Documents

Petition for Writ of Certiorari — Jones v. Pennsylvania

Supreme Court brief · Petition for Writ of Certiorari · 2005

Rather, she requested that the trial court consider the conditions after the animals were removed and she cleaned the home. … The inability to hear air conduction thresholds at an average of 40 decibels or greater in the better ear. "Blind."

Appendix — Cameron v. Civil Aeronautics Board

Supreme Court brief · Appendix · 1944

Dear Sir: The Department of Justice has re- quested the comment of this office with respect to certain parallel provisions of Army Air Forces regulations and Civil Aeronautics Authority rules. … D., Acting Air Judge Advocate. U, S. GOVERNMENT PRINTING OFFICE; 1944 ! orem x. Brercn, SNS ads ME ar ante ee eae aU ES er ae)

Petition for Writ of Certiorari — Meghan Kelly, Applicant v. United States District Court for the Eastern District of Pennsylvania

Supreme Court brief · Petition for Writ of Certiorari · Dec 26, 2023

Interment co @eryane for ai] The acts of kindness SHOWN fo tes During our bereavement. … In a city with safe, clean, mass transportation, we do not need police to monitor drivers’ speed, behavior at stop signs, or proper papers. Other examples are the air and the water.

Joint Appendix — Metropolitan Wash. Airports Authority v. Noise Abatement Citizens

Supreme Court brief · Joint Appendix · 1991

He also commented that the proposed establish- ment of a TCA at Dulles reflected growth at that air- 57 port. Mr. … Lehman commented that they would be introduced over 10 to 15 years, a relatively long period. He also repeated that the people should not be misled about improvements in noise levels. Mr.

Brief for Respondent — Hughes Tool Co. v. Trans World Airlines, Inc.

Supreme Court brief · Brief for Respondent · 1965

existence.* Inthe second place, the comments ‘of all the Senators “involved in the debate evidenee concern that antitrust principles be preserved in their application to both air transportation and … , and Section 1107(g) amended the Cayton Act to provide that authority to enforce that Act be vested inthe Board*“where applicable to air carriers and foreign air carriers subject to the Civil.

Appellants Reply Brief — Michaelis v. Nebraska State Bar Ass'n

Supreme Court brief · Appellants Reply Brief · 1982

in 1961, 1962, and 1970 to 1972 (Periods prior to appellant even being a lawyer). … The Moodie-controlled local press has never allowed a bit of this to be aired publically even to this date. 21.

Petitioners Brief — Curtrina Martin, Individually and as Parent and Next Friend of G. W., a Minor, et al., Petitioners v. United States, et al.

Supreme Court brief · Petitioners Brief · Mar 7, 2025

Boule, 596 U.S. 482, 491 (2022) (cleaned up). … Gaubert, 499 U.S. 315, 324 (1991), or legally conferred discretion “based on considerations of In margin comments to the original 1946 enactment of the FTCA, the exceptions were described as: (a) (“Act

Amicus Brief — Marshall v. Barlow's, Inc.

Supreme Court brief · Amicus Brief · 1978

And in Air Pollution Variance Board u. … The Centrif-Air Machine Co., Inc., et al., 424 F.

Petition for Writ of Certiorari — Aloha Bed & Breakfast, Petitioner v. Diane Cervelli, et al.

Supreme Court brief · Petition for Writ of Certiorari · Oct 9, 2018

City of Jacksonville, 405 U.S. 156, 162 (1972) (cleaned up). Accordingly, this Court has long barred a state from banning acts in vague terms that force citizens to guess at their meaning. … In a case indistinguishable from this one, the Fourth Circuit invalidated penalties the EPA imposed under the Clean Air Act because a company “had reason to believe that its interpretation of [an] exemption

Transcript of Record — Columbus Constr. Co. v. Crane Co.

Supreme Court brief · Transcript of Record · 1899

The object of laying that line of pipe was for experimental pur- poses, to ascertain how the pipe would act under 1,000 pounds of air, how the joints would be. … I was on the line of the company sometimes during the period covered by these statements.

