Documents
Briefs, oral arguments, agency decisions and the Federal Register.
10,000+ results
0.33s
Petition — Bayou Des Familles Development Corp. v. United States Corps of Engineers
Supreme Court brief · Petition · 1984
of 1899, § 10, 33 U.S.C. § 403 (hereinafter RHA), and the Federal Water Pollution Act, § 404, 33 U.S.C. § 1251, renamed Clean Water Act (hereinafter CWA), the Corps of Engineers completely destroys … of 1899 (RHA), 33 U.S.C. 401, 403, and Section 404 of the Clean Water Act (CWA), 33 U.S.C. 1344.
465 U.S. 1065Petition for Writ of Certiorari — Dawn Moore, Petitioner v. United States
Supreme Court brief · Petition for Writ of Certiorari · Jul 15, 2022
According to Moore, while play ing Frisbee football during physical training, she jumped in the air for the Frisbee and, upon landing, “felt a sharp pain shooting in [her] knee.” Id. … Here, “[b]oth parties agree that, because 38 U.S.C. § 1975 does not provide an applicable standard of review, this action is governed by § 706 of the Ad ministrative Procedures Act [APA].”
Supreme Court brief · Application · Dec 17, 2021
Just as the EPA overstepped the limits of the Clean Air Act in West Virginia, OSHA has far exceeded the OSH Act here. … Please submit comments related to the Paperwork Act analysis to OSHA in the PRA docket (Docket Number OSHA-2021-0008).
Record and brief — Saville v. Westinghouse Electric Corp.
Supreme Court brief · Record and brief · 1985
This comment presaged this Court's holding in DelCostello. … The Perez decision also pointed to the comment in Falsetti, supra, that sug- gested that the six month limitations period in the NLRA might apply to some §301 actions.
474 U.S. 911Brief for the United States — Red Lion Broadcasting Co. v. Federal Communications Commission
Supreme Court brief · Brief for the United States · 1969
To correct this interpretation of the Communica- tions Act: by the ae the Gongress amended the Act. : ‘In summary, the ‘inevitable result of the. … Reston comments: ‘What is ‘an attack?’ How do you define ‘hohesty, character, integrity or like personal qualities?
395 U.S. 367Transcript of Record — Seaboard Air Line R. Co. v. Horton
Supreme Court brief · Transcript of Record · 1914
Seaboard Air Line Railway. … Seaboard Air Line Railway.
233 U.S. 492Amicus Curiae Brief — Republican National Committee, Petitioner v. Mi Familia Vota, et al.
Supreme Court brief · Amicus Curiae Brief · Sep 4, 2026
Valley Citizens’ Council for Clean Air v. Pa., 674 F.2d 970 (3d Cir. 1982) . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 20, 21 Dunn v. … Valley Citizens’ Council for Clean Air v. Pa., 674 F.2d 970, 974 (3d Cir. 1982) (quoting the three-factor test for timeliness established in Pa. v. Rizzo, 530 F.2d 501, 506 (3d Cir. 1976)).
Amicus Curiae Brief — Curious Theatre Co. v. Colorado Department of Public Health & Environment
Supreme Court brief · Amicus Curiae Brief · 2010
This plot element cannot be convincingly portrayed without a lit cigar, which, if used in a contemporary production in a Colorado theater would be a criminal act under Colorado’s Clean Indoor Air Act … Indoor Air Act is actually “narrowly drawn to further a substantial governmental interest.”
560 U.S. 906Respondents Brief — Environmental Protection Agency v. New York, 127 S. Ct. 2127 (2007) (No. 06-736)
Supreme Court brief · Respondents Brief · 2007
Circuit “erred in invalidating” the Equip- ment Replacement Provision (“ERP”) rule on the “ground that the phrase ‘any physical change’ in the definition of ‘modifi- cation’ in” Clean Air Act (“CAA” … Washington, D.C. 20006 (202) 955-1500 Counsel for the Utility Air Regulatory Group December 18, 2006
Supreme Court brief · Brief for the Respondent in Opposition · 1974
Air, Inc. v. … Delaware Citizens for Clean Air, Inc. v.
Petition for Writ of Certiorari — William M. Hilton, Petitioner v. United States
Supreme Court brief · Petition for Writ of Certiorari · Mar 12, 2026
Court of Criminal Appeals’ (Air Force Court) decision. … The Government has no justification for the delay, especially considering that it failed to act with reasonable diligence. The trial judge found that the Government acted with diligence.
Petitioners Brief — Tm Duche & Sons, Limited v. American Schooner &C.
Supreme Court brief · Petitioners Brief · 1921
The captain was so satisfied with the weighing at Buenos Aires that he was content to sign a clean bill of lading without inserting any of the customary quali- fying phrases, such as ‘‘shipper’s weight … For a period of upwards of two months there was constantly a considerable quantity of water in the hold.
255 U.S. 77Motion to Affirm — Florida East Coast Railway Co. v. United States
Supreme Court brief · Motion to Affirm · 1967
sion in passing upon a rail merger proposal under §$5(2) -of the Interstate Commerce Act. It emphasized that the teachings of its decisions in M: cLean Trucking. Co. v. … The Commission will retain jurisdiction for a period .
386 U.S. 544Supreme Court brief · Petition for Writ of Certiorari · Nov 1, 2023
Glenhaven Healthcare LLC, 27 F.4th 679, 684 (9th Cir. 2022) (cleaned up). … Saldana, 27 F.4th at 686 (cleaned up).
Joint Appendix Vol I — Department of Transportation v. Public Citizen
Supreme Court brief · Joint Appendix Vol I · 2004
Air. Res. Bd. (dated May 20, 2002) Comments of Public Citizen, et al. (DOT filed May 20, 200) Gov't C.A. Br. (filed July 22, 2002) Pet. C.A. … Non- attainment areas are regions where the air pollution levels persistently exceed national air quality standards established by the Clean Air Act of 1967.
541 U.S. 752Amicus Brief — Schad v. Mount Ephraim
Supreme Court brief · Amicus Brief · 1981
It is ample to lay out zones where family values, youth values, and the blessings of quiet seclusion and clean air make the area a sanctuary for people."5 An additional rationale for the application … Conclusion The Borough of Mount Ephraim, in permitting only certain uses, has acted with due regard to the public needs and with due regard for the lack of public need for permitting the location
452 U.S. 61Supreme Court brief · Petition for Writ of Certiorari · 1991
Environmen- tal Protection Agency, 521 F.2d 827 (9th Cir. 1975), dealt with at- tempts by the national government to implement the Clean Air Act. … Pursuant to the Clean Air Act, if an area of a State fails to achieve compliance with air quality standards, the national gov- ernment may step in and implement its own plan. Maryland v.
Supreme Court brief · Amicus Curiae Brief · Jul 24, 2023
At issue in Chevron was the meaning of the term “stationary source” in the Clean Air Act Amendments of 1977. 467 U.S. at 859. … Air Act.
Appendix — Century Air Freight, Inc. v. Civil Aeronautics Board
Supreme Court brief · Appendix · 1982
The Bureau has further alleged that during the period from 1971 to 1977, Century Air Freight, Inc. … Annexed to the Comments was a marked copy of section 1002 (k) of the Act; 49 U.S.C. § 1482 (k).
459 U.S. 943Petition — Army and Air Force Exchange Service v. Sheehan
Supreme Court brief · Petition · 1982
Appointments are considered probationary for the periods specified below and these periods may not be extended. … be made following expiration of the authorized reply period. 83.
456 U.S. 728
Ask Donna what matters in the record.
She can read the source against your case and show you exactly where the answer came from.