Documents
Briefs, oral arguments, agency decisions and the Federal Register.
10,000+ results
1.65s
Transcript of Record — Six Companies of Cal. v. Joint Highway Dist. No. 13 of Cal.
Supreme Court brief · Transcript of Record · 1940
or cleaning with air under pressure, and no new concrete or mortar shall be placed until all excess material and water have been removed. … Samples shall be shipped in clean, air-tight containers.
311 U.S. 180Opposition Brief — Edison Electric Institute v. Piedmont Environmental Council (No. 09-343)
Supreme Court brief · Opposition Brief · 2009
on an application throughout an ongoing period of one year, but does not pertain to the instantaneous act of denial. … The word “withheld” in this context is limited to a continually recurring failure to act throughout a period of one year.
Supreme Court brief · Petition for Writ of Certiorari · Oct 12, 2018
They contend that Defendants Chrysler and Aramark released these chemicals into the environment over a period of many years while they operated their respective automotive and dry cleaning facilities. … in four homes could harm residents who breathe the indoor air.
Supreme Court brief · Amicus Curiae Brief · Jul 24, 2023
L. 307 (2000) ................ 18 Jason Bailey, Clean Water Act, Section 404 Applicants: May the Odds Be Ever in Your Favor, 3 AM. U. BUS. L. … Gorsuch, 742 F.2d 1028, 1036 (7th Cir. 1984) (addressing the Clean Air Act).
Amicus Curiae Brief — Atlantic Richfield Company, Petitioner v. Gregory A. Christian, et al.
Supreme Court brief · Amicus Curiae Brief · May 30, 2018
Particularly for the Montana Mining Association and the Montana Petroleum Association, their members operate within heavily regulated federal arenas under the purview of the Clean Water Act, the Clean … Air Act, and the Resource Conservation and Recovery Act, to name just a few.
Supreme Court brief · Amicus Curiae Brief · Aug 3, 2020
(cleaned up). … Ct. 1462, 1476 (2020) (discussing multifactor test for determining when a permit is required under the Clean Water Act, and explaining that sometimes “there are too many potentially relevant factors applicable
Respondents Brief — Weinberger v. Romero-Barcelo
Supreme Court brief · Respondents Brief · 1982
Air Act. … The legislative history of the Clean Air Act provi- sion also manifested Congressional concern for the “flagrant viola- tions of air and water pollution standards by Federal facilities.” S. Rep.
456 U.S. 305Supreme Court brief · Amicus Curiae Brief · Apr 13, 2022
Co., 893 F.3d. at 1026.26 These examples highlight the importance of this Court finally providing clarity on the reach of Clean Water Act jurisdiction. III. … The Scientific Advisory Board panel commenting on the EPA’s proposed Clean Water rule in 2014 recognized that significant nexus is not a scientific, but a legal term which requires a policy determination
Petition for Rehearing — Clean Air Coordinating Committee v. Roth Adam Fuel Co.
Supreme Court brief · Petition for Rehearing · 1973
In THe Supreme Court of the United States Octoser Term, 1972 No. 72-243 CLEAN AIR COORDINATING COMMITTEE, Petitioner, vs. … Under the federal act, state participation is integral in the sequences and review of such sequences was to be permitted only once, and that was only after vielen promulgation or approval of the state
409 U.S. 1117Petitioners Brief — Permian Basin Area Rate Cases
Supreme Court brief · Petitioners Brief · 1968
Wisconsin, . 347 3 Re ry Bigs.” ) RSE | hee eee ener 5, 6, 50, 65 Seaboard Air Line Railroad Company v. United States, 382 U.S. 154, 157 (1965) ..... & 2. 76,77. … See also Seaboard Air Line vuanll . Senne od ean ear yee eee setae | | . Se ee 11 | | : o vind Company v. United — 382 U. S. 154, 137 (1965).
