Documents

Petition for Writ of Certiorari — Clayton Lee Waagner, Petitioner v. United States

Supreme Court brief · Petition for Writ of Certiorari · Nov 13, 2020

United States, 139 S.Ct. 399 (2018)........................................... 6, 7, 8, 10, 12, 13, 14 Taylor v. … Id at 24.

Amicus Curiae Brief — Bannister v. Illinois

Supreme Court brief · Amicus Curiae Brief · 2010

Green, 399 U.S. 149 (1970) ................ Q Charbonneau v. State, 904 A.2d 295 (Del. a cuuasundaxennnsneass 6 Commonwealth of N. Mariana Islands v. … Bowie, 243 F.3d 1109, 1123-24 (9th Cir. 2001) (noting that “[oJur system long ago recognized and embraced” the “kind of favoritism” granted to cooperators-—who “purchase leniency from the government

Opposition Brief — Gurley v. United States

Supreme Court brief · Opposition Brief · 1995

J-C-83-399 (E.D. Ark. Oct. 30, 1985) (reprinted in Pet. C.A. Br. Adden. 37- 45). … Petitioner also contends (Pet. 23-24) that the court of appeals improperly prevented him from de- veloping facts demonstrating that he was in priv- ity with GRC in the CWA action.

Reply Brief — AT&T Corp. v. RLH Industries, Inc. (No. 05-1493)

Supreme Court brief · Reply Brief · 2006

Ct. 399 EESTI" SRR Oe er Roe es SORES Pe Pee ets 10 Paes @. Gato, SET UD. GEO CIGSDD svcesccccsevereteecicosisves 4,5 Goodyear Atomic Corp. v. … App. 32a (€ 24). However, it is undisputed that Mr. Murray was in fact an employee of a third party, SBC Services, Inc., not of SBC Communications Inc. or of Pacific Beli.

Reply Brief — Brian Matthew Morton, Petitioner v. United States

Supreme Court brief · Reply Brief · Apr 24, 2023

arrests a year, see National Center for Drug Abuse Statistics, Drug Related Crime Statistics (2023), available at https://drugabusestatistics.org/drug-related-crime-statistics/, last visited April 24 … See Riley, 573 U.S. at 399. The government assumes that the good faith exception applies if the facts show that a cell phone “could” contain evidence.

Reply Brief — Oklahoma, et al., Petitioners v. Environmental Protection Agency, et al.

Supreme Court brief · Reply Brief · Feb 18, 2025

Reg. 31,470 (May 24, 2022) ............. 19, 20, 24 88 Fed. Reg. 9,336 (Feb. 13, 2023) .......... 9, 12, 19, 20, 21, 23, 24 89 Fed. … Br. 24-25.

Appellants Brief — Gill v. Whitford, 138 S. Ct. 52 (2017) (No. 16-1161)

Supreme Court brief · Appellants Brief · 2017

Perry (LULAC), 548 U.S. 399, 420 (2006) (plurality op.). … Tr. of Oral Argument at 35, LULAC, 548 U.S 399 (No. 05-204).

Petitioners Brief — Dada v. Mukasey

Supreme Court brief · Petitioners Brief · 2008

Reg. 10,312 (Mar. 6, 1997) .............. 6, 8, 18, 24, 26 67 Fed. Reg. 54,878 (Aug. 26, 2002) ..........csseecees 5, 23, 24 Bi AR. … As the Government has noted, the 24 B.

Petition for Rehearing — Rico v. Monteagudo (No. 08-1454)

Supreme Court brief · Petition for Rehearing · 2008

Rodriguez: Torres, 399 F.3d at 64; Chestnut v. … Rodriguez-Torres, 399 F.3d at 64.

Brief for the United States — Gojack v. United States

Supreme Court brief · Brief for the United States · 1966

United States, 365 U.S. 399; Braden, United States, 365 U.S. 431; Gibson v. … Seeger, 303 F. 24 478 (C.A. 2) (following United States v.

Petition for Writ of Certiorari — Pedro Rodriguez, Petitioner v. San Diego County, California, et al.

