Documents

Petition for ReHearing — Patridge v. United States (No. 07-1045)

Supreme Court brief · Petition for ReHearing · 2007

Consider another example: the Clean Air Act requires businesses to curtail certain emissions using the best available technology, and to report on those emissions to the EPA. … P. 28(a}(7) shall be a fair summary without argument or comment.

Petition for Writ of Certiorari — Dugas v. Kansas City Southern Railway Co.

Supreme Court brief · Petition for Writ of Certiorari · 1973

To be more specific, the precise holding was: “The comment of the court is accurate and we can add nothing to it. … Dugas’ primary job with the railroad was to clean out boxcars in the KCS yard at Port Arthur, Texas. After empty cars come into the yard, they are chan- neled to the “cleaning track”.

Application — United States, et al., Applicants v. United States District Court for the District of Oregon

Supreme Court brief · Application · Jul 17, 2018

Air Act or the Clean Water Act. … Clean Water Act.

Petition for Writ of Certiorari — Boyd v. United States

Supreme Court brief · Petition for Writ of Certiorari · 1976

Significant disagreements between comments made in the report and comments made in an attached letter of evaluation will be explained or justified in the comments of the _ indorsing official. … Plaintiff had not qualified for his degree during the period covered by the OER.

Petition for Writ of Certiorari — Chew v. California

Supreme Court brief · Petition for Writ of Certiorari · 1990

Ald Also without merit is plaintiff's argument that the state has impliedly consented to suit in federal court by participating in the Clean Air Act, a federally funded program. … No such language is present in the Clean Air Act. See 42 U.S.C. §7401 et seq. Plaintiff's final argument is more difficult to resolve.

Amicus Curiae Brief — Herrera v. Wyoming, 138 S. Ct. 720 (2018) (No. 17-532)

Supreme Court brief · Amicus Curiae Brief · 2018

XCVII (“The people shall have the right to clean air and water, freedom from excessive and unnecessary noise, and the natural, scenic, historic, and esthetic qualities of their environment; and the … I, § 27 (“The people have a right to clean air, »ure water, and to the preservation of the natural, scenic, historic and esthetic values of the environment. Pennsylvania's public natura!

Amicus Curiae Brief — Shell Oil Co. v. United States

Supreme Court brief · Amicus Curiae Brief · 2003

API's members have been identified as potentially responsible parties at contaminated sites across the country pursuant to the Comprehensive Environmental Response, Compensation, and Liability Act, … Likewise, the courts have imposed “operator” liability for violations of the federal Clean Air Act on parties based on a significant degree of control over a facility. See, e.g., United States v.

Petition for Writ of Certiorari — NKC Hospitals, Inc. v. Heckler

Supreme Court brief · Petition for Writ of Certiorari · 1985

The review is during the 60-day period in Section 1878(f)(1) of the Social Security Act, as amended [42 USC 139500(f) ]. … When commenting, please refer to MAB-84-P. Agencies and organizations are requested to submit their comments in duplicate.

Petition for Writ of Certiorari — Roberts v. Brea Hospital Neuropsychiatric Center

Supreme Court brief · Petition for Writ of Certiorari · 1990

Delaware Valley Citizens Counsel for Clean Air (1986) 478 U.S. _, 92 L.Ed.2d 439, a 6 dnc 555 26s euncesvaaunls 8 Serrano v. Unruh (1982) EE 8S hs dds ore 64 66d oda n kee nan 8 Sokolow v. … Delaware Valley Citizens Counsel for Clean Air (1986) 478 U.S. _, 92 L.Ed.2d 439, 106 S.Ct. 3088, you stated: “We further refined our views in Blum v.

Petition for Writ of Certiorari — Shannon Poe, Petitioner v. Idaho Conservation League

Supreme Court brief · Petition for Writ of Certiorari · Mar 15, 2024

SMITH, Circuit Judge: This appeal raises questions of statutory interpretation concerning the Clean Water Act (CWA), 33 U.S.C. § 1311(a). … This is a re-opened Clean Water Act case, first filed in 2011.”). 46a Consequently, an injunction will be issued barring Mr.

appendicesr — Utilities Commission v. Tampa Electric Co.

