Documents

Joint Appendix — Air Courier Conference of America v. American Postal Workers Union

Supreme Court brief · Joint Appendix · 1991

ACTON: Proposed Rule; Extension of comment period. … Service is extending the comment period by an additional thirty days.

Reply Brief — Anthony Novak, Petitioner v. City of Parma, Ohio, et al.

Supreme Court brief · Reply Brief · Jan 24, 2023

Thus, this case is an exceptionally clean vehicle for review; the Court needs only to apply law to uncontested facts to answer the questions presented. … When commenters and the department tried to spoil the joke by disclaiming it as fake, Novak deleted those comments and reposted the department’s notice. Id. at 3a.

Petition for Writ of Certiorari — Cole v. Schlesinger

Supreme Court brief · Petition for Writ of Certiorari · 1975

Cole enlisted in the Regular Air Foree on June 21, 1972, for a period of four years’ active duty. … As indieated, Cole voluntarily enlisted in the 23 Regular Air Foree for a four-year period of duty, and, at the time of his enlistment, Cole indicated that he was not a conscientious objector.

Respondents Brief — Johnson v. United States (No. 07-9)

Supreme Court brief · Respondents Brief · 2007

Delaware Valley Citizens’ Council for Clean Air, 438 U.S. 711 (1987) Rapanos v. United States, 126 S. Ct. 2208 (2006) ... passzm Solid Waste Agency of N. Cook County v. … (Clean Water Act or CWA). The district court held that petitioners’ unpermitted dis- charges into wetlands violated the CWA, see Pet. App.

Motion to Proceed In Forma Pauperis — William J. Trengove, Jr., Petitioner v. Department of Justice

Supreme Court brief · Motion to Proceed In Forma Pauperis · Feb 11, 2025

Laundry and dry-cleaning $. Medical and dental expenses $. —* £HL as/A $. o s i^A 57 7) & A~A*?'7 T)t^ety'7< A? … MPT:75.000000 T600179 1/8" Maid o' Mist Air Vent Replace Existing In order for a radiator to properly heat up it must first remove the cooler air that is in the radiator.

Opposition Brief — OIL, CHEMICAL AND ATOMIC WORKERS INT. U. V. DUNLOP (Nos. 75-71, 75-75)

Supreme Court brief · Opposition Brief · 1974

Written comments were invited. … The 400 air contaminant standards had originally been issued under the Walsh-Healey Act, 41 U.S.C. §§ 95-45.

Amicus Curiae Brief — Jack Daniel's Properties, Inc., Petitioner v. VIP Products LLC

Supreme Court brief · Amicus Curiae Brief · Feb 23, 2023

By cutting through the constraints imposed by pomp and ceremony, it is a form of irreverence as welcome as fresh air.” Falwell v. … “clean coal” as an oxymoron. 8 The spoof website 7.

Amicus Curiae Brief — Lee v. International Soc. for Krishna Consciousness, Inc.

Supreme Court brief · Amicus Curiae Brief · 1992

Griffen, 303 U.S. 444, 452 (1938) (“The liberty of the press is not confined to newspapers and periodicals. It necessarily embraces pamphlets and leaflets. … See pp. 3-5, supra. 19 This attribute of transportation terminals has been recognized—and acted on—throughout our history.

Appendix — Public Utilities Commission v. Federal Express Corp.

Supreme Court brief · Appendix · 1992

Among the proposals being considered by the District are peak period fee assessment, traffic diversion, requiring Carriers to retrofit equipment with engines which burn clean fuel, and outright bans … Otherwise a public hearing is held, with the ensuing decision subject to Commission rules on a 30-day comment period.

Reply Brief — Sharon Steel Corp. v. City of Fairmont

Supreme Court brief · Reply Brief · 1986

Air Act or any Federal law, or (ili) prohibits the use of such substance or mixture in such State or political subdivision (other than its use in the manufacture or processing of other substances … If the EPA has not acted, the States are free to act. If the EPA has acted, then the States must appiy for an exemption from the preemption.

