Documents

Briefs, oral arguments, agency decisions and the Federal Register.

Filtersbriefs

10,000+ results

1.39s

  • Amicus Curiae Brief — Rawl Sales & Processing Co. v. United Mine Workers of America 1974 Pension Trust

    Supreme Court brief · Amicus Curiae Brief · 1993

    PERIODICALS AND PUBLICATIONS “Annual Energy Outlook 1993”, Energy Informa- tion Administration, U.S. Department of Energy (Dec. 1992) Ne RR sts in. … Department of Energy (Nov. 1992) at 101. 4In order to comply with the Clean Air Act, AECI’s plans for the future include a switch to non-bituminous, low-sulphur Western coal.

    509 U.S. 924
  • Appendix — Fromson v. Anitec Printing Plates, Inc.

    Supreme Court brief · Appendix · 1998

    Air agitation by tubes with holes bored in them is also not appropriate. … The surface of the foil was then wiped dry using clean, dry gauze.

    525 U.S. 817
  • Appendix — Askew v. American Waterways Operators, Inc.

    Supreme Court brief · Appendix · 1973

    The department shall periodically consult with other departments of the state and specifically with the department of air and water pollution control relative to procedures for the prevention of discharges … a permit issued by department of air and water pollution control.

    411 U.S. 325
  • Petition for Writ of Certiorari — Lei Ke, Petitioner v. John Fry, et al.

    Supreme Court brief · Petition for Writ of Certiorari · Jun 12, 2018

    A &ZSeptic Clean, 5 F. 3d 51, 56 (3d Cir. 1993), would never possibly apply. … A & ZSeptic Clean, 5 F.3d 51, 56 (3d Cir. 1993)).

  • Prologue — INDIANA WATER QUALITY COALITION v. Environmental Protection Agency

    Supreme Court brief · Prologue · 2006

    To this end, Congress enacted the Great Lakes Critical Programs Act of 1990, which amended section 118 of the Clean Water Act. … The purpose of the Proposed Guidance was to provide “opportunity for comment on the proposed Water Quality Guidance for the Great Lakes System .. . developed under section 118(c)(2) of the Clean Water

    548 U.S. 903
  • Petition — Baton Rouge Marine Contractors, Inc. v. Federal Maritime Commission

    Supreme Court brief · Petition · 1976

    With respect to dock cleaning, no one disputes that grain spillage creates a safety hazard which requires periodical cleaning of the grain dock. … Scrap, 412 U.S. 669, 697-699 (1973); Continental Air Lines v, CAB, __F.2d__ (D.C.

    429 U.S. 868
  • Petition for Writ of Certiorari — Tonka Corp. v. Bituminous Casualty Corp.

    Supreme Court brief · Petition for Writ of Certiorari · 1994

    Acting under the Minnesota Superfund Act, Minn. Stat. … Floyd Weinzierl, a paint department employee, testified that when cleaning out the degreasers, he would let them air out first because, "You couldn’t breathe in there otherwise.

    511 U.S. 1083
  • Appendix — United States Nuclear Regulatory Commission v. Steven Sholly

    Supreme Court brief · Appendix · 1983

    In the Atomic Energy Act ... … The draft version of this assessment and two subsequent addenda were issued for public comment, and by the close of the comment period on May 16, 1980 approximately 800 responses had been received.

    463 U.S. 1224
  • Amicus Curiae Brief — American Fuel & Petrochemical Manufacturers, et al., Petitioners v. Jane O’Keeffe, et al.

    Supreme Court brief · Amicus Curiae Brief · Feb 8, 2019

    States Ctr. for a Clean Air Future, Introducing a Low Carbon Fuel Standard in the Northeast (July 2009). 7 States can use life-cycle analysis to achieve any purpose desired. … Air Res.

  • Petition for Writ of Certiorari — Animal Legal Defense Fund, et al., Petitioners v. Department of Homeland Security, et al.

    Supreme Court brief · Petition for Writ of Certiorari · Aug 23, 2018

    And in Whitman, 531 U.S. at 465, 473—where the Clean Air Act delegated authority to the EPA to promulgate ambient air quality standards “to protect the public health”—the statute directed the EPA to use … . § 1531 et seq.)), the Clean Air Act (42 U.S.C. § 7401 et seq.), and the Clean Water Act, (33 U.S.C. § 1251 et seq.)); • The Fish and Wildlife Coordination Act (Pub. L.