Amicus Curiae Brief — Decker v. Northwest Environmental Defense Center

Supreme Court brief · Amicus Curiae Brief · 2013

Water Act, 33 U.S.C. § 1342. … Maintenance activities include surface grading and gravel supplementation; ditch cleaning; cleaning and replacement of damaged relief 44 Randy B.

Brief of Amicus Curiae — Jankovich v. Indiana Toll Road Commission

Supreme Court brief · Brief of Amicus Curiae · 1965

Airport 4 Encouragement and development of a nation-wide air transport system is embodied in two Congressional acts, the Federal Aviation Act and the Federal Aitport Act. … For example, during the 5 year period 1957 through (1961, CAB informs that 66% of-all air, carrier acci- dents and fatalities occurred within-this area.

Amicus Curiae Brief — Joseph R. Biden, Jr., President of the United States, et al., Petitioners v. Sierra Club, et al.

Supreme Court brief · Amicus Curiae Brief · Jan 18, 2021

Environmental Protection Agency, for instance, this Court considered whether an administrative compliance order issued under the Clean Water Act was subject to pre-enforcement review under § 702. 566 U.S … Ct. 1807, 1813-16 (2016) (analyzing the role and effect of a jurisdictional determination under the Clean Water Act to conclude that its issuance is a reviewable agency action); Bennett v.

Appendix — International Molders & Allied Workers Union v. Howard

Supreme Court brief · Appendix · 1986

After cooling, the castings were removed from the mold and cleaned. … The “cleaning” phase of fittings production included shot blasting the fittings to remove excess sand, and gen- eral finishing of the fittings with hand-held, air operated chipping hammers and grinders

Reply Brief — Animal Legal Defense Fund, et al., Petitioners v. Department of Homeland Security, et al.

Supreme Court brief · Reply Brief · Nov 12, 2018

1996 as Amended by Section 102 of the REAL ID Act of 2005 and as Amended by the Secure Fence Act of 2006, 72 Fed. … The Clean Air Act provisions challenged in American Trucking required the EPA to set air-quality standards based on technical criteria and included guidance regarding those criteria and the procedures

Opposition Brief — Northern Arapaho Tribe, et al., Petitioners v. Wyoming, et al.

Supreme Court brief · Opposition Brief · May 18, 2018

When, in the context of the Clean Air Act, the Tenth Circuit was presented with the issue of whether the 1905 agreement and ratifying act truly diminished the reservation, it properly applied the three-step … Course of proceedings In December 2008, the Tribes applied to EPA for treatment as a state under the Clean Air Act. See 42 U.S.C. § 7601(d).

Petition for Writ of Certiorari — Butts v. United States

Supreme Court brief · Petition for Writ of Certiorari · 1984

Maintaining the beeper in- side the plane past the period permitted by the warrant was just as necessary to the law enforcement objectives as was the act of monitoring. … As the Supreme Court commented in Boyd v.

Petition for Writ of Certiorari — Butts v. United States

Supreme Court brief · Petition for Writ of Certiorari · 1986

Maintaining the beeper in- side the plane past the period permitted by the warrant was just as necessary to the law enforcement objectives as was the act of monitoring. … As the Supreme Court commented in Boyd vy.

Petition for Writ of Certiorari — E. I. du Pont de Nemours and Co. v. United States (No. 06-726)

Supreme Court brief · Petition for Writ of Certiorari · 2006

Coast Air Quality Megmi. Dist., 541 U.S. 246, 257 (2004); Conn. Nat'l Bank v. Germaine, 503 U.S. 249, 253-54 (1992). … Florio) (“EPA is required not to act if the responsible party or parties will take appropriate action to clean[ Jup and contain these sites.”).

Opposition to Emergency Application for Writ of Injunction — R.J. Reynolds Tobacco Company, et al., Applicants v. Robert Bonta, Attorney General of California, et al.

Supreme Court brief · Opposition to Emergency Application for Writ of Injunction · Dec 6, 2022

Engine Manufacturers considered a Clean Air Act provision directing that “No State or any political subdivision thereof shall adopt or attempt to enforce any standard relating to the control of emissions … The text and structure of the Clean Air Act established that Congress “[c]learly” contemplated “enforcement of emission standards through purchase requirements,” id. at 254, thus bringing the district’