Documents
Briefs, oral arguments, agency decisions and the Federal Register.
10,000+ results
0.78s
Amicus Curiae Brief — City of Los Angeles v. Kern County
Supreme Court brief · Amicus Curiae Brief · 2010
Water Act … In 1987, Congress amended the Clean Water Act to require USEPA to develop comprehensive rules for land application. 33 U.S.C. § 1345.
560 U.S. 939Petition for Writ of Certiorari — Ian Gage, Petitioner v. Midwestern University
Supreme Court brief · Petition for Writ of Certiorari · Feb 13, 2023
During that period, Gage requested updates and consistently reasserted his concerns about safety requesting another opportunity to present his Safety Complaint. … Aloha Island Air, Inc., 281 F.3d 1054, 1061 (9th Cir. 2002).
Respondents Brief — Key Tronic Corp. v. United States
Supreme Court brief · Respondents Brief · 1994
The private respondents allowed haz- ardous chemicals from the dry cleaning plant to contam- inate Stanton Road’s land. Pet. App. C2, D2-D6. a. … See Omnibus Budget Reconciliation Act of 1990, Pub. L.
511 U.S. 809Brief for the United States in Opposition — Selby v. United States
Supreme Court brief · Brief for the United States in Opposition · 1959
‘With re- spect to this voyage, he testified that the horses’ stables were not cleaned, that dead horses were not promptly thrown overboard, and that the live horses coughed and sneezed into the air … -As to this ° voyage, the petitioner testified that the'stalls were not cleaned out (R. 125a).
361 U.S. 815Appendix — Fromson v. Anitec Printing Plates, Inc.
Supreme Court brief · Appendix · 1998
Air agitation by tubes with holes bored in them is also not appropriate. … The surface of the foil was then wiped dry using clean, dry gauze.
525 U.S. 817Response Respondent — Public Affairs Associates, Inc. v. Rickover
Supreme Court brief · Response Respondent · 1962
Cross-Petitioner comes without “clean hands.” … Rosenrrenp March 196] 7 The Petition (No. 649) outlined eight categories of conflicts with or evasions of the Copyright Act (pp. 18-22). For official confirmation that the Air Force, Army. Navy.
369 U.S. 111Amicus Curiae Brief — Decker v. Northwest Environmental Defense Center
Supreme Court brief · Amicus Curiae Brief · 2013
Air Act). … The Court in Duke Energy distinguished, for purpos- es of an analogous Clean Air Act judicial-review provi- sion, “between a purposeful but permissible reading of the regulation adopted to bring it
568 U.S. 1118Petition for Writ of Certiorari — Tin Cup, LLC, Petitioner v. Army Corps of Engineers
Supreme Court brief · Petition for Writ of Certiorari · Dec 18, 2018
Clean Water Act, the U.S. … with the requirements for notice and public comment.”
Amicus Brief — Commonwealth Edison Co. v. Montana
Supreme Court brief · Amicus Brief · 1981
Kansas utilities have been driven to look to Wyoming coal, in large part, by Federal clean air and energy statutes. … Coal mined in the western states--principally Wyoming and Montana--meets air-quality requirements of Federal law far better than coal from any other region.
453 U.S. 609Supreme Court brief · Petition for Writ of Certiorari · 1986
the Federal Water Pollution Control Act of 1972 and stated that the Act might be cited as the Clean Water Act. … "The Corps of Engineers and the EPA share responsibility for enforcement of the Clean Water Act. 12 under the Act could drift.
474 U.S. 1055Petition for Writ of Certiorari — Duane L. O'Malley, Petitioner v. United States
Supreme Court brief · Petition for Writ of Certiorari · Aug 26, 2019
Air Act, see 42 U.S.C. 6 7413(c)(1). … Air Act unintentionally.
