Documents
Briefs, oral arguments, agency decisions and the Federal Register.
10,000+ results
0.92s
Opposition Brief — Texas Water Conservation Ass'n v. Department of the Interior
Supreme Court brief · Opposition Brief · 1992
People Against Nuclear Energy, 460 U.S. 766 (1983) National Environmental Policy Act, 42 U.S.C. … ". . . irreparable damage to air, land, and water..." How is the air -- or the land -- or water -- damaged by the acceptance of the easement?
506 U.S. 823Jurisdictional Statement — Spalding Laundry & Dry Cleaning Co. v. Department of Revenue
Supreme Court brief · Jurisdictional Statement · 1969
A copy of this Order is, set forth in Appendix B. } , Appellant's Notice of Appeal to this court was filed in the Court of Appeals of Kentucky on March 26, 1969, within the statutorily prescribed period … The act grants a broad exemption én sales made of “thachinery for new and expanded industry, ** Ken- tucky Revised Statutes 139. 480(8), but in a separate section thé act undertakes to classify industries
396 U.S. 2Petitioners Brief — NATIONAL COTTON COUNCIL OF AMERICA v. RAYMOND J. DONOVAN (Nos. 79-1583, 79-1429)
Supreme Court brief · Petitioners Brief · 1980
The Occupational Safety and Health Act .... 3 B. … App. 65) '* The Standard prohibits compressed air blow-down cleaning ex- cept where alternative means are not feasible. 43 Fed.
Supreme Court brief · Petition for Writ of Certiorari · Dec 22, 2025
Arizona applies a three-year limitations period to fraud claims. Ariz. Rev. Stat. § 12-543(3). … However, on December 20, 2018, Moreland published a “Notice of 30-day Public Comment Period Administrative Settlement Agreement” (“Notice of Settlement”) in the Arizona Business Gazette.
Supplemental Appendix — Graziani v. New Jersey (No. 951)
Supreme Court brief · Supplemental Appendix · 1959
James Graziani supervised the purchasing of used cars. ~ He directed the cleaning up of the vehicles, which, beside removal of dents, or tt and replacement of slip-covers, included steam cleaning of … Clippinger then looked under the engine hood and testified that “‘the engine _ was beautifully clean, with two exceptions; the air-cleaner and the oil filter.
Supreme Court brief · Petition for Writ of Certiorari · 1990
To comply with the federal Clean Water Act,! … The Clean Water Act itself is silent as to this issue.
493 U.S. 1077Amicus Curiae Brief — Budha Jam, et al., Petitioners v. International Finance Corporation
Supreme Court brief · Amicus Curiae Brief · Feb 14, 2022
E.g., Air & Liquid Sys. Corp. v. DeVries, 139 S. Ct. 986, 993 (2019). … , 1947 (UN Act 1947”) to the IFC.
Joint Appendix Vol II — Lebron v. National Railroad Passenger Corporation
Supreme Court brief · Joint Appendix Vol II · 1995
CLEANING AND SANITATION Permittee shall keep the facility in a clean and sanitary con- dition, including cleaning of floors, windows and lighting fix- tures, and will cause all dirt, rubbish and other … The comments fell into two general categories: favorable comments from communi- ties where service improvements are recommended and unfa- vorable comments from communities which presently do not have
513 U.S. 374Appendix — Town of Largo v. Richmond
Supreme Court brief · Appendix · 1940
Florida, described as follows, to-wit: Begin at the northeast corner of Section 34, Township 29 South, Range 15 East; thence west on the north line of said Section 34 to the east line of the Seaboard Air … Florida, described as follows, to-wit: Begin at the northeast corner of Section 34, Town- ship 29 south, Range 15 east; thence west on the north line of said Section 34 to the east line of the Seaboard Air
311 U.S. 663Supreme Court brief · Petition for Writ of Certiorari · Sep 19, 2023
Saldana, 27 F.4th at 686 (cleaned up). … Id. at 688 (cleaned up). Although a federal defense may be available under the PREP Act, “a federal defense is not a sufficient basis to find embedded federal question jurisdiction.” Id.
Joint Appendix — The American Legion, et al., Petitioners v. American Humanist Association, et al.
Supreme Court brief · Joint Appendix · Dec 17, 2018
Read these articles, and the comments sections. … from web form To: Maggie Ardiente mardiente@americanhumanist.org -------Forwarded message-----From: Comments @ AHA comments@americanhumanist.org Date: Mon, Sep 17, 2012 at 9:23 AM Subject: Fwd: Comment
Supreme Court brief · Petition for Writ of Certiorari · Sep 19, 2023
Saldana, 27 F.4th at 686 (cleaned up). … Id. at 688 (cleaned up). Although a federal defense may be available under the PREP Act, “a federal defense is not a sufficient basis to find embedded federal question jurisdiction.” Id.
Appellants Brief — Exxon Corp. v. Hunt
Supreme Court brief · Appellants Brief · 1986
In 1972, through passage of one part of the Federal Water Pollution Control Act, 33 U.S.C. § 1321 (Clean Water Act), Congress first addressed this problem. … The New Jersey Act explicitly requires the State, in pursuing such cleanup, to act in accordance with the “National Contingency Plan” as established under the Clean Water Act.
475 U.S. 355Petition for Writ of Certiorari — Shawn Pinson, Petitioner v. Texas
Supreme Court brief · Petition for Writ of Certiorari · Dec 7, 2021
They drove to a Wal-Mart for Applicant to buy cleaning supplies (9 R.R. 77-78). Applicant gave Neatherlin money to buy bleach and air freshener (9 R.R. 78-79).2 1. … He hired a lawyer because he was concerned that he had bought bleach and air freshener (9 R.R. 89-90). The police contacted him, and he gave a statement (9 R.R. 90). C.
Opposition — Outboard Marine Corp. v. Illinois
Supreme Court brief · Opposition · 1981
Relief was sought pursuant to the Refuse Act, 33 U.S.C. 407; the Clean Water Act, 33 U.S.C. 1251 et seq.; and the federal common law of nuisance. … The court of appeals also held that Illinois had a right to intervene in the federal government’s Clean Water Act suit.
453 U.S. 917Supreme Court brief · Appendix · 1985
Reference in the trial court's opinion to inmates Mallory, McAdoo, McLaughlin and Soto requires specific comment. … CS Dust was then used with two one-second bursts being sprayed into the air.
470 U.S. 1085Supreme Court brief · Appendix · 1988
Some of these commenters believe that cable op- erators have an incentive to keep new stations off the air. … ATC, 89 Cable Operators filing joint comments (89 Cable Commenters) and others state that the provisions of Section 624(f1) and (2) of the Cable Act bar the Com- mission from adopting new rules.’
486 U.S. 1032Supreme Court brief · Response to application from respondents Louisiana, et al. · Dec 30, 2021
See, e.g., Utility Air Regulatory Group v. … What’s more, in a comment period the States would have raised the issues described above for the agency’s consideration.
Transcript of Record — Pan American World Airways, Inc. v. United States
Supreme Court brief · Transcript of Record · 1963
cockpit windows (1) Clean cabin windows and aircraft exterior as ‘time permits (m) Clean cabin interior as tine permits (n) Clean lavatories : : Lo) Check water in cabin ’ 3. … 97, 946.7% Tarleretion ené . evel comment : .
371 U.S. 296Supreme Court brief · Petition for Writ of Certiorari · Jan 9, 2019
The Department places a notice in the Pennsylvania Bulletin, beginning a 30-day comment period. Id. … Clean Water Act.
Ask Donna what matters in the record.
She can read the source against your case and show you exactly where the answer came from.