  • Appendix — Minerals Separation, Ltd. v. Hyde

    Supreme Court brief · Appendix · 1916

    He says that the coiled perforated pipe acts as an efficient agitator to intermingle a considerable 141 amount of air in the pulp. I found that it simply blew air through the pulp. … The tailings become very dirty and show no sign of what we know as a good ‘clean up’.

    242 U.S. 261
  • Petition for Writ of Certiorari — Jacobs v. United States

    Supreme Court brief · Petition for Writ of Certiorari · 1991

    concerned and have them make restitution or clean the apartment up to his satisfaction. … Fredell wanted done: He wanted Sergeant Johnston to act as his debt collector to bring to bear against Jacobs the threat of disciplinary action by the Air Force if the airman did not satisfy his landlord

    498 U.S. 1088
  • Amicus Curiae Brief — Shell PLC, fka Royal Dutch Shell PLC, et al., Petitioners v. City and County of Honolulu, Hawaii, et al.

    Supreme Court brief · Amicus Curiae Brief · Apr 1, 2024

    air. … The result would be a balkanization of clean air regulations and a confused patchwork of standards, to the detriment of industry and the environment alike.” N. Car., ex rel. Cooper v. Tenn.

  • Appellants Brief — Philadelphia v. New Jersey

    Supreme Court brief · Appellants Brief · 1978

    The comment submitted by the Department, was surprisingly candid: “A. … Areas where putrescible waste is stored or deposited must be cleaned within each twenty- four hour period, and no such waste may be stored longer than twenty-four hours without acceptable treatment

    437 U.S. 617
  • Joint Appendix — United States v. Locke

    Supreme Court brief · Joint Appendix · 2000

    Comments on editorial corrections 5. … In addition to clean-up costs and economic loss, OPA 90 allows claims for non- is mot specified in the Act. Those who insure owners’ third party liabilities are subject to direct action.

    529 U.S. 89
  • Brief for the Respondents in Opposition — Terminal Railroad v. Pashea

    Supreme Court brief · Brief for the Respondents in Opposition · 1943

    Federal Employers’ Liability Act, 45 U. S. C. A., See. 51, Act of April 22, 1908, Sec. 1, 35 Stat. 35........ 2 Encyclopedias Cited. AS, Os Oe ee, 34 20 Dik, Gil, Wee. … (R. p. 69); ‘*I was knocked clean clear of the coupler and also the brake shaft’? (R. p. 74).

    318 U.S. 763
  • Amicus Curiae Brief — SD Warren Co. v. Maine Bd. of Environmental Protection

    Supreme Court brief · Amicus Curiae Brief · 2006

    comprehensive proposed amendments to the Clean Water Act. … Finally, section 404 of the Clean Water Act, which concerns “discharge[s] of Gredged or fill material,” 33 U.S.C. § 1344, is triggered only when “dredged or fill material,” which the Clean Water Act

    547 U.S. 370
  • Petition — Department of Air Force v. Rose

    Supreme Court brief · Petition · 1976

    The purpose is clear, i.e., to have the Air Force and the District Court co-author a student contribu- tion to a legal periodical. ‘Time cost is another matter. … The government maintains that the comments por- tion of the study is exempt from disclosure under the terms of the fifth exemption from the Act.

    425 U.S. 352
  • Appendix — Columbia Broadcasting System, Inc. v. Democratic National Committee

    Supreme Court brief · Appendix · 1973

    Fortunately, we do not write on a clean slate in this area. Six courts have confronted discriminations among types of speech like the one challenged here. … That history shows that Con- gress specifically debated and rejected the idea of the licensee being required to act as a common carrier with respect to transmission of comment on public issues.

    412 U.S. 94
  • Petition — Wheeling-Pittsburgh Steel Corp. v. Department of Environmental Resources

    Supreme Court brief · Petition · 1977

    The granting of such a variance will not prevent or interfere with attainment or maintenance of ambient air standards within the time prescribed by the Federal Clean Air Act and Rules and Regulations … On April 15, 1975, DER initiated enforcement proceedings in this Court pursuant to the Air Pollution Control Act, Act of January 8, 1960, P. L. (1959) 2119, as amended, 35 P.

    434 U.S. 969

Ask Donna what matters in the record.

She can read the source against your case and show you exactly where the answer came from.

Ask Donna

A word about cookies

We need a few to keep you signed in and the library working. The rest help us see which pages people use and where they get stuck. They stay off unless you say yes.