Supreme Court brief · appendicesr · 2001

Clean Air Act.* * 42 U.S.C. 7401, et seq. … under the Clean Air Act, cooperative efforts by state and federal air quality regulators, and development of a new emissions regulatory program administered by the Commission under the Federal Power

Opposition Brief — Pyramid Lake Paiute Tribe of Indians v. Carson-Truckee Water Conservancy District

Supreme Court brief · Opposition Brief · 1985

Air Act had advanced the purposes of the Act. … Differing abilities to bear the cost of legal fees and differing notions of responsibil- ity for fulfilling the goals of the Clean Air Act likely would justify exercising special care regarding the

Petition — AAA Trucking Corp. v. Green

Supreme Court brief · Petition · 1980

Continental Air Lines, Inc., supra, at 722 but we do argue that while the Act is “identical in purpose with” the federal statute (Id. at p. 722), a construction accorded to a state statute which frustrates … The tractors were cleaned by spe- cial crews on weekends according to Green.

Amicus Curiae Brief — New York v. United States

Supreme Court brief · Amicus Curiae Brief · 1992

of 1954, 42 U.S.C. §2011 et seq. l Clean Air Act, as amended by the Clean Air Amendments of 1970, 42 U.S.C. §1857 et seq. 13 Fair Labor Standards Act, 29 U.S.C. 201 et seg. &, 11, 14 Low-Level Radioactive … 'S ‘The 1985 Amendments requirement that States own and possess radi- oa live Waste is also far more intrusive on State dignity and power than the EPA's Clean Air Act regulations reviewed by three Courts

Transcript of Record — Federal Trade Commission v. Procter & Gamble Co.

Supreme Court brief · Transcript of Record · 1967

° Cheer washes clothes so clean and white cloudy film. Dishes dry clean without wiping. ; i . … In commenting, Mr.

Amicus Curiae Brief — New York v. United States

Supreme Court brief · Amicus Curiae Brief · 1992

of 1954, 42 U.S.C. §2011 et seq. | Clean Air Act, as amended by the Clean Air Amendments of 1970, 42 U.S.C. §1857 et seq. 13 Fair Labor Standards Act, 29 U.S.C. 201 et seg. 8, 11, 14 Low-Level Radioactive … 'S The 1985 Amendments’ requirement that States own and possess radi- eactive waste is also far more intrusive on State dignity and power than the EPA's Clean Air Act regulations reviewed by three Courts

Brief for Petitioner — General Electric Co. v. Jewel Incandescent Lamp Co.

Supreme Court brief · Brief for Petitioner · 1945

“second periods at five second intervals (patent, p. 2, “lines . 58-62)-in a manner: similar to. the tréatment of: the first. … when the hot water was applied to it-—that it acted in the same way that the weaker acid acted in etching the experimental bulb which was only etched with a. 50% acid.

Petition for Writ of Certiorari — Rachel Threatt, Petitioner v. Ryan Thomas Farrell, et al.

Supreme Court brief · Petition for Writ of Certiorari · Mar 23, 2021

Delaware Valley Citizens’ Council for Clean Air, 478 U.S. 546, 563 (1986)); see also Murphy v. Smith, 138 S. … Delaware Valley Citizens’ 12 Council for Clean Air, 478 U.S. 546, 565 (1986), the Court incorporated the Section 1988 standards into fee awards under the Clear Air Act, 42 U.S.C. § 7401 ff., noting that

Petition for Writ of Certiorari — Murco Wall Products, Inc., Petitioner v. Michael D. Galier

Supreme Court brief · Petition for Writ of Certiorari · Feb 22, 2023

App., infra, 4a (cleaned up). … (cleaned up).

Brief for Petitioner — Mandel Brothers, Inc. v. Wallace

Supreme Court brief · Brief for Petitioner · 1948

’ act reactive crag (NHL) groups [R. 167, col. 2. +11. … grate, for grates in which thé supply of air’ may be - regulated were not new.