Documents
Briefs, oral arguments, agency decisions and the Federal Register.
10,000+ results
0.72s
Opposition Brief — AT&T Corp. v. RLH Industries, Inc. (No. 05-1493)
Supreme Court brief · Opposition Brief · 2006
P.A. 32a, q 24. … Ct. 399; 163 L. Ed. 2d 277 (2005). 14. Beretta sought review of District of Columbia v.
Petition for A Writ of Certiorari — Allen v. United States
Supreme Court brief · Petition for A Writ of Certiorari · 1942
C. 399, 408... ... 21 Schreiber-Schroth Co. v. Cleveland Trust Co., 305 MM Se Si Se Se ge Lee ae eG CA gs cs 5, 9, 21, 27 Steimmetz v. … C. 399, 408). This Court has many times had oceasion to modify the rules governing the practice in pending applications established by the tribunal having jurisdiction thereover.
320 U.S. 811Petition for Writ of Certiorari — Glenna Duram, Petitioner v. Jeremy Howard, Warden
Supreme Court brief · Petition for Writ of Certiorari · Nov 14, 2024
Alabama, 399 U.S. 1 (1970)...................................................... 13 Cornwell v Woodford, 312 Fed Appx 58, 59-60 (CA 9, 2009)...................... 13 Couch v Booker, 632 F3d 241, 246-47 … Alabama, 399 U.S. 1 (1970). Mr. Miller’s and Mr.
Record and brief — Maryland v. Buie
Supreme Court brief · Record and brief · 1990
Louisiana, 399 U.S. 30, 34, 90 S. Ct. 1969, 1972, 26 «OL. Ed. 24 409, 413 (1970); Stackhouse v. State, 298 Md. 203, 217, 468 A.2d 333, 341 (1983). … (Br. 24).
494 U.S. 325Record and brief — United States v. Rodgers
Supreme Court brief · Record and brief · 1983
Hall, 163 S.W. 399, 402 (Tex. Civ. App.. … On October 24, 1937, Philip S.
461 U.S. 677Petition — Terramar Beach Community Improvement Ass'n v. Carrithers
Supreme Court brief · Petition · 1983
Vermilion Corporation, 100 S.Ct. 399 (1979), was a companion case to Kaiser Aetna y. United States, supra. … Third, the Respondents took title to their property adjoining the 24 turning basin subject, in express terms, to Terramar’s easement rights.
464 U.S. 981Petition — McMorris v. State Bar of California
Supreme Court brief · Petition · 1984
condition that he be suspended for first three years and readmission there- after be conditioned on passing Professional Responsibility Examination, Jackson v State Bar (1979) 23 C3d 509, 153 CR 24 … State Bar (1967) 66 CI. 24 680, 683).
466 U.S. 958Amicus Curiae Brief — Troxel v. Granville
Supreme Court brief · Amicus Curiae Brief · 2000
, 24 U. … Meyer, 262 U.S. at 399; Yoder, 406 U.S. at 214.
530 U.S. 57Amicus Curiae Brief — Conestoga Wood Specialties Corp. v. Sebelius
Supreme Court brief · Amicus Curiae Brief · 2013
Bureau of Prisons, 349 F.3d 399 (7th Cir. 20038) .............cccceeeeeceee 28 Sherbert v. Verner, I 27, 30 iv Spencer v. … Lutheran SEE Ee 25 The Larger Catechism of the Westminster TE TEN ee 24 The Pew Forum on Religion & Public Life, U.S.
571 U.S. 1067Supreme Court brief · Amicus Curiae Brief · Sep 16, 2021
Br. at 19-22, 36-38. 28 262 U.S. at 399-400. 29 268 U.S. at 534-535. 25 26 13 the Texas statute because it “furthers no legitimate state interest which can justify its intrusion into the personal and … (filed May 24, 2019). 75 Miss.
Amicus Curiae Brief — Louisiana, Appellant v. Phillip Callais, et al.
