Documents

Briefs, oral arguments, agency decisions and the Federal Register.

10,000+ results

1.31s

  • Amicus Curiae Brief — Tanco v. Haslam, 135 S. Ct. 1040 (2015) (No. 14-562)

    Supreme Court brief · Amicus Curiae Brief · 2015

    Air Products’ materials technologies segment serves the semiconductor, polyurethanes, cleaning and coatings, and adhesives industries. … Ypsilanti Downtown Development Authority is a downtown development authority in Ypsilanti, Michigan organized under the Downtown Develop- ment Authority Act, Act 197 of 1975.

  • Amicus Curiae Brief — Deboer v. Snyder, 135 S. Ct. 1040 (2015) (No. 14-571)

    Supreme Court brief · Amicus Curiae Brief · 2015

    Air Products’ materials technologies segment serves the semiconductor, polyurethanes, cleaning and coatings, and adhesives industries. … Ypsilanti Downtown Development Authority is a downtown development authority in Ypsilanti, Michigan organized under the Downtown Develop- ment Authority Act, Act 197 of 1975.

  • Amicus Curiae Brief — Michael Sackett, et ux., Petitioners v. Environmental Protection Agency, et al.

    Supreme Court brief · Amicus Curiae Brief · Oct 25, 2021

    Chamber of Commerce, Comment Letter on Proposed Rule: Definition of “Waters of the United States” Under the Clean Water Act (Nov. 12, 2014), https://www.regulations.gov/comment/EP A-HQ-OW-2011-0880-14115 … Waters Advocacy Coalition, Comments on Proposed Rule to Define “Waters of the United States” Under the Clean Water Act, at 65 (Nov. 13, 2014).10 And the impact of such uncertainty is widespread, as the

  • Amicus Curiae Brief — Swierkiewicz v. Sorema NA

    Supreme Court brief · Amicus Curiae Brief · 2002

    and the Pregnancy Discrimination Act. … United Air Lines, Inc., 216 F.3d 1111, 1114 (D.C. Cir. 2000); Yamaguchi v. U.S. Dept. of the Air Force, 109 F.3d 1475, 1480-81 (9th Cir. 1997). 13 4.

    534 U.S. 506
  • Amicus Curiae Brief — Chevron USA Incorporated, et al., Petitioners v. Plaquemines Parish, Louisiana, et al.

    Supreme Court brief · Amicus Curiae Brief · Nov 20, 2025

    That period spanned nearly two centuries of major conflicts, foreign and domestic. … ‘acts’ that are the subject of the complaints” (cleaned up)); Parishes Br. 21-22 & n.18 (“The causation standard applied by this Court when Watson was decided in 2007 is substantially the same as it is

  • Amicus Curiae Brief — Department of Interior v. Klamath Water Users Protective Assn.

    Supreme Court brief · Amicus Curiae Brief · 2001

    For example, a legal newspaper covered a Ninth Circuit decision to treat a Native American Tribe as a state under the Clean Water Act and its effect on subsequent case law. … Because the primary purpose of the FOI Act is disclosure, any exemptions must be narrowly construed. Department of the Air Force v. Rose, 425 U.S. 352, 361 (1976).

    532 U.S. 1
  • Amicus Curiae Brief — Randall v. Sorrell

    Supreme Court brief · Amicus Curiae Brief · 2006

    .:..sssscsccsssserscersreenes 7 Kelly Burton, Money, Politics and Campaign I IG Diiccectichierianncscttneitisachibcicithdeipemenensertenenic 6 California Clean Election Campaign, Arizona - Clean Elections … “ California Clean Election Campaign, Arizona - Clean Elections Works! at http//www.caclean.org/content/victories/az_works.php?path= content/victories/az_works.php&. 10 2.

    548 U.S. 230
  • Amicus Curiae Brief — Marek v. Chesny

    Supreme Court brief · Amicus Curiae Brief · 1985

    Il), 42 U.S.C. § 2000e-(k) (Title VII) .............. 14 The Civil Rights Attorneys’ Fees Awards Act of 1976, 42 Sees GE, SN I co cctcddeneduectececuwad passim The Clean Air Act, 42 U.S.C. § 7622 … The Wilderness Society, 421 U.S. 240 (1975), which held that the federal courts could not award attorneys’ fees absent express statutory authorization. 14 See, e.g., The Clean Air Act, 42 U.S.C. § 7622

    473 U.S. 1
  • Amicus Curiae Brief — Bennett v. Spear

    Supreme Court brief · Amicus Curiae Brief · 1997

    ¢i 6 ooeeeeces 16 i vette tes ks 6s eee eee e < 19 iii TABLE OF AUTHORITIES CITED Cases Air Courier Conference of America v. … Gorsuch, 688 F.2d 1263 (9th Cir. 1982), a case which involved standing under the Clean Water Act’s Citizen-suit provision.

    520 U.S. 154
  • Amicus Curiae Brief — James L. Kisor, Petitioner v. Robert Wilkie, Secretary of Veterans Affairs

    Supreme Court brief · Amicus Curiae Brief · Jan 31, 2019

    Petitioner, ROBERT WILKIE, ACTING SECRETARY OF VETERANS AFFAIRS, Respondent. … Consider also how Auer deference nullified Arizona’s efforts to discharge its duties under the Clean Air Act.

