse Gate, supra, at 394-399. In Wallace v.

Petition for Writ of Certiorari — Arron Benedetti, et al., Petitioners v. Marin County, California, et al.

Supreme Court brief · Petition for Writ of Certiorari · Apr 24, 2026

Nebraska, 262 U.S. 390, 399 (1923)—also encompasses the fundamental right not to be forced into an occupation of the government’s choosing? … On February 5, 2026, this Court granted an application for an extension of time to file a petition for writ of certiorari, to and including April 24, 2026.

IDEXX Laboratories, Inc.; Analysis of Proposed Consent Order To Aid Public Comment

Federal Register · Notice · Jan 3, 2013

DATES: Comments must be received on or before January 24, 2013. … The Commission will consider all timely and responsive public comments that it receives on or before January 24, 2012.

Brief for the Respondent in Opposition — Thomas v. Ford Motor Motor Co (Nos. 74-1251, 74-1284)

Supreme Court brief · Brief for the Respondent in Opposition · 1974

The correct facts and proceedings are generally as stated by the District Court (A .15-.18, .24-.26, .30)? and by the Court of Appeals (A .1-.6, .8, .11-.14). … We do emphasize that the District Judge independently and thoroughly considered and rejected plaintiff’s charges of unfair representation (A .22-.24), and plaintiff’s con- tractual arguments (A .24-

Petition for Writ of Certiorari — Burnet v. Thompson Oil & Gas Co.

Supreme Court brief · Petition for Writ of Certiorari · 1931

Commissioner, 31 F. (2d) 399 (C..C. … A. 24), 28 F. (2a) 803 Burns v. Com mer (C. ©. A. 5th); 31 F. (24) a buna | aa i Rice Sy i 2 st Se ~DeLoss v.

Opposition Brief — Taylor Forge Stainless, Inc. v. Viacom International, Inc.

Supreme Court brief · Opposition Brief · 2000

Shepard Niles, Inc., 11 F.3d 399 (3d Cir. 1993) ............. Leonhardt v. Western Sugar Co., 160 F.3d 631 (10th a och twos vebvecneceeswescss Page 6 iv Cited Authorities Page Maryland Cas. … josned under Rule 14 (third-party practice or impleader), Rule 19 (necessary parties), Rule 20 (proper parties), or Rule 24 (intervention).”)