Documents
Briefs, oral arguments, agency decisions and the Federal Register.
10,000+ results
0.24s
Supreme Court brief · Amicus Curiae Brief · Apr 21, 2026
Burger, 482 U.S. at 702–03; see also City of Los Angeles v. Patel, 576 U.S. 409, 426 (2015). … See Burger, 482 U.S. at 702–03, 711–12; Patel, 576 U.S. at 424–25. Automation simultaneously eliminates discretion and expands scale.
Amicus Curiae Brief — Kansas v. Nebraska and Colorado (No. 220126-ORG)
Supreme Court brief · Amicus Curiae Brief · 2015
New Merico, 482 U.S. at 132. … New Mexico, 482 U.S. at 128.
Supreme Court brief · Petition for Writ of Certiorari · Dec 22, 2021
Hendrix, 423 F.3d 1247, 1252 (11th Cir. 2005). … Bennett, 423 F.3d at 1252.
Reply Brief — Mascuilli v. United States
Supreme Court brief · Reply Brief · 1967
Joachim Hendrik Fisser, 358 U.S. 423, 3 L. Ed. 2d Ue I ne i 2 Grillea v. United States, 232 F.2d 919 ‘(Qnd Cir. 1956) ...... 3 Norfleet v. … Joachim Hendrik Fisser, 358 U. 8. 423, 3.1L.
387 U.S. 237Joint Appendix — League of United Latin American Citizens v. Perry
Supreme Court brief · Joint Appendix · 2006
. = . s ; | =e U.S. … . 7 ‘ ».. ~ a Dalias and Tarrant U.S. Congressional Districts Proposed Pian - XKOR 01150C with U.S.
548 U.S. 399Opposition — Leppo v. United States
Supreme Court brief · Opposition · 1981
(en banc), cert. denied, 423 U.S. 837 (1975). Furthermore, the target of petitioner's extortionate demand was the firm, and not Warner individually, or the individual partners of the firm. … (en banc), cert. denied, 423 U.S. 837 (1975), is misplaced.
454 U.S. 964Supreme Court brief · Reply Brief · 2006
Ohio, 360 U.S. 423 (1959) oooccccccccccccccccesecesseeeeeeees 3 Ring v. Arizona, 536 U.S. 584 (2002) ......cccccccccccececeeceeeeesceeeee l State v. … Ohio, 360 U.S. 423, 436 (1959) (“There can be no question as to the proper presentation of a federal claim when the highest state court passes on it.”); Orr v.
548 U.S. 163Reply Brief — Bruce Westbrooks, Warden, Petitioner v. William G. Allen
Supreme Court brief · Reply Brief · Nov 20, 2017
Gas Pipe Line Corp., 423 U.S. 326 (1976) . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 2 Frisby v. Schultz, 487 U.S. 474 (1988) . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1 Goldblum v. … Gas Pipe Line Corp., 423 U.S. 326, 331 (1976). These considerations all weigh heavily in favor of review here.
Amicus Curiae Brief — RiseandShine Corporation, dba Rise Brewing, Petitioner v. PepsiCo, Inc.
Supreme Court brief · Amicus Curiae Brief · May 20, 2026
See 574 U.S. at 419-420, 422-423. … . at 423.
Record and brief — Wilder v. Gilman Paper Co.
Supreme Court brief · Record and brief · 1982
McCrary, 427 U.S. 160 (1976); Willingham v. Macon Telegraph Publishing Company, 482 F.2d 535 (5th Cir. 1973), vacated on other grounds, 507 F.2d 1084 (Sth Cir. 1975). … Kress and Company, 398 U.S. 144 (1970); Greco v. Orange Memorial Hospital Association, 513 F.2d 873 (5th Cir.), cert. denied, 423 U.S. 1000 (1975).
458 U.S. 1107Record and brief — Harrison v. United States
Supreme Court brief · Record and brief · 1981
Moore, 423 U.S. 122, 96 S.Ct. 335 Op Ee sé cco sancceessenns 4,7, 18 U.S. v. Rosen, 582 F.2d 1032 (Sth Cir. 1978)....... 21 U.S. v. Thompson 624 F.2d 740 (Sth Cir. 1980). ... … This Court, in U.S. v. Moore, 423 U.S. 122, 96 S.Ct. 335, 46 L.Ed.2d 222 (1975) has held the provisions of 21 U.S.C.
