Documents
Briefs, oral arguments, agency decisions and the Federal Register.
10,000+ results
2.81s
Petitioners Brief — Smith v. Hall
Supreme Court brief · Petitioners Brief · 1937
Other pertinent comment of this Court is found in the ~ Eibel case, 261 U. … of Appeals but received no comment in the opinion of that Court.
301 U.S. 216Respondents Brief — American Trading Transportation Co. v. Escobar
Supreme Court brief · Respondents Brief · 1976
Linde Air Products Co; S56 U. Bk CE i ccnvicvcess 0 cvevKice Kish v. Taylor [1912] A. C. 604 (House of Lords). .13, 14 The MALCOLM BAXTER, Jr., 277 VU. … S.) as well as to periodic special surveys and to special surveys in the event of a casualty or when ma- terial repairs were made.
423 U.S. 1070Respondents Brief — Trans World Airlines, Inc. v. Franklin Mint Corp.
Supreme Court brief · Respondents Brief · 1984
Afr., Carriage by Air Act, No. 17 of 1946, §3(7), as amended by No. 5 of 1964 and No. 81 of 1979, Stat. S. Afr. … The commentator cited by the Argentinean court, Paul P.
466 U.S. 243Petition — Village of Hoffman Estates v. Village of Barrington Hills
Supreme Court brief · Petition · 1981
For example, section | of the County Zoning Act (Ill. Rev. … Thus, Plaintiffs attempt to litigate in equity in violation of the maxim that he who seeks equity must do so with clean hands.
449 U.S. 1126Appendix VolI — World Airways, Inc. v. Pan American World Airways, Inc.
Supreme Court brief · Appendix VolI · 1968
an adequate experimental period.’ ° Two other matters: warrant brief comment. … In. response to. this notice, comments were submitted by twelve trunkline air carriers,’ threé local .* 7A joint comment was filed by American Airlines, Braniff.
391 U.S. 461Opposition Brief — City of Santa Clarita, California v. Los Angeles County, California (No. 05-1462)
Supreme Court brief · Opposition Brief · 2006
Cir. 1983), cert. denied, 467 U.S. 1219, 104 S.Ct. 2668, 81 L.Ed.2d 373 (1984) (Involving dispute as to consent decree in multi-party litigation under the Clean Water Act). 26 legal determination.” … Gorsuch, supra, 718 F.2d 1117, 1125-26 (involving dispute as to consent decree in multi-party litigation under the Clean Water Act). @ 7.
Opposition Brief — Sellers v. Time, Inc.
Supreme Court brief · Opposition Brief · 1970
As the article says, ‘Phe Bon Air was the place ‘to be, and to be seen. ~ During the period 1961-1964 the hotel was Closed fon fifty: “one weeks for each véar _and-was opened. only for the week of the … The re- ‘searcher’s report stated that during her inspection of the hotel. the grounds. were-clean. In addition, Time admitted: that the hotel walls were. not supported, by wooden braces.
400 U.S. 830Amicus Curiae Brief — School Bd. of Nassau Cty. v. Arline
Supreme Court brief · Amicus Curiae Brief · 1987
Persons catch the disease by inhaling the bacilli suspended In droplets of moisture in the air from an infected person's cough or Sneeze. … Most States that require subsequent physical examinations do so on an “as needed“ rather than periodic basis.
480 U.S. 273Supreme Court brief · Amicus Curiae Brief · Jul 24, 2023
Consider, for instance, the decades of conflicting regulations over what the “waters of the United States” means in the Clean Water Act. … Agency & Dep’t of the Army on Clean Water Act Jurisdiction Following the U.S. Supreme Court’s Decision in Rapanos v. United States & Carabell v.
Supreme Court brief · Petition for Writ of Certiorari · Mar 3, 2025
Air-Con, Inc. v. Daikin Applied Latin Am., LLC, 21 F.4th 168,176 (1st Cir. 2021). … Co., 992 F.3d 20, 28 (1st Cir. 2021) (cleaned up).
Opposition Brief — D&J Enterprises, Inc. v. United States
Supreme Court brief · Opposition Brief · 2003
V1 ...cessscccrcossscscsccsesesccessorneverssessvossosonees sé 5 Clean Air Act, 42 U.S.C. 7401 et seq.: BE TB, TETIONE) wxsecoscvevivsnecssssesscssvvrccecsoversnsnsensonvevnveonens 2 BS UBC, TOTEM) … Act, 42 U.S.C. 7413(¢)(1), 7671g(c)(1), and 40 C.F.R. 82.154(a).