Supreme Court brief · Petition for Writ of Certiorari · Oct 25, 2018
EPA, 540 U.S. 461 (2004), in which the EPA issued three compliance orders after a state agency issued a permit under the Clean Air Act. Id. at 480-81. … State Assumption Under Section 404 Of The Clean Water Act In 1972, Congress amended the Federal Water Pollution Control Act, commonly known as the CWA, to "restore and maintain the chemical, physical,
Amicus Curiae Brief — Shell Oil Co. v. United States (Nos. 07-1607, 07-1601)
Supreme Court brief · Amicus Curiae Brief · 2009
CERCLA section 107(b) contemplates three narrow defenses to liability: (a) act of God; (b) act of war; and (c) act of a third party.” Ronald G. … Instead of cattle and crops, the district court considered the percentage of land ownership by various parties, the period in which the land was held in ownership by each, and the period of contamination
Opposition Briefmm — City of New Haven v. Marsh
Supreme Court brief · Opposition Briefmm · 1988
of 1972, 26 U.S.C. § 1451 QF Bag. wcccceccs 44,47 Clean Water Act, 33 U.S.C. § 1251 et seg. 3S UVeBeCe § 2343(6) (2) ccccvccccce 45 OD UVeBeSn § BEEGcccccccsccceccesces 4,42 BS GeSeCe § 1LS4E (CD … These guidelines are to be based upon criteria comparable to those developed for ocean discharge permits pursuant to Section 403(c) of the Clean Water Act, 33 U.S.C. §1343(c) (1).
488 U.S. 848Supreme Court brief · Amicus Curiae Brief · Sep 15, 2025
Yet the decision below found that the Clean Air Act (“CAA”) somehow revived state law claims that never existed. … After the enactment of the CAA and Clean Water Act (“CWA”), this Court held that the federal statutory schemes had displaced federal common law. Milwaukee II, 451 U.S. at 313-14; Int’l Paper Co. v.
Supreme Court brief · Amicus Curiae Brief · 2014
tremendous amounts of research and capital into developing effective and economically efficient means of helping their customers — power-generating com- panies — comply with the MATS Rule and other clean-air … See Illinois EPA Mercury and Clean Air Interstate Rule (CAIR) Rulemaking http/ ‘Hino; topical nir- ita/ : rules/index).
Amicus Curiae Brief — Michigan v. Envtl. Prot. Agency, 135 S. Ct. 702 (2014) (No. 14-46)
Supreme Court brief · Amicus Curiae Brief · 2014
tremendous amounts of research and capital into developing effective and economically efficient means of helping their customers — power-generating com- panies — comply with the MATS Rule and other clean-air … See Illinois EPA Mercury and Clean Air prteretaie Rule es Rulemaking pr “The experience of 8 some > of amicrs customers under the Illinois rule shows that compliance with rules even stricter than the
Petition for Writ of Certiorari — Jonathan M. Martinez, Petitioner v. United States
Supreme Court brief · Petition for Writ of Certiorari · Sep 8, 2023
(cleaned up). … (cleaned up).
Petition — Consolidated Rail Corp. v. United States
Supreme Court brief · Petition · 1977
See comments of Erie Lackawanna Railroad, JA 20-21 (317 cars upgraded to XF status during this period); comments of Union Pacific Railroad, JA 104 (96 cars upgraded to XF status during this period). … See comments of GMI, Exhibit 16, at 9, JA 53; comments of General Foods Corp., JA 146. 51. Comments of Grand Trunk Western Railroad, JA 6. 52.
434 U.S. 954Petition for Writ of Certiorari — Southview Farm v. Concerned Area Residents for the Environment
Supreme Court brief · Petition for Writ of Certiorari · 1995
This is a citizen suit under the Federal Water Pollution Control Act, also known as the Clean Water Act (“CWA” or “the Act”), 33 U.S.C. § 1251 et seq. … Fentress, Comment, Nonpoint Source Pollution, Groundwater, and the 1987 Water Quality Act: Section 208 Revisited?, 19 Envtl.L. 807, text accompanying n. 57 (1989)).
514 U.S. 1082
Ask Donna what matters in the record.
She can read the source against your case and show you exactly where the answer came from.