Documents
Briefs, oral arguments, agency decisions and the Federal Register.
10,000+ results
0.29s
Appellees Briefo — London Co. v. Industrial Comm'n
Supreme Court brief · Appellees Briefo · 1929
S. 375 23, 24, 26 Passenger Cases, 7 How. 399, 400 27 Pensacola Tel. Co. vs. West Ete. Tel Co., 96 U. 8. 22. 28 „r r 15, 17 Quong Ham Wah vs. Industrial Acc. … Slaughter, 15 Pet. 505; Passenger Cases, 7 How. 399; State Freight Tax Case, 15 Wall. 277; U.S. ve. K. C. Knight Co., 156 U. S. 12.
279 U.S. 109Petition for Writ of Certiorari — Krantz v. Arkansas Department of Human Services
Supreme Court brief · Petition for Writ of Certiorari · 2011
Kran cation Order Denial of Rehearing, May 19, 2010 Mandate, June 24, 2010 Denial of Petition for Review, June Adjudi 24, Z010 TABLE OF AUTHORITIES CASES Anderson v. … Nebraska, supra at 399, the “qual Protection Clause of the Four teenth Amendment, Skinner v. Oklaho ma, supra at 541, and the Ninth Amendment, Griswold v.
562 U.S. 1137Record and brief — Hathorn v. Lovorn
Supreme Court brief · Record and brief · 1982
OPINION BELOW The decision of the Supreme Court of Mississippi is reported at 399 So.2d 1356 and is appended hereto as Appendix “A”’. … A detailed decree of the chancellor dated July 24, 1979, outlined the election procedure.
457 U.S. 255Reply Brief — Johnson v. Haslam
Supreme Court brief · Reply Brief · 2011
Perry, 548 U.S. 399, 439-440 (2006) (recognizing poll taxes as a device historically used to deny minorities the right to vote); Johnson v. DeGrandy, 512 U.S. 997, 1018 (1994) (describing pol! … Paul, 505 U.S. 377, 381 (1992 Specifically, in May, the Tennessee Supreme Court held that Tennessee “[l]Jaws disenfranchisins felons are penal in nature,” id. at 24!
563 U.S. 1008Brief for the Respondents in Opposition — Howe v. United States
Supreme Court brief · Brief for the Respondents in Opposition · 1945
The donor died on January 24, 1942, and the peti- tioner, as executrix, filed this suit to recover the tax (R. 2-3, 4, 16). … S. 399, and it has been interpreted to cover not only gifts which are limited to commence at a definite future time but also gifts qualified by, or dependent upon, the discretionary powers of a trustee
324 U.S. 841Prologue — Charter Communications, Inc. v. Broadcast Innovation, LLC (No. 05-1162)
Supreme Court brief · Prologue · 2006
Cis, SOGD) conser aciecnectcetecasgee 24 Dethmers Mfg. Co., Inc. v. Automatic Equip. Mfg. Co., 293 F.3d 13964 (Ped. Cir, 2002) «0... céscsccesescrnsccescccrses 24 Dickinson v. … Asari, 305 F.2d 747 (9th Cir. 1962)... 14, 15, 16, 17 In re Henricksen, 399 F.2d 253 (C.C.P.A. 1968).........0...... 16 Lacavera v.
Supreme Court brief · Petition for Writ of Certiorari · Jun 13, 2023
In short, she proceeded pro se and managed to file this case just under 24 months from the May 26, 2017 discovery of the foreign body (1CR15). … Rev. 397, 399 (1989). It has been the subject of conflicting decisions at the state level. Compare Landgraffv. Wagner, 546 P.2d 26, 29 (Ariz. Ct.
Supreme Court brief · Reply Brief · Dec 2, 2024
No. 24-472 In the Supreme Court of the United States ________________ NATIONAL HORSEMEN’S BENEVOLENT AND PROTECTIVE ASSOCIATION, ET AL., PETITIONERS v. … No. 24-354 .......... 7 Kisor v. Wilkie, 588 U.S. 558 (2019) ........................... 6 Pittston Co. v.
Petition for Writ of Certiorari — Williams v. Jaglowski
Supreme Court brief · Petition for Writ of Certiorari · 2002
(Id. par. 24.) … Raby, 40 Ill.2d 392, 399, 240 N.E.2d 595, 599 (1968). Plaintiff argues that neither prong of the test is met here. | A.
535 U.S. 1018Petition for Writ of Certiorari — Lingle v. Mitchell (No. 08-438)
Supreme Court brief · Petition for Writ of Certiorari · 2008
Moore, 131 F.3d 399, 415 n. 18 (4m Cir. 1997); see also Estelle v. … Moore, 131 F.3d 399, 415 n. 18 (4 Cir. 1997). Judge Doughton expressly stated that he would “look at’ the letter for impeachment purposes only.