537 U.S. 1171Respondents Brief — Weyerhaeuser Co. v. U.S. Fish & Wildlife Serv., 139 S. Ct. 45 (2018) (No. 17-71)
Supreme Court brief · Respondents Brief · 2018
Art. 1, § 8, Cl. 3 (Commerce Clause)......... 15, 44 Administrative Procedure Act, 5 U.S.C. 701 et seq............ 15 5 U.S.C. 701(aX(2) 18, 46, 48, la 5 U.S.C. 706(2)(A) 18, 48, la Clean Water Act … In the second and third scenarios, the Service as- sumed that future development of Unit 1 would both oc- cur and require a Clean Water Act permit.
Supreme Court brief · Petition for Writ of Certiorari · Aug 14, 2026
Dep’t of Agric., 779 F.3d 258, 267 (5th Cir. 2015) (cleaned up); see also Nat’l Env’t Dev. Ass’n’s Clean Air Project v. EPA, 752 F.3d 999, 1008 (D.C. … The proposed in- 101a crease must then undergo a notice-and-comment period. § 3052(f )(1)(C)(iv)(II).
Petition — Baltimore Gas & Electric Co. v. Natural Resources Depense Council, Inc.
Supreme Court brief · Petition · 1978
-csssssssseseesseseees 6, 8, 10, 11, 15, 17 Atomic Energy Act of 1954 § 189, 42 U.S.C. § 2239 (1970) 8, 9, 10, 11 Clean Air Act § 307(b) (1), 42 U.S.C, § 1857h-5(b) (1) (1970), | as amended (Supp. … At that point, the majority ordered “procedural devices” on remand in excess of the notice and comment requirements of the Atomic Energy Act and the Administrative Procedure Act.
435 U.S. 964Petition for Writ of Certiorari — Fernandes v. Environmental Protection Agency
Supreme Court brief · Petition for Writ of Certiorari · 1998
New Jersey Air National Guard, 684 F. Supp. 1275 (D.N.J. 1988). … The addendum will allow far a 30 calendar day comment period.
525 U.S. 869Supreme Court brief · Petition for Writ of Certiorari · Jul 21, 2023
United Air Lines, Inc., 527 U.S. 471, 483 (1999), superseded by statute on other grounds, ADA Amendments Act of 2008, Pub. L. No. 110-325, 122 Stat. 3553. … United Air Lines, Inc., 527 U.S. 471, 483 (1999), superseded by statute on other grounds, ADA Amendments Act of 2008, Pub.
Appendix — Alabama Surface Mining Reclamation Commission v. Commercial Standard Insurance
Supreme Court brief · Appendix · 1984
Commercial urges this court to construe the phrase as meaning a single act which would start the ninety day period running. … or water quality standards promulgated under the authority of the Federal Water Pollution Control Act, as amended (33 U.S.C. 1151-1175), and the Clean Air Act, as amended (42 U.S.C. 1857 et seq.)
467 U.S. 1242Petition for Writ of Certiorari — Bradley LeDure, Petitioner v. Union Pacific Railroad Company
Supreme Court brief · Petition for Writ of Certiorari · Dec 10, 2020
Union Pacific conducted an inspection and reported cleaning a “small amount of oil” on the walkway. LeDure sued Union Pacific for negligence. … the manufacturer’s minimum operating specifications during the periodic inspection required for the locomotive pursuant to § 229.23 of this part.
Supreme Court brief · Petition for Writ of Certiorari · 2003
As a result, even though Respondent placed its air monitors in positions that did not measure the air in the employees’ breathing zone, and even though TDRH did not have access to Respondent’s air quality … We had to do something to get it cleaned up.”
537 U.S. 1106Supplemental Brief — Sprenger, Olson & Shutes, P. A. v. Burlington Northern Railroad
Supreme Court brief · Supplemental Brief · 1987
Delaware Valley Citizens’ Coun- cil for Clean Air, 55 U.S.L.W. 5113 (June 26, FRESE Pe eee ETE TT eeT Tere 1, 6, 7,9 In THE Supreme Court of the United States OctrosEer Term, 1986 SPRENGER, OLSON … Delaware Valley Citizens’ Coun- cil for Clean Air, 55 U.S.L.W. 5113 (June 26, 1987) on the Petition for Writ of Certiorari. This ease is the logical next step for review after Dela- ware Valley.
484 U.S. 821
Ask Donna what matters in the record.
She can read the source against your case and show you exactly where the answer came from.