Documents
Briefs, oral arguments, agency decisions and the Federal Register.
10,000+ results
0.11s
Amicus Curiae Brief — Alaska v. Southeast Alaska Alaska Conservation Council (No. 07-990)
Supreme Court brief · Amicus Curiae Brief · 2009
EPA, Clean Water Act Section 404(c) “Veto Authority.” … National Research Council, Compensating for Wet- land Losses Under the Clean Water Act 2 (2001).
Amicus Curiae Brief — City of Albuquerque v. Homans
Supreme Court brief · Amicus Curiae Brief · 2004
REV. 39 (1999) ..............ccccccseeeeeeee 7 California Clean Election Campaign, Arizona — Clean Elections Works! at http://www.caclean.org/content/ victories/az_works.php? … * California Clean Election Campaign, Arizona - Clean Elections Works! at http://www.caclean.org/content/victories/az_works.php?path= content/victories/az_works.php&. 10 New State Ice Co. v.
543 U.S. 1002Amicus Curiae Brief — eBay Inc. v. MERCEXCHANGE, LLC
Supreme Court brief · Amicus Curiae Brief · 2005
In the comments to the final bill regarding Section 283, the editors note that “this section is the same as the provision which opens R.S. § 4921 with minor changes in language.” H.R. Rep. … Air Act (42 U.S.C. § 7608): and (8) limited the enforceability of certain medical procedures patents (35 U.S.C. § 287)
546 U.S. 1029Supreme Court brief · Amicus Curiae Brief · Feb 22, 2018
Those facts are straightforward: First, the FCC established the rules for Auction 97 through public notice and comment. … .; Utility Air Regulatory Group v.
Amicus Curiae Brief — Chemical Manufacturers Ass'n v. Natural Resources Defense Council, Inc.
Supreme Court brief · Amicus Curiae Brief · 1987
an essential element of the Clean Water Act’s pretreatment program. … THE DECISION BELOW UPSETS EPA’S LONG- STANDING INTERPRETATION OF THE CLEAN WATER ACT RELIED UPON BY POTWs.
479 U.S. 1084Supreme Court brief · Amicus Curiae Brief · 1986
an essential element of the Clean Water Act’s pretreatment program. … THE DECISION BELOW UPSETS EPA’S LONG- STANDING INTERPRETATION OF THE CLEAN WATER ACT RELIED UPON BY POTWs.
Amicus Curiae Brief — Obergefell v. Hodges
Supreme Court brief · Amicus Curiae Brief · 2015
Air Products’ materials technologies segment serves the semiconductor, polyurethanes, cleaning and coatings, and adhesives industries. … Ypsilanti Downtown Development Authority is a downtown development authority in Ypsilanti, Michigan organized under the Downtown Develop- ment Authority Act, Act 197 of 1975.
576 U.S. 644Amicus Curiae Brief — Relentless, Inc., et al., Petitioners v. Department of Commerce, et al.
Supreme Court brief · Amicus Curiae Brief · Nov 27, 2023
Air Regulatory Grp. v. EPA, 573 U.S. 302 (2014), and Nat’l Ass’n of Mfrs. v. Dep’t of Def., 138 S. Ct. 617 (2018). … EPA, 576 U.S. 743 (2015), this Court held that a “necessary and appropriate” clause in the Clean Air Act requires an agency to weigh the various, contextsensitive factors that inform sound policy.
Amicus Curiae Brief — Deaton v. United States
Supreme Court brief · Amicus Curiae Brief · 2004
under the Clean Water Act. … That is not what the Clean Water Act says.
541 U.S. 972Supreme Court brief · Amicus Curiae Brief · Oct 25, 2024
Rather, Congress directed that the acting agency retains responsibility for considering such effects and must “consult with and obtain the comments of any Federal agency which has jurisdiction by law or … See, e.g., 33 U.S.C. § 1371(c) 20 (exempting from NEPA review certain EPA permitting actions under the Clean Water Act); 42 U.S.C. § 5159 (exempting from NEPA review certain disaster-restoration actions
Supreme Court brief · Amicus Curiae Brief · Jul 10, 2025
City of Boston, Massachusetts, 596 U.S. 243, 247-48 (2022) (cleaned up). … Again, all unanswered. 22 FHSAA is not acting consistently.
