Documents
Briefs, oral arguments, agency decisions and the Federal Register.
10,000+ results
0.08s
Supreme Court brief · Amicus Curiae Brief · 2016
Icon Health & Fitness, Inc., EE Le os bk be eae oa ee A 1,16 Oracle Corp., In re, 399 F. App’x 587 (Fed. Cir.2010).............. 13 Personal Audio, LLC v. … Suarez, n,. .. se bh ekcue es ele eee 9, 24 Red Wing Shoe Co. v. Hockerson-Halberstadt, Inc., 148 F.3d 1355 (Fed. Cir. 1998) ............... 24 Reuben H. Donnelley Corp. v.
Motion to Affirm — Louisiana Financial Assistance Commission v. Poindexter
Supreme Court brief · Motion to Affirm · 1968
A10), On October 19, 1966, the United States filed-its motion, ° for leave to intervene as a party plaintiff pursuant to © Section 902 of the Civil Rights Act of 1964 (42 U.S.0. 2000h-2) and Rule 24 … Aaron, supra; Andersonv: ~ ~° | Martin, 375 U.S. 399; Lombard v. Louisiana, 373 U.S. | 267 ; ‘NAACP. v. Alabama, 357 U.S. 449; Hamm v. Virginia State Board of Elections, 230 F.
389 U.S. 571Appendix — Franco-Gomez v. United States
Supreme Court brief · Appendix · 1982
Fulton, 549 F.24 1325, 1327 (9th Cir. 1977); United States v. McLaughlin, $25 F.2d $17, 520-21 (9th Cir. 1975), cert. denied, 427 U.S. 904 (1976); United States v. … Louisiana, 399 U.S. 30, 34 (1970), and United States v. Matlock, 415 U.S. 164, 177-78, n. 14 (1074). Because the : © government failed to meet its burden in this case, we reverse.”
459 U.S. 1018Reply Brief — RODGERS v. UNITED STATES (Nos. 79-1030, 79-1028, 1029)
Supreme Court brief · Reply Brief · 1979
Local 50, 294 F.2d 399 (2d Cir. 1961), aff’d on other grounds, 370 U.S. 254 (1962), when the equally-divided en banc court, by a 4-2 vote, affirmed the district court rather than the panel, and his … United States, No. 78-1202, 48 L.W. 4250 (March 18, 1980). 7 failure to include a bribery instruction in connection with the mail fraud counts is of no material conse- quence (Brief in Opp., at pp. 24
Petitioners Brief — Graham & Foster v. Goodcell
Supreme Court brief · Petitioners Brief · 1931
On February 24, 1921 the petitioner filed a claim for abatement covering this additional assess- ment and also the additional assessment of $13,299.62, for 1918. … S. 399). Wiborg v. United States, (163 U. S. 632). Every word of a statute is to be given effect. Wil- mot vy. Mudge, (103, U. S., 217); Early v.
282 U.S. 409Opinion — Tutun v. United States
Supreme Court brief · Opinion · 1926
United States, 94 U.S. 397, 399. Or it may provide only a legal remedy. Compare Turner v. United States, 248 U. 8. 354. … No. 4984, pp. 18-24. The section makes no reference to appellate proceedings.
270 U.S. 568Prologue — Dentsply International, Inc. v. United States
Supreme Court brief · Prologue · 2006
OPINIONS BELOW The Third Circuit’s opinion is reported at 399 F.3d 181. (Pet. App. la-26a). The district court’s opinion is reported at 2/7 F. Supp. 2d 387. (Pet. App. 27a-145a). … JURISDICTION The Third Circuit issued its judgment on February 24, 2005, and denied a timely petition for rehearing and rehearing en banc on May 17, 2005. (Pet. App. 146a-47a).
546 U.S. 1089Petition for Writ of Certiorari — Bourns, Inc. v. Allen-Bradley Co.
Supreme Court brief · Petition for Writ of Certiorari · 1973
The decree of the Court of Appeals. entered on June 14, 1973, appears at A-24. The order of the Court of Appeals deny- ing a rehearing appears at A-25. … Kolodziejski, 399 U.S. 204 (1970); Cipriano v. City of Houma, 395 U.S. 701 (1969); and Allen v. State Board of Elections, 393 U.S. 544 (1969).
414 U.S. 1094Brief for the Respondent in Opposition — Frankel v. New Jersey
Supreme Court brief · Brief for the Respondent in Opposition · 1973
J. 399, 217 A. 2d 441 (1966)... = 4-7 ul TABLE OF CONTENTS Steenback, In re, 34 N. J. 89, 167 A. 2d 397 (1961)... Teine, In re, 17 N. J. 170, 110 A, 2d 93 (1954)............ United States vy. … The court gave | i her 24 hours to reconsider her position, warning her that! { it would hold her in contempt of court if she did not change it (Pa6).