  • Amicus Curiae Brief — Rapanos v. United States

    Supreme Court brief · Amicus Curiae Brief · 2005

    Federal and _ State Partners Recognize the Importance of Broad Clean Water Act Jurisdiction to Bay Watershed Restoration. .:.....................0006 20 The Chesapeake Bay Partners Must the Clean … Water’ Act Throughout the Watershed to Restore Chesapeake Bay........................... 21 The Bay partners need broad Clean Water Act jurisdiction to improve water quality. ..............22 2.

    546 U.S. 932
  • Amicus Curiae Brief — Love Terminal Partners, L.P., et al., Petitioners v. United States

    Supreme Court brief · Amicus Curiae Brief · Mar 15, 2019

    Susan Rose-Ackerman, Against Ad Hockery: A Comment on Michelman, 88 Colum. L. Rev. 1697, 1700 (1988). … The Wright Amendment Reform Act (“WARA”) mooted those efforts, and stymied JetBlue’s hopes of gaining competitive access to Dallas through Love Field.

  • Amicus Curiae Brief — Isabel Rico, Petitioner v. United States

    Supreme Court brief · Amicus Curiae Brief · Aug 21, 2025

    Herstein, A Normative Theory of the Clean Hands Defense, 17 Legal Theory 171 (2011) ................................... 8 T. Leigh Anenson, Announcing the “Clean Hands” Doctrine, 51 U.C. Davis L. … Talley, 83 F.4th at 1302 (cleaned up).

  • Amicus Curiae Brief — Festo Corp. v. Shoketsu Kinzoku Kogyo Kabushiki Co.

    Supreme Court brief · Amicus Curiae Brief · 2002

    Linde Air Prods. Co., $29 US. GB6 (BOSD) ..cccocessesossnecnnenssesntintepsniniemmnmaaniaal 14 Lemelson v. … Linde Air Prods. Co., 329 U.S. 605, 607-08 (1950). 14 6.

    535 U.S. 722
  • Amicus Curiae Brief — Johnson & Johnson, et al., Petitioners v. Lynn Fitch, Attorney General of Mississippi, ex rel. Mississippi

    Supreme Court brief · Amicus Curiae Brief · Oct 4, 2021

    As long as the FDA “act[s] within the scope of [that] congressionally delegated authority,” it may enact binding requirements with preemptive effect whether or not it acts through “notice-and-comment rulemaking … “During the effective period of [that] declaration,” the PREP Act preempts most state laws that differ from “any requirement applicable under” the PREP Act. Id. § 247d-6d(b)(8).

  • Amicus Curiae Brief — Solid Waste Agency of Northern Cook Cty. v. Army Corps of Engineers

    Supreme Court brief · Amicus Curiae Brief · 2001

    Criminal Prosecutions Under the Clean Water Act Are Frequent. … Lopez: Can the Clean Water Act and the Endangered Species Act Survive Commerce Clause Attack?, 15 Va. Envtl.

    531 U.S. 159
  • Amicus Curiae Brief — City of Edmonds v. Oxford House, Inc.

    Supreme Court brief · Amicus Curiae Brief · 1995

    provisions of the Fair Housing Act Amendments (FHAA). … As this court has already recognized, the City may exercise its police powers to "lay out zones where family values, youth values, and the blessings of quiet seclusion and clean air make the area a

    514 U.S. 725
  • Amicus Curiae Brief — SNR Wireless LicenseCo, LLC, et al., Petitioners v. Federal Communications Commission, et al.

    Supreme Court brief · Amicus Curiae Brief · Feb 22, 2018

    Those facts are straightforward: First, the FCC established the rules for Auction 97 through public notice and comment. … .; Utility Air Regulatory Group v.

  • Amicus Curiae Brief — Merrill Lynch, Pierce, Fenner & Smith, Inc. v. Ware

    Supreme Court brief · Amicus Curiae Brief · 1973

    Lockheed Air’ Terminal, Ine., 41% AFB: OBIE. BEE BGO Wow dea sorowa? wrado i-Discrimination Comm'n v. … Govern- ment would keep the shotgun, so to speak, behind the door, loaded, well oiled, cleaned, ready for use but. with the hope it would never have:to be used.”

    414 U.S. 117
  • Amicus Curiae Brief — J. T. H., et al., Petitioners v. Spring Cook

    Supreme Court brief · Amicus Curiae Brief · Dec 14, 2022

    Biddle, 177 F.2d 579, 581 (2d Cir. 1949)) (cleaned up). In Mullenix v. … The relevant inquiry is not the means of violation; it is whether the official had fair notice that she “acted unreasonably.” Mullenix, 577 U.S. at 13–14.

Ask Donna what matters in the record.

She can read the source against your case and show you exactly where the answer came from.

Ask Donna

A word about cookies

We need a few to keep you signed in and the library working. The rest help us see which pages people use and where they get stuck. They stay off unless you say yes.