Supreme Court brief · Petition for Writ of Certiorari · Aug 14, 2018

. § 2254. 23 ABSTENTION 24 25 Further, the Petition must be dismissed because it is clear that this Court is barred from consideration of his claims by the abstention doctrine announced in Younger … Wilson, 399 F. App'x 391,95 (l0thCir. 20 10) 3 (noting dismissal based on Younger abstention was a dismissal on procedural grounds 4 for certificate of appealability purposes).

Petition for a Writ of Certiorari — Shellhammer v. Lehigh Valley Railroad

Supreme Court brief · Petition for a Writ of Certiorari · 1954

E. 2d 399 . 11 fn, 24 fu. Wilson v. Director General of Railroads, 95 N. J. L. 482, 112 A. 732, C. D. 41 S. Ct. 538, 256 U. S. 700... 23 fn. iv Ee ; ‘ ‘page Wolf v. Chicago, M., St. P. & Pac. R. … Co., 402 II. 494, 84 N. 2d 399; Pennsylvania Co. v. L. S., Ohio 1917, 241 F. 824, 154 C. C. A. affirming, D. C., 237 F. 471; U. F. v. Chicago & A. R. A.

Petition — Cooper v. Federal Reserve Bank of Richmond

Supreme Court brief · Petition · 1984

Cook, 586 F.2d 399 (5th Citas 1978) eoe*eeseieeeeeeeneeeneeneeeneeeee#ee Chicopee Manufacturing Corp. v. Kendall Co., 288 F.2d 719 (4th Cir. 1961) ..... Connecticut v. … Cook, 586 F.2d 399 (5th Cir. 1978), the Fifth Circuit held that an individual prison inmate who had testi- fied during an earlier class action regard- ing prison conditions could still litigate the

Opposition — Michigan v. Miller

Supreme Court brief · Opposition · 1983

On August 24, 1982, one hundred sixteen days later, the petition for writ of certio- rari was filed. … The record further belies any consent by Miller as justification for the search in question (R 24).

Petition for Writ of Certiorari — Jamar Green, Petitioner v. United States

Supreme Court brief · Petition for Writ of Certiorari · Nov 8, 2023

Von Moltke, 332 U.S. at 723-24. … Johnson, 24 F.4th at 601 (6th Cir. 2022). IV.

Opposition Brief — John E. Drummond, Petitioner v. Ohio

Supreme Court brief · Opposition Brief · Apr 17, 2019

Steffen, 70 Ohio St.3d 399 (1994)………………………………………...19 State v. Tapscott, 2012 Ohio 4213, 978 N.E.2d 210 (7th Dist.)…………………15 State v. … Steffen, 70 Ohio St.3d 399, 410 (1994), citing State v.

Amicus Curiae Brief — John H. Merrill, Alabama Secretary of State, et al., Applicants v. Marcus Caster, et al.

Supreme Court brief · Amicus Curiae Brief · Jan 31, 2022

Perry (“LULAC”), 548 U.S. 399, 415 (2006). … Jan. 24, 2022) (three-judge court).

Amicus Curiae Brief — Wes Allen, Alabama Secretary of State, et al., Appellants v. Evan Milligan, et al.

Supreme Court brief · Amicus Curiae Brief · May 2, 2022

Perry, 548 U.S. 399 (2006) ....................................... passim Luna v. County of Kern, 291 F. Supp. 3d 1088 (E.D. Cal. 2018)................... 3 Miller v. … Appellants’ Br. at 23–24.

Opposition Brief — Robert Paul Langley, Jr., Petitioner v. Oregon

Supreme Court brief · Opposition Brief · Apr 24, 2020

Premo, 361 Or. 688, 399 P.3d 431 (2017)............................................................21 McKinney v. Arizona, 140 S. … Stat. § 163.150(1) (2014) ..................................................... i, 10, 23, 24 Or. Rev.

Respondents Brief — Parisi v. Davidson

Supreme Court brief · Respondents Brief · 1972

Resor, 17 U:S.C.M.A. 135, 37 C.M.R. 399. … AFR 35-24, paragraph: 7..