Supreme Court brief · Amicus Curiae Brief · Jan 27, 2025
Nos. 24-109, 24-110 In the Supreme Court of the United States __________ LOUISIANA, Appellant, v. PHILLIP CALLAIS, ET AL., Appellees. ____________________ PRESS ROBINSON, ET AL., Appellants, v. … Perry, 548 U.S. 399 (2006) .................................... 10, 22, 23 Marbury v. Madison, 5 U.S. 137 (1803).............. 20, 23 Massachusetts v.
Supreme Court brief · Petition for Writ of Certiorari · Jun 16, 2025
COPLAN, 399 F.3d 18 (1st. Cir.) … COPLAN, 399 F.3d 18 (1st Cir.); and LEWIS V. WILKINSON, 307 F.3d 423 (6th Cir. 2022).
Brief for Respondent — Supt. of Insurance v. Bankers Life & Cas. Co.
Supreme Court brief · Brief for Respondent · 1971
Syracuse China Corporation, 417 F.2d 963, 969 (2d Cir..1969), cert. denied, 399 U.S.909 (1970), and Carliner v. Fair Lanes, Inc., 244 F. Supp. 25 (D. Md. 1965). … Court of Appeals for the Second - ‘Circuit reviewed ayd reaffirmed the purchaser- seller reqhirement i in ; Iroquois Industries, Inc. v, Syracuse China Corp., 417 } 963 (2d Cir. 1969), cert.tdenied, 399
404 U.S. 6Supreme Court brief · Petition for Writ of Certiorari · 1993
Vee See, 399 N.E.2d at 281. … Brief at 20, dated Feb. 24, 1992. See also Complaint { 20.
510 U.S. 992Petition for Writ of Certiorari — Butler v. Fletcher (No. 06-955)
Supreme Court brief · Petition for Writ of Certiorari · 2006
Taylor, 399 F.3d 150, 158 n. 13 (3d Cir. 2005). … The Manual provides that detainees must re- ceive an initial medical screening within 24 hours of entering ADC.
Petition for Writ of Certiorari — Woodard v. Alabama
Supreme Court brief · Petition for Writ of Certiorari · 1994
DeGeorge, 341 U.S. 223, 71 S.Ct. 703, I es canaunoncenas 10 Ex parte Kyser, 399 So.2d 330 (Ala. 1981)..............0.... 14, 17 Lockhart v. … State, 534 So.2d 638, 642-45 (Ala.Cr.App. 1985), aff’d 534 App. 24 So.2d 656 (Ala. 1986), cert. denied, 479 U.S. 1040, 197 S.Ct. 898, 93 L.Ed.2d 850 (1987).
513 U.S. 869Supreme Court brief · Petition for Writ of Certiorari · Oct 17, 2024
EDCV 24-0514JGB (DTBx) 24-0540JGB (DTBx) 2024 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 97262 *; 2024 WL 2804100 STARLIGHT DUNES HOMEOWNERS ASSOCIATION, v. DENNIS SADORRA, et al. … Supp. 397, 399 (N.D. Cal. 1973) (“In order to be legally sufficient^] the allegations, taken as true, must contain information that is definite as to time and place”).
Respondents Brief — Witters v. Washington Department of Services for the Blind
Supreme Court brief · Respondents Brief · 1986
Mueller, 463 U.S. at 399. … Mueller, 463 U.S. at 399.
474 U.S. 481Amicus Brief — United States v. Cronic
Supreme Court brief · Amicus Brief · 1984
Maroney, 399 U.S. 42 (1970), dictate a contrary result. … Adams, 465 F.2d 1023 (24 Cir. 1972) (failure to file motion to suppress and ill- advised cross-examination) Cooks v.
466 U.S. 648Supreme Court brief · Amicus Curiae Brief · Aug 18, 2022
Nebraska, 262 U.S. 390, 399–401 (1923). … Nebraska, 262 U.S. at 399; see Pierce v.
Ask Donna what matters in the record.
She can read the source against your case and show you exactly where the answer came from.