Opposition — Missouri-Kansas-Texas Railroad v. United States
Supreme Court brief · Opposition · 1981
No. 96-265, § 94 Stat. 399 .............. 28 Revised Interstate Commerce Act, Pub. L. … April 24, 1981
451 U.S. 1017Petition — C & H Transportation Co. v. Jensen & Reynolds Construction Co.
Supreme Court brief · Petition · 1984
Lanpar Company, 399 S.W.2d 340 (Tex. 1966). … May 24, 1983. A.
466 U.S. 945Petition for Writ of Certiorari — Morgan v. Metro-Goldwyn-Mayer, Inc.
Supreme Court brief · Petition for Writ of Certiorari · 1970
App. 223, 463 P.2d 118, and is iepiodnced in: — c hereto { App. :- A-24). 7 . … Modern Homes, 84 Ariz. 399, 330 P.2d 113 (1958); Marphey v. Valens =uela, 7 95 Ariz. 30, 386. P.2d 78 (1963); City of Tucson v.
400 U.S. 902Amicus Curiae Brief — United States v. Nobles
Supreme Court brief · Amicus Curiae Brief · 1975
Florida, 399 U.S. DEE hb 6 bbb 06 enk bade bbebeedtewor 5, 6, 15 f iv. … Florida, 399 U.S. 78, 85, (1970).
422 U.S. 225Petition for Writ of Certiorari — R. K. B., et al., Petitioners v. E. T.
Supreme Court brief · Petition for Writ of Certiorari · Dec 29, 2017
App. 1995) ....................... 5, 15 Statues 1975 Utah Laws 378 [Ch. 94] ...................................... 6 25 U.S.C. 1901 ........................................................ 6, 24 25 U.S.C … Baby Girl, No. 12-399 ... 8, 14, 18 Sup. Ct. R. 10 ....................................................... 14, 17 Tina Norris et al., U.S.
Appellees Brief — United States v. Reading Co.
Supreme Court brief · Appellees Brief · 1926
The New York, New Haven and Hartford Railroad Company ...........0.ecceceeee 1-12 No. 399. The United States v. … No. 399. THE UNITED STATES, APPELLANT, v.
270 U.S. 320Opposition — Missouri v. Crews
Supreme Court brief · Opposition · 1981
United States, U.S. , 63 L.Ed, 24 715 (1980). hoe Zacchini v. Scripp-Howard Broadcasting Co., 433 U.S. 562, 53 L.Ed, Z 9 . . STATUTES CITED Rule 21, Rules of the Supreme Court. §559.225 R.S.Mo. … Alabama, 399 U.S. 1 (1970). As was stated in Memorial Hospital vy.
452 U.S. 957Petition for Writ of Certiorari — Graham v. Niagara Mohawk Power Corp.
Supreme Court brief · Petition for Writ of Certiorari · 1996
Ct. 399. 4. Jones v. Rath Packing Co.,430 U.S. 519, 97 S.Ct. 1305. 5. Pacific Gas & Electric, 461 U.S. 190, 103 S.Ct. 1713. 6. Rice v. Sante Fe Elevator Corp., 331 U.S. 219, 67 S. Ct. 1146. 7. … Dated: July 24, 1996. CHARLES E. LUPIA, ESQ. Attorney for Plaintiff-Petitioner, James Graham P.O.
519 U.S. 1009Petition for Writ of Certiorari — Washington v. Washington Metropolitan Area Transit Authority
Supreme Court brief · Petition for Writ of Certiorari · 1999
discriminatory act —-the demotion—occurred more than 180 days before Washington filed his charged with the EEOC, his compliant was time barred under 29 U.S.C. 626(d)(1) and 42 U.S.C. 2000e-5 (e)(1), see J.A. 24 … Ya [[Page 399]] One of its purpose the provision of assistance. For purposes of this regulation, the term Federal financial!
527 U.S. 1038Reply Brief — Lebron v. National Railroad Passenger Corp.
Supreme Court brief · Reply Brief · 1996
Opp. 23-24. But petitioners in Lehman advanced no vagueness challenge, and therefore that issue was not before the Court. … PHARES PAUL, HASTINGS, JANOFSKY & WALKER 399 Park Avenue New York, New York 10022 (212) 318-6000 Respectfully submitted, DAVID D.
517 U.S. 1188
Ask Donna what matters in the record.
She can read the source against your case and show you exactly where the answer came from.