Amicus Curiae Brief — Chemical Waste Management, Inc. v. Hunt
Supreme Court brief · Amicus Curiae Brief · 1992
Regulation of PCBs Under the Toxic Sub- stances Control Act. … This statute cre- ated a mechanism by which EPA can either compel the cleanup of sites that pose a threat to the environment or clean up those sites itself. 42 U.S.C. §§ 9604, 9606.
504 U.S. 334Amicus Curiae Brief — Winston Tyler Hencely, Petitioner v. Fluor Corporation, et al.
Supreme Court brief · Amicus Curiae Brief · Aug 7, 2025
Connecticut, 564 U.S. 410, 415 (2011) (holding that the Clean Air Act displaces federal common law). 22 Int’l Paper Co. v. … Ouellette, 479 U.S. 481, 489 (1987) (holding that the Clean Water Act displaces federal common law and down-river state law); Arkansas v. Oklahoma, 503 U.S. 91, 99– 100 (1992) (same). 23 Am.
Amicus Curiae Brief — South Dakota v. Rosebud Sioux Tribe
Supreme Court brief · Amicus Curiae Brief · 1991
Moreover, this scheme is likely to change in the immediate future, because the 1990 Amendments to the Clean Air Act have granted the Administrator of the EPA authority to determine whether States or … Indian tribes should exert Clean Air authority on reservations.
500 U.S. 915Amicus Curiae Brief — County of Maui, Hawaii, Petitioner v. Hawaii Wildlife Fund, et al.
Supreme Court brief · Amicus Curiae Brief · Jul 19, 2019
................................ 4, 17 1 STATEMENT OF INTEREST OF AMICI1 The two localities listed as amici curiae represent Southeastern, county governments in support of the critical role that the Clean … See Water Quality Act of 1987, Pub.L.
Supreme Court brief · Amicus Curiae Brief · Aug 15, 2019
Facundo Vila comments in a letter to Ms. Lidia Guerrero, Mr. … Comments by Víctor Saldaño obtained by Mr.
Supreme Court brief · Amicus Curiae Brief · Mar 4, 2024
Erie Street between SOMA and the Mission 7 In effect, a significant number of San Francisco’s public spaces have been converted into unofficial open-air public housing facilities. … Using the 2016 encampment ordinance and other public safety laws that prohibit camping or sleeping in public places, the City began cleaning up several homeless encampments per week.28 Before cleaning
Supreme Court brief · Amicus Curiae Brief · Sep 19, 2025
Similarly, Idaho’s Fairness in Women’s Sports Act provides that participation is determined by a student’s “reproductive anatomy, genetic makeup, or normal endogenously produced testosterone levels.” … Cf. id. at 1851 (Barrett, J., concurring) (cleaned up).
Amicus Curiae Brief — PennEast Pipeline Company, LLC, Petitioner v. New Jersey, et al.
Supreme Court brief · Amicus Curiae Brief · Apr 7, 2021
Some guarantee clean water or air and grant related environmental rights to State citizens. 2 2. Ala. Const. art. XI, § 219.07(1); Cal. Const. art. X, § 2; Colo. Const. art. XVIII, § 6; Fla. … The constitutions of Hawaii, Illinois, Massachusetts, Montana, Pennsylvania, and Rhode Island all contain Environmental Rights Amendments, providing their citizens with an individual right to clean air
Amicus Curiae Brief — Friedrichs v. Cal. Teachers Ass'n, 135 S. Ct. 2933 (2015) (No. 14-915)
Supreme Court brief · Amicus Curiae Brief · 2015
ITT Sahoo eiceeeinceiiatinteit acted aaa taciiniatitan Rita F. Fahy, Paul R. LeBlanc, and Joseph L. … For example, NFPA 1851 provides that fire departments should provide the means to have PPE cleaned and decontaminated.
Ask Donna what matters in the record.
She can read the source against your case and show you exactly where the answer came from.