Documents

Petition for a Writ of Certiorari — Ng Sui Sang v. Esperdy

Supreme Court brief · Petition for a Writ of Certiorari · 1965

I have never transacted any business under any fictitious names or acted as agent for any one else in the collection of monies. … However, the weight slips during the years 1951 and 1952.would be accumulated for a period of approxi- mately 10 days without payment.

Appellants Brief — Ray v. Atlantic Richfield Co.

Supreme Court brief · Appellants Brief · 1978

(Supp. between the United States and Canada, January Dt catbnciesedanokweaeedasacunanwinsetenedvsed« 56 ss FF | & frre Ter TT ee 76 Clean Air Act, as amended, 42 U.S.C. §§ 1857 et seq. … Thus, for example, in the Clean Air Act Amendments of 1970, 42 U.S.C. § 1857 et seq., Congress expressly preempted the field of adopting and enforcing new car emission standards to prevent air pollution

Motion for divided argument — Environmental Protection Agency, Petitioner v. Calumet Shreveport Refining, L.L.C., et al.

Supreme Court brief · Motion for divided argument · Jan 17, 2025

The Renewable Fuel Program (“RFP”) is a Clean Air Act program that mandates the amount of renewable fuel to be blended annually into the nation’s supply of gasoline and diesel fuel. … Section 307(b)(1) of the Act specifies that a petition for review of any “action” taken under the Act “may be filed only in” the D.C.

Brief for the Respondent in Opposition — United Aircraft Corp. v. National Labor Relations Board

Supreme Court brief · Brief for the Respondent in Opposition · 1964

The collective agreement had no union -seeurity provision (J.A. 96; 102). 2 International Union, United Automobile, Aire raft, and Agri- cultural Liplement Worker-, APL-C1O. … The Union also isssed three other leaflets, a prepared by Chamberlain, juring this period.

Reply Brief — Norfolk & Western Railway Co. v. Roberson

Supreme Court brief · Reply Brief · 1991

patently contrary to the Act’s purpose and legislative history. … The Seventh Circuit, in upholding his claim against Old Ben, focussed on the fact that Mitchell was de facto an employee of the coal comp&ny during the period he cleaned railroad cars, finding that

Transcript of Record — Wood v. Gas Service Co. (No. 501)

Supreme Court brief · Transcript of Record · 1957

Returned - slhues ms aa Court’s Comments After. Verdicts - as Notice ‘of: Appeal to the oe States Court of Appeals for. … After. the war, I have been act-- .

Amicus Curiae Brief — PDR Network, LLC, et al., Petitioners v. Carlton & Harris Chiropractic, Inc.

Supreme Court brief · Amicus Curiae Brief · Feb 14, 2019

Bleicher, Economic and Technical Feasibility in Clean Air Act Enforcement Against Stationary Sources, 89 Harv. L. … Bleicher, Economic and Technical Feasibility in Clean Air Act Enforcement Against Stationary Sources, 89 Harv. L.

Amicus Curiae Brief — McNab v. United States

Supreme Court brief · Amicus Curiae Brief · 2004

A common example illustrates the point: Consider, the crime ot “knowingly filing a false monitoring report” under the Clean Water Act. … Weitzenhoff, 35 F.3d 1275 (9th Cir. 1994) (felony violation of Clean Water Act—no knowledge of regulations necessary).’

Petition for Writ of Certiorari — Hicks v. United States

Supreme Court brief · Petition for Writ of Certiorari · 1998

The Acting SJA then stated: AIC Hicks asks that you grant him clemency by reducing the period of confinement adjudged by the court-martial and suspending his bad-conduct discharge. … These comments were not error.

Joint Appendix — Va. Uranium, Inc. v. Warren, 138 S. Ct. 293 (2017) (No. 16-1275)

Supreme Court brief · Joint Appendix · 2017

the authority of the Adminis- trator under the Clean Air Act of 1970, as amended, or the Federal Water Pollution Con- trol Act, as amended. … of the Clean Air Act or the Federal Water Pollution Control Act.

Appendix — Independent U. S. Tanker Owners Committee v. Skinner

Supreme Court brief · Appendix · 1990

The agency could have and should have allowed Congress a period of time in which to act. … MARAD also received several comments after the close of the comment period, which were placed in the docket. MARAD now turns to addressing the comments that it has received.

Opposition Brief — Scott Fenstermaker, Petitioner v. Stephen Fenstermaker, et al.

Supreme Court brief · Opposition Brief · Oct 11, 2022

App. 814, 820, 21 A.3d 572, cert. denied, 302 Conn. 914, 27 A.3d 373 (2011)) (cleaned up). … (cleaned up). So the Superior Court had no more jurisdiction to grant Petitioner’s application than did the probate court below.

Petition for Writ of Certiorari — Patricia A. Allen, Petitioner v. Scott Bessent, Secretary of the Treasury

Supreme Court brief · Petition for Writ of Certiorari · Dec 10, 2024

weigh conflicting evidence and conclude that the Spectrum Act was not foreseeable.") … Wilson's motivations in the 2008-2014 period, and not to assess Ms. Allen's alleged hostile work environment. Tr. at 1337:15-24. 25a From Mr. Horlor's emails, Ms.

Petition for Writ of Certiorari — Luis Fernando Ramirez, Petitioner v. United States

Supreme Court brief · Petition for Writ of Certiorari · Aug 3, 2020

May 18, 2020) (No. 19-6588) ............................... 4 Utility Air Regulatory Group v. … Illegal Immigration Reform and Immigrant Responsibility Act (IIRIRA) of 1996 § 309(c)(2), Pub.

Appendix — Chun v. New Jersey (No. 07-1562)

Supreme Court brief · Appendix · 2008

Comments Wisniewski: He found several inconsistencies in the code’s comments, which must be fixed. … Also, Lint ignored the quality of the errors, and improperly flagged “comments within comments.”

Transcript of Record — Birmingham Fire Insurance v. Tropical Marine Products, Inc. (No. 570)

Supreme Court brief · Transcript of Record · 1957

put the fish in a holding box, to be sent by air to Miami. … Dow: “Is Your Honor going to make any comments on the record for the benefit of the Miami Court?

Record and brief — John A. Dushane and John W. Stonebraker, Plaintiffs in Error, vs. Joseph Benedict

Supreme Court brief · Record and brief · 1885

“To the best of my knowledge and belief they were clean.” … J © remit the condition) during the period of continuous 4.

Amicus Curiae Brief — Wisconsin Public Intervenor v. Mortier

Supreme Court brief · Amicus Curiae Brief · 1991

Supp. 423 (N.D. 476 N.E.2d 585 (1985) 45 Ill. 1985), aff'd without opinion, 826 F.2d 1068 Statutes (7th Cir. 1987) 46 Clean Air Act, 42 U.S.C. … See, e.g., Clean Air Act, 42 U.S.C. Sections 7602(e), (£) (*municipality,"* “person"); Clean Water Act, 33 U.S.C.

Petition — National Labor Relations Board v. Mercy Hospital Ass'n

Supreme Court brief · Petition · 1980

In order to insure that the employees in the appro- priate unit will be accorded the services of their selected bargaining agent for the period provided by law, we shall construe the initial period … Eligible to vote are those in the units who were employed during the payroll period ending immediately pre- ceding the date of this Decision, including employees who did not work during that period

Appendix — Cleveland Electric Illuminating Co. v. Public Utilities Commission

Supreme Court brief · Appendix · 1983

Several comments are in order. … Economic Recovery Tax Act of 1981: The Economic Recovery Act of 1981 (Act) became law on August 13, 1981.