454 U.S. 1126Amicus Curiae Brief — Felder v. Casey
Supreme Court brief · Amicus Curiae Brief · 1988
App.), cert. denied, 464 U.S. 1018 (1983). See also 423 S. Salina Street v. City of Syracuse, 68 N.Y.2d 474; 510 N.Y.S.2d 507, 503 N.E.2d 63 (N.Y. 1986), appeal dismissed, 107 S. … Pachtman, 424 U.S. 409, 423-24 of Monroe, 451 N.E.2d at 457. Giving notice can also advance the objectives of civil rights law.
487 U.S. 131Petition for A Writ of Certiorari — Burnrite Coal Briquette Co. v. Riggs
Supreme Court brief · Petition for A Writ of Certiorari · 1927
Seasongood, 130 U.S. 482...... 31 Chicago, &e., Co. rs. Newman, IST Ped. 573 0 2... 9,2 Cine&:- vs, Brown, 110 Fed: 800. 0. vcsseciiccssccuass a Couper ve. … Seasongood, 130 U. 8. 482; Mendenhall ys.
274 U.S. 208Petition for Writ of Certiorari — Gardner v. United States
Supreme Court brief · Petition for Writ of Certiorari · 2001
in Commissioner y Shaprio,474 U. §. 614, 616 (1976) and Laing v United States, 423 U.S. 16] (1970). … United States, 423 U.S. 161, 184 n.27 (1976). 4.
531 U.S. 1114Amicus Curiae Brief — Kokesh v. Sec. & Exch. Comm'n, 137 S. Ct. 1635 (2017) (No. 16-529)
Supreme Court brief · Amicus Curiae Brief · 2017
Co., 236 U.S. 412, 423 (1915). … See Meeker, 236 U.S. at 423. The D.C.
Supreme Court brief · Petition for Writ of Certiorari · Oct 7, 2025
State, 83 Nev. 100, 103, 423 P.2d 666, 668 (1967); State v. … Ramsdell, 423 F.3d 810, 814 (8th Cir. 2005) (Parratt applies to substantive and procedural due process claims).
Amicus Curiae Brief — Overton v. Bazzetta
Supreme Court brief · Amicus Curiae Brief · 2003
Safley, 482 U.S.78, 95, 99 (1987), striking down restrictions on the right of prisoners to marry. … See 482 U.S. at 89.
539 U.S. 126Reply Brief — United States v. Cabrales
Supreme Court brief · Reply Brief · 1998
Heaps, 39 F.3d 479, 482 (1994). See Pet. 9-10, 12. … Anderson, 328 U.S. at 705. Accord, eg., Armour Packing Co. v.
524 U.S. 1Opposition Brief — McAusland v. United States
Supreme Court brief · Opposition Brief · 1993
Se BE BOE ivesactstnensnerssiriarsxercesecys 23 41 U.S.C. 423(j)(1) (Supp. IT 1990) .................ccscceeeee 23 41 U.S.C. 423(p)(6) (Supp. … II 1990) ................ccccssseees 23 41 U.S.C. 423(pX7) (Supp.
507 U.S. 1003Reply Brief — Ohio v. Veney (No. 08-1018)
Supreme Court brief · Reply Brief · 2009
Ballard, 66 Ohio St.2d 473, 423 ess icencscsotensersacccesecscecese 3-4 State v. Colon, 118 Ohio St.3d 26, 2008 Ohio 1624, 885 N.E.2d 917 (2008)............ 4 State v. … Ballard, 66 Ohio St.2d 473, 423 N.E.2d 115 (1981), which itself was a federal constitutional rul- 4 ing determining “what does Boykin require of a trial court.” Id. at 476, 423 N.E.2d at 117.
Ask Donna what matters in the record.
She can read the source against your case and show you exactly where the answer came from.