Amicus Curiae Brief — Shell Oil Products Co., L.L.C., et al., Petitioners v. Rhode Island

Supreme Court brief · Amicus Curiae Brief · Jan 5, 2023

It held unanimously that the climate claims there sounded in the federal common law and that Congress displaced any such claims when it enacted the Clean Air Act. See id. at 424. … Second, and only after determining the claims arose under federal common law, did the Court hold Congress displaced through the Clean Air Act remedies that might be granted under federal common law.

Appendix D — Kelly v. Tahoe Regional Planning Agency

Supreme Court brief · Appendix D · 1994

Kelly to postpone their building plans for a reasonable period of time. 22. … The actions of the TRPA during the period from 1982 to 1987 are not confiscatory and do not’ require compensation. 6. Mr.

Amicus Brief — Motor Vehicle Mfrs. Assn. of United States, Inc. v. State Farm Mut. Automobile Ins. Co.

Supreme Court brief · Amicus Brief · 1983

The agency would propose after receiving and considering these comments to “issue any supplemental decision . . . within 45 days after the close of the comment period.” Pet. App. 133a. … Under the instrue- tions of this Court in Ford, supra, it is clear that the Court of Appeals here acted properly, when its “comment” period had finally closed with a response or rebuttal from the agency

Petition for Writ of Certiorari — Jugometal Enterprise for Import & Export of Ores & Metals v. Irving

Supreme Court brief · Petition for Writ of Certiorari · 1989

Houston Bag and Burlap as the cleaning company. … such act or transaction; and 3.

Amicus Brief — Hodel v. Virginia Surface Mining & Reclamation Assn., Inc.

Supreme Court brief · Amicus Brief · 1981

The numerous regulations (e.g., Clean Air Act and Water Pollution Control Act) provide ample federal control over how surface mining is conducted while stil] protect- ing the environment. … However, the states have no choice but to adopt the federal standards as their own or else hand over total control of surface coal mining to the federal government.4 While the Clean Air Act and the

Petition for Writ of Certiorari — Cramer v. Pena

Supreme Court brief · Petition for Writ of Certiorari · 1993

Section 29 of the International Air Transportation Com petition Act of 1979, Pub.L. … We received comments and reply comments from: Air Midwest, America West Airlines, Continental Air Lines, the Dallas/Fort Worth Parties, Delta Air Lines, the Department of Justice, the Regional Airline

Petition for Writ of Certiorari — Tsaconas v. Federal Communications Commission

Supreme Court brief · Petition for Writ of Certiorari · 1994

During this period, the Bureau Chief and an FCC Commissioner expressed their general views concerning “applications mills." … Professional Air Traffic Controllers, 653 F.2d 1134, 1142 (7th Cir. 1981).

Amicus Brief — Quinn v. Muscare

Supreme Court brief · Amicus Brief · 1976

The face shall be clean-shaven, ex- cept that a non-eccentric mustache is permissable. … \pp. 117- 118), saying ‘‘No, we want orders obeyed because we have a reason to have a man clean-shaven, for safety with air gear.’’ (App. 118).

Petitioners Brief — Channel Two Television Co. v. National Citizens Committee for Broadcasting

Supreme Court brief · Petitioners Brief · 1977

No. 706, 75th Cong., 3d Sess., 52 Stat. 973 (193) 39 Clean Air Act: GD BEE. … See also, e.g., grandfather provisions under the Natural Gas Act, 15 U.S.C. § 717 f (e) ; the Clean Air Act, 42 U.S.C. §§ 1857 f-1, 1857 f-2, 1857 £-5, 1857 f-5a, 1857 f-6f; the Federal Water Pollution

Petition for Writ of Certiorari — World Airways, Inc. v. Pan American World Airways, Inc.

Supreme Court brief · Petition for Writ of Certiorari · 1968

, or regulation issued: pursuant to said Acts dur- ing the period such person controlled or participated in the control of said air carrier. … However, several. exceptions warrant comment. ‘Legal Issues. Under the, definition of supplemental. air transportation in section 101(33) of the Act, we may authorize supplemental air.