Documents

Petition for Writ of Certiorari — Miller v. Southwestern Bell Telephone Co.

Supreme Court brief · Petition for Writ of Certiorari · 2003

United Air Lines, 527 U.S. 471, 489 (1999)). … Liquid Air Corp., 37 F.3d 1069, 1075 (5th Cir. 1994)(en banc).

Jurisdictional Statement — Aberdeen & Rockfish R. Co. v. Students Challenging Regulatory Agency Procedures (SCRAP)

Supreme Court brief · Jurisdictional Statement · 1975

See, e.g., Citizens for Clean Air, Inc. v. Corps of Engineers, United States Army, S.D.N.Y., 349 F.Supp. 696, 708 (1972). … We also heard testimony based upon a preliminary draft of Compilation of Air Pollutant Emission Factors, Office of Air Programs Publication No. AP-42, U.S.

Respondents Brief — Electric Power Supply Association, et al., Petitioners v. Anthony M. Star, et al.

Supreme Court brief · Respondents Brief · Mar 11, 2019

The case concerns the Federal Power Act’s (“FPA’s”) scheme of cooperative federalism. … FERC received comments from dozens of parties, including Petitioners. Those proceedings remain pending.

Appendices — Gonzalez v. Vincent

Supreme Court brief · Appendices · 1973

national Airport arrived on flights from Bogota; the American women discovered in this activity were us- ually young, clean looking, and traveling alone; women discovered carrying cocaine on their … She was at the border, in the act of entering the Country.

Amicus Curiae Brief — Suncor Energy (U.S.A.) Inc., et al., Petitioners v. County Commissioners of Boulder County, et al.

Supreme Court brief · Amicus Curiae Brief · Sep 5, 2025

air. … The result would be a balkanization of clean air regulations and a confused patchwork of standards, to the detriment of industry and the environment alike.” N. Car., ex rel. Cooper v. Tenn.

Joint Appendix — Cleavinger v. Saxner

Supreme Court brief · Joint Appendix · 1985

The form provides space for a period of up to ten (10) days. … COMMENTS OF INMATE TO COMMITTEE REGARDING nsJOVE INCIDENT 18.

Amicus Curiae Brief — BP p.l.c., et al., Petitioners v. Mayor and City Council of Baltimore

Supreme Court brief · Amicus Curiae Brief · Nov 23, 2020

govern state-law claims under the Clean Air Act). … Air Act.

Appendix — Triplett v. Lowell

Supreme Court brief · Appendix · 1936

invention relates to receptacles of the heat-insulated non-vacuum type, objects thereof being to economically produce relatively large recepiacles, to render such recep- tacles sanitary and easy to clean … If the stopper were not spaced from said neck, the in- sulation would be appreciably impaired and the period of heat retention would be somewhat shortened.

Petition for a Writ of Certiorari — Alexander v. Alton Ochsner Medical Foundation

Supreme Court brief · Petition for a Writ of Certiorari · 1973

As the air is removed the lung re-expands and becomes sealed with the result that the leakage of air from the lung is gradually eliminated. … As the air is removed the lung re- expands and becomes sealed with the result that the leakage of air from the lung is gradually eliminated.

Transcript of Record — Calmar SS Corp. v. Taylor

Supreme Court brief · Transcript of Record · 1938

Is that fast or slow acting? A. That is immediate. … the foot clean.

Transcript of Record — Abercrombie & Fitch Co. v. Baldwin

Supreme Court brief · Transcript of Record · 1917

The projection of the thread or wire. from the mouth of the tube, FE, facilitates the draining of the water while the thread, or wire. may he readily with- drawn from the tube for periodically cleaning … as an air vent to admit air during the normal operation of the lamp.

Opposition Brief — Alcan Aluminum Corp. v. United States

Supreme Court brief · Opposition Brief · 1997

Babs BEE wccincessteccvvesnstitccavsvisnsevionisinemteneans 9 Clean Air Act, § 112, 4B UB.C. TAD cccosescccccsccosezeescess 8 Clean Water Act, 33 U.S.C. 1251 et seq.: § DOTia), BO TIES. … , 42 U.S.C. 6921; (D) “any toxic pollutant” listed under Section 307(a) of the Clean Water Act, 33 U.S.C. 1317(a); (E) “any hazardous air pollutant” listed under Section 112 of the Clean Air Act, 42

Appendix — Kaiser Eagle Mountain, Inc. v. National Parks & Conservation Ass'n

Supreme Court brief · Appendix · 2011

JTNP is a Class I air quality unit under the 246 Clean Air Act and a designated World Biosphere Reserve. … Pursuant to Section 176(c) of the Clean Air Act, Federal agencies cannot support, permit or approve any activity which does not conform to an applicable state implementation plan (SIP).

Reply Brief — Michigan v. Environmental Protection Agency

Supreme Court brief · Reply Brief · 2001

EGR. 29, Aes BP ssscsncdsaenciasaneamavercmaneananaeae: 2, 5,6 STATUTES The Clean Air Act, 42 U.S.C. §§ 7401 et seq. … (IRA), located outside the boundaries of formal reservations — those established by treaty, Executive Order, or Act of Congress — constitute reservation lands for purposes of the Clean Air Act (CAA

Petitioners Brief — Sondock v. Walling

Supreme Court brief · Petitioners Brief · 1943

McBrivg, 124 F. (2d) 90 (5th C.C.A.), Jupce HutcHEsoN, in commenting upon the Administrator’s narrow definition of “retail establish- ment,” said: “The Act is unambiguous and operates to exempt all … The porters keep the building clean and habit- able.”

Appendix — Bo-Mick Construction Construction Co. v. LaFleur (Nos. 89-164, 88-2126)

Supreme Court brief · Appendix · 1989

Act or Louisiana Worker's Compensation Act. … Who cleaned that? A-23 A. The skipper, as far as I know, he would wash it. I mean I don't know. I never did clean it. Q. All right.

Memorandum — Massachusetts v. American Trucking Assns.

Supreme Court brief · Memorandum · 2001

2 of a judgment of the United States Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia Circuit that remands the En- vironmental Protection Agency’s (EPA’s) final rules revising the National Ambient Air … See Clean Air Act § 109, 42 U.S.C. 7409.

Petition for Writ of Certiorari — D R Burton Healthcare LLC, Petitioner v. Trudell Medical International Inc.

Supreme Court brief · Petition for Writ of Certiorari · Jun 30, 2025

Ford Motor Co., 997 F.3d 526, 538 (4th Cir. 2021) (cleaned up). … Collins did not submit an expert - Appx10 - report on noninfringement during the discovery period. Dr.

Petition for Writ of Certiorari — Michaels v. Avitech, Inc.

Supreme Court brief · Petition for Writ of Certiorari · 2000

were never cleaned and the system never checked. … See also In re Air Crash, 919 F.2d at 1087.

Petitioners Brief — New York v. United States

Supreme Court brief · Petitioners Brief · 1992

Environmen- tal Protection Agency, 521 F.2d 827 (9th Cir. 1975), dealt with attempts by the national government to implement the Clean Air Act. … Pursuant to the Clean Air Act, if an area of a state fails to achieve compliance with air quality standards, the national gov- ernment may step in and implement its own plan.