Documents
Briefs, oral arguments, agency decisions and the Federal Register.
10,000+ results
0.35s
Reply Brief — Ross v. Bernhard
Supreme Court brief · Reply Brief · 1969
Ney: 399, O4 y. K. $95 (1911), the defendant president and director caused: his corporation to pay him part of its capiti ul. … Hurley Motor Co.7.273 US. 18. 24 (1927 ys Okeechobee . County v. Nuveen, 145 F.2d 684, 6S7-and n. 5 (5 Cir. 1944) : Restatement, Restitution, yp. 5-9 (1937). In fact. the ne.
396 U.S. 531Opinion — Winters v. United States
Supreme Court brief · Opinion · 1908
Argued October 24, 1907.—Decided January 6, 1908. … Kincannon, 7 Pet. 399; Masterson v. Herndon, 10 Wall. 416; Hampton v. Rouse, 13 Wall. 187; Wilson’s Heirs v. Insurance Co., 12 Pet. 140.
207 U.S. 564Reply Brief Petitioner — National Labor Relations Board v. Bradford Dyeing Ass'n
Supreme Court brief · Reply Brief Petitioner · 1940
IV, Title 24, See. 151 et seq.): Section 9 ® . … Natiorval Bituniinous Coal Commission, 99° (2d) 399, 406 (App. D. C.). . omental J 4 \, offered hy the Cc.
310 U.S. 318Jurisdictional Statement — Voorhes v. Dempsey
Supreme Court brief · Jurisdictional Statement · 1965
Martin, 375 U.S. 399, 112 L.Ed. 430, 84 S.Ct 454; 32 Law Week 4101 (1963). : 7 Davis, Secretary, a et al. v. ome et al., 374°U.S. 803 (1963) 3 ‘ « 3 Eaton v. … Murtin, 375 U.S. 399, - 112 L.Ed. 430, 84 S.Ct. 454; 32 Law Week 4101 (1963).
379 U.S. 648Brief for the Respondents in Opposition — Benson v. Rich
Supreme Court brief · Brief for the Respondents in Opposition · 1972
(Petition pp. 24-36). In their appeal to the _ >. … Discipline Committee of East Tennessee State U niv ersity, 6th Cir., 419 F.2d 195, cert. den. 399 U.S. 906 (1970). Those in charge of the situation need.
405 U.S. 978Motion — Caldwell v. City of New Orleans
Supreme Court brief · Motion · 1975
New York, 399 U.S. 66 (1972) .......... 8 Bloom v. Illinois, 391 U.S. 194 (1968) .............. 8 Coolidge v. … New York, 399 U.S. 66 (1972); Johnson v. Turner, 429 F.2d 1152; ULS. v. 9 Merick, 459 F.2d 644; U.S. v. Potvin, 481 F.2d 380; Maita v. Whitmore, 365 F.Supp. 1331.
420 U.S. 957Supplemental Brief — Credit Suisse Securities (USA) LLC v. Billing
Supreme Court brief · Supplemental Brief · 2007
LEVINE WILMER CUTLER PICKERING HALE & DORR LLP 399 Park Avenue New York, New York 10022 (212) 230-8800 Attorneys for Petitioner STEPHEN M. SHAPIRO Counsel of Record KENNETH S. … See Pet. 20-24; Pet. Reply to Billing 2-4; Gordon, 422 U.S. at 682, 685; NASD, 422 U.S. at 730-734.
551 U.S. 264Brief for the Respondent in Opposition — Eubank v. Illinois
Supreme Court brief · Brief for the Respondent in Opposition · 1971
Davis, 399 F. 2d 948, 951-952 (2nd Cir. 1968), cert. denied, 393 U.S. 987 (1968) ...... 8 see taaiai nein iii. United States v. Marcello, 423 F. 2d 993, 1005 (5th Cir. 1970), cert. denied, 90 S. … State of California, 386 U.S. 18, 24.” Gilbert v. California, 388 U.S. at 274. In the present case, Mrs.
402 U.S. 972Supreme Court brief · Reply Brief · 1990
Dolan, 544 F.24¢ 1219 (C.A. 4, 1976)..... United States v. Johnson, 801 F.2d 597 (C.A. 2, 1986)...... United States v. Pink, 315 U.S. 203 (1942)... cc eeeeveees 2. Statutes me meme. … United States, 399 U.S. 392, 435 (1970). Such is not the case here. The facts set forth for Judicial Notice are, relatively speaking, extremely limited.