409 U.S. 1125Motion — DeLong Corp. v. Oregon ex rel. State Highway Commission
Supreme Court brief · Motion · 1973
Standard Oil Company of California, 399 U.S. 222. We are assuming that in a case originating in the Oregon state courts the motion should be filed in this Court. … STEPHANIE SLATER Notary Public for Oregon My Commission Expires: 1/24/75 SEAL : ee OLLIE FOIE COE EIR IGE
411 U.S. 965Brief for the Respondents in Opposition — Speten v. Bowles
Supreme Court brief · Brief for the Respondents in Opposition · 1945
Russell, 298 N.Y. 492, 58 N. . 24 508 5 OQeeanic Sieam Navigation Co. v. Stranahan, 214. … Mitchell, 303 U. 8. 391, 399-404, and cases cited therein. 5 Petitioner’s answer did not advert to the Fifth Amend- ment but to Article IIL, Section 2 and the Sixth Amendment ax support for the constitutional
324 U.S. 877Petition — Edwards v. Tennessee
Supreme Court brief · Petition · 1977
Green, 399 U.S., at 161.” 400 U.S. 74, at p. 79. —_ Mrs. … Green, 399 U.S. 149, 90 S.Ct. 1930, 26 L.Ed. 2d 489 (1969), the Supreme Court, while refusing to set forth a theory that would determine the validity of all such hear- say ‘exceptions’ (399 U.S. at
429 U.S. 1061Petition for Writ of Certiorari — Smith v. United States
Supreme Court brief · Petition for Writ of Certiorari · 2010
Green, 399 U.S. 149 (1970)... ec eeeeeeeees 21 Cooper Industries, Inc. v. Leatherman Tool Group, Inc., 682 U.S. 424 (2001) 0... eceeesenees 20, 22 Cooter & Gell v. Hartmarz Corp., 496 U.S. … Green, 399 U.S. 149, 158 (1970) (internal quotation marks omitted). It has also deemed the right of confrontation to be “one of the fundamental guaran- tees of life and liberty,” Kirby v.
562 U.S. 1061Petition for Writ of Certiorari — Mark Anthony Jenkins, Petitioner v. Timothy O'Rourke, et al.
Supreme Court brief · Petition for Writ of Certiorari · Jul 17, 2020
Latasha Jackson, No. 2015'CA 399, Fifth Circuit Court of Appeal, State ofLouisiana, Disposition handed down on July 31, 2015. Ill Mark Anthony Jenkins v. … Latasha Jackson, No. 2015'CA-399, Fifth Circuit Court of Appeal, State of Louisiana! rehearing denied Sept. 2, 2015. Mark Anthony Jenkins, Sr. v.
Petition for Writ of Certiorari — Gregory Carter, Petitioner v. Blaine Lafler, Warden
Supreme Court brief · Petition for Writ of Certiorari · Mar 26, 2018
Dated: March 24, 2017 /s/ Robert J. Jonker ROBERT J. … filed 08/24/06 PageID.193 Page 1 of 46 APP 108 A-15 Case 1:09-cv-00215-RJJ-RSK ECF No. 13 filed 08/24/06 PageID.231 Page 39 of 46 APP 109 Case 1:09-cv-00215-RJJ-RSK ECF No. 13 filed 08/24/06 PageID
Amicus Curiae Brief — Miller v. Florida
Supreme Court brief · Amicus Curiae Brief · 1987
Florida, 466 So. 24 1018 (Fla. Dist. ct. App. 1985). … Id. at 399.
482 U.S. 423Amicus Curiae Brief — Patterson v. McLean Credit Union
Supreme Court brief · Amicus Curiae Brief · 1989
shere Congress is free to this Court's a von”), Unsed Seases » South R# Co 399 US. 771, 1-751 Consraries, Congress can rely our aiouke and exe ch cumstances reversal & aot readily to be made”) (ctavon … Crary should not be overruled june 24, 1988 Alabama 5520) New York, New York 100% it Respectfully submated. iH Ff Twomas D Baar Cowman Kk. Hanree Sruast ).
491 U.S. 164Opposition — United States v. Watson
Supreme Court brief · Opposition · 1975
DATED: January 24, 1975 Subscribed and sworn to before me on January 24, 1975 “arc €VrORMA aS, rr uM. … Maroney, 399 U.S. 42, 90 S.Ct. 1975.
423 U.S. 411Brief for the Respondents in Opposition — Raladam Co. v. United States
Supreme Court brief · Brief for the Respondents in Opposition · 1944
Contrary to the basic premise of petitioner's entire argument (Pet. 14-17, 24-49), neither the 606431—44—. 2 g trial court nor the cireuit court of appeals hela that Section 502 (j) of the Act is … Lexington Mill and Elevator Company, 232 U.S. 399. 3.
323 U.S. 731Petition for Writ of Certiorari — Pugh v. Florida
Supreme Court brief · Petition for Writ of Certiorari · 1985
occasion a different boat named the Sea Angel (See Appendix E, pages 24 and 25). Affiant never saw any illegal activity and neither did anyone else (See Appendix E, pages 24 and 57). c. … Winkel Counsel for Petitioner -24- LY IRN.
474 U.S. 847
Ask Donna what matters in the record.
She can read the source against your case and show you exactly where the answer came from.