390 U.S. 747Transcript of Record — Koppers Co. v. Otto (No. 660)
Supreme Court brief · Transcript of Record · 1957
Was that recommendation acted upon by the com pany?) oA. … To be ‘‘killed’’ means clean- ing.
Petition for Writ of Certiorari — United States v. Colorado
Supreme Court brief · Petition for Writ of Certiorari · 1994
(15 U.S.C. 2601 et seq.), the Safe Drinking Water Act (42 U.S.C. 300f et seq.), the Clean Air Act (42 U.S.C. 7401 et seq.), the Clean Water Act (83 U.S.C. 1251 et seq.), the Marine Protection, Research … water quality criteria established under section 304 or 303 of the Clean Water Act (38 U.S.C. 1314, 1813), where such goals or criteria are relevant and appropriate under the circumstances of the
510 U.S. 1092Appendix — Modine Manufacturing Co. v. United States Environmental Protection Agency
Supreme Court brief · Appendix · 1985
SECTION 304(b) OF THE CLEAN WATER ACT, 33 USC § 1314(b) (1976 & SUPP. V. SECTION 307(b) OF THE CLEAN WATER ACT, 33 USC § 1317(b) (1976 & SUPP. V. … (3) Following the comment period, the Director or Enforcement Division Director will make a determination on the request taking into consideration any comments received.
474 U.S. 1005Opposition — Bethlehem Steel Corp. v. Department of Environmental Resources
Supreme Court brief · Opposition · 1977
The national ambient air quality standards adopted pursuant to the Clean Air Act continue to be exceeded. … Sec- tion 10(a) of the Air Pollution Control Act, 35 PS. §4010 (a). 10.
430 U.S. 955Amicus Brief — Industrial Union Dept., AFL-CIO v. American Petroleum Institute
Supreme Court brief · Amicus Brief · 1980
Section 303 of the Clean Water Act, 33 U.S.C. §1313, requires the States to establish water quality standards subject to EPA review and approval. … Clean Water Act, §304(a), 33 U.S.C. §1314(a).
448 U.S. 607Opposition — New Mexico v. United States
Supreme Court brief · Opposition · 1979
Instead, Sec- tion 1161 contemplates that state substantive standards 2The language of Section 1161 may be compared to that found in the Clean Air Amendments of 1970, 42 U.S.C. 1857f, and the Federal … State Water Resources Control Board, 426 U.S. 200 (1976), this Court held that the Clean Air Amendments and the FWPCA Amendments do not authorize States to insist that fed- eral air and water pollution
444 U.S. 832Supreme Court brief · Reply Brief · Jan 3, 2022
Air Regul. Grp. v. EPA, 573 U.S. 302, 134 S. … Further, the only reason that the record does not reflect this information is that OSHA, for the second time in 2021, did not submit the temporary standard to notice and comment.
Petition — Chemical Manufacturers Ass'n v. U. S. Environmental Protection Agency
Supreme Court brief · Petition · 1982
. § 7607(b\ 1) (Clean Air Act); 42 U.S.C. § 300j-7 (Safe Drinking Water Act); 42 U.S.C. § 6976 (Resource Conservation and Recovery Act). See also n.18 below. 733 U.S.C. § 136% b\ 1 WE). … decision below is at odds with the language and history of the Clean Water Act.
459 U.S. 879Supreme Court brief · Petition for Writ of Certiorari · Aug 6, 2018
Act Amendment Act, and Section 504 of the Rehabilitation Act of 1973. … Act Amendment Act, and Section 504 of the Rehabilitation Act of 1973.
Emergency Application — Amanda Gunasekara, Applicant v. Matthew Barton, et al.
Supreme Court brief · Emergency Application · May 26, 2023
So rather than leading to a full airing of the constitutional issue, the Court’s action prohibits it all together. … Ct. at 658 (cleaned up).
Ask Donna what matters in the record.
She can read the source against your case and show you exactly where the answer came from.