493 U.S. 1079Reply Brief — Lodi Truck Service, Inc. v. Division of Labor Standards Enforcement
Supreme Court brief · Reply Brief · 1986
displaced states’ power over safety of operation employees of inter- Pe ee a 8 6 6 cbs ace kasd cee ce be ceeensann Cases cited by appellee are not directly related or applicable to the issue herein S28 24 … 1973 Cah abcd kd awk Gx 42 © 8 Motor Carrier Act of 1935 (49 Stat. 543) (MCA)...... 2 Seamen’s Act (38 Stat. 1164, 1169, 1170-1184) ........ 2 Title 49, Code of Federal Regulations, section 350-399
479 U.S. 801Petition for Writ of Certiorari — Brandon A. Dunkleberger, Petitioner v. Illinois
Supreme Court brief · Petition for Writ of Certiorari · Apr 28, 2025
Dunkleberger, 251 N.E.3d 399 (Table), 479 Ill. Dec. 777 (2025). ii TABLE OF AUTHORITIES Cases: Page Federal Cases: Bradshaw v. … Buchanan, a family or household member of the defendant, in that said defendant strangled Katelyn Buchanan, and the defendant having been previously convicted of the offense of domestic battery” (C. 24
Respondents Brief — Irizarry v. United States
Supreme Court brief · Respondents Brief · 2008
J.A. 400; see J.A. 399 (citing 18 U.S.C. 3553(a)(2)(C)). … A. 399-400.
553 U.S. 708Supplemental Brief — Barbee v. United States
Supreme Court brief · Supplemental Brief · 1989
C-6 Appendix II is page 399 of my Civil Service Hearing conducted July 1980. This page is sworn testimony by Major Leslie T. … STUCKLEY CC: TAG NC Chief, Office of Policy and Liason Letter by Andrew Vanore, Jr Dated 24 August 1982 APPENDIX X 7 C-57 24 August 1982 Mr. Elmer R.
493 U.S. 809Amicus Curiae Brief — Louisiana, Appellant v. Phillip Callais, et al.
Supreme Court brief · Amicus Curiae Brief · Sep 3, 2025
Nos. 24-109, 24-110 IN THE Supreme Court of the United States ________________________ STATE OF LOUISIANA, et al., Appellants, v. … Perry, 548 U.S. 399 (2005).
Supreme Court brief · Amicus Curiae Brief · Sep 4, 2025
Novo Nordisk A/S, 566 U.S. 399 (2012) . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 8–9, 17 Carbice Corp. of America v. … Cir. 2024), petition for cert. filed, No. 24-889 (U.S. Feb. 19, 2025).
Petition for Writ of Certiorari — Rudy Mario Flores, Petitioner v. United States
Supreme Court brief · Petition for Writ of Certiorari · Sep 29, 2025
Illinois, 399 U.S. 235 (1970) .................................................................... 34 Zherka v. … Flores, No. 24-50459 (5th Cir. June 30, 2025) (per curiam), is reproduced at Pet.
Petitioners Brief — Monjar v. United States
Supreme Court brief · Petitioners Brief · 1945
Day, of Blackwell, Oklahoma, acquired a block of oil and gas leases commercial upon their face covering 2240 acres of land in Sections 23, 24, 25 and 26, Township 28 North, Range 1 East, Kay County … United States (8th Cir.), 24 Fed. (2d) 399; Freeman v. United States (3rd Cir.), 20 Fed. (2d) 748; Davis v. United States (3rd Cir.), 63 Fed. (2d) 545; Whealton v.
325 U.S. 859Appellees Brief — United States v. Vuitch
Supreme Court brief · Appellees Brief · 1971
D.C. 147, 138 F.2d 81 (1943) 3, 5, 24, 28, 29, 81, 32, 62 Yu Cong Eng v. … The Act sanctioned abortions by licensed physicians “within 24 weeks after the commence- ment of the pregnancy; or if after 24 weeks ... ” under the circumstances set out in the Model Penal Code proposal
402 U.S. 62Amicus Curiae Brief — Moran v. Burbine
Supreme Court brief · Amicus Curiae Brief · 1985
State, 287 So.2d 399 (Fla. App. 1974) -....... 14 Dunn v. State, No. 248-84 (Tex. June 26, 1985), summarized, 37 Crim. L. Rep. (BNA) 2274 0 Ae | EE ee 4 Elfadl v. Maryland, 61 Md. … June 21, 1985) (No. 85-24) (lawyer retained by defendant’s wife refused permission to communicate with defendant or have him informed of counsel’s presence) ; Lodowski v.
471 U.S. 1098Petition for Writ of Certiorari — Michael Terrill Faircloth, Petitioner v. United States
Supreme Court brief · Petition for Writ of Certiorari · Oct 3, 2019
KENT RYAN MCFARLAND KENT & MCFARLAND ATTORNEYS AT LAW 24 N. Market Street Suite 300 Jacksonville, FL 32202 (904) 398-8000 CARTER G. PHILLIPS * JEFFREY T. GREEN SIDLEY AUSTIN LLP 1501 K Street, N.W. … Dupree, 788 N.W.2d 399 (Mich. 2010) .......................................................... 10 People v. Hurtado, 54 Cal. Rptr. 2d 853 (Ct.
Ask Donna what matters in the record.
She can read the source against your case and show you exactly where the answer came from.